Cognition and Memory: From Body to Mind and Back

A special issue of Psych (ISSN 2624-8611). This special issue belongs to the section "Cognitive Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 December 2019) | Viewed by 17950

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), ICube Lab UMR 7357 CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, F-67081 Strasbourg, France
Interests: cognitive neuroscience; brain; cognitive psychology; behavior; perceptual learning and memory; neural networks; consciousness; philosophy of artificial intelligence; principles of unsupervised learning; computing and philosophy

Special Issue Information

Memory encoding, consolidation, and retrieval involve brain processing at various levels of functional organization, from bottom-up mechanisms to top-down decision-making and control. This Special Issue invites paper contributions on experimental research or theory relative to the complex interactions between body and mind. One of the goals, among others, is to shed further light on how action, body movement, and physical exercise may facilitate or inhibit cognitive activities for the encoding and storage or the organization and retrieval of information by memory processes.

Prof. Dr. Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Psych is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Memory
  • Information Processing
  • Encoding
  • Retrieval
  • Body Movement
  • Physical Exercise
  • Consolidation

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

9 pages, 534 KiB  
Article
Improvement of Theory of Mind in Schizophrenia: A 15-Year Follow-Up Study
by Oguz Kelemen, Adrienne Máttyássy and Szabolcs Kéri
Psych 2019, 1(1), 420-428; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010032 - 17 Jul 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3201
Abstract
Neurocognitive and social cognitive deficits are a hallmark of schizophrenia. The purpose of the present study was to investigate long-term changes in theory of mind (ToM), executive functions, lexical retrieval, and speed of information processing/attention in schizophrenia. We followed-up 31 outpatients with schizophrenia [...] Read more.
Neurocognitive and social cognitive deficits are a hallmark of schizophrenia. The purpose of the present study was to investigate long-term changes in theory of mind (ToM), executive functions, lexical retrieval, and speed of information processing/attention in schizophrenia. We followed-up 31 outpatients with schizophrenia and 31 healthy control subjects for 15 years. ToM was assessed with the Reading the Mind from the Eyes Test (RMET), whereas neurocognitive functions were measured with the verbal fluency (VF) task (executive functions and lexical retrieval) and with the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) (speed of information processing/attention). Clinical symptoms and general functioning were rated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale, respectively. At baseline assessment, patients with schizophrenia exhibited significant and generalized impairments on all measures. At follow-up, relative to the baseline, we observed marked improvements in ToM (RMET), stability in executive functions and lexical retrieval (VF), and a significant decline in psychomotor speed/attention (DSST) in schizophrenia. Clinical symptoms and psychosocial functions did not differ at baseline and at follow-up examinations (mild-to-moderate symptoms on the PANSS and moderate difficulty in social and occupational functions on the GAF). These results indicate that patients with schizophrenia with mild-to-moderate symptoms and functional deficits are characterized by improved ToM during over a decade. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognition and Memory: From Body to Mind and Back)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2869 KiB  
Article
Effects of Intensity-Specific Acute Exercise on Paired-Associative Memory and Memory Interference
by Lindsay Crawford and Paul Loprinzi
Psych 2019, 1(1), 290-305; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010020 - 25 May 2019
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4525
Abstract
The improvement of memory performance is an ever-growing interest in research, with implications in many fields. Thus, identifying strategies to enhance memory and attenuate memory interference is of great public health and personal interest. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the [...] Read more.
The improvement of memory performance is an ever-growing interest in research, with implications in many fields. Thus, identifying strategies to enhance memory and attenuate memory interference is of great public health and personal interest. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the role of intensity-specific acute exercise on improving paired-associative memory function and attenuating memory interference. A counterbalanced, randomized controlled, within-subject experimental design was employed. The three counterbalanced visits included a control visit, moderate-intensity exercise (50% of HRR; heart rate reserve) and vigorous-intensity exercise (80% of HRR), all of which occurred prior to the memory assessment. To evaluate memory interference, an AB/AC paired-associative task was implemented for each laboratory visit. The number of correctly recalled words from List 1 (AB–DE) was statistically significantly (F = 4.63, p = 0.01, η2p = 0.205) higher for the vigorous-intensity condition (M = 6.53, SD = 1.54) as compared to moderate-intensity (M = 6.11, SD = 1.59) and control (M = 5.00, SD = 2.56) conditions. No statistical significance was found between proactive interference or retroactive interference across the experimental conditions. This experiment provides evidence for an intensity-specific effect of acute exercise on short-term, paired-associative memory, but not memory interference. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognition and Memory: From Body to Mind and Back)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 669 KiB  
Article
Experimental Manipulation of Psychological Control Scenarios: Implications for Exercise and Memory Research
by Jeremiah Blough and Paul D. Loprinzi
Psych 2019, 1(1), 279-289; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010019 - 25 May 2019
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 6976
Abstract
The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the extent to which variations in control activities influence memory function, as well as to investigate the participants’ memory expectations for the various conditions. A within-subject, counterbalanced experimental design was employed. Across four visits, participants [...] Read more.
The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the extent to which variations in control activities influence memory function, as well as to investigate the participants’ memory expectations for the various conditions. A within-subject, counterbalanced experimental design was employed. Across four visits, participants engaged in four tasks, including an acute exercise session, and three cognitive-engagement control tasks of varying degrees of cognitive engagement and valence, namely reading neutral text, looking at a video, and puzzle completion. Participants’ perceived expectations for how each condition would improve their memory performance was also assessed. We observed no differences in objective cognitive performance or outcome expectations across the three evaluated control tasks, and thus, future studies may wish to employ either of these control tasks, which should not compromise making comparisons across studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognition and Memory: From Body to Mind and Back)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

7 pages, 782 KiB  
Brief Report
Exercise and Retrieval-Induced Forgetting
by Justin Cantrelle and Paul Loprinzi
Psych 2019, 1(1), 405-411; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010030 - 10 Jul 2019
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2808
Abstract
Retrieving a subset of items from memory can cause forgetting of other related items in memory, referred to as retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). This type of forgetting (RIF) is thought to be related to working memory and executive control processes, of which are known [...] Read more.
Retrieving a subset of items from memory can cause forgetting of other related items in memory, referred to as retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF). This type of forgetting (RIF) is thought to be related to working memory and executive control processes, of which are known to be influenced by acute exercise. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether acute exercise could accentuate RIF. A two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled intervention was employed. Participants (N = 40) were randomized into one of two groups, including an experimental group (15-min of moderate-intensity exercise) and a control group (time-matched seated task). Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) and retrieval practice (RP) were assessed from a category-exemplar memory task. There was no significant main effect for RIF and no group by RIF interaction, suggesting that acute exercise did not alter RIF more than the control group. There was a significant main effect for RP, but there was no group by RP interaction. These RP findings align with the RIF findings, indicating that acute exercise did not alter RP more so than the control group. In conclusion, our experimental results do not provide support for an association of acute exercise on retrieval-induced forgetting or retrieval practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cognition and Memory: From Body to Mind and Back)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop