The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2025) | Viewed by 5210

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Humanistic Studies, Università del Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Interests: the manuscript tradition and text criticism of Greek and Latin authors; the reuse of the Greek and Latin Classics in early Christian Greek and Latin literature; and anti-pagan and anti-Christian polemical literature

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to invite you to propose a contribution on the topic "The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature". The relationship of Greek and Latin patristic literature with the pagan cultural tradition is fundamental from several points of view—rhetorical, literary, lexical, exegetical, theological, and philosophical, just to give a few examples. Understanding one or more of these aspects is very important for better knowledge of ancient Christian literature and, more generally, Christianity of the first centuries.

This Special Issue aims to study the forms and contents with which the Greek and Latin Christian authors of the first centuries reworked the classical pagan tradition. This re-elaboration is not always explicit; more often, it is voluntarily hidden, so it is the task of the modern scholar to trace the many ways in which the classical tradition has been re-read and re-elaborated in patristic literature.

Themes, words, expressions, and ideas of the classical tradition have often been taken up without particular modifications or completely distorted depending on the new context in which the Christian authors operated.

In any case, the nascent Christian literature has always interacted with the previous pagan production. More than a few times, this interaction was the opportunity to seek arguments in the controversy against the pagan world contemporary to Christian authors or to fuel the doctrinal controversies that developed in the first centuries of Christianity.

Therefore, it is this interaction that this issue intends to examine according to the plurality of approaches that each contributor wants to offer.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Religion and literature;
  • Theology;
  • Religion and linguistics;
  • History of religions;
  • Thoughts, ideologies, and philosophies.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200–300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editor, Prof. Alessandro Capone (alessandro.capone@unisalento.it), and CC the Assistant Editor, Margaret Liu (margaret.liu@mdpi.com), of Religions. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of this Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving insightful contributions.

Prof. Dr. Alessandro Capone
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Christianity
  • pagan tradition
  • literature
  • religion
  • theology
  • philosophy
  • controversy
  • philology
  • lexicon
  • holy scripture

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 408 KB  
Article
Classical Echoes in Gregory of Nyssa’s Εἰς Πουλχερίαν: Literary Parallels and Rhetorical Strategies
by Mattia C. Chiriatti and Lorenzo Maria Ciolfi
Religions 2025, 16(9), 1177; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16091177 - 12 Sep 2025
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the reception and rephrasing of illustrious Classical literary quotes and five references in Gregory of Nyssa’s παραμυθητικὸς λόγος for the Princess Pulcheria (Pulch. 461.3–472.18). Composed specifically for the firstborn daughter of the Roman Emperor Theodosius the [...] Read more.
This paper aims to analyze the reception and rephrasing of illustrious Classical literary quotes and five references in Gregory of Nyssa’s παραμυθητικὸς λόγος for the Princess Pulcheria (Pulch. 461.3–472.18). Composed specifically for the firstborn daughter of the Roman Emperor Theodosius the Great, this speech represents a significant case study, as it offers the opportunity to investigate how the Cappadocian bishop, in the rhetorical construction of this oratio consolatoria, incorporated nine passages from Classical literature to enhance both his theological content and political message. Since this is the first study of this kind on Gregory’s Εἰς Πουλχερίαν, it will go through a philological analysis and a careful examination of intertextual references, casting light upon literary allusions and rhetorical strategies within the text, which reveal Gregory’s familiarity with Classical authors, both Latin (e.g., Catullus, Ovid, Seneca) and Greek (e.g., Herodotus, Thucydides). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature)
15 pages, 1636 KB  
Article
Interpreting the Bible Like Homer: Origen’s Prosopological Exegesis in the New Homilies on the Psalms
by Andrea Villani
Religions 2025, 16(8), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16081019 - 6 Aug 2025
Viewed by 375
Abstract
Origen’s prosopological exegesis, derived from a technique developed for Homeric interpretation by the Alexandrian grammarians and applied by Christian interpreters to some texts of the Scriptures, has been already studied in its principal aspects by a few scholars in the 1980s, especially M.-J. [...] Read more.
Origen’s prosopological exegesis, derived from a technique developed for Homeric interpretation by the Alexandrian grammarians and applied by Christian interpreters to some texts of the Scriptures, has been already studied in its principal aspects by a few scholars in the 1980s, especially M.-J. Rondeau and B. Neuschäfer. However, the discovery of a corpus of 29 Greek homilies which have been attributed to Origen makes necessary a reexamination of the previous studies, in order to verify (and possibly correct) their results. This study aims to present such a comparison, analyzing some examples of prosopological exegesis in the new Homilies on the Psalms in the light of other examples in Origen’s remaining literary oeuvre; furthermore, it aims to show that Origen adopted (and adapted) an exegetical technique typical of the Alexandrian Homeric philology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature)
13 pages, 419 KB  
Article
Ut in his reperias aliquam partem uasorum Dei: Jerome and the Pagan Culture in the CDan
by Daniela Scardia
Religions 2025, 16(7), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070906 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 351
Abstract
The image of the vasa domus Dei, repeated on two occasions in the book of the prophet Daniel (Dan 1:2 and 5:4), enables Jerome to formulate an explicit judgement on pagan culture. Drawing extensively on a well-established repertoire, he highlights in [...] Read more.
The image of the vasa domus Dei, repeated on two occasions in the book of the prophet Daniel (Dan 1:2 and 5:4), enables Jerome to formulate an explicit judgement on pagan culture. Drawing extensively on a well-established repertoire, he highlights in one case its positive aspects and in the other its negative ones, and so in CDan 1,1,2b, he underlines the presence, at least in philosophy, of some truths drawn from the doctrine of God; in CDan 2,5,4, he discusses the wicked use the heretics make of the saeculares litterae. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature)
16 pages, 321 KB  
Article
Jerome and Florus
by Nunzio Bianchi
Religions 2025, 16(7), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070888 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 473
Abstract
This paper explores the presence of Florus in Jerome’s works, with particular focus on the Vitae monachorum. Scholars of the Vita Pauli and Vita Malchi have identified passages where Jerome would employ words or expressions from Florus (no such evidence appears in [...] Read more.
This paper explores the presence of Florus in Jerome’s works, with particular focus on the Vitae monachorum. Scholars of the Vita Pauli and Vita Malchi have identified passages where Jerome would employ words or expressions from Florus (no such evidence appears in the Vita Hilarionis). The significance of these lexical borrowings is assessed here. Jerome’s knowledge extends not only to Florus’ Epitome, but also to the fragmentary treatise Vergilius orator an poeta (whose attribution to the same Florus remains debated). If intertextual analysis allows for the investigation of an author’s engagement with another one, there are indications that Jerome may have been familiar with this text as well. This paper provides a comparative analysis of passages in Jerome and Florus, discussing lexical borrowings, sources, rhetorical features, and individual words and expressions, including those drawn from other authors and works. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature)
13 pages, 320 KB  
Article
Asterius of Amaseia Between Libanius and John Chrysostom on the Kalends of January
by Maria Veronese
Religions 2025, 16(7), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070873 - 5 Jul 2025
Viewed by 447
Abstract
This article examines Asterius of Amaseia’s Homily 4 on the Kalends of January and compares it with the works of Libanius and John Chrysostom on the same subject. Preached in January 400, Asterius’ sermon takes a distinctive approach, focusing less on condemning pagan [...] Read more.
This article examines Asterius of Amaseia’s Homily 4 on the Kalends of January and compares it with the works of Libanius and John Chrysostom on the same subject. Preached in January 400, Asterius’ sermon takes a distinctive approach, focusing less on condemning pagan aspects and more on criticising immoral behaviour during the festival. The bishop emphasises the economic and non-inclusive nature of the celebration, directly refuting Libanius’ eulogy. Asterius portrays the Kalends as a source of social division and violence, in contrast to Libanius’ portrayal of shared joy. This article suggests that Asterius’ polemic reflects a social conflict rather than a pagan–Christian opposition, presenting the Kalends as a moral problem threatening society, particularly through the corruption of its leaders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature)
10 pages, 451 KB  
Article
Emperor Julian, Paul of Tarsus, and the Octopus
by Alessandro Capone
Religions 2025, 16(6), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16060802 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 653
Abstract
The so-called “octopus norm” was originally described by Pindar and Theognis. It represented the way in which a poet could adapt to contingent circumstances without abdicating his own sensibility, grasping what might be appropriate to say or not to say in relation to [...] Read more.
The so-called “octopus norm” was originally described by Pindar and Theognis. It represented the way in which a poet could adapt to contingent circumstances without abdicating his own sensibility, grasping what might be appropriate to say or not to say in relation to a specific audience or context. This contribution considers two occurrences of this so-called norm in the works of the Emperor Julian, revealing a polemical use of the image of the octopus. This study primarily attempts to contextualize the two Julian passages, highlighting their sources, and to clarify the polemical value of his use of the “octopus norm”, which is very different from the virtuous manner suggested by the archaic poets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature)
17 pages, 396 KB  
Article
Porphyry on Asclepius’s and the Gods’ Departure from Rome
by John Granger Cook
Religions 2025, 16(6), 755; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16060755 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 557
Abstract
Eusebius transmits a fragment of Porphyry’s Contra Christianos in which the philosopher claimed that a disease or plague (νόσος) had seized the city for many years because there was no longer any sojourn (ἐπιδημία) of Asclepius and the gods there. Since Jesus was [...] Read more.
Eusebius transmits a fragment of Porphyry’s Contra Christianos in which the philosopher claimed that a disease or plague (νόσος) had seized the city for many years because there was no longer any sojourn (ἐπιδημία) of Asclepius and the gods there. Since Jesus was honored, no one experienced any public help from the gods. Porphyry’s claim that Asclepius and the gods no longer dwelt in Rome resembles one of the elements of the ancient Roman ritual of evocatio, in which the tutelary deities were called out of a city by a Roman commander. It is only an analogy, since the Christians did not promise the tutelary deities that their images would be carried to their own city and given a cult, and they certainly did not make use of an obscure Roman military ceremony. Whether or not the ritual was practiced in the Imperium is not the central question of this article. Instead I wish to show that the implicit debate between Eusebius and Porphyry alludes to similar arguments between pagans and Christians in antiquity and that there are important analogies between Porphyry’s argument about the departure of Rome’s tutelary gods due to the presence of worship of the Christian deity in the city and the ritual of evocatio. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Interaction of Early Christianity with Classical Literature)
Back to TopTop