sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Social Media, Crisis Communication, and Publics

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2021) | Viewed by 7608

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Communication and Digital Media, University of Western Macedonia, Kastoria 52100, Greece
Interests: crisis communication; public relations; consumer experience; social media in election campaigns; e-government

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Crises are inevitable events that happen suddenly and harm businesses, non-profit organizations, public organizations, industries, governments, economies, as well as public figures. Social media can impose barriers, as they are platforms where a crisis begins and escalates but can create opportunities for affected entities. Specifically, social media can help organizations and public personas monitor audience reactions; effectively communicate their crisis response; respond to their stakeholders’ questions; and thus, manage their image and reputation. These new platforms also create new spaces where citizens can retrieve and share relevant crisis information, interact with other users and organizations, as well as express their emotions and thoughts during crisis events.

So far, related work on social media crisis communication has expanded traditional crisis communication theories (e.g., situational crisis communication theory, image repair theory), generated new crisis communication models for social-mediated environments, and applied various methodological approaches for the examination of the antecedents and consequences of crisis communication across different sectors, types of social media, and types of crises.

However, there still a great potential for additional research regarding the intersection between crisis communication and social media. Researchers and scholars need to continue addressing questions such as: How are various crisis communication theories applied in different types of social media? What factors drive the effectiveness of social media crisis communication? How does social media crisis communication impact the offline world and the public’s perceptions and emotions? What are the characteristics of social media users during times of crises? How do businesses, public organizations, and personas utilize social media to respond to different types of crises? Hence, this Special Issue aims to further research on social media crisis communication and welcomes contributions on, but not limited to, the following topics:

  • Social media crisis communication models;
  • Situational crisis communication and image repair theory in social-mediated environments;
  • Crisis communication patterns on social media during natural disasters;
  • Health-related crisis communication (Covid-19) and social media usage by organizations and citizens;
  • User characteristics and types during times of crisis;
  • Effective crisis communication strategies on social media;
  • Brand crisis communication on social media;
  • Political crises and scandals on social media;
  • Social media engagement in crisis communication;
  • Visual crisis communication on social media (e.g., Instagram);
  • Social media crisis communication and corporate social responsibility;
  • Social media crisis communication and reputation;
  • Dialogic communication on social media during a crisis.

Dr. Amalia Triantafillidou
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • social media
  • crisis communication
  • public reaction
  • organization
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • social media engagement
  • disaster communication
  • health-related crises

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 570 KiB  
Article
Social Climate and Psychological Response in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Greek Academic Community
by Domna Michail, Dimitris Anastasiou, Nektaria Palaiologou and Giorgos Avlogiaris
Sustainability 2022, 14(3), 1576; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031576 - 29 Jan 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1511
Abstract
This study examines how the social climate was associated with the psychological response during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a structural equation model linking the economic crisis to the social climate (pandemic fear, social and psychological distress, civil protection, and [...] Read more.
This study examines how the social climate was associated with the psychological response during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a structural equation model linking the economic crisis to the social climate (pandemic fear, social and psychological distress, civil protection, and population’s response) and to the psychological response (perspectives of life and reconsidering values), we tested their multivariate relationships in a Greek academic community sample. At the first level of the model, the economic crisis was significantly associated with the social climate: pandemic fear, social/psychological distress, and civil protection. At the second level, social/psychological distress was associated with the pandemic fear and civil protection, whereas the pandemic fear was associated with the population’s response to governmental measures. At the third level, civil protection was directly associated with the psychological response resilience variables: perspectives of life and reconsidering values. The model explained a significant amount of the variance in the population’s response (62%), reconsidering values (42%), and perspectives of life (32%). Moreover, women presented higher levels of social/psychological distress, pandemic fear, and perspectives of life. Finally, younger people were more affected by the social/psychological distress and pandemic fear, whereas older people presented higher levels in the population’s response to governmental measures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Media, Crisis Communication, and Publics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1601 KiB  
Article
Exploring Negative Spillover Effects on Stakeholders: A Case Study on Social Media Talk about Crisis in the Food Industry Using Data Mining
by Dorit Zimand-Sheiner, Shalom Levy and Eyal Eckhaus
Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10845; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910845 - 29 Sep 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2654
Abstract
Focusing on public-centered, social-mediated crisis communication, the current exploratory study drew on situational crisis communication theory to formulate a comprehensive view of consumer reactions to crisis. Data mining and automated content analysis techniques were utilized to analyze social media posts by the public [...] Read more.
Focusing on public-centered, social-mediated crisis communication, the current exploratory study drew on situational crisis communication theory to formulate a comprehensive view of consumer reactions to crisis. Data mining and automated content analysis techniques were utilized to analyze social media posts by the public during a crisis in the cereals industry. Two path analyses showed that: (a) crisis-related social media posts tended to skip over competitor brand products, followed by two major reaction paths—(1) a rational path based on guilt attribution that justifies implications for the company and (2) an emotional path associated with public distrust; and (b) public self-blame spilled over to other stakeholders such as the government and economic system. The results give voice to issues that concern the public during crises, both as individuals and as a community. They highlight the fact that sustainable crisis management should involve additional stakeholders. Conclusions and implications for society and practice are suggested. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Media, Crisis Communication, and Publics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 18559 KiB  
Article
Framing the EU: Big Data Analysis of South Korean News Media
by Sung-Won Yoon and Sae Won Chung
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 1621; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041621 - 3 Feb 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2321
Abstract
Since 2010, both South Korea and the European Union have rapidly developed their diplomatic ties by completing a Free Trade Agreement and establishing a strategic partnership. However, perceptions of the European Union (EU) among Korean elites, media, and public have not been properly [...] Read more.
Since 2010, both South Korea and the European Union have rapidly developed their diplomatic ties by completing a Free Trade Agreement and establishing a strategic partnership. However, perceptions of the European Union (EU) among Korean elites, media, and public have not been properly established. Against this backdrop, it is of value to examine the news media, which are the main sources of information for elites and the public. The purpose of this study is to examine the evolution of representations of the EU among South Korean media. To examine media representation, this study employed a quantitative methodology (semantic network analysis) for reviewing the data and a qualitative methodology (framing analysis) to interpret the results. The results of this study indicate that both conservative and liberal media employ conflict, economic consequences, and human interest framings to report EU issues. Despite some minor changes, neither type of media demonstrated clear differences in their EU coverage. The conclusion presented in this paper states that the South Korean media projects an incomplete picture of the EU to the Korean public. To overcome this issue, both South Korea and the EU should pay more attention to establishing accurate mutual perceptions to support a constructive future for their bilateral co-operation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Media, Crisis Communication, and Publics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop