Archaeology in the Late Quaternary: Emerging Materials, Methods, Issues and Perspectives

A special issue of Quaternary (ISSN 2571-550X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 10 November 2025 | Viewed by 264

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Interests: phytolith analysis and its applications in paleoecology; animal diets; archaeology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent decades, new analytic methods have furthered the progress of archaeology, especially in research of the late Quaternary. Recent archaeological findings, combined with new analytic methods, have renewed knowledge in multiple aspects, such as the interaction between different groups of humans, the dispersal of lithic technology, the origin of agriculture, and the function of various artefacts. However, new findings also raise new issues, such as the revision of theoretical models, and the reconsideration of the route of human and technology dispersal, among others. As such, it is necessary to bring these issues together for consideration.

This Special Issue aims to collect new archaeological findings for the late Quaternary, and to introduce new methods and associated issues and perspectives.

The topics of interest for publication include, but are not limited to, the original study of new archaeological materials, the application of new methods to solve archaeological issues, and reviews and perspectives on such studies.

Dr. Yong Ge
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Quaternary is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • archaeology
  • archaeobotany
  • archaeometry
  • stone tools
  • artefacts

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 4669 KiB  
Article
Food Production and Landscape Reconstruction of Liangzhu Culture Village (5000–4600 B.P.)—Archaeobotanical Evidence from the Site of Zhumucun, Southern China
by Xiaoqu Zheng, Fan Yang, Mingli Sun and Qinyu Chen
Quaternary 2025, 8(2), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat8020021 - 27 Apr 2025
Viewed by 110
Abstract
Preserved macro-botanical and charcoal remains collected from the Zhumucun site have revealed the paleodiet and agricultural production of a small settlement during the Liangzhu period. Further, they have also helped to reconstruct the landscape and social organization that occurred therein. The plant remains [...] Read more.
Preserved macro-botanical and charcoal remains collected from the Zhumucun site have revealed the paleodiet and agricultural production of a small settlement during the Liangzhu period. Further, they have also helped to reconstruct the landscape and social organization that occurred therein. The plant remains assemblage shows that rice was the main crop at this site; however, the appearance of the millets may also indicate the spread and communication between southern and northern China. An analysis of the discarded spikelets confirmed that rice was locally produced and processed. A study of charcoal helped restore the vegetation landscape in the settlement and provided valuable insights for reconstructing the functional zoning and agricultural production at the site. Following an analysis of the plant distribution and utilization patterns at the site, it became clear that the Zhumucun site functioned as a small agricultural settlement. Compared to other settlements from the Liangzhu period, the Zhumucun site likely supported a smaller population. The site could be divided into smaller groups, including facilities in residential areas, processing areas, tomb areas, and farming areas. Agricultural production at the Zhumucun site appears to have been highly coordinated, with activities carried out in a unified manner and primarily by local households. This efficient system of resource management likely reflects a well-organized labor structure, where food surpluses may have been redistributed to support other higher-level settlements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop