The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 April 2024) | Viewed by 7367

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Religion and Philosophy Division, Seaver College, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA, USA
2. The Straus Institute of Dispute Resolution, Caruso School of Law, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA, USA
3. Graduate Program in Social Entrepreneurship and Change, Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA, USA
Interests: religious pluralism; African philosophy; Christian studies; interreligious peacebuilding; sustainable development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The burgeoning field of Interreligious Studies (IRS) pursues understanding across religious traditions and addresses critical issues that emerge when religiously different peoples interact in various contexts.

All well and good. And yet, IRS scholar Rachel S. Mikva asks a pertinent question of the academic enterprise: “Does interreligious understanding matter if the world is coming to an end?” (Mikva, 12). To put it differently, where do interreligious explorations rank on a list of global and academic priorities when compared to existential concerns about climate change and “environmental anxiety”? While Mikva answers her own question by affirming the importance of IRS in the midst of climate concerns, she follows up with a critical challenge: “The question is: How should the crisis shape our work?” (Mikva, 13).

Of course, such questions about the value and methods of IRS are also relevant when considering other global challenges and crises. For example, we can ask why and how interreligious efforts should be pursued in the midst of threats of nuclear war, cyber attacks, and bio-pandemics; or in light of the global resurgence of “illiberal” authoritarianism, unprecedented levels of human migration, and heightened social and ethnic hostilities; or considering technological developments that disrupt the social, economic, and moral structures of modern societies. Given the weight of these and other issues, some consider fields such as IRS, by comparison, to be derivative or, at best, marginal.

This issue of Religions challenges such assessments. It confronts a “secular myopia” that assumes major challenges of the twenty-first century can be effectively diagnosed and addressed without significant engagements with religion. As a growing chorus of scholars now demonstrate, not only does secular myopia fail to adequately address the challenges that religion presents in the world today, it also overlooks the powerful resources religion offers in the pursuit of sustainable solutions. This volume, however, posits both a primary value for interreligious reflection as well as its increasing urgency.

In addition, by emphasizing both the academic and pragmatic relevance of IRS, the contributions in this Special Issue represent what we can call “scholarship with legs”, that is, scholarship that emerges at the intersections of reflection and activism, and that explores the synergies between theory and social and environmental realities. This invites multidisciplinary analysis that is, in fact, characteristic of the field of IRS. It also contains an implicit promise that analysis will embolden and mobilize constructive interreligious efforts for the sake of the world we all share, and the world we want our grandchildren to inherit.

With all this in mind, this volume will help locate IRS within the broader landscape of religious studies while focusing on interreligious contributions to global challenges. We seek submissions that reflect a plurality of religious orientations and explore specific social and environmental issues.

Reference

Mikva, Rachel S. “Does Interreligious Understanding Matter if the World Is Coming to an End?” In Deep Understanding for Divisive Times: Essays Marking a Decade of the Journal of Interreligious Studies; Mosher, L.A., Oaks Takacs, A.M., Rose, O.N., Moore, M.E., Eds.; Newton Centre: Interreligious Studies Press, 2020; pp. 12–17.

Prof. Dr. John D. Barton
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • interreligious/interfaith
  • secular myopia
  • peacebuilding
  • social change
  • dispute resolution
  • conflict transformation
  • collaborative solutions
  • restorative justice
  • justpeace
  • activism
  • sustainability
  • religious literacy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

3 pages, 119 KiB  
Editorial
Editorial for Special Issue “The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies”
by John D. Barton
Religions 2025, 16(4), 413; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16040413 - 25 Mar 2025
Viewed by 155
Abstract
This issue of Religions serves as a modest invitation to consider a big claim, namely, that if we want to address the most pressing challenges of the 21st century, interreligious collaboration is required [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

11 pages, 206 KiB  
Article
Execute Justice and Charity for Your People: Jewish Divorce Mediation as a Model for Intrareligious Peacekeeping
by Sarah M. Nissel
Religions 2025, 16(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010045 - 6 Jan 2025
Viewed by 761
Abstract
This article explores the complex issue of disharmony within religious marriages, focusing on Jewish approaches to divorce. Contrasting Jewish divorce mediation with other religions’ approaches to marital conflict, this article examines two Judaic models: one viewing divorce as a severe remedy permissible only [...] Read more.
This article explores the complex issue of disharmony within religious marriages, focusing on Jewish approaches to divorce. Contrasting Jewish divorce mediation with other religions’ approaches to marital conflict, this article examines two Judaic models: one viewing divorce as a severe remedy permissible only under certain circumstances, and the other allowing for divorce when a marriage is irreparably broken. The author highlights the positive Jewish commandment to peacefully divorce, discussing how mediation integrates compassion and justice, in line with Jewish legal and ethical traditions. This work emphasizes the benefits of community-based divorce mediation, including lower costs, shorter timelines, and increased communal acceptance. Jewish divorce mediation, the author argues, is particularly effective in maintaining child-centeredness and co-parenting relationships post-divorce. This article calls for a broader adoption of Jewish divorce mediation through charitable organizations to effectuate Jewish family values and provide amicable resolutions within the Jewish community. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies)
16 pages, 1529 KiB  
Article
How to Engage with Non-Human Others in Ecosystems from a Phenomenological and Interreligious Perspective
by Youngjin Kiem
Religions 2024, 15(12), 1539; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121539 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 885
Abstract
Humanity is currently in the midst of a number of serious ecological crises. Various scientific, philosophical, and religious ideas have been put forth in response to these global crises. Here, I suggest that the solutions to ecological problems can be best achieved when [...] Read more.
Humanity is currently in the midst of a number of serious ecological crises. Various scientific, philosophical, and religious ideas have been put forth in response to these global crises. Here, I suggest that the solutions to ecological problems can be best achieved when we undergo an essential change in our perspective on the existence and value of the natural world. In this regard, interreligious engagement and research, which address the multiple worldviews that emerge from individual religions and philosophies, have great potential to fundamentally transform our view of ecosystems. The problem is how to conduct such interreligious engagement and research, which has—unfortunately—to this point been overlooked. In this context, I propose the “four-step method of interreligious sympoiesis to address the ecological crisis”. This is a phenomenological–hermeneutic method that involves the following steps: (1) Suspension of Judgment (Epoché): the mind’s performing an epoché, which is taken as an ethical or religious vow; (2) Empathetic Reduction: the mind’s engaging in empathy with non-human beings; (3) Symbiotic Reduction: the mind’s envisioning of proper coexistence between humans and non-human beings in both minimal and maximal ways; (4) Interreligious Hermeneutical Synthesis: the arranging and synthesizing of the ideas obtained from the above reductions in a specific or comprehensive manner from an interreligious perspective. This paper aims to expound and defend these ideas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 220 KiB  
Article
The Rising Tide of Hindu Nationalism: Threats and Opportunities for Peace
by Karie Cross Riddle
Religions 2024, 15(11), 1299; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111299 - 24 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2205
Abstract
Observers of Indian politics have noted rising acts of violence against Muslims in an atmosphere of increasing Hindu nationalism during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tenure. Hinduism, however, like all religions, also contains many resources for peace. Looking to both theory and practice, this [...] Read more.
Observers of Indian politics have noted rising acts of violence against Muslims in an atmosphere of increasing Hindu nationalism during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tenure. Hinduism, however, like all religions, also contains many resources for peace. Looking to both theory and practice, this piece examines how we can theorize Hinduism and religion in general as a source of protection for peace and human rights. It also looks for peaceful practices that may be of use in the contemporary climate of violence. I conclude that we can only get to peace through the acknowledgement of religious motivations within politics and a renewed commitment to the truth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies)
11 pages, 644 KiB  
Article
Capitalizing on Religious Pluralism in U.S. Prison Ministry: Lessons from LSP Angola’s Inmate Seminary
by Michael Hallett and Byron R. Johnson
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101220 - 8 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1356
Abstract
The renewed growth of immersive “faith-unit” programs operating inside U.S. maximum-security prisons has brought with it a heightened emphasis on the practice of religion in correctional settings. Modeled from a prototype Christian seminary planted inside Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola, newer programs utilize outside [...] Read more.
The renewed growth of immersive “faith-unit” programs operating inside U.S. maximum-security prisons has brought with it a heightened emphasis on the practice of religion in correctional settings. Modeled from a prototype Christian seminary planted inside Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola, newer programs utilize outside religious educators for the credentialing of inmates into work assignments on behalf of prisons. As resource-challenged wardens deploy religiously credentialed inmates for leading new forms of prison ministry inside state facilities, research has not kept pace with the rapid growth of programs. Based on previous research, this article offers a retrospective account of the establishment of “offender ministries” at the Angola prison seminary planted at Louisiana State Penitentiary in 1994. While correctional leaders are obliged to accommodate the diverse religious identities of prisoners, private sponsors of immersive religious programs must balance doctrinal fealty with religious pluralism. Drawing from fieldnotes and on-site interviews in previous research, lessons from the history of Angola’s ecumenical prison seminary and “inmate ministry” programs are discussed while strengths and weaknesses are also highlighted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 199 KiB  
Article
Spiritual Leadership in the Upheaval of Settler Colonialism
by Salim J. Munayer
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1168; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101168 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1171
Abstract
In the current global landscape, characterized by religious fervour, social and political unrest, economic instability, and environmental challenges, spiritual leaders stand as pivotal agents of change. Their role is especially crucial in contexts marred by ingrained injustices and persistent conflicts, such as the [...] Read more.
In the current global landscape, characterized by religious fervour, social and political unrest, economic instability, and environmental challenges, spiritual leaders stand as pivotal agents of change. Their role is especially crucial in contexts marred by ingrained injustices and persistent conflicts, such as the Palestinian–Israeli settler colonial context—a reality I have been intimately involved with over three decades of reconciliation work. This paper contextualizes scholarship on spiritual leadership within the Palestinian–Israeli context by integrating it with settler colonial theory. By applying insights about spiritual leadership to this context, three key traits of spiritual leaders—(1) spiritual authority, (2) discernment, and (3) the ethical use of power—are identified as essential for envisioning an alternative future. By embodying these traits, spiritual leaders can effectively guide their communities through the multifaceted realities, advocating a transformative approach to leadership and interreligious work. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Global Urgency of Interreligious Studies)
Back to TopTop