sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Educational Assessment: A Powerful Tool for Sustainable Education

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Education and Approaches".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2024) | Viewed by 13921

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Data Analytics, Policy and Leadership Division, Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Interests: educational technology; educational psychology; educational assessment and measurement
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the ever-evolving educational landscape, the role of pedagogy has changed from merely imparting knowledge to being a central force for all-encompassing development. Contemporary education that goes beyond traditional methods of content delivery enables individuals to participate in a continual cycle of learning. This paradigm fosters an environment in which learners not only absorb factual knowledge, but also sharpen their analytical skills and cultivate a sense of global responsibility so that they can address contemporary challenges. The role of assessment is central to this challenging matrix of modern education. In the past, assessments were very limited and often restricted to summative assessments that focused on memory recall. Given our advanced understanding of the multiple aspects of learning and cognition, such a view seems less and less useful. The beginning of the 21st century saw a paradigmatic shift in academic thinking. The academic community began to acknowledge the plethora of skills, abilities, and perspectives that constitute real learning. This recognition underscored the need for multiple and adaptive assessments that were attuned to the myriad modalities through which individuals acquire knowledge. When carefully crafted and seamlessly integrated into instructional frameworks, assessments evolve from simple assessment tools to platforms for constructive feedback that facilitate introspection and foster a culture of continuous improvement among teachers and learners alike. This nuanced perspective on assessment is particularly evident in the context of sustainable education, a concept that is gaining prominence in global academic discourse. When we hear the term “sustainability,” we involuntarily think of protecting the environment. However, sustainable education goes beyond this limited view. It advocates a comprehensive pedagogical strategy that harmoniously weaves together the cognitive, affective, and social spectrums of learners. The sustainable education ethos emphasizes inclusivity and ensures that every learner is recognized, included, and valued. It also requires curriculum content to be aligned with concrete, real-world challenges and evidence, which requires adaptability in response to societal change. In navigating the complicated choreography of sustainable education, assessments serve a dual function: they serve as guideposts and critical evaluators. These tools calibrate and maintain the intended pedagogical rhythm while providing important insights for iterative refinement. Consequently, it is not a matter of merely possessing assessment mechanisms, but of using them prudently and critically. As we strive to shape the coming cohort of learners, these refined tools are central to ensuring that our educational initiatives are coherent, impactful, and enduringly meaningful.

In this Special Issue, we welcome original research articles and reviews. Research areas may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • National and international large-scale assessments;
  • Classroom assessment: assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning;
  • Assessment literacy;
  • Assessment of deeper learning outcomes;
  • Assessment of special populations;
  • New developments in psychometrics;
  • Applications of psychometrics ;
  • Validity in educational assessment.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Shaljan Areepattamannil
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • educational assessment
  • educational measurement
  • educational statistics
  • educational psychology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

12 pages, 886 KiB  
Article
Evaluating a National Traditional Chinese Medicine Examination via Cognitive Diagnostic Approaches
by Lingling Xu, Zhehan Jiang and Yuting Han
Sustainability 2024, 16(13), 5400; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135400 - 25 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1762
Abstract
The current research utilized diagnostic classification models (DCMs), an advanced psychometric theory, to evaluate the examination’s quality using psychometric methods for a more precise and comprehensive understanding of health professionals’ competence. Data was gathered from 16,310 fourth-year Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduates who completed [...] Read more.
The current research utilized diagnostic classification models (DCMs), an advanced psychometric theory, to evaluate the examination’s quality using psychometric methods for a more precise and comprehensive understanding of health professionals’ competence. Data was gathered from 16,310 fourth-year Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduates who completed the Standardized Competence Test for Traditional Chinese Medicine Undergraduates (SCTTCMU) comprising 300 multiple-choice items. The study examined the fundamental assumptions, model-data fit, and cognitive diagnostic theory models’ item and test properties. The generalized deterministic input, noisy, “and” gate model applied in this research demonstrated a strong alignment with the real response data, meeting all the necessary assumptions. Cognitive diagnostic analysis indicated that all items exhibited satisfactory psychometric characteristics, and the reported scores offered insights into candidates’ proficiency in cognitive skills. It is expected that the advent of modern psychometric technology will contribute to the improvement of refined diagnostic information for health professional candidates. Furthermore, this research holds the potential to significantly enhance sustainability in healthcare practices, knowledge, economics, resource use, and community resilience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Educational Assessment: A Powerful Tool for Sustainable Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 3202 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses on the Impact of Formative Assessment on K-12 Students’ Learning: Toward Sustainable Quality Education
by Andrew Sortwell, Kevin Trimble, Ricardo Ferraz, David R. Geelan, Gregory Hine, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Bastian Carter-Thuiller, Evgenia Gkintoni and Qianying Xuan
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7826; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177826 - 8 Sep 2024
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 11058
Abstract
Formative assessment in K-12 education has been a notable teaching and learning focus area in schools over the last 20 years, as evidenced by numerous recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating and summarizing the evidence for formative assessments’ effectiveness and sustainability. This umbrella [...] Read more.
Formative assessment in K-12 education has been a notable teaching and learning focus area in schools over the last 20 years, as evidenced by numerous recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating and summarizing the evidence for formative assessments’ effectiveness and sustainability. This umbrella review systematically reviews meta-analyses investigating the effects of formative assessment on learning, summarizes the current findings, and assesses the quality and risk of bias in the published meta-analyses. Meta-analyses were identified using systematic literature searches in the following databases: Scopus, ERIC, Academic Research Complete, ProQuest, APA PsycArticles, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Humanities International Complete. Thirteen meta-analyses, each of which examined the effects of formative assessment on learning in K-12 students, were included in this umbrella review. The review considered evidence for the potential effectiveness of using formative assessment in class with primary and secondary school students. Formative assessment was found to produce trivial to large positive effects on student learning, with no negative effects identified. The magnitude of effects varied according to the type of formative assessment. The 13 included meta-analysis studies showed moderate (n = 10), high (n = 1), and low (n = 2) methodological quality (AMSTAR-2), although the robustness of the evidence (i.e., GRADE analysis) was very low (n = 9), low (n = 3), and moderate (n = 1). These findings offer valuable insights for designing and implementing different types of formative assessment aimed at optimizing student learning and ensuring the sustainability of assessment practices. However, the low-to-very-low certainty of the available evidence precludes robust recommendations regarding optimal formative assessment strategies for learning in K-12 students. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Educational Assessment: A Powerful Tool for Sustainable Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop