Emerging -Scapes: Conceptual and Spatial Constructs in Architectural and Urban Studies

A special issue of Urban Science (ISSN 2413-8851). This special issue belongs to the section "Urban Planning and Design".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2026 | Viewed by 1761

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73/II, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia
Interests: architectural programming; urban morphology; urban housing; landscape studies; sustainability and heritage

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Čika Ljubina 18-20, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Interests: spatial and urban sociology; social ontology; anthropocene

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73/II, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia
Interests: urban morphology; urban typology; urban form; public spaces

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

When Arjun Appadurai introduced the notion of “-scapes” in the early 1990s, he sought to capture the disjunctive, deterritorialized flows that structure our global condition: ethnoscapes, mediascapes, technoscapes, financescapes, and ideoscapes. More than three decades later, the “-scape” is not revisited here out of conceptual nostalgia. Rather, we contend that it remains an underutilized spatial analytic in architectural and urban research—one capable of tracing the radically recomposed conditions of spatial life in the Anthropocene. Urban environments are no longer shaped solely by physical infrastructures but also by planetary degradation, algorithmic governance, and digital sovereignty regimes. In an era marked by ecological urgencies and expanding platform economies, cities emerge less as fixed containers and more as metabolic assemblages—terrains traversed by flows of matter, energy, data, labor, affect, and code. From smart infrastructures and robotic protocols to automated labor regimes, trial ecologies, and retrofitted housing futures, contemporary urban and architectural forms demand new conceptual maps. As recent scholarship shows, the digital and ecological spheres are now co-constitutive forces, reconfiguring governance, perception, and spatial agency.

Against this backdrop, this Special Issue invites contributions that critically engage with the conceptual and spatial paradigm of “-scapes” in architectural and urban studies. The suffix “-scape” has increasingly evolved into a theoretical tool to describe spatial conditions as fluid, multi-layered, and dynamically constructed environments. Building on Appadurai’s influential framework, this Issue explores how architectural and urban thinking can extend and spatialize such imaginaries in response to contemporary global, ecological, and technological transformations.

The overall focus is on how diverse types of “-scapes”, including but not limited to spascapes, servicescapes, soundscapes, datascapes, repair-scapes, platform-scapes, naturescapes, smartscapes, or technoscapes, inform the way we design, perceive, govern, and contest built and unbuilt environments. These scapes are not merely symbolic framings of terrain but perspectival and infrastructural formations, emerging at the intersections of bodies, buildings, sensors, systems, and imaginaries. The scope of this Issue therefore spans empirical, theoretical, and design-based inquiries into emerging landscapes of care and wellness, infrastructure and heritage, ecological systems, digitalization and artificial intelligence, publicness and privatization, and multi-sensory or affective spatial experiences. By foregrounding hybrid or intersecting spatial logics, this Special Issue seeks to open new conceptual and methodological avenues for understanding the production and negotiation of spatial experience.

In doing so, this Special Issue aims to supplement the existing literature by bridging theoretical reflections on global flows and imaginaries with grounded architectural and urban research. While concepts such as landscape urbanism, smart cities, and wellness architecture have attracted scholarly attention, there is a pressing need to reframe them within a more integrative and critical lens that attends to the situated, relational, and speculative dimensions of spatial production. The “-scape” framework offers a valuable conceptual infrastructure to connect diverse research trajectories and foster dialogue across disciplines. We particularly welcome contributions that approach space as an imagined world—experienced, produced, and contested by individuals, institutions, and communities across cultural and geographic contexts.

Dr. Aleksandra Milovanović
Dr. Stefan Janković
Prof. Dr. Vladan Djokic
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Urban Science is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • spatial theory
  • landscape and urban imaginaries
  • urban transformation
  • multisensory environments
  • situated spatial practices
  • hybrid spatialities
  • architecture and urban experience
  • cultural and social infrastructures
  • digital urbanism
  • design research methodologies
  • interdisciplinary approaches to space

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

28 pages, 4289 KB  
Article
Mining-Scapes of Participation in Serbian Extractive Regions: Enhancing Participatory Processes in Decision-Making
by Marijana Pantić, Milena Toković, Tamara Maričić, Dušanka Milosavljević and Milovan Vuković
Urban Sci. 2026, 10(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10010005 - 20 Dec 2025
Viewed by 195
Abstract
Extractive regions are among the most visible frontlines of the Anthropocene as they are areas where the environmental and social consequences of intensive resource exploitation are concentrated. In Serbia, mining areas such as Bor and Majdanpek represent complex socio-spatial assemblages in which everyday [...] Read more.
Extractive regions are among the most visible frontlines of the Anthropocene as they are areas where the environmental and social consequences of intensive resource exploitation are concentrated. In Serbia, mining areas such as Bor and Majdanpek represent complex socio-spatial assemblages in which everyday life, work, and governance intersect under pressures of neoliberal development and ecological degradation. This study aims to identify the challenges and opportunities for citizen participation in mining regions, providing guidance on enhancing participatory processes in decision-making. To operationalise this aim, the study pursues three objectives: (1) to assess residents’ awareness, participation practices, access to information, and motivation to engage in planning; (2) to identify perceived barriers and opportunities for participation; and (3) to formulate recommendations for improving participatory and communication processes in extractive-region governance. Accordingly, the research is guided by the main question: How do residents of the Bor–Majdanpek mining region perceive opportunities and barriers to public participation in planning and decision-making processes? To address this question, a face-to-face field survey was conducted in the summer of 2024 with a random sample of residents (N = 300). In this mixed-methods exploratory study, primary survey data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods. In contrast, open-ended questions were analysed qualitatively to capture respondents’ detailed perceptions and suggestions. Findings indicate limited awareness of planning procedures, low participation experience, and structural barriers related to information access, trust, and institutional responsiveness. At the same time, respondents show a strong interest in more transparent, accessible, and dialogic forms of engagement. This study demonstrates that citizen participation in extractive landscapes is not only a procedural requirement but a mechanism to strengthen democratic governance and rebuild trust. Insights from Bor–Majdanpek provide an evidence base for improving participatory practices in mining regions undergoing socio-environmental transformation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 3889 KB  
Article
Controlled Openness: How Architectural Agency Remade Public Space and Civic Life in Riyadh’s Oil-Boom Era (1980s–1990s)
by Naif Alghamdi and Mohammed Mashary Alnaim
Urban Sci. 2025, 9(11), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9110491 - 19 Nov 2025
Viewed by 869
Abstract
This study investigates how architectural buildings integrating open-space architectural forms that enabled new modes of public space contributed to reshaping civic life in Riyadh between the 1980s and early 1990s. While previous scholarship has largely focused on the city’s infrastructural expansion and planning [...] Read more.
This study investigates how architectural buildings integrating open-space architectural forms that enabled new modes of public space contributed to reshaping civic life in Riyadh between the 1980s and early 1990s. While previous scholarship has largely focused on the city’s infrastructural expansion and planning discourse, it has given limited attention to the role of architecture in producing spatial openness and publicness in culturally conservative, climatically harsh, and state-directed urban contexts. Using a multi-case qualitative methodology, the research examines three landmark projects—Kindy Plaza in the Diplomatic Quarter, Qasr Al-Hukm District, and the Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs & Housing—and analyzes their formal configurations, user behaviors, and socio-spatial implications. The findings reveal that these projects introduced varying degrees of “controlled permeability” and hybrid public typologies, enabling shifts in spatial behavior, civic identity, and urban connectivity. Framed within a contextual model synthesizing theories of socially produced space, architectural mediation, relational urbanism, and typological adaptation, the study offers new insights into how architecture can mediate public transformation in non-Western cities undergoing negotiated modernity. The research contributes to broader discourses on urban design, architectural agency, and public life in the Global South. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop