sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Bringing Ecosystem Services into Decision-Making—2nd Edition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2026 | Viewed by 496

Special Issue Editors

School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Interests: ecosystem service; landscape ecology; land resources management; land policy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Interests: land evaluation; land planning; land policy; territorial spatial planning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In complex socio-ecological systems, human well-being and the sustainable development of society ultimately depend on the ecosystem services provided by nature. The spatial mismatch characteristics of the supply, flow, and demand of ecosystem services such as food supply, flood regulation, and carbon sequestration can have a non-negligible impact on the sustainable development of human society. At the same time, there are large differences between different regional and spatial scales in decision-making strategies for natural capital management, conservation, and planning. For example, the strategic objectives of food supply chains are significantly different at the national and regional scales, and, therefore, there is an urgent need to address the challenges of disconnected policies at multiple scales from different perspectives to strategic objectives. By analogy, decision-making sectors with a long tradition of natural resource management, such as tourism, water, and forestry, most often deal with decision-making related to the management, conservation, and spatial planning of ecosystem services such as landscape recreation, flood regulation, and carbon sequestration as a means of achieving synergies among multiple ecosystem services to sustain human benefits and social sustainability. Therefore, it is essential to integrate ecosystem services into decision-making. Recent ecosystem-services-related research aims to inform multiple policy sectors, but only a very small number of studies clearly address a particular policy. To bridge the science–policy gap at this level, assessments of the effects of these policies from the perspective of human well-being and social sustainability is needed to better meet the requirements of decision-makers.

Dr. Zhe Feng
Prof. Dr. Huafu Zhao
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ecosystem services
  • decision-making
  • spatial planning
  • ecological management
  • conservation of natural capital
  • effectiveness assessment
  • human well-being
  • sustainable development

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 1715 KB  
Article
A Comparative Analysis of the Regional Integrated Rice–Crayfish Systems Based on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of Huoqiu County and Chongming District in China
by Bingbing Lou, Chen Qian, Xiangzhi Cai, Zeyi Cheng, Yewen Xi, Qiqi Pan, Jinghao Li, Zhaofang Zhang and Jiayao Li
Sustainability 2025, 17(24), 11047; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411047 - 10 Dec 2025
Viewed by 81
Abstract
This study evaluates regional differences in ecosystem service values (ESVs) between the integrated rice–crayfish systems of Huoqiu County (HQ) and Chongming District (CM) in China. The assessment was based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1, which categorizes ecosystem services [...] Read more.
This study evaluates regional differences in ecosystem service values (ESVs) between the integrated rice–crayfish systems of Huoqiu County (HQ) and Chongming District (CM) in China. The assessment was based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1, which categorizes ecosystem services into provisioning, regulation and maintenance, and cultural services. In this framework, each service category was quantified using region-specific biophysical indicators combined with monetary valuation methods. The results showed that the ESVs in HQ and CM were 346,113.59 CNY/ha and 467,334.89 CNY/ha, respectively, with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions accounted for as a negative value. Regulation and maintenance services dominated both regions (59% in HQ and 52% in CM), followed by provisioning services (22%) in HQ and cultural services (19%) in CM. Among these, temperature regulation, water storage and flood control, soil nutrient retention, social security functions, and greenhouse gas emissions were higher in HQ than in CM, with the key difference lying in social security value in HQ and greater tourism development value in CM. A SWOT-AHP analysis recommends a pioneering strategy leveraging strengths and opportunities for sustainable development. These findings inform region-specific policies to balance economic growth and environmental sustainability, contributing to global discourse on integrated agriculture–aquaculture (IAA) systems. Future research incorporating primary data and refining model parameters would further enhance the precision and practical application of these assessments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bringing Ecosystem Services into Decision-Making—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop