Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (306)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = LCC—Life Cycle Costing

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 2843 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Circular Economy Choices: The Role of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
by Víctor Fernández Ocamica, David Zambrana-Vasquez and José Carlos Díaz Murillo
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6759; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156759 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 289
Abstract
This study investigates the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a decision-support mechanism for managing complex sustainability issues in industrial settings, specifically within the framework of circular economy principles. Focusing on a case from the brewery sector, developed under the EU [...] Read more.
This study investigates the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a decision-support mechanism for managing complex sustainability issues in industrial settings, specifically within the framework of circular economy principles. Focusing on a case from the brewery sector, developed under the EU ECOFACT initiative, this research evaluates ten distinct configurations for the must cooling process. These alternatives are assessed using environmental, economic, and technical criteria, drawing on data from life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The findings indicate that selecting an optimal scenario involves balancing trade-offs among electricity and water consumption, operational efficiency, and overall environmental impacts. Notably, Scenario 3 emerges as the most balanced option, consistently demonstrating superior performance across the primary evaluation criteria. The use of AHP in this context proves valuable by introducing structure and transparency to a multifaceted decision-making process where quantitative metrics and sustainability objectives intersect. By integrating empirical industrial data with an established multi-criteria decision approach, this study highlights both the practical utility and existing limitations of conventional AHP, particularly its diminished ability to discriminate between alternatives when their scores are closely aligned. These insights suggest that hybrid or advanced AHP methodologies may be necessary to facilitate more nuanced decision-making for circular economy transitions in industrial environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

77 pages, 2935 KiB  
Review
Assessment Methods for Building Energy Retrofits with Emphasis on Financial Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review
by Maria D. Papangelopoulou, Konstantinos Alexakis and Dimitris Askounis
Buildings 2025, 15(14), 2562; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142562 - 20 Jul 2025
Viewed by 344
Abstract
The building sector remains one of the largest contributors to global energy consumption and CO2 emissions, yet selecting optimal retrofit strategies is often hindered by inconsistent evaluation practices and limited integration of environmental and social impacts. This review addresses that gap by [...] Read more.
The building sector remains one of the largest contributors to global energy consumption and CO2 emissions, yet selecting optimal retrofit strategies is often hindered by inconsistent evaluation practices and limited integration of environmental and social impacts. This review addresses that gap by systematically analyzing how various assessment methods are applied to building retrofits, particularly from a financial and environmental perspective. A structured literature review was conducted across four major scientific databases using predefined keywords, filters, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, resulting in a final sample of 50 studies (green colored citations of this paper). The review focuses on the application of Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA), Cost–Benefit Analysis (CBA), and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), as well as additional indicators that quantify energy and sustainability performance. Results show that LCCA is the most frequently used method, applied in over 60% of the studies, often in combination with LCA (particularly for long time horizons). CBA appears in fewer than 25% of cases. More than 50% of studies are based in Europe, and over 60% of case studies involve residential buildings. EnergyPlus and DesignBuilder were the most common simulation tools, used in 28% and 16% of the cases, respectively. Risk and uncertainty were typically addressed through Monte Carlo simulations (22%) and sensitivity analysis. Comfort and social impact indicators were underrepresented, with thermal comfort included in only 12% of studies and no formal use of tools like Social-LCA or SROI. The findings highlight the growing sophistication of retrofit assessments post-2020, but also reveal gaps such as geographic imbalance (absence of African case studies), inconsistent treatment of discount rates, and limited integration of social indicators. The study concludes that future research should develop standardized, multidimensional evaluation frameworks that incorporate social equity, stakeholder values, and long-term resilience alongside cost and carbon metrics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Construction Management, and Computers & Digitization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 3162 KiB  
Article
Advancing Energy-Efficient Renovation Through Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing: Insights and Experiences from VERIFY Tool Deployment
by Komninos Angelakoglou, Ioannis Lampropoulos, Eleni Chatzigeorgiou, Paraskevi Giourka, Georgios Martinopoulos, Angelos-Saverios Skembris, Andreas Seitaridis, Georgia Kousovista and Nikos Nikolopoulos
Energies 2025, 18(14), 3736; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18143736 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 433
Abstract
This study investigates the deployment of VERIFY, a dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) tool, tailored to evaluate the energy and environmental performance of building renovation strategies. The tool was applied to three diverse building renovation projects across Europe, [...] Read more.
This study investigates the deployment of VERIFY, a dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) tool, tailored to evaluate the energy and environmental performance of building renovation strategies. The tool was applied to three diverse building renovation projects across Europe, offering insights into how life cycle-based tools can enhance decision-making by integrating operational data and modeling of energy systems. The paper highlights how VERIFY captures both embodied and operational impacts—addressing limitations of conventional energy assessments—and aligns with EU frameworks such as Level(s). Key findings from the case studies in Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands demonstrate how LCA/LCC-based approaches can support energy efficiency objectives and guide sustainability-aligned renovation investments. Across the three case studies, the tool demonstrated up to 51% reduction in primary energy demand, 66% decrease in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, and 51% reduction in life cycle costs. These outcomes provide researchers with a validated dynamic LCA/LCC framework and offer practitioners a replicable methodology for planning and evaluating sustainability-driven renovations. Despite their advantages, the effective use of LCA tools in energy renovation faces challenges, including limited data availability, regulatory fragmentation, and methodological complexity. The paper concludes that advanced tools such as VERIFY, when harmonized with evolving EU energy performance and sustainability standards, can strengthen the evidence base for deep energy renovation and carbon reduction in the building sector. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4651 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Deployment of Electric Aircraft from Energy, Environmental, and Economic Perspectives
by Ye Liang, Wei Zhang and Chengjiang Li
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5453; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125453 - 13 Jun 2025
Viewed by 450
Abstract
Electric aircraft represent a promising pathway for decarbonizing the aviation sector, offering significant potential for sustainable transformation in air transportation. This study develops a life cycle assessment–multi-criteria decision-making analytical framework to evaluate the developmental prospects of electric aircraft. This study employs life cycle [...] Read more.
Electric aircraft represent a promising pathway for decarbonizing the aviation sector, offering significant potential for sustainable transformation in air transportation. This study develops a life cycle assessment–multi-criteria decision-making analytical framework to evaluate the developmental prospects of electric aircraft. This study employs life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate electric aircraft development and integrates multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) to assess their potential. First, LCA and life cycle cost (LCC) are applied to compare the energy consumption, environmental impact, and economic costs of electric versus conventional aircraft. These results then inform MCDM, with the system boundary guiding indicator selection. The results show that electric aircraft consume slightly more energy than conventional aircraft, and the pollutant emissions are only 50% of that of conventional aircraft, thereby significantly reducing life cycle pollutant emissions and exhibiting high development potential. The cost of conventional aircraft significantly exceeds that of electric aircraft. Total energy consumption, global warming potential, and fuel usage cost are essential for electric aircraft development. This study provides valuable insights for stakeholders seeking to advance sustainable aviation solutions while addressing complex technical and economic considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Saving and Emission Reduction from Green Transportation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 3860 KiB  
Article
Ecodesign of a Legume-Based Vegan Burger: A Holistic Case Study Focusing on Ingredient Sourcing and Packaging Material
by Tryfon Kekes, Fotini Drosou, Nived R. Nair, Milena Corredig, Christos Boukouvalas, Marco Berardo di Stefano, Vincenza Ruggiero and Magdalini Krokida
Sustainability 2025, 17(12), 5243; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125243 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 570
Abstract
The growing need for healthy and sustainable food alternatives has led to a rapid increase in vegan burgers on the market. Specifically, plant-based burgers using legumes as a protein substitute are amongst the most widespread choices for consumers. While these products can offer [...] Read more.
