Search Results (236)

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder with significant racial and ethnic disparities in prevalence, disease severity, and outcomes. Cardiovascular complications, including pericarditis, myocarditis, valvular disease, and conduction abnormalities, contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in SLE patients. This study examines racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular outcomes among hospitalized SLE patients in the United States. Methods: This retrospective study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2021 to analyze hospitalizations of adult patients (≥18 years) with a primary or secondary diagnosis of SLE. Patients were stratified into racial/ethnic groups: White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and Other. Primary outcomes include major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which are a composite of in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death, and other SLE-related outcomes including cardiac, pulmonary, and renal involvement. Statistical analyses included multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and hospital-related factors to assess racial disparities. Results: The study included 514,750 White, 321,395 Black, and 146,600 Hispanic patients, with smaller proportions of Asian, Native American, and Other racial groups. Black patients had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08–1.26, p < 0.001) and sudden cardiac death (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.46–1.85, p < 0.001) compared to White patients. Asian patients also exhibited increased mortality risk (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.14–1.63, p = 0.001) as compared to Whites. Conversely, Black (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.96, p = 0.01) and Hispanic (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.80–0.96, p = 0.03) patients had lower odds of MI. Racial disparities in access to care, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity burden may contribute to these differences. Conclusion: Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in cardiovascular outcomes among hospitalized SLE patients. Black and Asian individuals face higher in-hospital all-causes mortality and sudden cardiac death risks, while Black and Hispanic patients exhibit lower MI rates. Addressing social determinants of health, improving access to specialized care, and implementing targeted interventions may reduce disparities and improve outcomes in minority populations with SLE. Full article

Social adversity is linked to poorer physical health in breast cancer survivors, highlighting the urgency of addressing health equity. Simultaneously, identifying individual-level factors that mitigate these effects may provide more immediate relief for survivors. This study examined whether four modifiable psychosocial factors—emotion dysregulation, physical activity, sleep disturbance, and social support—moderate the relationship between place-based social adversity and physical health in 255 breast cancer survivors (Mage = 56.03, 74.5% non-Hispanic White) within six months post-treatment. Linear regression analyses with 5000 bootstrapped estimates revealed that sleep disturbance significantly moderated the relationship between place-based social adversity and physical health (B = −0.014, SE = 0.001, bootstrapped 95% CI = −0.027, −0.001). Specifically, greater place-based social adversity was associated with poorer physical health at high levels of sleep disturbance (B = −0.22, p = 0.004), but not at low (B = 0.01, p = 0.94) or average (B = −0.10, p = 0.07) levels. Emotion dysregulation, physical activity, and social support did not moderate this relationship. Findings suggest that improving sleep quality may buffer the negative impact of social adversity on physical health, identifying sleep as a potential target for interventions aimed at reducing disparities among breast cancer survivors. Full article

Background/Objectives: Mental disorders and diabetes-related distress (DRD) are under-addressed aspects of person-centered diabetes care. This study examines the burden of depression, anxiety, and DRD among adults with type 1 (T1D), latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), type 2 (T2D), and gestational diabetes (GD), and explores their experiences and barriers in receiving mental health services. Methods: This study uses quantitative data from the 2023/24 Diabetes, Distress, and Disparities (3D) Study, which is based at a large US medical center. The 3D Study consists of 573 adults with diabetes (51.3% with T1D or LADA, 43.5% with T2D, and 4.4% with current/past GD). Mental health assessments included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (anxiety), and Problem Areas in Diabetes-11 (DRD). Logistic regression was used to examine the prevalence of mental health concerns and behavioral service use. Results: Overall, 14.5% had clinically significant depression, 8.0% had anxiety, and 23.6% had elevated DRD. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and DRD had a positive, non-linear relationship with poor glycemic control. Approximately 30% of those with clinically significant emotional health concerns did not receive any behavioral health services in the past 12 months. Black adults were less likely to receive behavioral health treatment than non-Hispanic Whites (Odds Ratio = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07–0.77). Common reasons for not receiving behavioral health services included not knowing where to go, cost, and lack of accessible providers. Conclusions: Gaps in addressing the emotional health needs of people with diabetes persist. Healthcare systems need to integrate addressing psychosocial factors as part of person-centered diabetes care. Full article

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with significant increases in mental-health-related concerns in adolescents, including eating disorders. Disparities in screening, diagnosis, and treatment impact adolescents with eating disorders. This study aimed to describe the patterns in the prevalence and the associations between eating disorder diagnoses and demographic factors in adolescent patients since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining adolescent patients (aged 12 to 21) with an eating disorder (ED) diagnosis documented between January 2019 and July 2023 using Epic Systems Corporation’s Cosmos, a de-identified dataset aggregated from electronic health record (EHR) data. We examined the differences in demographic factors by utilizing chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis rank sum tests. Results: A total of 82,435 distinct adolescent and young adult patients with eating disorder diagnoses were included in the analytical dataset. The overall prevalence of EDs has increased since 2019. The median age of patients with an ED decreased between 2019 and 2023. There was a decrease in other eating disorder diagnoses and an increase in avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) during the study period. There was a decrease in the proportion of individuals who identified as White and an increase in the proportion of adolescents from historically minoritized racial and ethnic groups (i.e., African American or Black and Hispanic). There was also an increase, during this study period, in the proportion of adolescents with an ED diagnosis who were from more socially vulnerable communities. Conclusions: Our study describes the changes in the prevalence of sociodemographic factors in adolescent patients with EDs since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further studies should address screening, diagnostic, and treatment barriers for EDs in historically underserved communities. Full article

Background: The burden of liver cirrhosis correlated with diabetes mellitus (DM) poses a significant public health challenge in the United States. Both conditions independently contribute to high morbidity and mortality rates. While extensive individual analyses have been conducted, US trends in comorbid liver cirrhosis-DM-related mortality remain unexplored. This study seeks to investigate mortality trends associated with the simultaneous occurrence of liver cirrhosis and DM among U.S. adults over the period from 1999 to 2020. Methods: We conducted a descriptive analysis using publicly available mortality data from the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 individuals were calculated using the 2000 U.S. standard population. Trends were stratified by year, age, sex, race/ethnicity, urbanization, region, and state. Joinpoint regression analysis was employed to determine annual percentage changes (APCs) and assess statistical significance (p < 0.05). Results: A total of 90,418 deaths were recorded among adults with both cirrhosis and DM between 1999 and 2020. The overall AAMR increased from 1.02/100,000 in 1999 to 1.78/100,000 in 2020, reflecting a significant upward trend in mortality. The highest mortality rates were observed in non-metropolitan regions, in the South, and among males, older adults (65+), and NH American Indian or Alaska Native and Hispanic populations. All demographic groups exhibited a pronounced mortality surge between 2018 and 2020. A state-level analysis revealed notable disparities, with Oklahoma and Texas presenting the highest AAMRs. Conclusions: Liver cirrhosis and diabetes-related mortality have been steadily increasing over the past two decades, with notable disparities in demographics and regions. These findings underscore the urgent necessity for targeted prevention, early intervention, and policy-level strategies specifically designed for high-risk populations to reduce future mortality rates in the US and ultimately, globally. Full article

Introduction: Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are strong predictors of cardiometabolic diseases, which disproportionately affect individuals across gender, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. We aim to estimate and test the temporal trends in the prevalence of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance (IR) by sociodemographic groups among nondiabetic adults in the United States from 1999 to 2018. Methods: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2018. We fitted linear and joinpoint logistic regression models to test the sample weighted and age-standardized time trends for linear and nonlinear trends in the prevalence of hyperinsulinemia and IR, respectively. Results: We included 17,310 nondiabetic men and nonpregnant women aged 20 years or older. The age-standardized prevalence of hyperinsulinemia increased from 28.2% in 1999–2000 to 41.4% in 2017–2018, with IR prevalence similarly rising from 24.8% in 1999–2000 to 38.4% in 2017–2018. Across the entire period examined, individuals who were male; non-Hispanic Black; Hispanic; or had a lower educational level or lower family income consistently had a higher prevalence of hyperinsulinemia and IR than other groups. We found increasing temporal trends in the prevalence of hyperinsulinemia and IR for all the sociodemographic subgroups, at least in some periods from 1999 to 2018. Conclusions: There was an increased age-standardized prevalence of hyperinsulinemia and IR among nondiabetic adults in the US across each defined sociodemographic group from 1999 to 2018. The difference in prevalence across subgroups underscores the need for designing personalized and targeted interventions to address disparities. Full article

Health disparities among populations across geographic regions, demographic and socio-economic groups are well documented; however, ecological studies which visually demonstrate health disparities associated with structural racism among racialized populations are limited. The purpose of this study was to examine low birthweight (LBW) as a measurable indicator of disproportionate health impacts across three race/ethnicity groups—non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic and non-Hispanic White–in the United States (US) for visualizing ecological manifestation of this disparity attributed to structural racism. We begin by providing the contextual background of structural racism through a literature review, and then more specifically, we examine LBW as a selected health indicator characterized with a socio-biological pathway of structural racism via socio-economic and politico–legal determinants and associated mediating factors to health disparities, from which we synthesized a visualization model with the indicators of structural racism reported in the literature reviewed. To further visualize these impacts, publicly available US County Health Ranking data for LBW, at the county level in two US states, Tennessee and Ohio, were analyzed to uncover area-based ecological health outcome—LBW. Significant correlation and scatter plots provided evidence of LBW as a racially sensitive health indicator associated with impacts of structural racism. These findings were further notable through examination of socio-economic determinants (e.g., race/ethnicity, income, education, and employment) and environmental factors such as housing issues as well as other underlying health conditions. Our case study has opened a window for visualizing disparity across non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic White populations as demonstrated by the prevalence of LBW disparity through its determinants and mediating factors at the county level. Potentially important policy implications for reparative change are drawn through our study findings that are salutary and/or reductive for addressing impacts of structural racism. Further studies are needed to fully understand the comprehensive web of area-based ecological factors impacting various health outcomes through the impacts of structural racism. Full article

Purpose: Because of shared mechanisms such as decreased access to health care, rurality and poverty may act synergistically to decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of SEER data (22 registries) with census tract-level measures of poverty/rurality for the period 2006–2015. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regressions were applied to examine the independent and intersectional associations of persistent poverty and rurality on 5-year cause-specific CRC survival across five racial/ethnic groups. Results: Among 532,868 CRC patients, non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) demonstrated lower 5-year survival probability (64.2% vs. 68.3% in non-Hispanic Whites [NHW], 66.5% in American Indian/Alaska Natives [AI/AN], 72.1% in Asian/Pacific Islanders, and 68.7% in Hispanic groups) (p-value < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, CRC patients living in rural areas with poverty were at a 1.2–1.6-fold increased risk of CRC death than those who did not live in these areas in five racial/ethnic groups. In particular, AI/AN patients living in rural areas with poverty were 66% more likely to die from CRC (95% CI, 1.32, 2.08). Conclusions: CRC patients who live in rural or poverty areas in SEER areas in the U.S. have a poorer survival compared with those who do not live in such areas regardless of race/ethnicity. Significantly greater risk of CRC death was observed in AI/ANs. Impact: Patient navigators, community education or screening, and other health care system interventions may be helpful to address these disparities by socioeconomic status, race, and geographic residence. Multi-level interventions aimed at institutional racism and medical mistrust may also be helpful. Full article

Objectives: The United States has been greatly impacted by the opioid overdose epidemic, and fentanyl has largely contributed to the rise in overdose deaths in the past decade. We have analyzed trends in fentanyl-related mortality amongst adolescents and young adults (AYAs) to further describe emerging trends by ethnicity, gender, and age. Methods: We used mortality data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) Multiple Cause of Death file from 2009 to 2022. Drug overdose mortalities were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Joinpoint regression was used to examine mortality rates involving fentanyl by ethnicity (Hispanic and non-Hispanic), gender, and age category. Results: The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) for fentanyl-involved mortality increased for all adolescents and young adults within the United States from 2009 to 2022. The greatest AAPCs for fentanyl-related mortalities occurred amongst, Hispanic AYAs, Male AYAs, and 13–18-year-olds. Conclusions: Significant increases in fentanyl-related mortalities have occurred in AYAs from 2009 to 2022. Disparities by ethnicity and emerging trends in gender and age category highlight the need for targeted approaches to help aid in reducing fentanyl-involved mortality amongst AYAs. There is an urgent need for harm reduction and public health efforts to address this escalating crisis. Full article

Background/Objectives: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as diagnosis before age 50, has been rising at an alarming rate, with Hispanic/Latino (H/L) individuals experiencing the most significant increases in both incidence and mortality. Despite this growing public health concern, the molecular mechanisms driving EOCRC disparities remain poorly understood. Oncogenic pathways such as WNT, TGF-beta, and RTK/RAS are critical in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression, yet their specific roles in EOCRC across diverse populations have not been extensively studied. This research seeks to identify molecular alterations within these pathways by comparing EOCRC cases in H/L and non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. Furthermore, we explore the clinical significance of these findings to inform precision medicine strategies tailored to high-risk populations. Methods: To investigate mutation frequencies in genes associated with the WNT, TGF-beta, and RTK/RAS pathways, we conducted a bioinformatics analysis using publicly available CRC datasets. The study cohort consisted of 3412 patients, including 302 H/L and 3110 NHW individuals. The patients were categorized based on age (EOCRC: <50 years; late-onset CRC [LOCRC]: ≥50 years) and population group (H/L vs. NHW) to assess variations in mutation prevalence. Statistical comparisons of mutation rates between the groups were conducted using chi-squared tests, while Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate overall survival differences associated with pathway alterations. Results: Notable molecular distinctions in the RTK/RAS pathway were identified between EOCRC and LOCRC among the H/L patients, with EOCRC exhibiting a lower frequency of RTK/RAS alterations compared to LOCRC (66.7% vs. 79.3%, p = 0.01). Within this pathway, mutations in CBL (p < 0.05) and NF1 (p < 0.05) were significantly more prevalent in the EOCRC cases (5.8% vs. 1.2% and 11.6% vs. 3.7%, respectively), whereas BRAF mutations were notably less frequent in EOCRC than in LOCRC (5.1% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.05). Comparisons between the EOCRC patients from the H/L and NHW populations revealed distinct pathway-specific alterations that were more common in the H/L individuals. These included RNF43 mutations (12.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.05) in the WNT pathway, BMPR1A mutations (5.1% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.05) in the TGF-beta pathway, and multiple RTK/RAS pathway alterations, such as MAPK3 (3.6% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.05), CBL (5.8% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.05), and NF1 (11.6% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.05). Survival analysis in the H/L EOCRC patients did not reveal statistically significant differences based on pathway alterations. However, in the NHW EOCRC patients, the presence of WNT pathway alterations was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes, suggesting potential ethnicity-specific prognostic implications. Conclusions: This study highlights the substantial molecular heterogeneity present in EOCRC, particularly among high-risk populations. The H/L EOCRC patients exhibited distinct genetic alterations, with a higher prevalence of CBL, NF1, RNF43, BMPR1A, and MAPK3 mutations compared to their NHW counterparts. Additionally, RTK/RAS pathway alterations were less frequent in EOCRC than in LOCRC. Despite these molecular differences, pathway alterations did not significantly impact survival outcomes in the H/L EOCRC patients. However, in the NHW EOCRC patients, the presence of WNT pathway alterations was associated with improved survival. These findings emphasize the necessity for further research to clarify the molecular mechanisms driving EOCRC disparities in high-risk populations and to inform precision medicine strategies for underrepresented groups. Full article

Background/Objectives: Recently, the term metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has replaced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Through analysis of the trends and disparities regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD) among individuals with MASLD, identifying the leading cause of death in this population is crucial. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988–1994) and NHANES 2017–2020 data. MASLD was identified by using clinical profiles and liver ultrasonography to exclude other liver diseases. We estimated the prevalence of CVD among individuals with MASLD and calculated the prevalence ratios for those with and without MASLD. Results: In 2017–2020, MASLD affected 31.2% or 61.9 million US adults, and 17.0% (95% confidence interval: 13.7–20.3%) of these individuals had CVD. The absolute CVD prevalence in individuals with MASLD doubled from that in the NHANES III cohort, which was 8.7% (6.4%, 10.9%). These increases were especially notable among older adults, non-Hispanic whites, and those with higher education and income. Individuals with MASLD had a higher prevalence of total CVD than those without MASLD, even after adjusting for socioeconomic and metabolic factors. These differences were more pronounced in younger age groups. Conclusions: This study revealed a doubled 30-year trend in CVD prevalence among adults with MASLD in the US. Sociodemographic disparities emphasize the need for tailored screening, prevention, and policy measures to address gaps and promote cardiovascular health in this population. Full article

Background/Objectives: Sparse data exist identifying racial/ethnic outcome disparities among patients with lung cancer, specifically regarding healthcare utilization patterns, such as emergency department visits and outpatient follow-ups. We aimed to utilize our large, multicenter, and ethnically diverse integrated health system to assess for such disparities among patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer. Methods: The cohort comprised all patients undergoing pulmonary resections for lung cancer at our integrated health system from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. Outcomes including the length of stay (LOS), 30-day return to the emergency department (30d-ED), 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day outpatient appointments, and 30- and 90-day overall mortality were compared by race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic and linear models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, procedure approach, neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), cancer stage, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and insurance. Results: Of the 645 included patients, non-Hispanic White patients tended to be older and live in the least deprived neighborhoods. Among each race/ethnicity, the percentage of patients insured by Medicaid was highest among Asian patients. On bivariate analysis, only the outcome of surgical outpatient appointments within 30 days had differing distributions by race/ethnicity with no other significant associations between race/ethnicity and other outcomes; however, multivariable analysis showed Asian patients having lower odds of 30d-ED (adjusted odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.27–0.98) while those with Medicaid insurance had higher odds of 30d-ED (adjusted odds ratio 3.29; 95% CI 1.26–8.59). Conclusions: Despite parity across clinical outcomes, some patient encounter-related differences still exist within our system. To better understand racial/ethnic disparities in care, systems must track such disparities in addition to clinical outcomes. Full article

Objectives: Social factors play a crucial role in health outcomes for pediatric patients, yet in the neurosurgery pediatric literature, these factors are rarely reported. To develop a deeper understanding of pediatric spine trauma outcomes, we investigate demographic and social factors measured by the Child Opportunity Index (COI) and Social Deprivation Index (SDI). We hypothesize that social factors predict clinical presentation, injury severity, and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients treated for spinal trauma at a Level 1 trauma center in Sacramento, California. We collected patient clinical data such as mechanisms of injury (MOIs), length of stay (LOS), treatment type, hospital disposition, polytrauma incidence, and follow-up attendance. Each patient’s social environment was characterized using COI and SDI metrics. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess associations between social factors and clinical outcomes. Results: Patients with worse childhood opportunity (lower COI and higher SDI) were more likely to be insured through Medi-Cal, identify as Hispanic, and experience violent MOI. Female patients were more likely to sustain polytrauma and had a higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention. Additionally, patients from underserved communities demonstrated longer hospital stays and poorer follow-up adherence, with COI and SDI scores correlating with these disparities. Conclusion: Social disparities are associated with worse outcomes in pediatric spine trauma. We found COI and SDI to be valuable clinical metrics, motivating further research to be carried out at the state and national levels. These findings highlight health disparities in pediatric spine trauma. Full article

Although breastfeeding provides health benefits to both mother and child, this study aimed to explore whether disparities in breastfeeding continue to exist, particularly among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) mothers and children. We performed a cross-sectional analysis among 19,830 children in the United States (US) using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1999 to 2020. Breastfeeding initiation and duration rates increased overall from 1999 to 2020. Children who were ever breastfed were more likely to have higher body weight, older mothers, mothers who did not smoke during pregnancy, a higher family poverty–income ratio (PIR), food security, mothers in excellent health, and mothers who had not seen a mental health professional in the past year. NHB children were breastfed at significantly lower rates and for shorter duration than non-Hispanic White (NHW), Mexican, Other Hispanic, and Other/Multi-Racial children. NHB children were breastfed less than other racial groups, including minority Mexican children with similar average PIR, suggesting a possible unique experience for NHB mothers and children. Strategies include impacting social norms and offering culturally tailored breastfeeding supports. The provision of structural supports to remove barriers to breastfeeding is a social justice issue. Breastfeeding confers health benefits to mother and child, and disparities exist among mothers and children, particularly among NHB mothers and children. The current study provides data on the most recent breastfeeding trends, showing that these disparities by race/ethnicity are present. Interestingly, even among Mexican participants of a similar PIR, NHB children were still breastfed less. Full article

Epidemiological data show racial and ethnic differences exist in breast cancer morbidity and mortality amongst Black, Indigenous, Asian, and Hispanic populations, with non-white females experiencing earlier age at diagnosis, more aggressive breast cancer subtypes and advanced cancer stages, and earlier mortality than white females. However, the current Canadian breast cancer screening guidelines recommend biannual screening for all females starting from age 50 to age 74 and suggest not to screen individuals aged 40–49. In May 2024, the Canadian Task Force for Preventative Health released updated draft breast cancer screening guidelines, maintaining such recommendations for screening. Both the existing and the proposed guidelines fail to account for the unique cancer burden amongst racialized populations in Canada and risk further perpetuation of existing racial and ethnic disparities by underscreening racialized females. This commentary will present data regarding racial disparities in cancer burden, highlighting the role social and biological factors play in impacting cancer risk and age of disease and presenting perspectives from stakeholder groups reflecting the impacts of current screening guidelines. Ultimately, we critique the current “one-size-fits-all” approach to breast cancer screening in Canada, emphasizing the need for adapted screening practices with the understanding that the current approaches overlook the needs of racialized Canadian populations. Full article