Search Results (25)

Background and Clinical Significance: Complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAc) involving visceral and renal vessels can be treated via open surgery or less invasive fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) minimizes contrast and radiation while improving placement accuracy, though its specific role in FEVAR remains understudied. This CARE-compliant article reports a FEVAR case guided by IVUS. Case Presentation: A 75-year-old male with multiple comorbidities presented with an enlarging AAAc extending to the renal artery ostia, lacking an adequate neck. Anatomical variants included a left renal artery with a caudal origin (pelvic left kidney), a left renal polar artery originating from the right common iliac artery, and a patent inferior mesenteric artery (<3 mm). Following multidisciplinary evaluation, the patient successfully underwent simultaneous FEVAR and coronary angiography. Guided by IVUS, the fenestrated endograft was deployed with preserved visceral patency. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on postoperative day two. A 30-day CT angiogram detected a stable inferior mesenteric artery endoleak, managed conservatively through a 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: IVUS-guided FEVAR may offer a promising alternative to traditional angiography, reducing radiation and contrast exposure. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish clinical and economic benefits. Full article

Background: To present perioperative and follow-up outcomes of physician-modified endograft (PMEG) repair for juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods: This PRISMA 2020 systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261340339). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until December 2025. Eligible reports described full-text-confirmed cohorts of at least five patients treated with PMEG. The strict primary analysis required endpoint-separable juxtarenal or pararenal populations and used random-effects generalized linear mixed models for pooled proportions. Methodological quality and evidence certainty were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and GRADE framework. Results: Fifteen eligible reports described 981 patients before overlap adjudication; 10 reports originated from one institution and contained overlapping populations. After pathology and endpoint-level overlap adjudication, one to four independent populations informed each endpoint estimate, and single-source outcomes were not pooled. Technical success was 97.8% (95% CI, 94.8–99.1%; three populations, 228 patients), and 30-day mortality was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.1–4.8%; four populations, 299 patients). Acute kidney injury, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia occurred in 4.5%, 1.6%, and 1.7% of patients, respectively. During available follow-up, the single-source Type III endoleak estimate was 3.4% (7/203), any reintervention was 13.2% (95% CI, 2.9–43.7%; two populations, 217 patients; I² = 89.0%), and patient-level target-vessel occlusion was 2.4% (95% CI, 0.6–9.1%; 2 populations, 83 patients). Follow-up estimates were exploratory report-period proportions. GRADE certainty was very low for all key outcomes. Conclusions: PMEG repair demonstrated a high technical-feasibility signal and low observed early event rates in experienced centers, but clinical effectiveness and durability remain uncertain. The evidence base is dominated by overlapping expert-center reports and should not be interpreted as establishing equivalence or superiority to custom-manufactured FEVAR. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study compared the hemodynamic performance of fenestrated (FEVAR), branched (BEVAR), and chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (chEVAR) in patients with complex aortic aneurysms. Methods: The pre- (native) and post-endovascular repair (endograft-defined) blood lumen was reconstructed from computed tomography angiographies of nine (9) elective patients treated with FEVAR (n = 3), BEVAR (n = 3), and chEVAR (n = 3). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations obtained blood flow properties. Velocity magnitude, wall shear stress (WSS), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and local normalized helicity (LNH) were computed at peak systole and mid-diastole. The hemodynamic data were statistically analyzed to evaluate correlations between FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR, focusing on targeted visceral arteries. Results: Only slight differences were observed regarding RRT, OSI, and TAWSS between FEVAR and BEVAR, whereas the chEVAR group demonstrated a marked deviation from both. In FEVAR, the postoperative helical flow structures appeared more compact, while in BEVAR they were more developed and exhibited a more rotational configuration. The LNH of the visceral vessel patterns exhibited similar qualitative features across groups. Regarding TAWSS, higher values were found in BEVAR, whereas chEVAR showed the lowest. Conclusions: FEVAR, BEVAR, and chEVAR improved postoperative blood flow characteristics toward near-physiological conditions, reducing undesired flow patterns and recirculation zones. FEVAR showed more stable visceral flow, and BEVAR demonstrated higher flow rates and fewer recirculation zones, while chEVAR exhibited more streamlined visceral artery flow with reduced regurgitation at bridging stent entries. Despite variations, all approaches effectively preserved visceral artery perfusion. Full article

Background and Objectives: Hostile iliofemoral anatomy (HIA) challenges large-bore access in thoracic, branched, or fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (t/b/fEVAR). Retroperitoneal open iliac conduit (ROIC) enables safe delivery, but data in complex t/b/fEVAR are scarce. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study (2017–2025) of 80 t/b/fEVAR patients followed STROBE guidelines. Eight (10%) required elective ROIC for HIA (small iliac diameter < 7 mm or occlusive disease). Outcomes were compared to 23 no-conduit complex endovascular aortic repair cases. Results: ROIC patients [50% female, 87.5% smokers] had higher PAD [62.5% vs. 17.4%, p-value = 0.015]. All ROICs were elective [vs. 69.5% no-conduit, p-value = 0.076]; indications: Type V TAAA [50%], synchronous aneurysms (25%), Type II TAAA [12.5%] and arch aneurysm [12.5%]. Median operative time [365 vs. 200 min, p-value = 0.002], blood loss [1190 vs. 600 cc, p-value < 0.001], and contrast [420 vs. 300 cc, p-value = 0.004] were higher. Technical success was 100% [8/8] vs. 86.9% [20/23] (p-value = 0.28), and clinical success was 87.5% vs. 78.2% (p-value = 0.569). Median ICU stay [3 d vs. 2 d, p-value = 0.817] and hospital stay [12 d vs. 9 d, p-value = 0.404] were prolonged, albeit without statistically significant differences. In-hospital mortality was similar (12.5% vs. 17.4%, p-value = 0.746) between groups. One ROIC patient had intraoperative cardiac arrest [sheath dislodgement]; another required a covered stent for anastomotic rupture. At 12-month follow-up, one Type III endoleak required relining. Conclusions: Planned retroperitoneal open iliac conduits achieved 100% technical success in patients with hostile iliofemoral anatomy, without ischemic complications, despite longer operative times and higher blood loss. ROIC remains a safe and indispensable technique that extends complex endovascular aortic repair to otherwise ineligible patients. Full article

This is a single-center study about upward facing in branched endovascular aortic repair. Background: The evolution of branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) has introduced upward-facing branches as a novel approach to facilitate exclusive transfemoral access in complex aortic aneurysm repair. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of custom-made BEVAR devices incorporating upward-facing branches in patients with cranially oriented renal arteries. The investigation further aims to analyze the technical success and mid-term outcomes related to these novel devices, as well as to identify any challenges or complications specific to the use of upward-facing branches in clinical practice. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 17 patients treated at a single center between January 2020 and December 2024 using custom-made Cook Medical branched stent grafts with at least one upward-facing branch. Demographics, comorbidities, target vessel details, bridging stent graft (BSG) configurations, and procedure-related complications were collected. The primary endpoints were technical success and branch patency. Secondary endpoints included short- and mid-term branch-related complications. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 70 years, with hypertension (88%) and coronary artery disease (47%) being common comorbidities. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. The left renal artery was the most frequently targeted vessel (63.2%). Most upward-facing branches were bridged using a combination of balloon-expandable and self-expandable stents. One patient (5.9%) experienced a renal bleeding complication requiring embolization. There were no cases of primary stent occlusion or dislocation. At a mean follow-up of 14 months, one asymptomatic occlusion of an upward-facing branch was detected in computed tomography angiography. No further upward-facing branch-related complications occurred, and 1-year follow-up was available in 41.2% of patients. Conclusions: In our single-center study including 17 patients, upward-facing branches in BEVAR demonstrate high technical success and a low complication rate, offering a promising alternative to traditional access strategies. These findings support broader adoption in select anatomical scenarios, pending larger comparative studies and longer-term data collection. Full article

Background: Fenestrated stentgrafting has become a first-line treatment for juxtarenal aneurysms, and the incorporation of all renovisceral vessels with fenestrations has become common to increase the proximal sealing zone. This increases the complexity of the repair compared to using fewer fenestrations, and stenting of the celiac artery (CA), in particular, can be technically challenging. Objective: This study evaluates the mid-term outcomes of leaving the celiac artery unstented during quadruple fenestrated stentgrafting for complex aortic aneurysms. Additionally, it explores the clinical and anatomical factors that influence the decision to not stent the celiac artery. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with complex aortic aneurysms who underwent elective fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) between 2018 and 2023. Custom Cook Zenith grafts were used, and all patients underwent preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) as well as follow-up CTA to assess the celiac artery. This study evaluated celiac artery anatomic factors, such as proximal and distal diameter; presence of stenosis (<50% or >50%) and patency; length of any CA stenosis; CA takeoff angulation, CA tortuosity, early CA division; calcification; and presence of CA aneurysm or ectasia anatomical abnormalities. Recorded outcomes of CA instability included any stent stenosis, target vessel occlusion, reintervention, or endoleak (types 1C and 3). Results: A total of 101 patients underwent FEVAR, with 72 receiving a stent in the celiac artery and 29 not receiving it. Rates of technical success (96.5% vs. 100%), intervention times (256 min vs. 237 min), and lengths of hospital stay (5.1 vs. 4.7 days) were similar between unstented vs. stented groups. At one year, no significant difference in celiac artery instability was noted (17.2 vs. 5.5%; p = 0.06). Risk factors for CA occlusion on univariate analysis included a steep takeoff angle (≥140°), length of stenosis >6.5 mm, proximal diameter ≤6.5 mm, preoperative stenosis ≥50%, and celiac artery tortuosity. Conclusions: Anatomical features of the CA impact the ability to achieve routine CA stenting during FEVAR. Selectively not stenting the celiac artery during FEVAR might simplify the procedure without compromising patient safety and mid-term outcomes. Full article

The natural history of focal non-infected lesions of the abdominal aorta (fl-AA) remains unclear and largely depends on their aetiology. These lesions often involve a focal “tear” or partial disruption of the arterial wall. Penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) and intramural hematomas (IMHs) are examples of focal tears in the aortic wall that can either progress to dilatation (saccular aneurysm) or fail to fully propagate through the medial layers, potentially leading to aortic dissection. These conditions typically exhibit a morphology consistent with eccentric saccular aneurysms. The management of focal non-infected pathologies of the abdominal aorta remains a subject of debate. Unlike fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysms, the inconsistent definitions and limited information regarding the natural history of saccular aneurysms (sa-AAAs) have prevented the establishment of universally accepted practice guidelines for their management. As emphasized in the latest 2024 ESVS guidelines, the focal nature of these diseases makes them ideal candidates for endovascular repair (class of evidence IIa—level C). Moreover, the Society for Vascular Surgery just referred to aneurysm diameter as an indication for treatment suggesting using a smaller diameter compared to fusiform aneurysms. Consequently, the management of saccular aneurysms is likely heterogeneous amongst different centres and different operators. Endovascular repair using tube stent grafts offers benefits like reduced recovery times but carries risks of migration and endoleak due to graft rigidity. These complications can influence long-term success. In this context, the use of endovascular bifurcated grafts may provide a more effective solution for treating these focal aortic pathologies. It is essential to achieve optimal sealing regions through anatomical studies of aortic morphology. Additionally, understanding the anatomical characteristics of focal lesions in challenging necks or para-visceral locations is indeed crucial in device choice. Off-the-shelf devices are favoured for their time and cost efficiency, but new endovascular technologies like fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and custom-made devices enhance treatment success and patient safety. These innovations provide stent grafts in various lengths and diameters, accommodating different aortic anatomies and reducing the risk of type III endoleaks. Although complicated PAUs and focal saccular aneurysms rarely arise in the para-visceral aorta, the consequences of rupture in this segment might be extremely severe. Experience borrowed from complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair demonstrates that fenestrated and branched devices can be deployed safely when anatomical criteria are respected. Elective patients derive the greatest benefit from a fenestrated graft, while urgent cases can be treated confidently with off-the-shelf multibranch systems, reserving other types of repairs for emergent or bail-out cases. While early outcomes of these interventions are promising, it is crucial to acknowledge that limited aortic coverage can still impede effective symptom relief and lead to complications such as aneurysm expansion or rupture. Therefore, further long-term studies are essential to consolidate the technical results and evaluate the durability of various graft options. Full article

Background/Objectives: We sought to demonstrate the versatility and economy of physician-modified endograft (PMEG) fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) based on the Treo (Terumo Aortic) platform for patients referred for custom-made device (CMD) FEVAR due to a complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (CAAA). Endovascular planning was performed utilizing a standardized design incorporating all visceral arteries with a low supra-celiac landing zone. The pure cost of the aortic components was compared between the PMEG and CMD designs. Methods: A total of 39 consecutive patients treated with CMD FEVAR due to a CAAA between September 2018 and December 2023 were recruited at a tertiary vascular center for a retrospective evaluation. Endovascular planning was performed on readily available computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets using 3Mensio Vascular (Pie Medical Imaging) software. The actual cost of the major components was compared between the implanted CMD platform produced by Cook and the planned Treo-based PMEG repair. Results: A total of 155 fenestrations were planned on 3 triple-, 34 quadruple-, and two quintuple-fenestrated devices. The 90 mm distance between the proximal edge and the flow divider of the 120 mm long main body of the Treo graft allowed for the placement of all necessary fenestrations of the target arteries without the need to reduce the 3 cm supra-celiac landing zone while also preserving a safety distance of >1 cm to the flow divider. The costs of the components were EUR 33896 for CMD and EUR 8878 for a PMEG. Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests that a quadruple-fenestrated PMEG based on the Treo bifurcation is a highly versatile alternative with a significant price advantage over custom-made devices for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. Full article

Pathophysiological conditions in arteries, such as stenosis or aneurysms, have a great impact on blood flow dynamics enforcing the numerical study of such pathologies. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) could provide the means for the calculation and interpretation of pressure and velocity fields, wall stresses, and important biomedical factors in such pathologies. Additionally, most of these pathological conditions are connected with geometric vessel changes. In this study, the numerical solution of the 2D flow in a branching artery and a multiscale model of 3D flow are presented utilizing CFD. In the 3D case, a multiscale approach (3D and 0D–1D) is pursued, in which a dynamically altered velocity parabolic profile is applied at the inlet of the geometry. The obtained waveforms are derived from a 0D–1D mathematical model of the entire arterial tree. The geometries of interest are patient-specific 3D reconstructed abdominal aortic aneurysms after fenestrated (FEVAR) and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR). Critical hemodynamic parameters such as velocity, wall shear stress, time averaged wall shear stress, and local normalized helicity are presented, evaluated, and compared. Full article

Background: The aim of this case series is to describe technical considerations and preliminary outcomes of preventive aneurysm sac embolization during fenestrated or branched EVAR (embo F/BEVAR technique). Methods: Five male patients suffering from juxtarenal or pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, preoperatively identified as being at “high risk” of type 2 endoleak (EL2) development, were treated with embo F/BEVAR. The patients presented at least two of these risk factors: patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) > 3 mm; more than three pairs of patent lumbar arteries (LAAs); more than two pairs of LAAs, associated with an accessory efferent artery or at least a pair of intercostal arteries; aneurysm thrombus volume < 40%; aneurysm sac diameter > 65 mm. Embo F/BEVAR was performed with 15 × 20 mm MReye Inconel coils (Cook Medical, Limerick, Ireland), using different aortic endografts. Results: Technical success was 100%, with no complications related to perioperative or postoperative coils implantation. An average number of 11 ± 4.4 coils/patient was deployed. No reinterventions were observed during the follow-up (12.4 ± 3.6 months). One case of EL2 (20%) was detected during the follow-up, without aneurysm sac enlargement. Conclusions: According to this preliminary experience, embo F/BEVAR technique with Inconel coils seems a feasible adjunctive procedure to manage the risk of EL2 after FEVAR or BEVAR, allowing a simple follow-up with low levels of scatter artifacts, and ensuring limited additional procedural costs. Moreover, embo F/BEVAR can be used with different endografts, requiring minimal increases in operating times. Further studies with larger cohorts of patients and longer follow-up periods are mandatory to better define the potential of this technique and its limitations. Full article

Purpose: This paper aims to describe a straightforward, efficient, and reliable technique to simplify cannulation maneuvers during aortic branched endograft repair. Technique: The suggested approach utilizes the Penumbra Neuron Select catheter, which combines diagnostic, sizing, and support capabilities in one. This has the potential to reduce procedural time and minimize the need for serial catheter and guidewire exchanges. Conclusions: The proposed technique offers a simple yet effective tool to mitigate the risk of vessel loss and injury, and to streamline complex aortic repair procedures. Full article

Comparative sonographic examination of the renal resistance index (RRI) can provide evidence of renal artery stenosis. The extent to which the RRI is changed after stent graft implantation is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of stent graft implantation into non-diseased renal arteries during endovascular treatment of pararenal aortic aneurysms on the RRI. Sonographic examinations of the kidneys were conducted using a GE ultrasound system. The evaluation was performed according to the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2D standard criteria. RRI values were determined in consecutive patients on the day before and after stent graft implantation and compared for each kidney. A total of 32 consecutive patients (73.9 ± 8.2 years, 5 females, 27 males) were treated with a fenestrated or branched aortic stent graft including bridging stent graft implantations into both renal arteries and received pre- and postinterventional examinations. Sonomorphologically, the examined kidneys were inconspicuous. The arborisation of the renal perfusion was preserved pre- and post-implantation. The RRI did not differ (0.66 ± 0.06 versus 0.67 ± 0.07; p = ns). Successful stent graft implantation into non-stenosed renal arteries did not lead to a relevant change in RRI. Therefore, the RRI is a suitable tool for assessing renal perfusion after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic therapy. Full article

Acute limb ischemia due to limb-graft occlusion (LGO) after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and acute bypass graft occlusion with an ePTFE graft pose critical challenges, necessitating prompt intervention to prevent limb loss. This paper discusses two cases of acute limb ischemia treated with a hybrid approach using the AngioJet™ Ultra Thrombectomy System as an adjunct to Fogarty thrombectomy. Case I involved a 69-year-old male post-FEVAR with contralateral iliac limb graft occlusion of the fenestrated Anaconda™, while Case II featured a 70-year-old male (ASA IV) post-bypass surgery (iliopopliteal arterial bypass with ePTFE Graft) with acute bypass graft occlusion. Both cases underwent successful recanalization using the AngioJet™ Ultra Thrombectomy System (ZelanteDVT™ 8F catheter, Solent™ Proxi 6F catheter) (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), combined with adjunctive techniques including Fogarty thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, stenting, and local lysis. Immediate postoperative and follow-up assessments after 6 months revealed restored limb perfusion and improved clinical outcomes, with palpable pulses and improved ulcer healing. The aim of this treatment strategy is not only to alleviate limb ischemia but also to preserve future options in the event of graft failure. The use of the AngioJet™ Thrombectomy System in cases of LGO aims not only to clear the thrombus load but also to avoid the need for graft relining. In the case of acute arterial bypass graft occlusion in a patient with ASA IV, the goal of using the thrombectomy device is to preserve the native vessels for future procedures, such as long infragenual bypass, in addition to limb salvage. These cases demonstrate the efficacy of a hybrid surgical approach in managing acute limb ischemia following graft occlusion following FEVAR and bypass surgery. Long-term follow-up will further elucidate the durability of these interventions and their impact on limb salvage and overall patient outcomes. By combining mechanical thrombectomy with adjunctive techniques, such as balloon angioplasty and stenting, this hybrid approach offers a comprehensive solution to acute limb ischemia, addressing both the underlying occlusive pathology and ensuring optimal limb perfusion. Furthermore, the utilization of the AngioJet™ Ultra Thrombectomy System provides a minimally invasive yet effective method for thrombus removal, reducing procedural time and potential complications associated with open surgical techniques. As such, this approach represents a valuable addition to the armamentarium of treatments for acute limb ischemia, particularly in cases of graft occlusion following complex endovascular and bypass procedures. Full article

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is becoming increasingly popular around the world not only in engineering but also in the medical industry. This trend is visible, especially in aortic modeling for both training and treatment purposes. As a result of advancements in 3D technology, patients can be offered personalized treatment of aortic lesions via physician-modified stent grafts (PMSG), which can be tailored to the specific vascular conditions of the patient. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the utility of 3D printing in PMSG in aortic lesion repair by examining procedure time and complications. Methods: The systematic review has been performed using the PRISMA 2020 Checklist and PRISMA 2020 flow diagram and following the Cochrane Handbook. The systematic review has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42024526950. Results: Five studies with a total number of 172 patients were included in the final review. The mean operation time was 249.95± 70.03 min, and the mean modification time was 65.38 ± 10.59 min. The analysis of the results indicated I² of 99% and 100% indicating high heterogeneity among studies. The bias assessment indicated the moderate quality of the included research. Conclusions: The noticeable variance in the reviewed studies’ results marks the need for larger randomized trials as clinical results of 3D printing in PMSG have great potential for patients with aortic lesions in both elective and urgent procedures. Full article

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of target vessel anatomy and post-stenting geometry on the outcome of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR). Methods: A retrospective review of data from a single center was conducted, including all consecutive fenestrated endovascular aortic repairs (f-EVARs) performed between September 2018 and December 2023 for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs). The analysis focused on the correlation of target vessel instability to target vessel anatomy and geometry after stenting. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of target vessel instability. Secondary endpoints were the 30-day and follow-up re-interventions. Results: A total of 136 patients underwent f-EVAR with 481 stented target vessels. A total of ten target vessel instabilities occurred including three in visceral and seven instabilities in renal vessels. The cumulative incidence of target vessel instability with death as the competing risk was 1.4%, 1.8% and 3.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. In renal target vessels (260/481), a diameter ≤ 4 mm (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.035–1.274, p = 0.009) and an aortic protrusion ≥ 5.75 mm (OR 8.21, 95% CI 3.150–12-23, p = 0.027) was associated with an increased target vessel instability. In visceral target vessels (221/481), instability was significantly associated with a preoperative tortuosity index ≥ 1.25 (HR 15.19, CI 95% 2.50–17.47, p = 0.045) and an oversizing ratio of ≥1.25 (HR 7.739, CI % 4.756–12.878, p = 0.049). Conclusions: f-EVAR showed favorable mid-term results concerning target vessel instability in the current cohort. A diameter of ≤4 mm and an aortic protrusion of ≥5.75 mm in the renal target vessels as well as a preoperative tortuosity index and an oversizing of the bridging stent of ≥1.25 in the visceral target vessels should be avoided. Full article