sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Flood Risk Management: Challenges and Resilience

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Hazards and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 February 2026 | Viewed by 1721

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Manchester School of Architecture, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BX, UK
Interests: climate change adaptation and resilience; flood-resilient technologies; nature-based solutions

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BX, UK
Interests: governance of risk; stakeholder engagement in decision-making; just adaptation and resilience

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Manchester School of Architecture, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BX, UK
Interests: community resilience; smart cities; nature-based solutions

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Flood risk management is a critical aspect of urban planning and environmental sustainability, especially in the face of the increasing frequency and intensity of climate change impacts and urbanisation (Carter et al. 2015). However, these events are not purely natural phenomena; rather, they are shaped by social constructs and are unevenly distributed across various interconnected social, demographic, and economic factors (Cutter et al. 2000).

Contemporary approaches to flood risk management emphasise a move away from large-scale structural defences towards learning to "live with water" and maximizing "resilience". Resilience is a malleable term, subject to interpretation, where the perceived success of resilient technologies, both hard and soft, is highly contingent on a range of factors (Connelly et al. 2020). For example, establishing community flood resilience without state support could be perceived as "a substitute for responsive and accountable governance" (Davoudi et al. 2013; Kaika 2017). Consequently, those who are already vulnerable may become less resilient due to the introduction of new measures that purport to increase their resilience.

Holistic and integrated approaches should be at the forefront in flood risk planning and management, supporting community resilience and discouraging individualistic approaches. We should account for nuanced contexts, avoiding treating populations as uniform groups and overlooking the complex realities faced by those at risk (O’Hare & White, 2018; O’Hare 2025). Moreover, we need to consider how climate-adaptive practices have synergies or trade-offs with energy reduction measures through mitigation (Liyanage et al. 2024), especially since natural flood management measures themselves are infrastructure at risk from climate change (Connelly et al. 2023).

This Special Issue seeks reviews and articles that examine sustainable flood risk and resilience in theory and practice, covering technical, environmental, and socio-economic aspects. We welcome submissions from scholars and practitioners who are working on flood risk management and practice in a way that critically engages with the concepts of resilience, sustainability, and justice. We hope to showcase both critical thinking as well as critical practice, and particularly welcome submissions that consider flood risk management and practice in diverse contexts. 

Contributions to this special Issue may include (but will not be limited to) the following topics:

  • Equity and justice issues, especially marginalised and vulnerable populations at risk of flooding.
  • Synergies and trade-offs between flood resilience and energy efficiency reduction.
  • Community engagement, capacity building, and learning for sustainable flood risk planning.
  • Infrastructural resilience beyond structural measures, including natural flood management strategies.
  • Integrated water management, as a principle, and broader policy integration
  • Innovative funding and resourcing strategies for community-based flood risk management and planning.
  • Developments in flood risk data and technology to assist community resilience building, including risk education and interpretation.

References

  1. Carter, J.G., Cavan, G., Connelly, A., Guy, S., Handley, J. and Kazmierczak, A., 2015. Climate change and the city: Building capacity for urban adaptation. Progress in planning, 95, pp.1-66.
  2. Connelly, A., Snow, A., Carter, J., Wendler, J., Lauwerijssen, R., Glentworth, J., Barker, A., Handley, J., Haughton, G. and Rothwell, J., 2023. What approaches exist to evaluate the effectiveness of UK-relevant natural flood management measures? A systematic map. Environmental evidence, 12(1), p.12.
  3. Connelly, A., O’Hare, P., White, I., 2020. “The best flood I ever had”: Contingent resilience and the (relative) success of adaptive technologies. Cities 106, 102842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102842
  4. Cutter, S.L., Mitchell, J.T., Scott, M.S., 2000. Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00219
  5. Davoudi, S., Brooks, E., Mehmood, A., 2013. Evolutionary Resilience and Strategies for Climate Adaptation. Planning Practice and Research 28, 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
  6. Kaika, M., 2017. ‘Don’t call me resilient again!’ : the New Urban Agenda as immunology … or … what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with ‘smart cities’ and indicators. Environment and Urbanization 29, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816684763
  7. Liyanage, D.R., 2024. Climate adaptation of existing buildings: A critical review on planning energy retrofit strategies for future climate. RSER 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114476
  8. O’Hare, P. and White, I., 2018. Beyond ‘just’ flood risk management: the potential for—and limits to—alleviating flood disadvantage. Regional Environmental Change, 18, pp.385-396.
  9. O’Hare, P., 2025. Not ‘just’ climate adaptation—towards progressive urban resilience. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), pp.1-7.

Dr. Angela Connelly
Dr. Paul O'Hare
Prof. Dr. Yamuna Kaluarachchi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • community resilience
  • integrated flood risk management
  • climate adaptation
  • natural flood management measures

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 5254 KB  
Article
Advancing Sustainability and Resilience in Vulnerable Rural and Coastal Communities Facing Environmental Change with a Regionally Focused Composite Mapping Framework
by Thomas O’Shea, Dónall Cross, Mark G. Macklin and Chris Thomas
Sustainability 2025, 17(17), 8065; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178065 - 8 Sep 2025
Viewed by 776
Abstract
Rural and coastal communities in areas of socio-economic deprivation face increasing exposure to compound climate-related hazards, including flooding, erosion and extreme heat. Effective adaptation planning in these contexts requires approaches that integrate physical hazard modelling with measures of social vulnerability in a transparent [...] Read more.
Rural and coastal communities in areas of socio-economic deprivation face increasing exposure to compound climate-related hazards, including flooding, erosion and extreme heat. Effective adaptation planning in these contexts requires approaches that integrate physical hazard modelling with measures of social vulnerability in a transparent and reproducible way. This study develops and applies the Adaptive and Resilient Rural-Coastal Communities in Lincolnshire (ARRCC-L) framework, a sequential process combining data collation, two-dimensional hydraulic simulation using LISFLOOD-FP, and composite vulnerability mapping. The framework is versioned and protocolised to support replication, and is applied to Lincolnshire, UK, integrating UKCP18 climate projections, high-resolution flood models, infrastructure accessibility data and deprivation indices to generate multi-scenario flood exposure assessments for 2020–2100. The findings demonstrate how open, reproducible modelling can underpin inclusive stakeholder engagement and inform equitable adaptation strategies. By situating hazard analysis within a socio-economic context, the ARRCC-L framework offers a transferable decision support tool for embedding resilience considerations into regional planning, supporting both local adaptation measures and national risk governance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Flood Risk Management: Challenges and Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 4492 KB  
Article
The Multiscale Assessment of Infrastructure Vulnerability to River Floods in Andean Areas: A Case Study of the Chibunga River in the Parish of San Luis, Ecuador
by Daniel S. Paredes, E. Fabián Rivera, Paúl Baldeón-Egas and Renato M. Toasa
Sustainability 2025, 17(17), 7915; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17177915 - 3 Sep 2025
Viewed by 489
Abstract
This research evaluates the vulnerability of public infrastructure in San Luis parish, Riobamba canton, Ecuador, to the flood risk posed by the Chibunga River under return period scenarios of 10, 50, 100, and 500 years. The main objective was to identify the most [...] Read more.
This research evaluates the vulnerability of public infrastructure in San Luis parish, Riobamba canton, Ecuador, to the flood risk posed by the Chibunga River under return period scenarios of 10, 50, 100, and 500 years. The main objective was to identify the most exposed systems—such as drinking water, sewerage, power grid, and utility poles—in order to prioritize mitigation measures. The methodology combined hydrometeorological analysis, hydraulic modeling using HEC-HMS and Iber, and the estimation of economic losses through the DaLA methodology. The results reveal that the low vulnerability of the drinking water system, as less than 0.08% of the network’s length, is at risk in the high-to-very-high range, even in a scenario with a 500-year return period. On the other hand, there is evidence of high exposure of the sewerage network in extreme scenarios, considering that 49.15% is at high-to-very-high risk in the worst-case scenario. Furthermore, as the return period increases, there is a growing impact on the electrical network, where the proportion of assets at high-to-very-high risk increases from 0.60% to 6.88% for high voltage, 0.00% to 18.03% for low voltage, and 0.00% to 1.18% for streetlights for a return period of 10 to 500 years. It should be noted that the estimated direct economic losses amount to USD 84,162.86 when taking into account the worst-case scenario. In this regard, the novelty of this study lies in the integration of technical, hydraulic, and economic analyses for a scarcely studied rural Andean area, providing crucial data for preventive risk management. It concludes that investment in prevention is more cost-effective than post-disaster reconstruction, recommending the strengthening of the sewerage system’s hydraulic capacity and the optimization of electrical infrastructure protection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Flood Risk Management: Challenges and Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop