Search Results (59)

This study presents a bibliometric and systematic review of 480 articles meeting the following inclusion criteria: English-language articles, reviews, or proceeding papers focusing on building topics with full text available, retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection on 9 Jannary 2026 to map the intellectual landscape of smart-sustainable building (SSB) research. Employing the PRISMA framework combined with scientometric mapping (VOSviewer), thematic classification, and qualitative synthesis (no risk of bias assessment was performed as this was a bibliometric review), the analysis reveals exponential publication growth since 2022, identifying three dominant thematic clusters: digital enabling technologies (41.0%), energy systems (30.8%), and advanced building envelopes and materials (28.3%). Keyword analysis identifies “smart buildings,” “green buildings,” and “energy efficiency” as central conceptual anchors, while temporal trends indicate increasing attention to artificial intelligence, digital twins, and blockchain. Notably, 51.4% of articles address two or more themes simultaneously, confirming the field’s interdisciplinary character. Critical analysis reveals persistent fragmentation: sustainable building rating tools (e.g., BREEAM, LEED) and smart building evaluation methods (e.g., Smart Readiness Indicator). Seven challenges, including assessment fragmentation, high costs, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities, are identified as barriers to SSB adoption. Limitations include reliance on a single database (Web of Science) and subjective thematic classification. This review provides a roadmap for future research emphasizing integrated assessment frameworks and interdisciplinary collaboration. Registration: Not pre-registered. Funding: National Key R&D Program of China (2025YFF0521003). Full article

The building sector is a critical component of the European Union’s strategy to achieve climate neutrality, as it accounts for 30–40% of total energy consumption and significant greenhouse gas emissions. While sustainability certification systems like BREEAM, LEED, DGNB, and HQE have established frameworks for environmental assessment, their widespread adoption in the residential sector faces challenges related to complexity and technical barriers. This paper provides a state-of-the-art literature review on streamlining sustainability certification for residential buildings in the EU. It examines the transition from established private schemes to harmonised frameworks such as Level(s), alongside the integration of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The review identifies key obstacles, including data interoperability issues, the need for automated quantity extraction, and the lack of technical expertise among stakeholders. Findings suggest that streamlining requires advancing semantic data models and digital twins to enable real-time performance monitoring and automated compliance checking. Furthermore, the alignment of national building codes with the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) and the European Green Deal is essential for fostering a more cohesive certification landscape. The study concludes by outlining pathways for reducing the administrative and technical burden of certification to support the EU’s decarbonisation and renovation goals. Full article

The widespread adoption of circularity principles in the building sector fuels the need for robust and comprehensive evaluation systems, which could benefit from the approaches and indicators employed in widely accepted building sustainability assessment (BSA) methods. Simultaneously, the effective consideration of circular economy (CE) principles into BSA methods becomes increasingly urgent. An important step towards achieving these targets is the investigation of whether, and to which degree, the existing BSA methods encompass and express circularity principles; this study focuses on this relatively underexplored theme. Specifically, this study investigates the degree of association between five widely used BSA methods and the circularity strategies included in the 10R Framework. The methods examined are BREEAM, DGNB, LEED, Level(s) and SBTool (versions and criteria for new buildings). The examination was conducted at the lowest self-contained and score-attributing level of each method and was undertaken by five expert groups—each assigned one method. A quantitative scale from 0 to 5 was used to assess the strength of the association. The results are analysed in terms of (i) the criteria/thematic areas within each method receiving high/low scores, and (ii) the circularity strategies deduced to be strongly/weakly represented in and across the BSA methods. Common trends and milder differences across these axes are observed. Generally, the associations appear stronger in thematic areas relevant to, among others, resources and lifecycle performance, and weaker regarding parameters linked to user comfort. The R-strategies Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rethink emerge as more intensely represented in the examined methods. The study’s results indicate areas for further research and potential methodological enhancement. Full article

This literature review examines weighting schemes within Building Sustainability Assessment Systems (BSASs). Given the widespread adoption of BSASs and their direct link to significant economic benefits for investors and owners, weighting schemes serve as critical tools for policymaking in the sustainable building sector. The review synthesizes findings from 102 articles, covering multiple building types, subsystems, design parameters, lifecycle phases, locations, and sustainability dimensions. The identified schemes are categorized as subjective, objective, hybrid, or equal, based on established definitions. First, the weighting schemes of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM)—the two most frequently referenced BSASs—are analyzed within this framework. Second, a systematic analysis of novel weighting schemes proposed in the literature is conducted. Among these methodologies, 75% employed subjective weighting schemes, while objective, hybrid, and equal weighting schemes accounted for 12%, 6%, and 3%, respectively. No discernible temporal trend was observed in these proportions over the last 25 years. The geographical analysis further underscores the global dominance of subjective schemes. Notably, nearly 71% of the studies focus on developing countries in Asia and Africa, where the proportion of subjective schemes reaches 75% and 85%, respectively. Consequently, the results indicate the pivotal role of experts in shaping BSASs priorities. Finally, the discussion evaluates the advantages and limitations of these weighting approaches regarding their capacity to guide the building sector toward sustainability goals. Full article

Green building rating systems (GBRS) (e.g., LEED and BREEAM) assess sustainability in the built environment but require extensive data collection and processing. In this context, digitalization strategies, such as building information Modeling (BIM), enable centralized data management throughout the building’s life cycle. This study presents a PRISMA-based systematic literature review (SLR) of BIM-GBRS integration methods, identifying 83 articles and 13 reviews. The analysis is structured around three key phases defined to enable a systematic comparison of the existing approaches. Phase 1, “Data acquisition”, involves collecting the values of the investigated parameters either from the BIM model or through analysis software (e.g., Insight, One Click LCA) grouped into eight categories. Phase 2, “compliance verification”, focuses on comparing collected data with GBRS requirements using manual or automated tools (e.g., Dynamo). Phase 3, “optimization”, involves improving alternative design scenarios using tools such as plug-ins and MATLAB-based algorithms (e.g., NSGA-II, DWKNN). Emerging digital technologies (e.g., AI, digital twins, IoT) are analyzed to enable automated workflows, while interoperability is examined by distinguishing format-based (e.g., gbXML, IFC) and tool-based (e.g., APIs, VPL) approaches. The study identifies fragmented and limited interoperability in BIM-GBRS integration, highlighting the need for an automated end-to-end framework to support sustainability in the construction sector. Full article

The technocratic and economically driven approach to urban and industrial planning can be observed in the evolution of modern logistics parks, which have become key infrastructural elements of regional development. This study explores how technocratic logic influences the spatial and environmental transformation of logistics parks in Poland within the context of sustainable certification systems such as BREEAM International (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method). The research employed an eight-stage methodological framework combining exploratory, analytical, and empirical methods. The process began with a comprehensive literature and data query on the development of logistics parks at global, European, and national levels, followed by a systematic review of sustainability assessment systems. A research framework was then defined to establish a consistent model of warehouse buildings, verified through the PLGBC database of certified facilities. The dataset was filtered and standardized, and a purposive sample of 25 BREEAM-certified warehouses was selected from 150 eligible cases. Each certification report was analyzed to identify credit distribution patterns, and the results were examined through a factor analysis to interpret the technocratic and systemic determinants influencing sustainability decisions. The findings reveal that the decision-making logic of developers is dominated by quantitative optimization and regulatory alignment, leading to the prioritization of low-cost, easily verifiable credits such as ENE03 (External Lighting) and WAT02 (Water Monitoring), while complex or innovative credits such as MAT06 (Material Efficiency) remain under implemented. The study contributes to the understanding of how technocratic rationality shapes sustainable certification outcomes and highlights the need for stronger policy and market incentives to promote circular and systemic approaches in the logistics real estate sector. Full article

This study compares certification systems for green healthcare facilities implemented worldwide. Healthcare facilities are complex structures designed to provide uninterrupted service while involving substantial resources, high energy consumption, and heavy human and material traffic. The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of designs that ensure hygiene, reduce environmental impact, and improve energy efficiency, making green certification systems for healthcare facilities increasingly critical. Eight certification systems currently in use across eight countries were examined, four from advanced economies (LEED in the U.S., BREEAM in the U.K., Green Star in Australia, and CASBEE in Japan) and four from developing economies (YeS-TR in Türkiye, IGBC in India, GBI in Malaysia, and GREENSHIP in Indonesia). Country selection considered regional diversity, similarities in environmental policies, and the potential for healthcare infrastructure development. A literature-based comparative analysis was conducted, and seven key categories were identified for evaluating sustainability: sustainable land and transport, water and waste management, energy efficiency, material and life cycle impact, indoor environmental quality, project management process, and innovation. The comparison revealed considerable overlap among the systems but also highlighted shortcomings in addressing healthcare-specific needs. This paper contributes to the advancement of sustainability assessment in the healthcare sector by highlighting the need for certification schemes specifically designed for medical facilities. The findings emphasize the necessity of developing healthcare-tailored frameworks that not only address environmental performance but also capture the unique operational, functional, and clinical dynamics of this sector. Full article

The current green building assessment system suffers from issues such as insufficient coverage of smart indicators, significant biases in subjective weighting, and weak dynamic adaptability, which restrict the scientific promotion of green buildings. This study focuses on the gaps in the quantitative assessment of smart technologies in China’s green building evaluation standards (such as the current Green Building Evaluation Standard). While domestic standards are relatively well-established in traditional dimensions like energy conservation and environmental protection, there are fragmentation issues in the assessment of smart technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and BIM. Moreover, the coverage of smart indicators in non-civilian building fields is significantly lower than that of international systems such as LEED and BREEAM. This study determined the basic framework of the evaluation indicator system through the Delphi method. Drawing on international experience and contextualized within China’s (GB/T 50378-2019) standards, it systematically integrated secondary indicators including “smart security,” “smart energy,” “smart design,” and “smart services,” and constructed dual-drive evaluation dimensions of “greenization + smartization.” This elevated the proportion of the smartization dimension to 35%, filling the gap in domestic standards regarding the quantitative assessment of smart technologies. In terms of research methods, combined weighting using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and entropy weight method was adopted to balance subjective and objective weights and reduce biases (the resource conservation dimension accounted for 39.14% of the combined weights, the highest proportion). By integrating the grey clustering model with the whitening weight function to handle fuzzy information, evaluations were categorized into four grey levels (D/C/B/A), enhancing the dynamic adaptability of the system. Case verification showed that Project A achieved a comprehensive evaluation score of 5.223, with a grade of B. Among its indicators, smart-related ones such as “smart energy” (37.17%) and “smart design” (37.93%) scored significantly higher than traditional indicators, verifying that the system successfully captured the project’s high performance in smart indicators. The research results indicate that the efficient utilization of resources is the core goal of green buildings. Especially under pressures of energy shortages and carbon emissions, energy conservation and resource recycling have become key priorities. The evaluation system constructed in this study can provide theoretical guidance and technical support for the promotion, industrial upgrading, and sustainable development of green buildings (including non-civilian buildings) under the dual-carbon goals. Its characteristic of “dynamic monitoring + smart integration” forms differentiated complementarity with international standards, making it more aligned with the needs of China’s intelligent transformation of buildings. Full article

The construction of prefabricated concrete houses in Ecuador poses significant challenges in terms of environmental and social sustainability, amid growing housing demand and the urgent need to mitigate adverse impacts associated with the construction processes and materials. In particular, the lack of a comprehensive assessment of these impacts limits the development of effective strategies to improve the sustainability of the sector. In addition, in rural areas, the design of flexible and adapted solutions is required, as evidenced by recent studies in the Andean area. This study conducts a comprehensive assessment of the impacts and sustainability indicators for prefabricated concrete houses, employing international certification systems such as LEED, BREEAM, and VERDE, to validate various relevant environmental and social indicators. The methodology used is the Hierarchical Analytical Process (AHP), which facilitates the prioritization of impacts through paired comparisons, establishing priorities for decision-making. Hydrological, soil, faunal, floral, and socioeconomic aspects are evaluated in a regional context. The results reveal that the most critical environmental impacts in Ecuador are climate change (28.77%), water depletion (13.73%) and loss of human health (19.17%), generation of non-hazardous waste 8.40%, changes in biodiversity 5%, extraction of mineral resources 12.07%, financial risks 5.33%, loss of aquatic life 4.67%, and loss of fertility 3%, as derived from hierarchical and standardization matrices. Despite being grounded in a literature review and being constrained due to the scarcity of previous projects in the country, this research provides a useful framework for the environmental evaluation and planning of prefabricated housing. To conclude, this study enhances existing methodologies of environmental assessment techniques and practices in the construction of precast concrete and promotes the development of sustainable and socially responsible housing in Ecuador. Full article

This study compares the LEED, BREEAM, and WELL certification systems using the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework to assess their performance across environmental, social, and economic dimensions and their alignment with sustainable development goals. A structured secondary analysis was conducted on over 50 peer-reviewed articles, case studies, and official certification manuals. Inclusion criteria required documented design targets and post-occupancy outcomes for certified buildings (2014–2024). A two-phase analytical model was applied: first, evaluating each system’s structure and priorities; then benchmarking them using the TBL framework to assess how holistically each addresses sustainability. Results show that LEED leads to energy optimization, BREEAM to lifecycle integration, and WELL to occupant health and indoor environmental quality. However, all systems exhibit post-occupancy performance gaps: LEED and BREEAM underperform by 15–30% in energy use, while WELL-certified projects may exceed 30% due to stringent indoor comfort demands. These findings highlight the need to integrate real-time post-occupancy evaluation into certification protocols. To improve overall effectiveness, the study proposes enhancements such as adaptive performance tracking, occupant feedback loops, and dynamic benchmarking aligned with actual building use. By identifying both the comparative strengths and systemic limitations of the three frameworks, this research contributes to the refinement of green building assessment tools. Practical implications include (1) integrating post-occupancy evaluation into certification renewal cycles, (2) adopting hybrid certification strategies to improve sustainability coverage, and (3) designing benchmarking tools that reflect real-world operational data. Full article

BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is widely recognized for promoting environmental sustainability in the built environment, with a strong focus on energy efficiency, resource management, and ecological impact. However, as sustainability entails environmental and economic dimensions but also social dimensions, the current BREEAM New Construction standards do not fully address social sustainability targets. This article explores the potential for expanding BREEAM New Construction standards to more comprehensively incorporate social sustainability, ensuring that certified projects contribute to the well-being of their occupants and surrounding communities. Through a review of existing BREEAM categories, technical manuals, standards, and an analysis of gaps related to social sustainability, this paper identifies key areas for potential improvement, including user satisfaction, protecting workers’ and human rights, legacy planning, education and skills, and emergency response planning. These gaps are mapped against existing BREEAM categories and credits, with recommendations to introduce additional credits across the categories of management, materials, energy, waste, land use and ecology, health and well-being, and water. Additionally, this paper highlights the importance of transdisciplinary collaboration—bringing together architects, urban planners, social scientists, and public health experts—to effectively address the complexity of social sustainability in building design and certification. The proposed additions to BREEAM New Construction standards, alongside recommendations for industry and policymakers, offer guidelines for the evolution of green building certifications toward a more holistic approach to sustainability. This shift ensures that future certified buildings reduce environmental impact and promote social equity, health, and community well-being simultaneously. Full article

This study examines the quality and availability of daylight in childcare facilities, focusing on compliance with Polish Technical Conditions (TCs) and comparing them with international certification systems such as BREEAM, LEED, and WELL. Polish regulations regarding sunlight exposure require revisions to support the sustainable development of buildings, impacting children’s well-being, their health, and the building’s energy efficiency. Daylight’s significance for children’s health and development underpins the investigation, highlighting its impact on the circadian rhythm, cognitive abilities, and well-being. The research utilized computational simulations with Rhinoceros 7 and Ladybug and Honeybee plugins to model a preschool room’s daylight performance under various window configurations and orientations. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted, focusing on parameters such as Daylight Factor (DF), Daylight Autonomy (DA), and Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI). The findings revealed that while the TCs’ requirements ensure minimum daylight access, they result in nonoptimal lighting quality as defined by international standards. Almost half of the surveyed rooms in the case with a WFR of one-eighth did not meet the condition for having acceptable daylight levels, as defined in the study. In the same study, only about one-third of the analyzed variants achieved the threshold for good daylight quality. At a WFR of one-eighth, no room variant reached the level considered to indicate excellent daylight quality. The results show the need for revised regulations incorporating comprehensive metrics like Climate-Based Daylight Modeling (CBDM). This study suggests that integrating advanced methods of assessing daylight quality could significantly improve daylight conditions in childcare environments. This research is a starting point for discussing the need to modernize the Polish Technical Conditions (TC) to support the sustainable development of childcare facilities in Poland. Full article

As more companies strive for net-zero emissions, mitigating indirect greenhouse gas emissions embedded in value chains—especially in logistics activities—has become a critical priority. In the European logistics sector, sustainability and energy efficiency are receiving growing attention, given the sector’s intersectional role in both transportation and construction. This transition toward low-carbon logistics design not only reduces carbon emissions but also yields financial benefits, including operational cost savings and new market opportunities. This study examines the impact of passive design strategies and low-carbon technologies in a Swedish logistics center, assessed using the low-carbon design criteria from the BREEAM International standard, version 6. The findings show that passive energy-efficient measures, such as the installation of 47 skylights for natural daylighting, reduced light power density in accordance with AHSHARE 90.1-2019 and the integration of free night flushing, contribute to a 23% reduction in total energy consumption. In addition, the integration of 600 PV panels and 480 batteries with a capacity of 268 ampere-hours and 13.5 kWh storage, operating at 50 volts, delivers a further 56% reduction in carbon emissions. By optimizing the interaction between passive design and active low-carbon technologies, this research presents a comprehensive feasibility analysis that promotes sustainable logistics practices while ensuring a future-proof, low-carbon operational model. Full article

In the global context of carbon neutrality, higher education parks are an important strategic position for achieving China’s goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutralization. Strategies from the perspective of life cycle to guide early low-carbon planning and design are an effective way to achieve carbon emission reduction goals. As the scale of university construction gradually expands, the “urban” attributes of them are becoming prominent. However, there is no quantitative study on analyzing the life cycle carbon emission strategies at both the building and urban scale based on sustainability rating systems. This study first extracts the design strategies according to BREEAM, LEED, DGNB and relative assessment standards for campuses and cities in China at the building and urban scale based on the 7-dimensional low-carbon strategy framework, then sorts out and compares the proportions of carbon-emission-related strategies across various dimensions and life cycle stages. It then summarizes the applications and concerns of low-carbon design strategies at different design scales. Finally, the weighting and calculation methods of life cycle carbon emissions in different sustainability rating systems are compared, the scope and methods of carbon emission benchmarks under different standards are compiled, and the evaluation method for locally applicable carbon emission benchmarks in China is proposed in light of China’s national conditions, which provides guidance for the design process and standard formulation. Full article

Assessment methodologies such as BREEAM and LEED allocate points based on prescribed interventions that promote design features or strategies considered to be more sustainable than others. A focus on accumulating numerical scores, however, often fails to address pertinent contextual issues, particularly within developing countries. This paper examines the use of four assessment systems in Kenya—two international systems, LEED-US and Green Star SA-Kenya; and two locally developed systems, Green Mark Kenya and the Safari Green Building Index. The paper compares the relative weighting of different categories under each system, and assesses their appropriateness to a Kenyan context, with reference to the suitability of active technology versus passive design approaches. The paper examines selected examples of ‘green’ buildings in Nairobi, reflecting on the influence of different methods of assessment on the adopted design approaches. The paper argues that international rating systems, such as LEED, often focus on a Western construct of sustainability featuring a systematic bias towards global rather than local perspectives, with an emphasis on physical environmental factors. In pursuit of objectivity, the measurement of non-contextual parameters untailored to local circumstances (e.g., energy performance) is prioritised at the expense of those contingent on local conditions or climate. Full article