sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Environmental Policy as a Tool for Sustainable Development: 2nd Edition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Sustainability and Applications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 2472

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, 193 Pantazidou, 68200 Orestiada, Greece
Interests: environmental policy; decision-making; energy transition; renewable energy investments; environmental awareness
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, Orestiada, Greece
Interests: environmental communication; environmental policy; public relations; forest extension
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Relying on a combination of regulatory, market, and voluntary instruments, environmental policy is creating a favorable context in which it is possible to address pressing issues of sustainable development such as carbon emissions reduction, energy saving, energy efficiency, resource decoupling and reuse, or the valuation of ecosystems services. Since environmental policy can play a crucial role as a tool for sustainable development, it is necessary for policymakers to consider the latest research findings on ways to achieve sustainable development and to focus on science-based policymaking.

Sustainable development is a concept that seeks to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Environmental policy serves as a means to achieve this by addressing the environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability by establishing a framework for resource management, economic growth, climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, pollution control, waste management, environmental justice, international cooperation, education and awareness, long-term planning, stakeholder engagement, and monitoring and evaluation.

The aim of this Special Issue is to collate original research papers, reviews, and perspectives that address the application of environmental policies as tools for sustainable development. We welcome papers that utilize both traditional and innovative approaches including surveys, databases, machine learning, and modeling applications. Additionally, we invite submissions addressing the decision-making processes involved in the design of policy measures, the frameworks under policy design, the evaluation of current environmental policies, and the underlying connections between policy measures, climate change mitigation, and sustainability.

The following are the potential topics of interest:

  • Energy Transition:
    1. The promotion of renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and hydropower;
    2. Incentives for energy-efficient technologies and practices;
  • The phasing out of fossil fuel subsidies.
  • Climate Action:
    1. Commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in line with international agreements (e.g., the Paris Agreement);
    2. The implementation of carbon pricing mechanisms, such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems;
  • Investment in climate adaptation and resilience measures.
  • Biodiversity Conservation:
    1. The establishment and management of protected areas and wildlife reserves;
    2. Habitat restoration and reforestation programs;
  • Regulations to prevent the illegal wildlife trade and protect endangered species.
  • Sustainable Agriculture:
    1. The promotion of organic farming practices and sustainable land use;
    2. Support for small-scale farmers and access to markets;
  • Reductions in chemical pesticide and fertilizer use.
  • Circular Economy:
    1. Policies to promote recycling, waste reduction, and product reuse;
    2. Incentives for eco-design and sustainable manufacturing.
  • Social Equity:
    1. The implementation of policies to reduce income inequality and promote social inclusion;
    2. Support for rural, vulnerable, and marginalized communities.
  • Natural Resource Management:
    1. Sustainable forestry practices and responsible logging regulations;
    2. Soil conservation and land management policies.
  • Green Technology Innovation:
    1. Support for the research and development of clean and sustainable technologies;
    2. Intellectual property rights and patent policies that promote green innovation.
  • International Cooperation:
    1. Engagement in international partnerships and collaborations to address global sustainability challenges;
    2. Participation in United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) initiatives.
  • Environmental Education and Public Awareness:
    1. Educational programs to raise awareness about sustainable practices.
  • Long-Term Planning and Reporting:
    1. The development of long-term sustainability plans and goals;
    2. The regular reporting and assessment of progress toward sustainability targets.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Konstantinos S. Ioannou
Dr. Evangelia Karasmanaki
Prof. Dr. Georgios Tsantopoulos
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • environmental policy
  • decision making
  • climate change
  • sustainability 
  • environmental governance
  • circular economy
  • climate action
  • policymaking
  • technological transition
  • environmental agreements
  • strategic planning
  • stakeholder engagement

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 2708 KiB  
Article
The Nonlinear Relationship Between Urbanization and Ecological Environment in China Under the PSR (Pressure-State-Response) Model: Inflection Point Identification and Policy Pathways
by Ruofei An, Xiaowu Hu and Shucun Sun
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4450; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104450 - 14 May 2025
Viewed by 580
Abstract
In the process of social development, there is a contradiction between economic development and the ecological environment. Western countries were the first to experience the inverted U-shaped development model of “destruction first and compensation later”, and China is also facing similar problems. To [...] Read more.
In the process of social development, there is a contradiction between economic development and the ecological environment. Western countries were the first to experience the inverted U-shaped development model of “destruction first and compensation later”, and China is also facing similar problems. To reveal the formation mechanism and dynamic evolution of the inflection point of ecological environment changes in China, this paper combines the entropy weight method, the analytic hierarchy process, and quadratic curve fitting to construct the “Ecological Pressure Index—GDPP Model” and studies the inflection point of ecological pressure during China’s economic development from 2000 to 2022. The study shows that the key inflection point of China’s ecological environment pressure is between 2016 and 2017, which is mainly affected by multiple factors such as the economy, domestic and international situations, and policy adjustments. For example, the implementation of the “Supply-side Structural Reform” and the environmental protection supervision system has significantly reduced the pollution pressure. At the same time, the “inflection point” is applied to dynamically adjust the PSR model, revealing the stage transition of China’s environmental governance focus. For instance, from 2000 to 2016, end-of-pipe pollution treatment was dominant (for example, the weights of pollution emission indicators X5X8 were relatively high), while after 2016, the focus of governance shifted to the restoration of ecological space (for example, the weight of nature reserves X22 was 2.759%). The theoretical contribution of this paper lies in proposing the concept of “Policy-driven EKC”, emphasizing the core role of policy intervention in the formation of the inflection point of the ecological environment. In addition, the dynamic adjustment of the PSR model using the “inflection point” better interprets China’s self-transformation in the development process and provides other developing countries with a Chinese solution of “institutional innovation first” and the “Policy-driven EKC—Chinese PSR Model” for reference in balancing economic growth and ecological protection. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

26 pages, 1290 KiB  
Article
Türkiye’s Alignment with the Paris Agreement: A Comparative Policy Analysis with Germany and Spain
by Akın Batmaz and Goknur Sisman-Aydin
Sustainability 2025, 17(9), 3899; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093899 - 25 Apr 2025
Viewed by 521
Abstract
This study examines Türkiye’s compliance with the Paris Agreement by comparing its climate policy framework with those of Germany and Spain—two EU countries with absolute, legally binding emission reduction targets. Despite ratifying the Paris Agreement in 2021 and declaring a net-zero target for [...] Read more.
This study examines Türkiye’s compliance with the Paris Agreement by comparing its climate policy framework with those of Germany and Spain—two EU countries with absolute, legally binding emission reduction targets. Despite ratifying the Paris Agreement in 2021 and declaring a net-zero target for 2053, Türkiye’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) lacks absolute reduction commitments and a comprehensive Climate Act. This gap is particularly critical given the EU’s implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which links climate action to trade competitiveness. Using a comparative policy analysis approach, this study evaluates official emission data, legal documents, and EU climate progress reports to assess the coherence of Türkiye’s climate strategy. The findings indicated that Türkiye’s emissions continue to rise in the presence of fossil fuel domination and the absence of binding targets. Conversely, Germany and Spain have reduced emissions through robust legislation, functioning Emissions Trading Systems, and long-term investment in renewables. This study offers policy recommendations tailored to Türkiye’s context, including the adoption of absolute and binding targets, acceleration of renewable energy—especially solar—and the promotion of community-based energy models, inspired by Spain’s approach. Additionally, mechanisms to balance energy security, local acceptance, and decarbonization are discussed, drawing from Germany’s phased fossil fuel exit. The results indicate that Türkiye’s ability to align with EU climate targets and the Paris Agreement without compromising its development priorities or energy supply security can only be achieved with a realistic roadmap and specific reforms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop