sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of Biofuels

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Engineering and Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2021) | Viewed by 5034

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
GreenTech AgriFood & Innovation Canada; and School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada
Interests: biofuels; biomaterials; food vs. fuel nexus; waste management; life cycle assessment (LCA); life cycle costing (LCC); sustainability
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Biofuels are produced from a wide variety of feedstock, namely 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th generation biofuels. Although much attention has been placed on the development of biofuels to combat the rising global warming potential (GWP), they are not yet competitive with their counterparts. In addition, countries have set a wide range of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets for biofuels compared to conventional fossil fuels. Currently, there is a big question regarding what biofuels should be produced, the sources of biomass, and the types of land that should be used for growing biomass to avoid competition with food/feed. Consequently, any initiatives or investments in biofuel need to be evaluated to determine their environmental and economic sustainability, as well as their rebound effects on sustainable development.

This Special Issue calls for manuscripts on technoeconomic and environmental issues of biofuels to demonstrate their environmental and economic viability for policymakers and environmentalists. The manuscript may report experimental results, theoretical analysis, and modeling. This Special Issue aims to include manuscripts on the following non-restrictive topics as centered on life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC):

  • Thermochemical and biochemical conversion (1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th generation biofuels);
  • Energy crops for bioenergy and sustainable land management;
  • Co-processing of biomass and industrial waste streams;
  • Carbon sequestration/carbon cycle;
  • Sustainability of biofuels.

Dr. Poritosh Roy
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomass conversion technologies
  • biofuels
  • LCA, LCC
  • sustainability of biofuels

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

33 pages, 1620 KiB  
Article
Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Energy Sources for the Western Australian Transport Sector
by Najmul Hoque, Wahidul Biswas, Ilyas Mazhar and Ian Howard
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5565; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145565 - 10 Jul 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4440
Abstract
Environmental obligation, fuel security, and human health issues have fuelled the search for locally produced sustainable transport fuels as an alternative to liquid petroleum. This study evaluates the sustainability performance of various alternative energy sources, namely, ethanol, electricity, electricity-gasoline hybrid, and hydrogen, for [...] Read more.
Environmental obligation, fuel security, and human health issues have fuelled the search for locally produced sustainable transport fuels as an alternative to liquid petroleum. This study evaluates the sustainability performance of various alternative energy sources, namely, ethanol, electricity, electricity-gasoline hybrid, and hydrogen, for Western Australian road transport using a life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework. The framework employs 11 triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability indicators and uses threshold values for benchmarking sustainability practices. A number of improvement strategies were devised based on the hotspots once the alternative energy sources failed to meet the sustainability threshold for the determined indicators. The proposed framework effectively addresses the issue of interdependencies between the three pillars of sustainability, which was an inherent weakness of previous frameworks. The results show that the environment-friendly and socially sustainable energy options, namely, ethanol-gasoline blend E55, electricity, electricity-E10 hybrid, and hydrogen, would need around 0.02, 0.14, 0.10, and 0.71 AUD/VKT of financial support, respectively, to be comparable to gasoline. Among the four assessed options, hydrogen shows the best performance for the environmental and social bottom line when renewable electricity is employed for hydrogen production. The economic sustainability of hydrogen fuel is, however, uncertain at this stage due to the high cost of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs). The robustness of the proposed framework warrants its application in a wide range of alternative fuel assessment scenarios locally as well as globally. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of Biofuels)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop