Search Results (66)

Higher rates of food insecurity have been observed among Hispanic immigrants, yet these individuals have traditionally been excluded from food insecurity survey development. The most common Spanish translated food insecurity scale—the Spanish Translation of the U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module (S-FSSM)—may not be capturing how Spanish-speaking immigrant parents conceptualize food insecurity. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into how Spanish-speaking immigrant parents with low English literacy conceptualize household food insecurity within the 18-item S-FSSM and to use this information to revise the S-FSSM instrument. Researchers conducted two rounds of cognitive interviews with Spanish-speaking adults at a community center in Houston, TX, USA (N = 19; Round 1: n = 9, October 2023; Round 2: n = 10, July 2024). Researchers used participants’ feedback to refine the S-FSSM. All participants were female (Rounds 1 and 2 = 100%) and most born in Mexico (Round 1 = 66.7%; Round 2 = 50%). In Round 1, eight items were combined to enhance cultural relevance and to add definitions. Follow-up questions were added to improve clarity. Two items were revised for relevancy, two items had no change, six items were deleted. In Round 2, modifications to wording occurred and one item was added. The revised scale, named Food Access Measure for Immigrant Latinos In America (FAMILIA), resulted in 17 survey items. Study findings suggested that the S-FSSM needed refinement to enhance relevancy for Spanish-speaking immigrant parents with low English literacy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Prior studies suggest that rates of Helicobacter pylori colonization are higher among Hispanic immigrants compared to U.S.-born Hispanics. It is unknown whether differences in H. pylori colonization rates among Hispanics are related to immigration status or to cultural factors such as diet. Methods: This was a survey study, conducted among self-identified Hispanics who had an endoscopy for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Qualifying patients completed a telephone survey which included questions about immigration status and the 12-item Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (SASH), a validated instrument which measures cultural factors such as language preference and diet. We examined the relationship between SASH factors and H. pylori status, classified based on endoscopic biopsy results. Results: We called 400 patients and 186 completed the survey. Median age was 65 (interquartile range 21 to 82) and 81% were female. Thirty of 186 (16%) respondents were born in the U.S. while 156/186 (84%) were immigrants, primarily from the Dominican Republic. Among immigrants, 69% had immigrated before 1990. Rates of H. pylori were 8/30 (27%) among U.S. born Hispanics compared to 51/156 (33%) among Hispanic immigrants (p = 0.67). Rates of H. pylori were 51/147 (35%) among those with a mostly Latino diet vs. 8/39 (21%) among those with a U.S or mixed diet (p = 0.05). In a multivariable model predicting H. pylori status, a mostly Latino diet was the only cultural predictor which approached statistical significance (p = 0.05) (aOR 2.61, 95% CI 0.94–7.20). Conclusions: Rates of H. pylori colonization were modestly higher among Hispanic immigrants compared to U.S.-born Hispanics. A novel preliminary finding was that higher rates of H. pylori colonization were observed among those who ate a predominantly Latino diet. Full article

Immigrants from Latin America’s Indigenous and rural communities in New York City are likely to break the cycle of poverty by improving language proficiency, acculturation, and education. Their well-being has received poor attention in the economic literature, and little is known about the needs, financial welfare, health status, or education among Indigenous-origin migrants from Latin American households. This study used primary data from a non-probabilistic sample of 121 self-identified Indigenous migrants living in New York City (NYC), a demographic cohort presenting challenges in terms of research access. National-level data usually aggregates all Spanish-speaking individuals as Hispanics and fails to acknowledge the presence of these pre-Hispanic groups. Integrating low-skilled Latin American Indigenous migrants into labor markets remains a challenge. We examined the link between the household income of Indigenous migrants from Latin America in NYC and education, acculturation, and discrimination. Using a logistic regression, we substantiated that education retains its prominence as the primary determinant of income for Indigenous migrants, but perceptions of discrimination based on skin color undermined this progress. This study highlights the need for interventions to promote language proficiency, acculturation, and education among Indigenous immigrant communities and implement culturally tailored policies to encourage the upward mobility of this population. Full article

Food insecurity disproportionately affects Hispanic households in the US. This study examines food access perceptions among rural Latinos, acknowledging that food environments are complex systems influenced by factors such as availability, accessibility, affordability, acceptability, and accommodation. This phenomenological qualitative study was conducted with adult Latinas living in Nebraska’s rural areas. Data was collected through participatory mapping, semi-structured interviews guided by the five dimensions of food access, and demographic surveys. Eighteen women participated in in-person interviews, and 68.3% of participants met the criteria for food insecurity. While chain stores were the primary shopping option in rural areas, challenges included limited availability of foods that are culturally relevant and accommodate special dietary needs. Ethnic stores were valued for cultural relevance despite concerns about quality and pricing. Overall, affordability was a significant barrier due to high rural costs, worsened by challenges in navigating nutrition program benefits and documentation status. Research or interventions targeting improvements in rural food security must extend beyond mere store availability, focusing on economic development, policy reform, and enhanced education in assistance programs to address these complex challenges. Full article

Background: Previous research has examined the idea of the healthy immigrant effect and its potential application to pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders, particularly inracial and ethnic minority groups. The aim of this study is to examine how nativity, race, and ethnicity are related to prevalence of pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the PRAMS CDC dataset. These data were analyzed via Χ² comparisons of prevalence of pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders in foreign and US-born mothers, including subgroup analyses for Black and Hispanic women. Results: A sample size of 63,648 was analyzed, and revealed significant differences in the prevalence of gestational hypertension between US-born vs. foreign-born Black mothers (12.6% vs. 8.0%, Χ² (1, N = 12,046) = 36.92, p < 0.001), Hispanic mothers (9.5% vs. 7.2%, Χ² (1, N = 11,524) = 18.236, p < 0.001), and the larger sample of mothers across all reported racial and ethnic backgrounds (11.0% vs. 7.0%, Χ² (1, N = 63,648) = 163.835, p < 0.001). The results also revealed a significant difference in the prevalence of hypertension eclampsia between US-born and foreign-born Hispanic mothers (0.8% vs. 0.3%, Χ² (1, N = 11,152) = 8.480, p = 0.004). Conclusions: The study results showed evidence of significantly lower prevalence of pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders among foreign-born mothers as compared to their US-born counterparts, both in the full study sample and specifically in the subsamples of women who self-identified as Black and women who self-identified as Hispanic. These variances by nativity, race, and ethnicity provide further insight into how the healthy immigrant effect can apply to pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders, particularly for women of racial and ethnic minorities. Full article

Background/Objectives: Hispanic immigrants (HIs) in the U.S.A. are disproportionately affected by cervical cancer compared to other groups, at least partly due to low HPV vaccination rates. The aim of this study was to investigate strategies to improve HPV vaccine attitudes and intent of HIs in the U.S.A. by developing and testing the effectiveness of video-based interventions. Methods: This study employed a two-phase mixed-methods approach. In the first phase, focus groups with new and established HIs explored perspectives, concerns about HPV vaccination, types of information to include in a video intervention, and how an effective intervention should be designed. Findings from the focus groups guided the creation of seven short educational videos, including a summary video and a testimonial-based video, addressing key questions about HPV and its vaccine. The second phase, which involved a nationwide survey of 1500 Spanish-speaking HIs, revealed a significant change in overall HPV vaccine attitude generally, and a significant increase in both HPV vaccine intent and attitudes among parents of unvaccinated children. Results: Regression analysis revealed general vaccine attitudes (β = 0.620, p < 0.001), English proficiency (β = 0.066, p = 0.01), and gender (β = −0.072, p = 0.002), as significant predictors of attitudinal changes. Notably, females exhibited less favorable post-intervention attitudes compared to males. Additionally, perceived care from video creators was a strong predictor of normalized gains in vaccine attitudes (β = 0.270, p < 0.001). Video content effectiveness varied; the video addressing vaccine side effects demonstrated the highest impact on attitude improvement. Testimonials and the summary video were also effective in fostering positive changes in attitudes. Despite differences in trust levels between new and established immigrants, both groups valued culturally tailored, Spanish-language information from credible sources. Conclusion: Addressing language and cultural barriers can improve trust in healthcare interventions among Hispanic immigrants in the U.S.A. Public health initiatives should consider these factors to more effectively reduce HPV vaccine hesitancy in this population. Full article

Despite its demographic relevance, Spanish as an Immigrant Minority Language (IML) remains understudied in Europe. In Brussels, approximately 46,500 residents have Hispanic heritage, but their linguistic practices have largely remained unexplored in sociolinguistic research. This paper presents a pilot study on the language practices of the Hispanic communities in the city in order to assess language maintenance and vitality. Through an online survey among 125 adults with Hispanic heritage in Brussels, primarily first-generation immigrants, a highly multilingual sample was revealed, with most participants competent in at least four languages. While Spanish usage declines across generations, language competence remains high, with 60% of third-generation speakers still considering it one of their dominant languages. Findings challenge traditional minority–majority language maintenance perspectives, advocating for a multilingual approach to linguistic vitality. Patterns of language transmission, home language use, and integration highlight the communities’ adaptability while maintaining a connection to Spanish. Results point to unexplored sociolinguistic phenomena within the language minority, underscoring the need for further research on the Hispanic communities in Brussels. Full article

Coxiella burnetii is a significant infectious pathogen that causes Q fever. Q fever is thought to be uncommon in the US and most human cases are believed to occur in agricultural livestock workers. However, the extent of US community exposure to C. burnetii is not known with certainty. Using nationally representative 2003–2004 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey serologic, demographic, and occupational history data, the magnitude of US adult general population exposure to C. burnetii, excluding agricultural-sector workers, was estimated. Exposure was defined as positive serum IgG antibodies in an immunofluorescence assay (e.g., current or past infection). A total of 3.0% (95% CI: 2.0–4.4) of the US population met the criteria for C. burnetii exposure, representing some 6.2 million persons. Overall, 86.9% (95% CI: 75.5–98.4) of the seropositive persons had no lifetime history of work in the agricultural sector (5.5 million persons). This was consistently true across all US demographic groups: aged 20–59 years, 87.3%; aged 60+ years, 85.7%; men, 86.1%; women, 87.6%; non-Hispanic Whites, 82%; non-Hispanic Blacks, 95.8%; Mexican Americans, 89.4%; immigrants from Mexico, 83.5%; and other immigrants, 96.8%. As a proportion of C. burnetii infections result in acute Q fever and chronic Q fever conveys significant mortality, the community-level risks to the general public may be significant. It is recommended that a 6-year sample of the most recent NHANES stored sera be analyzed to determine the current community C. burnetii exposure rates. Also, analyzing an additional 2005–2008 stored sera sample would provide an opportunity to assess the time trends and long-term health impacts. Full article

Background: Exposure to traumatic experiences has been positively associated with college students’ academic difficulties and psychological distress. However, little is known about the traumatic events experienced by Hispanic college students. This study examined the types of lifetime traumatic events experienced by Hispanic college students, including immigration enforcement-related events, and the association between events and psychological distress. Methods: College students (N = 1112) completed self-reported measures assessing lifetime traumatic experiences, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and depression symptoms. Results: Most participants (81%) were born in the US, and most (84%) reported that at least one parent was foreign born. Hispanic students reported similar types of traumatic events reported by the general population of college students in previous studies. In addition, many students reported immigration-related potentially traumatic events. The following types of traumatic events were most strongly associated with greater levels of psychological distress: sexual assault or molestation, life-threatening illnesses or accidents, verbal abuse, physical or verbal bullying or mistreatment, directly experienced immigration enforcement events, and having witnessed physical or verbal abuse of someone close. Conclusions: It is important that clinicians use a broad definition of potentially traumatic events in the identification and treatment of Hispanic college students who may have experienced PTSD or depression symptoms following major life events, including immigration enforcement events. Full article

This study uses data from the 2006–2012 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) genetic sample (N = 11,667) to explore the “immigrant health paradox” from a novel perspective by examining the nativity differences in genetic predisposition to health-related outcomes. Polygenic indices (PGIs) were used to evaluate whether older non-Hispanic white foreign-born individuals have genotypes that predispose them to better health profiles compared to their U.S.-born counterparts. The results show an immigrant advantage with respect to genetic predisposition to cognitive function, BMI, and smoking frequency. There are no significant differences in genetic predisposition to height, smoking initiation, and depression. Including respective PGIs in multinomial regression models partially explains an immigrant advantage with respect to cognitive function and obesity. The findings are consistent with the “healthy immigrant effect” or selective migration of individuals with a favorable genetic predisposition to health as one of the explanations of the immigrant health paradox. Full article

Background/Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is linked to multiple cancers that can be prevented through vaccination. While the optimal age for vaccination is in childhood and adolescence, vaccination recommendations include adults through age 26 who missed childhood/adolescent vaccination. There are limited data about disparities among adults eligible for catch-up HPV vaccination. We conducted a comprehensive examination of HPV vaccination among US young adults, disaggregating the group by race/ethnicity and nativity status to identify subgroups that may require additional interventions. Methods: We analyzed 2019 and 2022 data of individuals aged 18–26 years from the National Health Interview Survey. Generalized linear models using Poisson regression with log link were used to examine the receipt of 1+ dose of HPV vaccine, race/ethnicity, and nativity (i.e., US- versus foreign-born) status. Results: The overall receipt of 1+ doses of HPV vaccine was 47.5%. The vaccination rate among the US-born group was 49.7% versus 31.9% among the foreign-born group with an adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) of 0.72; (95% CI, 0.62–0.82). Foreign-born non-Hispanic (NH) Black individuals (APR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.70) were less likely to be vaccinated against HPV than foreign-born NH White individuals, while US-born NH Asians (APR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09–1.48) had a higher prevalence of the vaccination than the US-born NH White group. Additionally, foreign-born NH Asian (APR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46–0.77), NH Black (APR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12–0.61), and Hispanic (APR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60–0.97) populations were less likely to be vaccinated than their respective US-born counterparts. Conclusion: Profound HPV vaccination inequalities exist among US young adults with particularly low vaccine coverage among racially and ethnically minoritized immigrant populations. Full article

Background/Objectives: Nutrient-poor diet quality is a major driver of the global burden of metabolic syndrome (MetS). The US ranks among the lowest in diet quality and has the highest rate of immigration, which may present unique challenges for non-US-native populations who experience changes in access to health-promoting resources. This study examined associations among MetS, nativity status, diet quality, and interaction effects of race–ethnicity among Hispanic, Asian, Black, and White US-native and non-US-native adults. Methods: We examined data from 5482 adult participants (≥20 years of age) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013–2018). MetS (per the ATP III panel guidelines) was assessed continuously (MetS z-score) and dichotomously. Dietary recalls were used to compute HEI-2015 scores. Nativity status and sociodemographic variables were assessed. Age-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted logistic regressions were conducted to examine the associations between nativity status and MetS and interaction effects by race–ethnicity. Results: Non-US-native participants displayed more guideline-adherent diet quality (55.23% vs. 49.38%, p < 0.001) compared to their US-native counterparts—even when stratified by racial–ethnic groups. US-native participants had larger waist circumferences and elevated triglyceride levels. Non-US-native Black Americans had a 60% lower risk of having MetS even after adjusting for diet quality (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.88) compared to their US-native counterparts. For MetS components, non-US-native Asian participants reported a lower risk for dyslipidemia, while non-US-native multiracial participants had higher triglycerides. Conclusions: Non-US-native groups display better diet quality compared to their US-native counterparts. However, the findings suggest that diet quality alone does not account for nativity-related cardiometabolic disparities, particularly in US-native Black Americans, thus necessitating interventions targeting the social determinants of health. Full article

Owning a home has become a distant, often unattainable dream for many Americans since the 2007–2009 recession. The shortage of homes has decreased affordability, forcing 43 million U.S. households to become renters rather than owners. Racially targeted policies and widespread discrimination, coupled with neoliberal urban renewal policies, have forced communities of color, especially immigrants and the foreign-born, at the greatest disadvantage in homeownership. This paper examines tract-scale disparities in homeownership across major racial/ethnic groups. Using the U.S. Census Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) 2019 definition of the 13-county-metropolitan statistical area (MSA) of Nashville, Tennessee, as the study area, I use five-year American Community Survey (ACS) (2015–2019) data estimates to examine the spatial disparity in homeownership and its predictors. Nashville MSA is one of the fastest-growing southern gateways, and it is also the largest, most diverse, and most intermixed metropolis in Tennessee. It contains higher than the state’s overall share of foreign-born, and during 2019–2040, its share of immigrants is projected to grow by 40.7%, making it the best-suited laboratory for race/immigrant-focused research on housing. This analysis finds significant differences in race-based mean per-capita income, with Whites ($32,522) and Asians ($32,556) at the top, whereas Blacks ($25,062) and Hispanics ($20,091) are at the lowest. The ratio of race-based per-capita-income-versus-median housing values is the highest for Whites (15.19) and Asians (15.07) and the lowest for Blacks (11.49) and Hispanics (9.27), putting these two groups as the most disadvantaged regarding their affordability. Regression models suggest lower White homeownership in higher diversity tracts among foreign-born-not-citizens (FBNCs), whereas Black and Hispanic homeownerships are higher in tracts with higher diversity among FBNCs. Interestingly, Asian homeownership is high in tracts with high-income Black tracts, pointing toward the increasing significance of class. Full article

The United States prides itself on its immigrant heritage and diversity, yet historically, minority advancements have faced opposition and violence. Little scholarship exists on how whites evaluate minority representation when represented by a minority in a legislative chamber. Prior research suggests that diversity may trigger negative racial and authoritarian attitudes among whites. Given recent political events in the United States and increases in the number of racial minorities running for and winning political office, we investigate white responses to minority representation in the United States Congress. Using the 2022 CES data, we examine how racial and authoritarian attitudes predict whites’ evaluations of Minority House Members. We expand beyond the Black and white binary to include whites’ evaluations of Hispanic legislators and broaden the study of racial attitudes beyond the Racial Resentment index. Our findings demonstrate that whites’ evaluations of minority legislators are linked to racial attitudes and endorsements of policy-based authoritarianism, varying by the representative’s race. White respondents who are in districts that are not represented by a Black or Hispanic legislator exemplify higher levels of racial resentment, disagree that whites have advantages, and agree that racial problems are rare. They also support more authoritarian policies than in districts represented by a Black Representative. White respondents’ approval of minority legislators relies on authoritarian policies and racial attitudes when the member of Congress is Black or Hispanic. In these districts, white respondents who disapprove of their Congressmember have more racial resentment, disagree that whites have advantages, and support more authoritarian policies than white respondents who approve of their Congressmember. This research provides insights into the complexities of minority political representation and its connection to policy-based authoritarianism, as well as its implications for American democracy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Puerto Rican households often face elevated rates of food insecurity. Frequently, households experiencing food insecurity turn to federal and emergency nutrition assistance for urgent or prolonged aid. This study analyzes factors influencing food insecurity and food assistance program involvement among Puerto Ricans in Holyoke, Massachusetts, amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using a combination of community-based participatory recruitment, purposive sampling, and web-based tools, we collected 284 survey responses. Our paper employed Pearson’s chi-square, logistic regression, and hierarchical linear models to assess relationships between demographic and household attributes and food access outcomes. Results: Variables such as having children in the household and age significantly influenced food relief participation and food insecurity outcomes. Puerto Rican heritage and low educational attainment were strong predictors of obtaining federal food aid. Low-income participants disproportionately faced food shortages and depended on emergency food initiatives. Our findings indicate that demographic and household factors significantly influence food insecurity and accessibility. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the pandemic made it challenging for households to obtain consistent, safe, and affordable nourishment. The impacts were unequally spread; hence, Puerto Rican communities and low-income groups were most affected. Full article