The growing need for healthy and sustainable food alternatives has led to a rapid increase in vegan burgers on the market. Specifically, plant-based burgers using legumes as a protein substitute are amongst the most widespread choices for consumers. While these products can offer environmental benefits over traditional meat-based options, further optimization in both ecological and economic aspects can be achieved. This study conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) analysis to evaluate and optimize the environmental and economic life cycle of a legume-based vegan burger. LCA was performed in accordance with the recommendations of the ISO 14040 and 14044 series, and ReCiPe 2016 Hierarchist served as the impact assessment methodology. For this purpose, a base case scenario, relying on imported raw materials and conventional packaging for a legume-based vegan burger, was established to serve as the comparison benchmark, and various alternative scenarios were examined, focusing on minimizing the distance between cultivation and processing areas for key legume ingredients and improving packaging materials. The results indicate that reducing transportation distances for raw ingredients and using bio-polyethylene packaging significantly enhance sustainability. Specifically, the legume-based vegan burger of the base case scenario had a carbon footprint of 1.30 kg CO2 eq. and a total life cycle cost of EUR 2.43 per two pieces. In contrast, the optimized scenario, which incorporated shorter transportation distances and bio-polyethylene packaging, achieved a carbon footprint of 0.51 kg CO2 eq. and a reduced cost of EUR 2.37. The findings of the present work highlight the potential for further environmental and economic improvements in vegan burger production through logistics optimization and selection of climate-friendly packaging solutions, thus contributing to sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Engineering and Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3174 KiB  
Article
Energy Optimization Gaps in Hotel Retrofits for Subtropical Climates
by Milen Balbis Morejón, Oskar Cabello Justafré, Juan José Cabello Eras, Javier M. Rey-Hernández and Francisco Javier Rey-Martínez
Sustainability 2025, 17(11), 5167; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115167 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 543
Abstract
This study investigates the significant energy optimization gaps in hotel retrofits in a subtropical climate, quantifying the missed energy-saving opportunities through advanced simulation techniques. Utilizing Design Builder software, the energy consumption of a hotel in Cienfuegos (Cuba) was assessed both before and after [...] Read more.
This study investigates the significant energy optimization gaps in hotel retrofits in a subtropical climate, quantifying the missed energy-saving opportunities through advanced simulation techniques. Utilizing Design Builder software, the energy consumption of a hotel in Cienfuegos (Cuba) was assessed both before and after renovation, focusing on passive strategies (e.g., replacing single-glazed windows with double glazing) and active interventions (e.g., upgrading the air conditioning system). The results reveal that current retrofit strategies fail to reduce energy consumption substantially. Replacing single-glazed windows with double glazing could reduce annual energy use by 42%. Additionally, upgrading the existing chiller system or implementing a Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) system could result in 40% and 59.5% energy savings, respectively. The most significant energy reduction, 71%, is achieved when both interventions—upgrading the chiller and installing double-glazed windows—are implemented, reducing the energy consumption index (ECI) to a quarter of its current value. The life cycle cost (LCC) analysis demonstrates that energy-efficient investments offer considerable economic returns. For instance, an investment of USD 508,600 in a modern chiller system would generate net savings of USD 1,373,500 over its operational lifespan. This study underscores substantial economic and environmental losses from omitting energy efficiency considerations in hotel renovations. It calls for integrating comprehensive energy optimization strategies in retrofit planning, with each dollar invested in energy-saving measures potentially yielding USD 2.5 in life cycle savings. This approach is crucial for global hotel markets facing energy challenges. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1473 KiB  
Article
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Greywater Treatment and Rainwater Harvesting for Decentralized Water Reuse in Brazil and Germany
by Hugo Henrique de Simone Souza, Carlo Gottardo Morandi, Marc Árpád Boncz, Paula Loureiro Paulo and Heidrun Steinmetz
Resources 2025, 14(6), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14060096 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 933
Abstract
Urban water management faces growing pressure from population growth, pollution, and climate variability, demanding innovative strategies to ensure long-term sustainability. This study applies the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) across four case studies in Brazil and Germany, evaluating integrated systems that combine constructed [...] Read more.
Urban water management faces growing pressure from population growth, pollution, and climate variability, demanding innovative strategies to ensure long-term sustainability. This study applies the Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) across four case studies in Brazil and Germany, evaluating integrated systems that combine constructed wetlands for greywater treatment with rainwater harvesting for non-potable use. The scenarios include a single-family household, a high-rise residential building, a rural residence, and worker housing. A multi-criteria analysis was conducted to derive consolidated sustainability indicators, and sensitivity analysis explored the influence of dimension weighting. Results showed that water reuse scenarios consistently outperformed conventional counterparts across environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) revealed notable reductions in global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, and eutrophication. Life Cycle Costing (LCC) confirmed financial feasibility when externalities were considered, especially in large-scale systems. Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) highlighted the perceived benefits in terms of health, safety, and sustainability engagement. Integrated water reuse systems achieved overall sustainability scores up to 4.8 times higher than their baseline equivalents. These findings underscore the effectiveness of decentralized water reuse as a complementary and robust alternative to conventional supply and treatment models, supporting climate resilience and sustainable development goals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 7137 KiB  
Article
Multi-Criteria Optimization of a Standalone Photovoltaic System in Cyprus (Techno-Economic Analysis)
by Athina Vogiatzoglou, Konstantinos Alexakis and Dimitris Askounis
Energies 2025, 18(11), 2953; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112953 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 396
Abstract
Photovoltaic systems are increasingly recognized as one of the most advanced, efficient, and rapidly developing methods of electricity generation, utilizing the limitless potential of solar radiation while offering environmentally sustainable solutions to contemporary energy challenges. However, despite their clear benefits, issues such as [...] Read more.
Photovoltaic systems are increasingly recognized as one of the most advanced, efficient, and rapidly developing methods of electricity generation, utilizing the limitless potential of solar radiation while offering environmentally sustainable solutions to contemporary energy challenges. However, despite their clear benefits, issues such as high initial investment costs and relatively low energy efficiency must be carefully addressed during the design phase. Key considerations include the quantity and type of panels, battery capacity and number, environmental conditions, site-specific factors, and the mathematical models and interconnection strategies of system components. This study proposes a two-stage optimization approach for standalone photovoltaic systems, employing three distinct optimization algorithms—NSGA-II, DEMO, and Particle Swarm Optimization—to minimize both the Loss of Load Probability (LLP) and the life cycle cost (LCC). In the second stage, optimal solutions from the Pareto front are evaluated using three multi-criteria decision-making techniques: the hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE. The proposed framework is applied to systems with storage batteries designed for deployment in three Cypriot cities, aiming to meet energy demands of 10, 15, and 20 kWh. The findings reveal a strong correlation between economic and energy performance and the degree of load coverage, with the combination of the DEMO algorithm and the AHP-TOPSIS method emerging as the most effective solution. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1228 KiB  
Article
Economic and Environmental Assessment of Organic Lemon Cultivation: The Case of Southeastern Spain
by Begoña García Castellanos, Benjamín García García and José García García
Agronomy 2025, 15(6), 1372; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061372 - 3 Jun 2025
Viewed by 624
Abstract
Spain is the world’s leading producer of organic fresh lemons, with production concentrated in the southeast. Given the relevance of this region in lemon production and the role of organic agriculture in sustainable development, this study establishes the main organic lemon production models [...] Read more.
Spain is the world’s leading producer of organic fresh lemons, with production concentrated in the southeast. Given the relevance of this region in lemon production and the role of organic agriculture in sustainable development, this study establishes the main organic lemon production models in Southeastern Spain (Fino and Verna) and evaluates them from the economic and environmental perspective using life cycle costing (LCC) and life cycle assessment (LCA). Both models present a similar cost structure, with labor and fertilization being the most significant costs. Verna presents higher unit cost due to lower productivity. Organic management entails higher unit costs than conventional due to lower productivity and the higher costs of organic fertilization and biotechnological pest control. In LCA, the contributions of the components to the impacts of the organic models are very similar, due to the similarities in the production models. These contributions also resemble those in conventional management systems, with fertilizers being the largest contributor to impacts. Organic systems generally show lower absolute values than conventional, mainly because of the use of organic fertilizers. Fino shows lower values than Verna, driven by higher productivity. The global warming results showed relatively low emissions, 0.053 and 0.068 kg CO2 eq·kg−1 for Fino and Verna, respectively. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed, introducing variability in non-fresh marketable yields and considering the avoidance of synthetic fertilizers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Farming Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 2936 KiB  
Review
Bibliometric Analysis of the Intersection of Circular Economy, Prefabrication, and Modularity in the Building Industry
by Nelson Soares and Vanessa Tavares
Buildings 2025, 15(11), 1923; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111923 - 2 Jun 2025
Viewed by 474
Abstract
This study aims to examine the latest literature at the intersection of prefabrication, modularity, and the circular economy (CE) through a bibliometric analysis. This systematic review follows five key steps: design and conceptualization, bibliometric data collection via the Scopus database, assessment of the [...] Read more.
This study aims to examine the latest literature at the intersection of prefabrication, modularity, and the circular economy (CE) through a bibliometric analysis. This systematic review follows five key steps: design and conceptualization, bibliometric data collection via the Scopus database, assessment of the collected data, data visualization, and discussion of the findings. The results are categorized into five main themes: prefabrication and modularity, CE in the construction sector, energy and environmental life cycle assessments, life cycle costing (LCC), and digitalization. The findings reveal that prefabricated and modular systems align with CE principles, supported by strategies such as disassembly and deconstruction design, as well as recycling and reuse. However, the direct connection between prefabrication/modularity and CE remains relatively weak, with environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) and building information modelling (BIM) emerging as the two primary methodologies bridging these concepts. To further advance the integration of prefabrication and modularity in CE, there is a need for the development of reliable guidelines and regulations that establish these practices as core requirements within the construction industry. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 10354 KiB  
Article
The Role of Regional Codes in Mitigating Residential Sector Energy Demand Sensitivity to Climate Change Scenarios in Hot–Arid Regions
by Mohammed A. Aloshan and Kareem Aldali
Buildings 2025, 15(11), 1789; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111789 - 23 May 2025
Viewed by 575
Abstract
Rising temperatures are intensifying residential cooling demands in hot–arid regions, with national building codes playing a pivotal role in mitigating these effects. This study evaluates the energy performance of two high-density residential buildings, Noor City in Cairo and Banan City in Riyadh, using [...] Read more.
Rising temperatures are intensifying residential cooling demands in hot–arid regions, with national building codes playing a pivotal role in mitigating these effects. This study evaluates the energy performance of two high-density residential buildings, Noor City in Cairo and Banan City in Riyadh, using DesignBuilder version 7.0.2.006 simulations for 2023, 2050, and 2080 under RCP 4.5 projections, followed by comparative and code-swapping analysis that assessed the role of envelope design parameters. All parameters were constant, except for those dictated by each country’s code. Results show that under future climate conditions, cooling loads in the uninsulated Noor City rise by 69% by 2080, compared to a 32% increase in Banan City. A code-swapping analysis confirmed the regulatory impact; applying the Saudi envelope to Noor City reduced annual energy use by over 40%, while using the Egyptian code in Banan City increased it by more than 50%. Solar exposure analysis further revealed that Noor City’s unshaded façades contribute to elevated thermal loads. Additionally, a 20.48 kWp rooftop photovoltaic system offsets 32:35% of annual energy consumption in both cases. While operational benefits are evident, no full life cycle cost (LCC) analysis was conducted; future studies should address economic feasibility to guide code adaptation in lower-income contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1605 KiB  
Article
Integrating Sustainability Indicators in Conceptual Design of Footbridges: A Decision-Support Framework for Environmental, Economic, and Structural Performance
by Valeria Gozzi and Leidy Guante Henriquez
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4562; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104562 - 16 May 2025
Viewed by 527
Abstract
Sustainability is increasingly prioritized in infrastructure design; however, its integration into the conceptual design phase remains limited, particularly for pedestrian bridges, where structural performance plays a critical role. While existing frameworks address environmental and economic impacts in later stages, they typically fail to [...] Read more.
Sustainability is increasingly prioritized in infrastructure design; however, its integration into the conceptual design phase remains limited, particularly for pedestrian bridges, where structural performance plays a critical role. While existing frameworks address environmental and economic impacts in later stages, they typically fail to incorporate structural performance and sustainability holistically at the outset. To address this gap, this study introduces a quantitative decision-support framework tailored for the conceptual design of footbridges. The methodology integrates five key indicators, Global Warming Potential (GI), Total Cost (TC), Robustness (RO), Inspection (IN), and Maintenance (MA), using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach, specifically the Weighted Sum Model (WSM), supported by Pearson correlation analysis, to identify trade-offs and interdependencies among metrics. The framework is tested on two real-world case studies involving steel pedestrian bridges in different urban contexts. The results reveal a strong correlation between inspection and maintenance, suggesting that designs optimized for inspection accessibility can significantly reduce life cycle maintenance efforts and costs. Robustness appears to be largely independent from environmental impact, indicating the potential to improve structural resilience without compromising sustainability. Furthermore, cost–sustainability relationships are shown to be highly context-dependent. The practical implications of these findings are substantial: by offering a structured, data-driven tool for early-stage evaluation, the framework enables engineers, urban planners, and policymakers to make informed design choices that align with long-term sustainability goals. It offers a methodological basis for comparing design options based on quantifiable sustainability and structural metrics, contributing to evidence-based decision making in line with evolving standards for sustainable infrastructure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 2581 KiB  
Article
Life Cycle Cost and Environmental Performance of Electric and Gasoline Vehicles in Cold Climate and Coal-Dependent Regions: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China
by Sining Ma, Amir Hamzah Sharaai, Zhijian He, Nitanan Koshy Matthew and Nazatul Syadia Zainordin
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4554; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104554 - 16 May 2025
Viewed by 528
Abstract
This study conducts a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and gasoline vehicles (GVs) in Heilongjiang Province, China, under cold climate conditions and a coal dominated electricity grid. Environmental impacts were assessed using [...] Read more.
This study conducts a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analysis of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and gasoline vehicles (GVs) in Heilongjiang Province, China, under cold climate conditions and a coal dominated electricity grid. Environmental impacts were assessed using SimaPro with the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method, while cost performance was evaluated over 5-, 10-, and 15-year ownership periods. Results show that BEVs offer lower total ownership costs than GVs, even without subsidies, primarily due to reduced energy and maintenance expenses. In terms of global warming potential, BEVs show a 4.52% reduction compared to GVs. However, BEVs demonstrate higher impacts in several non-climate categories—including ionizing radiation, particulate matter formation, eutrophication, toxicity, and water use—largely due to emissions from coal-based electricity. The derived grid emission factor of 1.498 kg CO2/kWh underscores the critical role of regional energy structure. These findings suggest that while BEVs provide economic and climate benefits, their overall environmental performance is highly dependent on local grid carbon intensity and seasonal energy demand. Policy recommendations include accelerating grid decarbonization, improving cold weather efficiency, and incorporating multidimensional environmental indicators into transport planning. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1028 KiB  
Article
Environmental and Economic Assessment of Desktop vs. Laptop Computers: A Life Cycle Approach
by Miguel Ferreira, Idalina Domingos, Lenise Santos, Anna Barreto and José Ferreira
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4455; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104455 - 14 May 2025
Viewed by 1038
Abstract
This study evaluates and compares the environmental and economic implications of desktop and laptop computer systems throughout their life cycles using screening life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The functional unit was defined as the use of one computer [...] Read more.
This study evaluates and compares the environmental and economic implications of desktop and laptop computer systems throughout their life cycles using screening life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) methodologies. The functional unit was defined as the use of one computer system for fundamental home and small-business productivity tasks for over four years. The analysis considered the production, use, and end-of-life phases. The results showed the desktop system had a higher overall carbon footprint (679.1 kg CO2eq) compared to the laptop (286.1 kg CO2eq). For both systems, manufacturing contributed the largest share of the emissions, followed by use. Desktops exhibited significantly higher use phase emissions, due to greater energy consumption. Life cycle cost analysis revealed that laptops had slightly lower total costs (EUR 593.88) than desktops (EUR 608.40) over the 4-year period, despite higher initial investment costs. Sensitivity analysis examining different geographical scenarios highlighted the importance of considering regional factors in the LCA. Manufacturer-provided data generally showed lower carbon footprint values than the modeled scenarios. This study emphasizes the need for updated life cycle inventory data and energy efficiency improvements to reduce the environmental impacts of computer systems. Overall, laptops demonstrated environmental and economic advantages over desktops in the defined usage cases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1638 KiB  
Article
Seismic Resilience and Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Steel and Reinforced Structures
by Hasan Mostafaei, Morteza Ashoori Barmchi and Hadi Bahmani
Buildings 2025, 15(10), 1613; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101613 - 10 May 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 825
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of seismic resilience and sustainability between steel and reinforced concrete structures. With growing demand for environmentally responsible and disaster-resilient infrastructure, evaluating the life cycle performance of construction materials has become critical. Three building typologies—10-, 20-, and [...] Read more.
This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of seismic resilience and sustainability between steel and reinforced concrete structures. With growing demand for environmentally responsible and disaster-resilient infrastructure, evaluating the life cycle performance of construction materials has become critical. Three building typologies—10-, 20-, and 30-story residential structures—are analyzed using a life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC), and incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) to assess environmental, economic, and seismic performance. The results reveal that reinforced concrete structures tend to exert greater environmental impacts, particularly in categories such as carcinogenic emissions, ecotoxicity, and acidification, primarily due to cement production. Steel structures, while associated with higher energy consumption and mineral resource depletion, demonstrated superior seismic performance across all building heights, characterized by a greater level of ductility and collapse capacity. For instance, the 30-story reinforced concrete structure generated approximately 6.93 million kg CO2 eq, compared to 6.79 million kg CO2 eq for its steel counterpart. Steel structures, while associated with higher energy consumption and mineral resource depletion, demonstrated superior seismic performance across all building heights, sustaining up to a 15% greater spectral acceleration before collapse. Additionally, the LCC analysis showed that reinforced concrete is more cost-effective in high-rise construction, especially during the construction stage. These findings offer valuable insights for engineers and decision makers aiming to balance sustainability and structural performance in urban development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Steel–Concrete Composite Structural Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop