Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (85)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = D-region ionosphere

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 630 KB  
Article
LIR-ACheM: Modelling of the D-Region Response to Solar Flares
by Pauline Teysseyre and Carine Briand
Atmosphere 2026, 17(6), 535; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17060535 - 22 May 2026
Viewed by 257
Abstract
A significant fraction of the HF waves is absorbed by the lowest ionospheric layer, the D-region. This region is perturbed by solar flares, which notably cause fast increases in the Sun’s X-ray flux. We present here a new chemistry model, the “Lower Ionosphere [...] Read more.
A significant fraction of the HF waves is absorbed by the lowest ionospheric layer, the D-region. This region is perturbed by solar flares, which notably cause fast increases in the Sun’s X-ray flux. We present here a new chemistry model, the “Lower Ionosphere Region–Absorption and Chemistry Modelling” (LIR-ACheM), to study the D-region behaviour. It is based on the Mitra–Rowe scheme and takes into account four distinct sources (EUV, Lyman-α, X-rays and cosmic rays) and seven species (electrons, NO+, O2+, O4+, positive cluster ions, O2 and other negative ions). It thus offers a compromise between accuracy and computing time. The D-region’s sluggishness and its recovery time after a flare are analysed, highlighting the importance of detachment at low altitudes and soft X-ray fluxes above 80 km. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ionospheric Responses to Solar Activity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 10840 KB  
Article
Ionospheric Response to Solar Flares at Mid-Latitudes During Geomagnetically Quiet Periods Based on Pruhonice Ionosonde Data 2023–2024
by Júlia Erdey, Attila Buzás, János Lichtenberger and Veronika Barta
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(11), 1675; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18111675 - 22 May 2026
Viewed by 1011
Abstract
The ionosphere is the ionized region of the atmosphere, extending roughly from 60 km to 1000 km in altitude. During flares, the near-Earth space is subjected to high-energy X-ray and EUV (extreme ultraviolet radiation) radiation, which also impacts the ionosphere. The changes in [...] Read more.
The ionosphere is the ionized region of the atmosphere, extending roughly from 60 km to 1000 km in altitude. During flares, the near-Earth space is subjected to high-energy X-ray and EUV (extreme ultraviolet radiation) radiation, which also impacts the ionosphere. The changes in the ionospheric parameters measured by ionosondes, namely the fmin (minimum frequency) and foF2 (F2-layer ordinary-mode critical frequency) values, were examined during solar flares that occurred in geomagnetically quiet conditions (Dst (Disturbance Storm Time index) > −40 nT, Kp (planetary K-index) < 4). The necessary data were obtained by manually evaluating ionograms recorded by the Czech DPS4D ionosonde at Pruhonice (PQ052). The degree of variation was compared to quiet reference days, allowing for the determination of the deviations in the required values (dfmin, dfoF2). The time series of the deviations were investigated. Furthermore, the relationship between the deviations and a “geoeffectiveness” parameter of the solar flare was also examined. The X-ray flux, the solar zenith angle of the station at the time of the event, and the position of the flare on the solar disk were also taken into account for the determination of the “geoeffectiveness” parameter. A positive correlation was observed between dfmin and the geoeffectiveness parameter of the flare, which was more significant than the correlation between the dfoF2 and the geoeffectiveness parameter. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 6835 KB  
Article
Effect of Mountain Terrain near Lightning Channels on Electric Fields at Sprite Halos Initiation Region
by Xin Wang, Jinbo Zhang, Jinxin Wu, Yan Tao, Jiawei Niu, Zhibin Xie and Qilin Zhang
Atmosphere 2026, 17(4), 397; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040397 - 15 Apr 2026
Viewed by 457
Abstract
The electric fields generated by lightning discharges propagate upward and couple with the lower ionosphere, triggering various mesospheric optical emissions. The potential role of local terrain in modulating the lightning-generated electric fields in the lower ionosphere remains poorly understood. To investigate the effect [...] Read more.
The electric fields generated by lightning discharges propagate upward and couple with the lower ionosphere, triggering various mesospheric optical emissions. The potential role of local terrain in modulating the lightning-generated electric fields in the lower ionosphere remains poorly understood. To investigate the effect of mountain terrain on the lightning-generated electric fields at high altitudes (70–85 km), a two-dimensional (2D) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation model was developed. The simplified mountain is parameterized by its height, width, and horizontal distance from the lightning channel. Simulation results show that mountain terrain significantly influences the lightning-driven electric field waveforms in the initiation region of sprite halos. Increased mountain height leads to greater attenuation of the high-altitude electric field amplitudes, thereby suppressing sprite halos initiation. The shielding effect of mountain width on the electric fields is less pronounced than that of mountain height, and it stabilizes when the width exceeds 40 km. When the horizontal distance between the mountain and lightning channel is less than 40 km, the electric field attenuation increases significantly with decreasing distance. The attenuation effect gradually weakens beyond a distance of 40 km, yet the electric field waveforms exhibit considerable fluctuations due to the reflection process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Meteorology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 9568 KB  
Article
Characteristics of Ionospheric Responses over China During the November 2023 Geomagnetic Storm and Evaluation of Positioning Performance of CORS in Low-Latitude Regions
by Linghui Li, Youkun Wang, Junhua Zhang, Jun Tang, Fengjiao Yu, Jintao Wang and Zhichao Zhang
Sensors 2026, 26(7), 2198; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26072198 - 2 Apr 2026
Viewed by 488
Abstract
This study used Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations from the China Crustal Movement Observation Network (CMONOC) and the Kunming Continuously Operating Reference Station (KMCORS) network to investigate ionospheric response characteristics over China during the geomagnetic storm of 4–6 November 2023, and to [...] Read more.
This study used Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations from the China Crustal Movement Observation Network (CMONOC) and the Kunming Continuously Operating Reference Station (KMCORS) network to investigate ionospheric response characteristics over China during the geomagnetic storm of 4–6 November 2023, and to assess their impacts on CORS-based real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning performance in the low-latitude Kunming region. A quantitative assessment was conducted by integrating regional two-dimensional dTEC (%) maps over China, BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) total electron content (TEC), the rate of TEC index (ROTI), and RTK positioning solutions to evaluate ionospheric disturbances, irregularity activity, and associated degradation in positioning performance. Results indicate that, during geomagnetic storms, ionospheric responses over China exhibit pronounced phase-dependent and latitudinal variations. During the second geomagnetic storm on 5–6 November, positive responses were dominant at mid-to-high latitudes, whereas alternating positive and negative responses were observed at low latitudes. During the recovery phase, the Kunming region successively experienced a positive ionospheric storm lasting approximately 10 h, followed by a negative ionospheric storm lasting about 7 h, with relative TEC variations reaching a maximum of approximately 90%. The GEO TEC time series was consistent with the temporal evolution of the two-dimensional dTEC (%), while ROTI increased markedly during the disturbance enhancement period (21:00 UT on 5 November to 07:00 UT on 6 November 2023). During periods of enhanced ionospheric response and irregularities, RTK positioning performance was observed to deteriorate markedly. The fixed-solution rate at medium-to-long baseline stations decreased from nearly 100% to close to 0%, accompanied by an increase in vertical positioning errors to approximately 20 cm, whereas short-baseline stations were only minimally affected. These results indicate that ionospheric disturbances during geomagnetic storms exert a pronounced impact on CORS-based RTK positioning services in the Kunming region, with the magnitude of this impact being closely related to baseline length. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in GNSS Signal Processing and Navigation—Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

40 pages, 3156 KB  
Review
A Review of What Can Be Learnt from Tweeks and Related Topics
by Michael J. Rycroft
Atmosphere 2026, 17(2), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020152 - 30 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 932
Abstract
Tweeks are ELF/VLF radio signals originating from lightning discharges that exhibit dispersion due to their propagation in the Earth-ionosphere waveguide. Examples of the waveforms of tweeks and their dynamic frequency-time spectra are presented and interpreted. Tweeks observed in the daytime and night-time are [...] Read more.
Tweeks are ELF/VLF radio signals originating from lightning discharges that exhibit dispersion due to their propagation in the Earth-ionosphere waveguide. Examples of the waveforms of tweeks and their dynamic frequency-time spectra are presented and interpreted. Tweeks observed in the daytime and night-time are compared and contrasted. Tweeks observed during a solar eclipse are also discussed, as are those due to volcanic lightning and those claimed to be recorded some hours or days before a strong earthquake. The variations of tweek occurrence with season and geomagnetic activity, and with variations of solar radiation over the 11-year solar cycle, are reviewed. Wherever possible, geophysical interpretations are discussed. Theoretical models of tweek waveforms and spectra are considered; they vary according to the lightning current model used, the distance from the source (≥1 Mm), the vertical profile of ionospheric D-region ionisation and the specific mode theory used. The simplest interpretation shows that the first-order tweek cut- off frequency ~1.8 kHz is explained as reflection by the ionosphere at a height of ~83 km where the electron density is ~27 × 106 m−3. More complex interpretations are also reviewed and compared with electron density observations made by rockets and with profiles given by lower ionospheric models such as the International Reference Ionosphere or the Faraday International Reference Ionosphere. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 6704 KB  
Article
Strong Longitudinal and Latitudinal Differences of Ionospheric Responses in North American and European Sectors During the 10–11 October 2024 Geomagnetic Storm
by Xinyue Luo, Ercha Aa, Xin Wang and Bingxian Luo
Remote Sens. 2026, 18(2), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18020256 - 13 Jan 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 774
Abstract
This study examines the spatiotemporal evolution of midlatitude ionospheric disturbances during the intense geomagnetic storm on 10–11 October 2024, focusing on the North American and European sectors. It utilizes multi-instrument datasets from ground-based observations, including Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers and ionosondes, [...] Read more.
This study examines the spatiotemporal evolution of midlatitude ionospheric disturbances during the intense geomagnetic storm on 10–11 October 2024, focusing on the North American and European sectors. It utilizes multi-instrument datasets from ground-based observations, including Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers and ionosondes, supplemented by the measurements from the Swarm, DMSP and GUVI/TIMED satellites. The results reveal significant longitudinal and latitudinal variations in regional ionospheric responses, specifically related to Storm Enhanced Density (SED) and the midlatitude trough. Key findings include: (a) During the main phase of the storm, the North American midlatitude ionosphere exhibited a pronounced longitudinal contrast: a positive SED-driven phase in the west versus a negative trough-dominated phase in the east. In the early recovery phase, the western sector transitioned to a trough-induced negative phase, while the eastern sector showed a positive phase related to auroral particle precipitation during substorms. (b) The North American SED featured a strong northwest-extending plume with a westward shift velocity of 200–300 m/s at 45°N, and a sharp density gradient of 60–65 TECU on its northeastern side, in contrast to the trough. (c) The European sector displayed a “sandwich-like” latitudinal pattern, with “positive–negative–positive” variations during the storm. (d) The European sector’s storm-time trough expanded rapidly equatorward, reaching a minimum of ~35° magnetic latitude (MLAT), while broadening latitudinally to a width of 18–20°. These density gradient structures, along with the longitudinal/latitudinal differences, highlight the dynamic processes occurring in the magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere system during intense storms and contribute to the understanding of storm-response mechanisms across different sectors. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2458 KB  
Article
Experimental Study of the Impact of Thunderstorms with Lightning Discharges of Different Polarity on the Ionospheric Parameters
by Valentina Antonova, Vadim Lutsenko and Galina Gordiyenko
Atmosphere 2025, 16(11), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111248 - 30 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 976
Abstract
The study was based on 11 years of measurements of ionospheric parameters and atmospheric electric fields reflecting the polarity of lightning discharges and recording return strokes. The response of ionospheric parameters to thunderstorms with lightning discharges of negative and positive polarity under quiet [...] Read more.
The study was based on 11 years of measurements of ionospheric parameters and atmospheric electric fields reflecting the polarity of lightning discharges and recording return strokes. The response of ionospheric parameters to thunderstorms with lightning discharges of negative and positive polarity under quiet solar and geomagnetic conditions was considered. No changes in the dynamics of ionospheric parameters are observed during thunderstorms with lightning discharges of negative polarity. Variation in the daily course of total electron content and the appearance of wave-like disturbances with a period of 2–5 h are recorded during thunderstorms with lightning discharges of positive polarity. More small-scale disturbances were also detected. Intensification of the sporadic layer was observed in ~70% of the thunderstorm events with positive lightning discharges. A decrease in the height of the sporadic layer Es (h’Es) by 10 km and an increase in the level of radio wave absorption in the D region of the ionosphere were recorded. The experimental results of the study indicate that the polarity of lightning discharges and electromagnetic effects play a decisive role in the process of thunderstorms affecting the ionosphere. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3482 KB  
Article
Analysis of Ionospheric Response and GNSS Positioning on Geodetic and Low-Cost Receivers in Mexico During the May 2024 Geomagnetic Storm
by J. Rene Vazquez-Ontiveros, Angela Melgarejo-Morales, Carlos A. Martinez-Felix and J. Ramon Martinez-Batlle
Geosciences 2025, 15(11), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15110408 - 22 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1931
Abstract
Geomagnetic storms can severely disturb the ionosphere, degrading Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) performance, particularly at low latitudes. The 10 May 2024 superstorm produced a strong ionospheric response across Mexico, with well-defined positive and negative phases observed at all analyzed stations. The proximity [...] Read more.
Geomagnetic storms can severely disturb the ionosphere, degrading Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) performance, particularly at low latitudes. The 10 May 2024 superstorm produced a strong ionospheric response across Mexico, with well-defined positive and negative phases observed at all analyzed stations. The proximity in time of %dTEC peaks to the second and third steps of the storm’s main phase, together with their local time dependence, indicates that Prompt Penetration Electric Fields (PPEFs) dominated the initial positive phase on the dayside. These eastward electric fields uplifted the F-region plasma, enhancing TEC values—especially at northern stations, where increases reached ±180%. In contrast, the subsequent nighttime depletion and extended recovery were mainly driven by composition-related plasma loss and enhanced recombination. A suppression of TEC followed the positive phase, with depletions between −58% and −77%, showing a persistent latitudinal gradient. Low-cost GNSS receivers successfully captured these ionospheric signatures but exhibited higher positioning degradation—up to 50% greater than geodetic-grade receivers. Multi-constellation Precise Point Positioning (PPP) mitigated these effects, reducing 3D errors by up to 23% and 53% in geodetic and low-cost receivers, respectively. These findings reveal the day–night dependence of ionospheric storm phases and underscore the importance of regional multi-GNSS monitoring during extreme space weather. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Geophysics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 10558 KB  
Article
Ionospheric Disturbances from the 2022 Hunga-Tonga Volcanic Eruption: Impacts on TEC Spatial Gradients and GNSS Positioning Accuracy Across the Japan Region
by Zhihao Fu, Xuhui Shen, Qinqin Liu and Ningbo Wang
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(17), 3108; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17173108 - 6 Sep 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1904
Abstract
The Hunga-Tonga volcanic eruption on 15 January 2022, produced significant atmospheric and ionospheric disturbances that may degrade global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and precise point positioning (PPP) accuracy. Using data from the GEONET GNSS network and Soratena barometric pressure sensors across Japan, we [...] Read more.
The Hunga-Tonga volcanic eruption on 15 January 2022, produced significant atmospheric and ionospheric disturbances that may degrade global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and precise point positioning (PPP) accuracy. Using data from the GEONET GNSS network and Soratena barometric pressure sensors across Japan, we analyzed the eruption’s effects through the gradient ionospheric index (GIX) and the rate of TEC index (ROTI) to characterize the propagation and effects of these disturbances on ionospheric total electron content (TEC) gradients. Our analysis identified two separate ionospheric disturbance events. The first event, coinciding with the arrival of atmospheric Lamb waves, was characterized by wave-like pressure anomalies, differential TEC (dTEC) fluctuations, and modest horizontal gradients of vertical TEC (VTEC). In contrast, the second, more pronounced disturbance was driven by equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs), which generated severe ionospheric irregularities and large TEC gradients. Further analysis revealed that these two disturbances had markedly different impacts on GNSS positioning accuracy. The Lamb wave–induced disturbance mainly caused moderate TEC fluctuations with limited effects on positioning accuracy, and mid-latitude stations maintained both average and 95th percentile positioning (ppp,P95) errors below 0.1 m throughout the event. In contrast, the EPB-driven disturbance had a substantial impact on low-latitude regions, where the average horizontal PPP error peaked at 0.5 m and the horizontal and vertical ppp,P95 errors exceeded 1 m. Our findings reveal two episodes of spatial-gradient enhancement and successfully estimate the propagation speed and direction of the Lamb waves, supporting the potential application of ionospheric gradient monitoring in forecasting GNSS performance degradation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3044 KB  
Article
Navigating the Storm: Assessing the Impact of Geomagnetic Disturbances on Low-Cost GNSS Permanent Stations
by Milad Bagheri and Paolo Dabove
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(17), 2933; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172933 - 23 Aug 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4596
Abstract
As contemporary society and the global economy become increasingly dependent on satellite-based systems, the need for reliable and resilient positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) services has never been more critical. This study investigates the impact of the geomagnetic storm that occurred in May [...] Read more.
As contemporary society and the global economy become increasingly dependent on satellite-based systems, the need for reliable and resilient positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) services has never been more critical. This study investigates the impact of the geomagnetic storm that occurred in May 2024 on the performance of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) low-cost permanent stations. The research evaluates the influence of ionospheric disturbances on both positioning performance and raw GNSS observations. Two days were analyzed: 8 May 2024 (DOY 129), representing quiet ionospheric conditions, and 11 May 2024 (DOY 132), coinciding with the peak of the geomagnetic storm. Precise Point Positioning (PPP) and static relative positioning techniques were applied to data from a low-cost GNSS station (DYVA), supported by comparative analysis using a nearby geodetic-grade station (TRDS00NOR). The results showed that while RMS positioning errors remained relatively stable over 24 h, the maximum errors increased significantly during the storm, with the 3D positioning error nearly doubling on DOY 132. Short-term analysis revealed even larger disturbances, particularly in the vertical component, which reached up to 3.39 m. Relative positioning analysis confirmed the vulnerability of single-frequency (L1) solutions to ionospheric disturbances, whereas dual-frequency (L1+L2) configurations substantially mitigated errors, highlighting the effectiveness of ionosphere-free combinations during storm events. In the second phase, raw GNSS observation quality was assessed using detrended GPS L1 carrier-phase residuals and signal strength metrics. The analysis revealed increased phase instability and signal degradation on DOY 132, with visible cycle slips occurring between epochs 19 and 21. Furthermore, the average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decreased by approximately 13% for satellites in the northwest sky sector, and a 5% rise in total cycle slips was recorded compared with the quiet day. These indicators confirm the elevated measurement noise and signal disruption associated with geomagnetic activity. These findings provide a quantitative assessment of low-cost GNSS receiver performance under geomagnetic storm conditions. This study emphasizes their utility for densifying GNSS infrastructure, particularly in regions lacking access to geodetic-grade equipment, while also outlining the challenges posed by space weather. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geospatial Intelligence in Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 2733 KB  
Data Descriptor
Investigating Mid-Latitude Lower Ionospheric Responses to Energetic Electron Precipitation: A Case Study
by Aleksandra Kolarski, Vladimir A. Srećković, Zoran R. Mijić and Filip Arnaut
Data 2025, 10(8), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/data10080121 - 26 Jul 2025
Viewed by 903
Abstract
Localized ionization enhancements (LIEs) in altitude range corresponding to the D-region ionosphere, disrupting Very-Low-Frequency (VLF) signal propagation. This case study focuses on Lightning-induced Electron Precipitation (LEP), analyzing amplitude and phase variations in VLF signals recorded in Belgrade, Serbia, from worldwide transmitters. Due to [...] Read more.
Localized ionization enhancements (LIEs) in altitude range corresponding to the D-region ionosphere, disrupting Very-Low-Frequency (VLF) signal propagation. This case study focuses on Lightning-induced Electron Precipitation (LEP), analyzing amplitude and phase variations in VLF signals recorded in Belgrade, Serbia, from worldwide transmitters. Due to the localized, transient nature of Energetic Electron Precipitation (EEP) events and the path-dependence of VLF responses, research relies on event-specific case studies to model reflection height and sharpness via numerical simulations. Findings show LIEs are typically under 1000 × 500 km, with varying internal structure. Accumulated case studies and corresponding data across diverse conditions contribute to a broader understanding of ionospheric dynamics and space weather effects. These findings enhance regional modeling, support aerosol–electricity climate research, and underscore the value of VLF-based ionospheric monitoring and collaboration in Europe. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Spatial Data Science for Environment and Earth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1538 KB  
Article
Lower Ionospheric Perturbations Associated with Lightning Activity over Low and Equatorial Regions
by Dayanand Bhaskar, Rajat Tripathi, Mahesh N. Shrivastava, Rajesh Singh, Sudipta Sasmal, Abhirup Datta and Ajeet Kumar Maurya
Atmosphere 2025, 16(7), 832; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16070832 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1264
Abstract
We present lightning-induced ionospheric perturbations in narrowband very-low-frequency (VLF) signals from the transmitters NWC (21.82° S, 114.17° E, 19.8 kHz) and VTX (8.4° N, 77.8° E, 18.6 kHz) recorded at the low-latitude station Dehradun (DDN; 30.3° N, 78.0° E) over a 12-month period [...] Read more.
We present lightning-induced ionospheric perturbations in narrowband very-low-frequency (VLF) signals from the transmitters NWC (21.82° S, 114.17° E, 19.8 kHz) and VTX (8.4° N, 77.8° E, 18.6 kHz) recorded at the low-latitude station Dehradun (DDN; 30.3° N, 78.0° E) over a 12-month period from September 2020 to October 2021. Early/slow VLF events, VLF LOREs, and step-like VLF LOREs associated with lightning were analyzed for their onset and recovery times. This study utilized data from the World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN), which provides lightning locations and energy estimates. The results show that early/slow VLF events occur most frequently, accounting for approximately 68% of cases, followed by VLF LOREs at 12%, and step-like VLF LOREs at 10%. Furthermore, we observed that 100% of the VLF perturbing events occurred during the nighttime, which is not entirely consistent with previous studies. Moreover, more than 60% of VLF LOREs were associated with lightning energies of approximately 1 kJ, and about 40% were associated with lightning energies of ~10 kJ. Step-like VLF LOREs were linked to WWLLN energies between 1 and 5 kJ. The observed WWLLN energy range is somewhat lower than the energies reported in previous studies. Scattering characteristics revealed that 87.3% of events were associated with wide-angle scattering, while approximately 12.6% were linked to narrow-angle scattering. LWPC version 2.1 was used to simulate these perturbing events and to estimate the reflection height (H′, in km) and the exponential sharpness factor (β, in km−1) corresponding to changes in D-region electron density. The reflection height (H′, in km) and the exponential sharpness factor (β, in km−1) of the D-region varied from 83 to 87 km and from 0.42 to 0.79 km−1 for early/slow VLF events, from 83 to 85 km and from 0.5 to 0.75 km−1 for step-like VLF LOREs, and from 81 to 83 km and from 0.75 to 0.81 km−1 for VLF LOREs, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Upper Atmosphere)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6414 KB  
Article
D- and F-Region Ionospheric Response to the Severe Geomagnetic Storm of April 2023
by Arnab Sen, Sujay Pal, Bakul Das and Sushanta K. Mondal
Atmosphere 2025, 16(6), 716; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060716 - 13 Jun 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2215
Abstract
This study investigates the impact on the Earth’s ionosphere of a severe geomagnetic storm (Dst  212 nT) that began on 23 April 2023 at around 17:37 UT according to very low-frequency (VLF, 3–30 kHz) or low-frequency (LF, 30–300 [...] Read more.
This study investigates the impact on the Earth’s ionosphere of a severe geomagnetic storm (Dst  212 nT) that began on 23 April 2023 at around 17:37 UT according to very low-frequency (VLF, 3–30 kHz) or low-frequency (LF, 30–300 kHz) radio signals and ionosonde data. We analyze VLF/LF signals received by SuperSID monitors located in mid-latitude (Europe) and low-latitude (South America, Colombia) areas across nine different propagation paths in the Northern Hemisphere. Mid-latitude regions exhibited a daytime amplitude perturbation, mostly an increase, by ∼3–5 dB during the storm period, with a subsequent recovery after 7–8 days post April 23. In contrast, signals received in low-latitude regions (UTP, Colombia) did not show significant variation during the storm-disturbed days. We also observe that the 3-hour average of foF2 data declined by up to 3 MHz on April 23 and April 24 at the European Digisonde stations. However, no significant variation in foF2 was observed at the low-latitude Digisonde stations in Brazil. Both the VLF and ionosonde data exhibited anomalies during the storm period in the European regions, confirming that both D- and F-region ionospheric perturbation was caused by the severe geomagnetic storm. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 9271 KB  
Article
Temporal and Spatial Analysis of the Impact of the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day Geomagnetic Storm on Ionospheric TEC Gradients and GNSS Positioning in China Using GIX and ROTI Indices
by Zhihao Fu, Ningbo Wang, Xuhui Shen and Ang Li
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(12), 2027; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122027 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2138
Abstract
Geomagnetic storms induce ionospheric disturbances, significantly affecting Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning accuracy. This study investigates how geomagnetic storm-induced ionospheric irregularities influence GNSS Precise Point Positioning (PPP), using data from approximately 260 GNSS stations across China during 15 storm events between 1 [...] Read more.
Geomagnetic storms induce ionospheric disturbances, significantly affecting Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning accuracy. This study investigates how geomagnetic storm-induced ionospheric irregularities influence GNSS Precise Point Positioning (PPP), using data from approximately 260 GNSS stations across China during 15 storm events between 1 January and 30 June 2015. We applied two indices—the Gradient Ionosphere Index (GIX), representing spatial gradients of vertical total electron content (VTEC), and the Rate of TEC Index (ROTI), describing temporal TEC variations. The analysis identified the St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm (17 March 2015) as causing the most pronounced ionospheric disruptions, with significant east–west TEC gradients (|GIXx,P95| > 50 mTECU/km) consistently associated with substantial PPP errors (>0.5 m). Spatial analyses further indicated that significant 3D PPP errors (PPP, P95 > 0.4 m) closely overlapped with regions experiencing intense east–west TEC gradients, predominantly in the 20–35°N latitude band. Further analysis indicated notable pre-storm ionospheric enhancements driven by zonal electric fields, distinct ionospheric suppression associated with westward disturbance dynamo electric fields (DDEFs) on 18 March, and re-intensification due to eastward penetration electric fields (PEFs) on 19 March. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5934 KB  
Article
Variation in Total Electron Content During a Severe Geomagnetic Storm, 23–24 April 2023
by Atirsaw Muluye Tilahun, Edward Uluma and Yohannes Getachew Ejigu
Atmosphere 2025, 16(6), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16060676 - 3 Jun 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1820
Abstract
In this paper, we study the geomagnetic storm that occurred on 23–24 April 2023. We present variations in the values of interplanetary magnetic field (IMF-Bz), solar wind parameters (Vsw, Nsw, Tsw, and Psw), geomagnetic index (SYM-H), and vertical total electron content (VTEC) obtained [...] Read more.
In this paper, we study the geomagnetic storm that occurred on 23–24 April 2023. We present variations in the values of interplanetary magnetic field (IMF-Bz), solar wind parameters (Vsw, Nsw, Tsw, and Psw), geomagnetic index (SYM-H), and vertical total electron content (VTEC) obtained from 18 GPS-TEC stations situated in equatorial, mid-latitude, and high-latitude regions. We analyze the variations in total electron content (TEC) before, during, and after the storm using VTEC plots, dTEC% plots, and global ionospheric maps for each GNSS receiver station, all referenced to universal time (UT). Our results indicate that GNSS receiver stations located at high latitudes detected an increase in ionospheric density during the main phase and a decrease during the recovery phase. In contrast, stations in equatorial and mid-latitude regions detected a decrease in ionospheric density during the main phase and an increase during the recovery phase. Large dTEC% values ranging from −80 to 190 TECU were observed a few hours before and during the storm period (23–24 April 2023); these can be compared to values ranging from −10 to 20 TECU on the day before (22 April 2023) and the day after (25 April 2023). Notably, higher dTEC% values were observed at stations in high and middle latitudes compared to those in the equatorial region. As the storm progressed, the TEC intensification observed on global ionospheric maps appeared to shift from east to west. A detailed analysis of these maps showed that equatorial and low-latitude regions experienced larger spatial and temporal TEC variations during the storm period compared to higher-latitude regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Upper Atmosphere (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop