Search Results (21)

Background/Objectives: As global aging accelerates, prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) continues to rise, challenging healthcare systems and diminishing older adults’ quality of life. There is great interest in better understanding the neuroprotective/anti-inflammatory properties of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids but the results from many published studies in humans come to different conclusions. This review aims to clarify the efficacy of n-3 fatty acids as a preventive or therapeutic strategy for cognitive health and to inform future clinical recommendations within aging populations. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and a registered PROSPERO protocol, we reviewed systematic reviews (SRs) from 2014 to 2024 assessing exclusive n-3 fatty acid supplementation and cognitive outcomes via MMSE. Data were extracted on intervention details and cognitive scores. Meta-analyses used fixed and random-effects models, with Hedges’ estimating overall impact. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, and statistical analyses were performed (SPSS 28). Results: A total of nine SRs incorporating 14 RCTs were included, representing 26,881 participants aged 40 years or older. The pooled random-effects meta-analysis showed a statistically significant but modest improvement in MMSE scores (effect size: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.01–0.32). Heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 42.8%), and no publication bias was detected. Further analyses revealed no significant associations between treatment duration or dosage and cognitive outcomes, suggesting a threshold effect rather than a dose–response relationship. Conclusions: These findings support n3-PUFA supplementation as a complementary approach to lifestyle-based strategies for cognitive health, including diet, physical activity, sleep optimization, and cognitive training. While benefits appear modest, consistent effects across studies warrant further high-quality research and well-designed studies to strengthen clinical recommendations. Full article

Background/Objectives: Heart failure (HF) often develops from a prolonged asymptomatic phase where early detection could prevent progression. Pre-heart failure (pre-HF) populations—those with risk factors (Stage A) or subclinical myocardial changes (Stage B)—are critical for intervention. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) mapping offers a non-invasive approach to detect early myocardial changes in these groups. This systematic review evaluates the role of T1 and ECV mapping in pre-HF populations, focusing on their diagnostic and prognostic utility. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane was conducted up to April 2025, identifying 17 studies that met inclusion criteria. Data was extracted directly into Excel, and methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and cross-sectional studies and AMSTAR-2 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) to compare T1 and ECV values between pre-HF and control groups. Results: Studies consistently reported elevated T1 (989.6–1415.41 milliseconds) and ECV (25.7–42.81%) in pre-HF groups compared to controls (T1: 967–1310.63 ms, ECV: 23.5–29.9%). Meta-analysis showed a significant increase in T1 (MD: 27.62 ms, 95% CI: 8.04–47.19, p < 0.006) and ECV (MD: 2.97%, 95% CI: 1.88–4.06, p < 0.00001) in pre-HF groups. RQS scores ranged from 17.2% to 77.8% (mean: 37.9%), and NOS scores ranged from 5 to 8 (mean: 6.2), reflecting variability in study quality. The AMSTAR-2 rating for the systematic review was moderate. Conclusions: T1 and ECV mapping enhance CMR-based detection of early myocardial changes in pre-HF, offering a promising non-invasive approach to predict HF risk. However, variability in study quality, small sample sizes, and methodological inconsistencies limit generalisability. Future research should focus on standardised protocols, prospective designs, and multi-center studies to integrate these techniques into clinical practice, potentially guiding preventive therapies such as SGLT2is and tafamidis. Full article

“Sola dosis facit venenum” (Paracelsus). Essential trace elements, crucial for maintaining neuronal function, have their dysregulation increasingly correlated with neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Parkinson’s disease (PD). This systematic review aims to synthesize recent high-quality evidence regarding the involvement of essential trace elements, such as iron, zinc, copper, manganese, and selenium, in the pathogenesis and, consequently, as potential therapeutic targets of PD. A comprehensive literature search was conducted for articles published between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2024. Out of an initial pool of 1231 identified studies, 63 met the methodological eligibility criteria according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All potentially eligible interventional and observational studies were initially assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, which is commonly employed for evaluating the internal validity and statistical interpretability of clinical trials and rehabilitation-focused studies. Following the qualitative assessment using the PEDro scale, 18 studies were ultimately selected based on their scientific relevance and methodological rigor. To supplement the PEDro scoring, which is designed primarily for individual trials, we applied the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklist for the evaluation of the included systematic reviews or meta-analyses. The included studies employed a variety of clinical, postmortem, and experimental models to investigate trace-element concentrations and their mechanistic roles in PD. The findings revealed consistent patterns of iron accumulation in the substantia nigra, zinc’s bidirectional effects on oxidative stress and autophagy, copper-induced α-synuclein aggregation, and the neuroprotective role of selenium via antioxidant pathways. Manganese was associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation. Essential trace-element disturbances contribute to PD pathology through interconnected mechanisms involving redox imbalance, protein misfolding, and impaired cellular homeostasis. These elements may serve as both biomarkers and potential therapeutic tools, warranting further investigation into personalized metal-based interventions for PD. Full article

This overview aimed at assessing botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A)’s effectiveness in managing bruxism compared to a placebo, the absence of treatment, or other interventions in adults. Only systematic reviews (SRs), with or without a meta-analysis, were included. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on 16 June 2024, encompassing seven databases and grey literature sources. Experts and reference lists of the included SRs were also consulted. Study selection was conducted in two phases by two independent authors. Methodological quality was evaluated using AMSTAR-2. Overlap was assessed using the corrected covered area. The 14 included SRs addressed several outcomes. In most studies, BoNT-A showed effectiveness in reducing pain (n = 10), the frequency of bruxism events (n = 7), and the maximum bite force (n = 5). None of the SRs effectively evaluated BoNT-A’s impact on functional movements. All of the included SRs scored “critically low” and “low” confidence rates in AMSTAR-2. Only one SR attempted to assess the certainty of the evidence, although unsuccessfully. The overlap across included SRs was rated as “high”, with a corrected covered area of 10.11%. The current systematic reviews on BoNT-A for bruxism lack methodological quality, limiting the reliability of their findings. Despite evidence indicating a potential reduction in pain, bruxism events, and the maximum bite force, methodological limitations prevent definitive conclusions from being drawn. High-quality research with standardized methodologies is essential to establish BoNT-A’s efficacy and support evidence-based clinical practice. Full article

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has been introduced to improve surgical precision and alignment in knee replacement procedures. However, its impact on clinical outcomes, pain relief, and cost-effectiveness remains debated. This umbrella review synthesizes evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing rTKA to conventional TKA. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing rTKA with conventional TKA were included. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. Primary outcomes included hospital stay, radiographic alignment, postoperative pain, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Results: Ten systematic reviews were included. rTKA demonstrated superior alignment accuracy and a reduction in alignment outliers. Some studies reported shorter hospital stays and lower early postoperative pain scores for rTKA. However, these benefits did not consistently translate into improved long-term functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, or reduced revision rates. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicated that rTKA remains an expensive option, with benefits largely dependent on surgical volume and healthcare system resources. Conclusions: While rTKA improves surgical precision and may offer short-term advantages, its long-term superiority over conventional TKA remains unproven. Higher costs and longer operative times limit its widespread adoption. Further high-quality, long-term studies are needed to determine its clinical and economic value. Full article

Background/Objectives: Ketamine offers effective pain relief with fewer side effects than traditional analgesics, making it a promising alternative for acute pain treatment. However, further research is needed to fully assess its role in perioperative care. This umbrella review aimed to compile the highest-quality evidence available regarding the application of ketamine in managing acute pain. Methods: A thorough search of the literature was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, including systematic reviews that focused on the application of ketamine in managing acute pain. The data extraction included the research type, analgesics used, number of studies and patients per review, pain types, scoring methods, ketamine doses, administration routes, and reporting guidelines. Results: Of the 807 records identified, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. In accordance with the AMSTAR-2 evaluation, most of the systematic reviews were rated as critically low quality. Intravenous ketamine administered during the perioperative period was found to reduce the pain intensity of acute pain within 15–30 and 60 min following treatment, and decrease postoperative opioid consumption by 14–50% at both 24 and 48 h after surgery. Conclusions: Evidence shows that intravenous ketamine reduces the pain intensity, postoperative opioid use, and the risk of vomiting and nausea while improving analgesia, making it a valuable adjunct in perioperative pain management. Full article

(1) Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Due to a lack of level 1 evidence, there is no clear consensus on the optimal extent of resection to improve overall survival. This umbrella review aggregates existing meta-analyses (MAs) to assess overall survival in patients undergoing subtotal resection (STR) versus gross total resection (GTR). (2) Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 441 studies, with four MAs meeting inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using the metaumbrella R package, focusing on overall survival. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR2, with scores ranging from 0 to 11. The Ioannidis criteria were applied to evaluate the credibility of the evidence. (3) Results: The quality assessment rated all four studies highly, with a mean AMSTAR2 score of 10.25. The pooled analysis revealed a significant survival advantage for GTR over STR. However, the Ioannidis classification graded the evidence as Class III, indicating weak credibility. (4) Conclusions: GTR offers a slight survival benefit over STR in GBM patients, but the credibility of the evidence is weak, highlighting the need for further research. Full article

Background: MicroRNA-150 (miR-150) plays a critical role in immune regulation and has been implicated in autoimmune diseases like Multiple Sclerosis (MS). This review aims to evaluate miR-150’s potential as a biomarker for MS, necessitating this review to consolidate current evidence and highlight miR-150’s utility in improving diagnostic accuracy and monitoring disease progression. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases like PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, SciSpace, MDPI and Web of Science, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Studies focusing on miR-150 implications in MS were included. Data extraction was conducted, while quality assessment was done using the NOS and AMSTAR 2 tools. With the extracted data a statistical analyses conducted. Results: 10 eligible articles were included in review. Findings show that miR-150 levels were consistently deregulated in MS patients compared to healthy controls, correlating with disease severity and clinical parameters such as (EDSS) scores and disease activity. Additionally, miR-150 is implicated in the inflammatory pathogenesis of MS, affecting immune cell regulation and inflammatory pathways. Conclusions: MiR-150 is a promising biomarker for MS, showing significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and monitoring disease progression. Its consistent deregulation in MS patients and correlation with clinical parameters underscore its clinical utility. Further research should validate miR-150’s salivary presence and its possible usage as a novel biomarker and therapeutic potential in the development of MS. Full article

Background: Chronic conditions, especially pain conditions, have a very significant impact on quality of life and on workplaces. Workplace interventions for chronic conditions are heterogenous, multidimensional, and sometimes poorly evidenced. The Joint Action for Chronic Disease Plus (CHRODIS Plus), including The CHRODIS Plus Workbox on Employment and Chronic Conditions (CPWEC), aimed to combat this, prevent chronic disease and multimorbidity, and influence policy in Europe. However, the supporting evidence behind CHRODIS Plus has not been formally assessed. Methods: A scoping review was carried out; Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched for literature related to CHRODIS Plus and pain. Title and abstract and full-text screening were carried out in duplicate and independently. Additionally, CHRODIS Plus authors were approached for unpublished data. Secondly, the search was broadened to CHRODIS Plus and pain-causing conditions. Grey literature was also searched. Appropriateness appraisal was derived from the Trial Forge Guidance. Systematic reviews, on which CPWEC was based, were appraised using the A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool. Results: The initial search yielded two results, of which zero were suitable to be included in the scoping review. The second, broader search revealed 14 results; however, none were deemed suitable for inclusion. AMSTAR 2 scores revealed that the three systematic reviews influencing CPWEC were of varying quality (from critically low to moderate). Conclusions: CPWEC is based on heterogenous reviews of varying quality. However, comparable tools are designed using alternative forms of evidence. Further research evaluating the post-implementation efficacy of the tool is needed. Full article

Background: Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) for anorexia nervosa (AN) is an intervention specifically focused on addressing cognitive difficulties associated with the eating disorder. This systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis aimed to provide a summary of the existing literature examining the efficacy of CRT in improving the neuropsychological, psychological, and clinical parameters of patients with AN. Methods: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were sought in electronic databases, encompassing studies that explored the impact of CRT on AN. Three eligible reviews were identified based on the inclusion criteria. The Revised Assessment of Multiple SysTemAtic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) was employed to evaluate the methodological quality of the reviews, and all included reviews demonstrated satisfactory methodological quality with an R-AMSTAR score of ≥22. Relevant information was extracted from each review and qualitatively compiled. Results: Findings suggest that CRT can help people increase their awareness of cognitive styles and information processing and have a positive effect on patients’ responses to treatment. Conclusions: Further research is required to better understand its impact on other relevant outcomes, including psychological variables, to optimize the treatment’s benefits. Full article

Background: The Foods with Function Claims (FFC) was introduced in Japan in April 2015 to make more products available that are labeled with health functions. The products’ functionality of function claims must be explained by scientific evidence presented in systematic reviews (SRs), but the quality of recent SRs is unclear. This study assessed the quality of SRs in the FFC registered on the Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) website in Japan. Methods: We searched the database from 1 April to 31 October 2022. Confidence in the methodological quality of each SR was evaluated by the AMSTAR 2 checklist. Results: Forty SRs were randomly extracted on the basis of the eligibility criteria and recruitment procedures. Overall confidence was rated as “high” (N = 0, 0%), “moderate” (N = 0, 0%), “low” (N = 2, 5%), or “critically low” (N = 38, 95%). The mean AMSTAR 2 score was 51.1% (SD 12.1%; range 19–73%). Among the 40 SRs, the number of critical domain deficiencies was 4 in 7.5% of SRs, 3 in 52.5% of SRs, 2 in 35% of SRs, and 1 in 5% of SRs. Registering the review’s protocol and comprehensive search strategies were particularly common deficiencies. Additionally, the risk of bias (RoB) was insufficiently considered. Conclusion: Overall, the methodological quality of the SRs based on the FFC, introduced eight years earlier, was very poor. This was especially true in the interpretation and discussion of critical domains, which had many deficiencies in terms of protocol registration, a comprehensive literature search strategy, and accounting for the RoB. Full article

Medical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is not always a feasible option due to a lack of full response or adverse effects. Open surgery or percutaneous procedures are advocated in these cases. Several articles have compared the results among different techniques. Nevertheless, the findings of these studies are heterogeneous. Umbrella reviews are studies sitting at the peak of the evidence pyramid. With this umbrella review, we provided a systematic review of the outcomes of the surgical procedures used for TN treatment. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included following the PRISMA guidelines. Ten articles were enrolled for qualitative and quantitative assessment. Level of evidence was quantified using a specific tool (AMSTAR-2). Results were heterogenous in terms of outcome and measurements. Microvascular decompression (MVD) appeared to be the most effective procedure both in the short-term (pain relief in 85–96.6% of cases) and long-term follow-up (pain relief in 64–79% of cases), although showed the highest rate of complications. The results of percutaneous techniques were similar but radiosurgery showed the highest variation in term of pain relief and a higher rate of delayed responses. The use of the AMSTAR-2 tool to quantify the evidence level scored three studies as critically low and seven studies as low-level, revealing a lack of good quality studies on this topic. Our umbrella review evidenced the need of well-designed comparative studies and the utilization of validated scales in order to provide more homogenous data for pooled-analyses and meta-analyses in the field of TN surgical treatment. Full article

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in occupational medicine journals from 2014 to 2021. Methods: Papers edited between 2014 and 2021 in the 14 open access journals with the highest impact were assessed for their quality. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and if they were published in English. Results: The study included 335 studies. Among these, 149 were meta-analyses and 186 were systematic reviews. The values of the AMSTAR-2 score range between three and fourteen with a mean value of 9.85 (SD = 2.37). The factors that significantly and directly associate to a higher AMSTAR-2 score were impact factor (p = 0.003), number of consulted research databases (p = 0.011), declaration of PRISMA statement (p = 0.003), year of publication (p < 0.001) and performing a meta-analysis (p < 0.001).The R² values from the multivariate analysis showed that the AMSTAR-2 score could be predicted by the inclusion of these parameters by up to 23%. Conclusions: This study suggests a quality assessment methodology that could help readers in a fast identification of good systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Future studies should analyze more journals without applying language restrictions and consider a wider range of years of publication in order to give a more robust evidence for results. Full article

Recommendations addressing screening for scoliosis differ substantially. Systematically developed guidelines are confronted by consensus and opinion-based statements. This paper elaborates on the issue of the standards of development and reporting of current guidelines and recommendation statements, as well as on the methodological quality of the corresponding evidence syntheses. The SORT classification and the AMSTAR 2 tool were used for those purposes, respectively. Publications included in the analysis differed substantially in terms of their methodological quality. Based on the SORT and AMSTAR 2 scores, the 2018 US PSTF recommendation statement and systematic review on screening for scoliosis are trustworthy and high-quality sources of evidence and aid for decision making. The recommendation statement on insufficient evidence to formulate any recommendations is, paradoxically, very informative. Significantly, updated opinion-based position statements supporting screening for scoliosis acknowledged the importance of research evidence as a basis for recommendation formulation and are more cautious and balanced than formerly. Expert opinions, not built on properly presented analyses of evidence, are at odds with evidence-based practice. Nonetheless, contemporary principles of screening programs, especially those addressing people’s values and preferences, and the possible harms of screening, remain underrepresented in both research and recommendations addressing screening for scoliosis. Full article

Upper extremities limitation is a common functional impairment in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Novel technological devices are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation to support motor function improvement and the quantitative assessment of motor performance during training in patients with neurological diseases. In this review, we systematically report the evidence on clinical applications and robotic-assisted arm training (RAT) in functional recovery in PwMS. PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) databases were systematically searched from inception to March 2021. The 10-item PEDro scale assessed the study quality for the RCT, and the AMSTAR-2 was used to assess the quality of the systematic review. The 5-item Oxford CEBM scale was used to rate the level of evidence. A total of 10 studies (161 subjects) were included. The selected studies included one systematic review, four RCTs, one randomized crossover, and four case series. The RCTs were scored as high-quality studies, while the systematic review was determined to be of low quality. Shoulder range of motion, handgrip strength, and proximal arm impairment improved after RAT. Manual dexterity, arm function, and use in daily life also ameliorated arm function. The high clinical heterogeneity of treatment programs and the variety of robot devices affects the generalizability of the study results; therefore, we emphasize the need to standardize the intervention type in future studies that evaluate the role of robotic-assisted training in PwMS. Robot-assisted treatment seems safe and useful to increase manual dexterity and the quality of movement execution in PwMS with moderate to severe disability. Additional studies with an adequate sample size and methodological rigour are warranted to drive definite conclusions. Full article