sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Innovation Strategies and Capabilities

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Ecology and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 12 July 2024 | Viewed by 2656

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Hochschule Heilbronn, Campus Schwäbisch Hall, 74081 Heilbronn, Germany
2. Artificial Intelligence Department, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28660 Boadilla del Monte, Spain
Interests: artificial intelligence; deep learning; cyberphysical systems; business intelligence; strategic organizational design
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
Interests: renewable energy systems; circular economy; sustainable product and service development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Marketing & Sales, University of Applied Sciences Heilbronn, Campus Schwäbisch Hall, 74523 Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
Interests: sustainable procurement management; sustainable-oriented innovations

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Against the background of transformative societal and economic change towards sustainability, companies have to find a way to react or respond to various regulatory, technological and market push and pull stimuli (Demirel & Kesidou, 2019; Fagerberg, 2018). Innovations are considered as one of the most effective strategies of businesses to contribute to reaching sustainability goals (OECD, 2010; Pedersen et al., 2018). Research on this synergy has grown in the recent years (e.g. Boons & Lüdeke-Freund 2013; Inigo & Albareda 2019a). According to Alfetra et al. (2021) “more emphasis has been placed on those innovations that can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals in order to achieve a “win-win-win” situation”. A variety of concepts and terminologies is used in the connection with sustainability and innovation. Often they are used interchangeably, such as e.g., “green innovation” (e.g., Stephen Oduro et al, 2021), “eco-innovation” (Pichlak & Szromek, 2021), “environmental innovation” (e.g., Leyva-de la Hiz et al., 2019), “responsible innovation” (e.g., Lubberink et al., 2017) or “inclusive innovation for sustainability” (e.g., Kalkanci et al., 2019). But,often the social sphere of sustainability is dismissed. To include innovations that focus on balancing the triple-bottom-line approach, the idea of sustainability-oriented innovations (SOIs) is used. It describes “innovations in which the renewal or improvement of products, services, technological or organisational processes delivers not only improved economic performance, but also an enhanced environmental and social performance” (Bos-Brouwers, 2010, p. 422)The development of specific (new) sustainability-oriented capabilities is discussed initially in the scientific community, but is valued as key prerequisite for corporate competitiveness, systemic transformation and adaptation of corporate strategic sustainability (Dangelico et al., 2017; Demirel & Kesidou, 2019; Inigo & Albareda, 2019b). The aim of this Special Issue is to generate new ideas regarding capabilities that might stimulate sustainability-oriented innovations. Topics for the Special Issue should combine aspects of sustainability, innovation and (dynamic) capabilities and might include, but are not limited to:

  • Internal/external capabilities, dynamic capabilities, organizational capabilities, collaborative capabilities etc. related to SOIs
  • Influence of ownership and capital structure on SOI related capabilities
  • Influence of company size, sector affiliation on SOI related capabilities
  • Different forms of innovations (process, organisational, services, open etc.)
  • Eco-innovations and related capabilities
  • Social innovations and related capabilities
  • SOI innovation ecosystems and related capabilities
  • Concepts related to SOIs such as e.g. responsible innovations (e.g. Lubberink et al., 2019; Owen et al., 2013), frugal innovations (e.g. Albert, 2019; Hossain, 2018), convivial innovations (e.g. Kerschner et al., 2018; Pansera & Fressoli, 2021) that might broaden the discussion.

Besides that, the editors welcome contributions that deal with findings from case studies, longitudinal research, critical theory analysis, concept development, comparative observation, empirical evidence or qualitative methodology.

References:

Afeltra, G., Alerasoul, S. A., & Strozzi, F. (2021). The evolution of sustainable innovation: from the past to the future. European Journal of Innovation Management.

Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable frugal innovation-The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117747.

Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M., Li, J., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2020). Innovation as a driver of eco‐innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1494-1503.

Boons, F., Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). “Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda.” Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 9–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007

Bos-Brouwers, H.J.B. (2010). “Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 19, pp. 417-435.

Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability-Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective. Business Strategy & the Environment, 26(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932.

Hossain, M. (2018). Frugal innovation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 926-936.

Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2019). Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 847-857.

Fagerberg, J. (2018). Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy, 47(9), 1568–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012.

Inigo, E.A. (2019a). Environmental Factors in Business Engagement in Innovation for Sustainability. In: Bocken N., Ritala P., Albareda L., Verburg R. (eds.) Innovation for Sustainability. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business in Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97385-2_4.

Inigo, E. A., & Albareda, L. (2019b). Sustainability oriented innovation dynamics: Levels of dynamic capabilities and their path-dependent and self-reinforcing logics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.023.

Kalkanci, B., Rahmani, M., & Toktay, L. B. (2019). The Role of “Inclusive Innovation” in Promoting Social Sustainability. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), 2960-2982. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13112.

Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L., & Ehlers, M. H. (2018). Degrowth and Technology: Towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of cleaner production, 197, 1619-1636.

Leyva-de la Hiz, D. I., Ferron-Vilchez, V., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2019). Do Firms’ Slack Resources Influence the Relationship Between Focused Environmental Innovations and Financial Performance? More is Not Always Better. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3772-3.

Lubberink, R., Blok, V., van Ophem, J., & Omta, O. (2019). Responsible innovation by social entrepreneurs: an exploratory study of values integration in innovations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(2), 179-210.

Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 31, 27-50.

Pansera, M., & Fressoli, M. (2021). Innovation without growth: Frameworks for understanding technological change in a post-growth era. Organization, 28(3), 380-404.

Pichlak, M., & Szromek, A. R. (2021). Eco-innovation, sustainability and business model innovation by open innovation dynamics. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 149.

Prof. Dr. Javier Villalba-Diez
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Gerstlberger
Prof. Dr. Wanja Wellbrock
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable innovation strategies
  • global green economy
  • inaction risk climate change
  • transition strategies sustainability
  • sustainability-oriented innovations
  • sustainable innovation (dynamic) capabilities
  • new concepts for sustainable innovations

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 25267 KiB  
Article
Research on Design Strategy of Mask Recycling Service Based on Behavior Environment
by Yueqin Wu, Hao Zhang and Miao Zhang
Sustainability 2023, 15(2), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021065 - 06 Jan 2023
Viewed by 1604
Abstract
The global novel coronavirus pandemic has caused a surge in the use of masks worldwide. A large number of used masks that have not been properly handled enter the environment, which caused and will cause serious ecological problems. The purpose of this study [...] Read more.
The global novel coronavirus pandemic has caused a surge in the use of masks worldwide. A large number of used masks that have not been properly handled enter the environment, which caused and will cause serious ecological problems. The purpose of this study is to propose a solution to the problem of mask management from the perspective of science of design, and to build a good mask recycling service design strategy through the combination of design and psychology. Firstly, based on the theory of behavioral environment and field investigation, this study analyzes the correlation between the existing mask recycling device and its recycling efficiency, user behavior psychology and environment, and studies the behavioral scene of mask recycling, and then establishes the center of design strategy implementation. Secondly, a visual guidance system is designed, as is a special recycling device for masks by color psychology and product design. Thirdly, combined with the concept of social innovation service design, the design of a mask recycling strategy is conceived, and the optimization and formulation of mask recycling strategy is demonstrated through stakeholders, user journey maps and service flow charts. Finally, the design strategy is hierarchically established, and the feasibility analysis system model of a mask recycling strategy design is constructed. The data collection is carried out through expert interviews and questionnaires, and the weight is calculated by a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. The final output comprehensive evaluation results show that the mask recycling strategy constructed in this study has public recognition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Innovation Strategies and Capabilities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop