sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2022) | Viewed by 16093

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Embedded in the normative principles of inter and intra generational equity, the promotion of sustainable development has come to be seen as requiring complex systems of multi-sector, multi-level governance, open to participatory and reflexive processes. However, in recent times governance practices have been reshaped by managerialist and neo-liberal trends, diverting practices away from the original sustainable development imaginary. Furthermore, governance efforts are now confronted with social, economic and political contexts characterised by austerity, populist politics and the ‘’securitisation’’ of the environmental agenda. These ‘’troubled times’’ offer values that directly contradict the sustainable development imaginary.

This SI asks for papers that explore context dynamics to examine whether the existing understanding of governance for sustainable development continues to be relevant. Here, we specifically call upon contributors to:

  • Examine how, and in what ways, approaches to the governance of sustainable development reflect particular historic social, political and cultural configurations, and consider whether what has come to be seen as the core requirements of sustainable development governance continue to remain valid in the contemporary period;
  • Explore the challenges presented for how we govern the pursuit of sustainable futures by the current configuration of geopolitical and ideological frames;
  • Consider how governance approaches might need to develop in response, including by examining more recent re-politicisation, as witnessed by the de-growth movement, the climate justice and just transition movements, and youth dissent on climate change.

Call for Papers

We seek papers dealing individually or in combination with the following:

  1. Failings in the earlier conceptualisation of governance for sustainable development, for example, the relative neglect of issues of power, interest and agency; or analysis of the extent to which its radical intent became co-opted to other agendas, examined from a theoretical perspective;
  2. Factors that may have restricted the impact of governance for sustainable development, such as, for example, deep structural barriers, the socio-economic resilience of unsustainability, the actions of vested interests, or limitations of democratic governance. Such papers can be of a theoretical or empirical nature;
  3. Theoretical insights dealing directly with the linkages between the rise of populism and existing approaches to governance for sustainable development, including as they relate to participatory forms of governance;
  4. Factors that may be subverting the value base of governance for sustainable development, particularly for experimentation, participatory processes, reflexivity and learning. This can include papers, for example, on the adoption of managerialist or neo-liberal approaches, the rise of populism, and/or the emergence of the securitization agenda. Such papers can be of a theoretical or empirical nature;
  5. The changing framing of sustainable development and/or related governance approaches in a specific institutional context. Papers, for example, can deal with empirical study of the development of policy narratives and practice amongst States (including across multi-level scale), State-like actors (UN; EU), Business Interest Associations (BIAs) and NGOs;
  6. The examination of political responses to the current context, for example, from those who place environmental issues within a social justice and redistributive agenda, such as the US ‘Green New Deal’, as they relate to the theme of the SI;
  7. Theoretical or empirical insights into measures that might better address the governance of sustainable development in contemporary, troubled times, including through examination of re-politicisation and dissent movements.

Papers should be no more than 8,000 words in length, inclusive of the abstract, tables, references, figure captions, and endnotes. We expect 8–10 papers to be included in the SI, inclusive of the Introduction. The Guest Editors will invite potential participation based on initial submission of abstracts. The Abstract should be submitted no later than 10th April 2019 and should be no more than 300 words in length. These will then be developed into expanded abstracts in discussion with the Editors. For abstract submission, please contact Assistant Editor Liv Li ([email protected])

Important deadlines:

  • Abstract submission: 10th April 2019
  • Final version submission: 15th December 2019

Prof. Susan Baker
Dr. Matthew Quinn
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Sustainable development
  • Governance

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
Populism, Austerity and Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times: Introduction to Special Issue
by Susan Baker and Matthew J. Quinn
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3271; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063271 - 10 Mar 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2486
Abstract
The sustainable development imaginary was built on a belief in co-operation, collaboration and consensus building and requires governance approaches that rely upon the values of a liberal, pluralistic, tolerant, and democratic society. Much scholarship assumed that the European Post-War, welfare, democratic order, with [...] Read more.
The sustainable development imaginary was built on a belief in co-operation, collaboration and consensus building and requires governance approaches that rely upon the values of a liberal, pluralistic, tolerant, and democratic society. Much scholarship assumed that the European Post-War, welfare, democratic order, with its emerging educated classes, would steadily progress towards an ever more refined and articulated version of these governance values. However, that governance imaginary has become increasingly deradicalised, focused instead on economic efficiency and technocracy. Our current ‘troubled times’ have now seen the rise of right populism and the imposition of austerity policies in Europe. Against this background, six key characteristics of sustainable development are examined through a governance lens—limits to growth, equity, inclusion, reflexivity, participation, and international solidarity—showing how right populism and austerity have further reshaped ideas about how to govern for sustainable development. Right populism and austerity have constrained both the narratives and tools available, while shrinking the political space for co-operation, reflection, and learning, poorly reflecting the governance values thought necessary to achieve an equitable and environmentally sustainable future. This has been further seen in the contested governance of the COVID-19 pandemic and the strategies designed to ensure post-Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic economic recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times)
14 pages, 266 KiB  
Article
Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals in Times of Rising Right-Wing Populism in Europe
by Sara Gottenhuber and Eric Mulholland
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8465; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208465 - 14 Oct 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2692
Abstract
This article discusses two ostensibly antagonistic themes: right-wing populism (RWP) and the UN 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). European politics has seen a sharp increase in right-wing populist influence over the last few election periods. More recently, such political influence has [...] Read more.
This article discusses two ostensibly antagonistic themes: right-wing populism (RWP) and the UN 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). European politics has seen a sharp increase in right-wing populist influence over the last few election periods. More recently, such political influence has led to questions about right-wing populism’s impact on environmental and sustainable development policy. This paper takes a novel approach to understanding the potential connections between the rise of RWP in Europe and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and SDGs in two ways. First, the paper is based on two workshops, informed by a preceding literature review on the topic of RWP in Europe, requested and organised by the European Sustainable Development Network (ESDN). Secondly, the results from the workshops are used to discuss and interpret the role of potentially differing worldviews (ontology, axiology, epistemology and societal vision) and how these relate to specific policy and governance responses, thereby impacting upon the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and SDGs in European countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times)
13 pages, 245 KiB  
Article
The Environment and Populist Radical Right in Eastern Europe: The Case of National Alliance 2010–2018
by Péteris F Timofejevs
Sustainability 2020, 12(19), 8092; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198092 - 01 Oct 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1860
Abstract
Although the literature on populist radical right parties (PRRP) in Western and Eastern Europe has expanded considerably in the last two decades, relatively little is known about the views on nature and the environment of the PRRP in Eastern Europe. This study focuses [...] Read more.
Although the literature on populist radical right parties (PRRP) in Western and Eastern Europe has expanded considerably in the last two decades, relatively little is known about the views on nature and the environment of the PRRP in Eastern Europe. This study focuses on the Latvian PRRP “National Alliance” (NA), which has not only been a coalition government partner since 2011, but occupied a ministerial post tasked with environmental policy from 2014 to 2019. This article examines how the NA viewed nature, the environment, and governance for sustainability in the period 2010–2018, and more specifically, whether and to what extent the NA’s vision of nature and the environment was compatible with its sustainable development position. The study employs qualitative content analysis examining the official party literature. The results indicate that the party’s vision embraced the sustainable development position in its declaratory statements on nature and environmental policy. The NA’s views on governance for sustainability demonstrate a strong statist preference, downplaying more participatory approaches, thus departing from the sustainable development governance position. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times)
16 pages, 1415 KiB  
Article
The Contours of State Retreat from Collaborative Environmental Governance under Austerity
by Nick Kirsop-Taylor, Duncan Russel and Michael Winter
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2761; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072761 - 01 Apr 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2837
Abstract
Although the effects of public austerity have been the subject of a significant literature in recent years, the changing role of the state as a partner in collaborative environmental governance under austerity has received less attention. By employing theories of collaborative governance and [...] Read more.
Although the effects of public austerity have been the subject of a significant literature in recent years, the changing role of the state as a partner in collaborative environmental governance under austerity has received less attention. By employing theories of collaborative governance and state retreat, this paper used a qualitative research design comprised of thirty-two semi-structured interviews within the case study UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in the United Kingdom to address this lacuna. Participants perceived that the austerity period has precipitated negative changes to their extant state-orientated funding regime, which had compelled changes to their organisational structure. Austerity damaged their relationships with the state and perceptions of state legitimacy whilst simultaneously strengthening and straining the relationships between intra-partnership non-state governance actors. This case offers a critical contemporary reflection on normative collaborative environmental governance theory under austerity programmes. These open up questions about the role of the state in wider sustainability transitions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 271 KiB  
Article
Sustainability in the Anthropocene: Between Extinction and Populism
by Manuel Arias-Maldonado
Sustainability 2020, 12(6), 2538; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062538 - 24 Mar 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5372
Abstract
The pursuit of environmental sustainability has been affected by two significant developments in the last years. On the one hand, the Anthropocene hypothesis suggests that the human impact on the environment has increased to such a degree, that natural systems are now disrupted [...] Read more.
The pursuit of environmental sustainability has been affected by two significant developments in the last years. On the one hand, the Anthropocene hypothesis suggests that the human impact on the environment has increased to such a degree, that natural systems are now disrupted at a planetary level. The most dangerous manifestation of the Anthropocene is climate change, where there is need for greater urgency in the face of insufficient climate action. There are a number of scientists who currently warn of the possibility that failing to reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may render the Earth uninhabitable in the first place. A first goal of this paper is thus to ponder how the sustainability paradigm may be affected in the face of this threat and whether, in fact, sustainability may be displaced by “habitability”. On the other hand, some climate policies are eliciting the reaction of a populist movement—from Trumpism to the gilets jaunes in France—that opposes the rise of environmentally-related taxes and denies climate change or questions the severity of its effects. Both as a concept and as a policy goal, sustainability thus finds itself under double pressure: as it must focus on keeping the planet inhabitable, while the political opposition to measures directed towards decarbonization also increases. In what follows, the paper suggests that sustainability should be understood as a technocratic project to keep the planet safe for humanity rather than imposing a new way of life for all its inhabitants. This is not to imply that moral or ideological debate is to be curtailed, but rather to differentiate between achieving environmental sustainability and seeking the reshaping of socionatural relations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Governance for Sustainable Development in Troubled Times)
Back to TopTop