Advances in Neuropharmacology and Brain Injury Therapeutics

A special issue of Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247). This special issue belongs to the section "Pharmacology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2026 | Viewed by 1138

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Interests: neurodegenerative diseases; brain injuries
Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Interests: traumatic brain injury; bioactive hydrogel; neuroinflammation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Pharmaceuticals is focused on exploring the current advancements in therapies for neurodegenerative diseases and brain injuries, highlighting the latest research and potential future directions for clinical practice.

The landscape of neuropharmacology and brain injury therapeutics is changing rapidly, with an increasing focus on addressing the fundamental mechanisms involved in injury and recovery. Rather than merely treating symptoms, current research and clinical approaches seek to target the complex and dynamic pathophysiology underlying secondary brain injuries, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Notable innovations in the field include the use of nanomedicine for targeted drug delivery, the application of stem cell therapies for tissue regeneration, and the adoption of precision medicine to tailor treatments based on individual biomarkers and genetic profiles.

The main categories of recent therapeutic advances in neurodegenerative diseases and brain injuries are outlined below:

  1. Neuropharmacological Advances and Drug Discovery

Recent efforts in neuropharmacology are centred on the development of neuroprotective agents that go beyond symptom management, aiming to limit secondary brain damage and actively support neural recovery. Examples of emerging drug strategies include the following:

  • Inhibiting excitotoxicity, which involves the excessive activation of neurons leading to cell death, thereby preserving neural function.
  • Reducing oxidative stress, a process in which free radicals cause damage to neural cells and tissues.
  • Modulating neuroinflammatory pathways, such as targeting the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) pathway. This approach, utilising small-molecule inhibitors, has shown promise in dampening the inflammatory response after brain injury and improving patient outcomes.
  1. Nanomedicine and Targeted Delivery

Nanotechnology is playing an increasingly important role in the delivery of therapies for brain injuries. Key advancements include the following:

  • The engineering of nanoparticles and nanocarriers capable of crossing the BBB, which has historically posed a significant barrier to effective treatment of brain disorders.
  • The use of these carriers to deliver therapeutic agents directly to the site of injury, enhancing drug efficacy while minimising potential side effects.
  • Examples of such nanocarriers include liposomes, dendrimers, and polymeric nanoparticles, which can be loaded with neuroprotective or anti-inflammatory drugs to support recovery.
  1. Stem Cell and Regenerative Therapies

Regenerative medicine, particularly stem cell-based therapies, is at the forefront of new treatments for brain injuries. Areas of current exploration include the following:

  • The investigation of utilising exogenous and endogenous stem cells for their ability to repair damaged neural tissue.
  • The potential of these cells to differentiate into neurons and glial cells, thus replacing cells lost or damaged due to injury.
  • The role of stem cells in secreting factors that help modulate the immune response, reduce inflammation, and promote tissue repair and recovery.
  1. Technological Interventions for Rehabilitation

Innovative technological approaches are transforming rehabilitation for individuals with brain injuries. These include the following:

  • The integration of robotics, virtual reality, and brain–computer interfaces into therapy programmes to support motor and cognitive recovery.
  • The provision of personalised, adaptive training and real-time feedback using these technologies, which can accelerate patient progress and improve outcomes.
  1. Precision Medicine and Diagnostic Biomarkers

The adoption of precision medicine is leading to more effective and individualised treatment strategies. Key developments involve the following:

  • The use of diagnostic biomarkers, such as specific proteins and genetic markers, to classify brain injuries and more accurately predict patient prognosis.
  • The tailoring of treatments according to an individual’s genetic and molecular profile, thereby increasing the likelihood of therapeutic success.
  • The identification of patient subgroups most likely to benefit from particular interventions, supporting a more targeted and efficient approach to care.

Despite these significant advancements, translating therapies from preclinical studies to successful clinical applications remains challenging. Factors such as the heterogeneity of brain injuries, difficulties in crossing the BBB, and the lack of standardised clinical trial protocols continue to impede progress in the field. The aim of this Special Issue of Pharmaceuticals is to highlight cutting-edge research addressing these challenges and to define future directions in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and brain injury.

Dr. Bruce X.W. Wong
Dr. Kaelyn Tan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pharmaceuticals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • neurodegenerative diseases
  • brain injuries
  • nanomedicine and targeted delivery
  • stem cell and regenerative therapies
  • precision medicine and diagnostic biomarkers

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

18 pages, 5064 KB  
Article
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Progesterone on Human Microglia via TLR4/NLRP3 Pathway Modulation: Relevance to Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
by Ramona Meanti, Maria Laura Criscione, Emma Sartori, Laura Rizzi, Elena Bresciani, Mario Mauri, Robert J. Omeljaniuk, Giuseppe Biagini and Antonio Torsello
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(6), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19060920 - 11 Jun 2026
Viewed by 476
Abstract
Background: Progesterone (P4) is used as an antiseizure medication (ASM) to treat catamenial epilepsy, refractory to first-line drugs. P4 and other neurosteroids (NSs) are important regulators of multiple nervous system functions, including neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity. In addition to their antiseizure [...] Read more.
Background: Progesterone (P4) is used as an antiseizure medication (ASM) to treat catamenial epilepsy, refractory to first-line drugs. P4 and other neurosteroids (NSs) are important regulators of multiple nervous system functions, including neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity. In addition to their antiseizure properties, P4 and other NSs are also anti-inflammatory agents. Neuroinflammation is an important pathophysiological mechanism of epilepsy refractory to ASMs. Accordingly, we evaluated the ability of P4 to modulate neuroinflammation, using human microglia activated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Methods: Human microglia (HMC3) were stimulated for 3 h with LPS in the absence or presence of various concentrations of P4. Thereafter, levels of (i) toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), (ii) the NLRP3 inflammasome, and (iii) pro-inflammatory cytokines were quantitated by real-time PCR and Western blot analyses. Phagocytic activity was also assessed using a phagocytosis assay employing fluorescent beads. Results: P4 treatment significantly reduced the microglial inflammatory state induced by LPS, which was mediated by upregulation of the TLR4- and NLRP3-axes. The protective effects of P4 were mediated by inhibition of Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) phosphorylation and reduced activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPK). The effects of P4 included a significant reduction in mRNA levels of the main pro-inflammatory cytokines and a reduction in phagocytic activity of HMC3. Conclusions: P4 is endowed with significant anti-inflammatory properties, which may be involved in the beneficial effects reported for drug-resistant catamenial epilepsy. Further research is required to clarify P4 post-receptor mechanisms of action and to explore the roles of other P4-derived NSs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Neuropharmacology and Brain Injury Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Other

Jump to: Research

36 pages, 876 KB  
Systematic Review
Therapeutic Potential of 2-(2-Benzofuranyl)-2-Imidazoline in Preclinical CNS Models: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Disease Models, and Cellular Targets
by In-Ae Choi, Ji Hee Yun, Jongmin Lee and Dong-Hee Choi
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(8), 1155; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19081155 (registering DOI) - 24 Jul 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: 2-(2-Benzofuranyl)-2-imidazoline (2-BFI) is a selective imidazoline I2-site ligand that has shown neuroprotective and neuromodulatory effects in preclinical central nervous system (CNS) studies. However, the primary preclinical literature remains fragmented across disease models, outcome types, mechanistic endpoints, and cellular targets, making [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: 2-(2-Benzofuranyl)-2-imidazoline (2-BFI) is a selective imidazoline I2-site ligand that has shown neuroprotective and neuromodulatory effects in preclinical central nervous system (CNS) studies. However, the primary preclinical literature remains fragmented across disease models, outcome types, mechanistic endpoints, and cellular targets, making it difficult to define where its therapeutic-development potential is strongest and how disease- or model-specific functional effects relate to molecular, cellular, tissue, and blood–brain barrier/neurovascular unit (BBB/NVU)-related findings. Methods: This systematic review integrated preclinical evidence from 36 original studies identified in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases through searches last updated on May 19, 2026, to evaluate the strength of evidence for 2-BFI across CNS-related models and to connect functional, molecular, cellular, and neurovascular findings. The evidence categories included ischemic stroke/neurovascular outcomes (n = 13), traumatic CNS injury (n = 2), neuroinflammatory/neurodegeneration-related models (n = 9), behavioral pharmacology (n = 8), and cellular mechanisms (n = 4). Eligible studies were original CNS-related animal, cellular, or behavioral/pharmacological studies that directly evaluated 2-BFI and reported neuroprotective, neurological, cellular, molecular, vascular, inflammatory, neurotransmitter-related, or behavioral outcomes. Findings were synthesized qualitatively, and risk of bias in in vivo animal studies was assessed using SYRCLE’s risk-of-bias tool. Results: The most extensive preclinical evidence was found in ischemic stroke and neurovascular injury models, in which 2-BFI attenuated infarct size, neurological deficits, and edema, and suppressed apoptosis-related injury and blood–brain barrier/neurovascular unit (BBB/NVU) disruption. Across models, these effects are best interpreted as modulation of interconnected secondary injury processes involving N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)/Ca2+-dependent excitotoxicity, oxidative and mitochondrial stress, inflammatory amplification, regulated cell death, and neurovascular destabilization. Evidence from traumatic CNS injury, autoimmune neuroinflammation, Alzheimer’s disease-related models, chronic epilepsy, and cellular stress models broadened the CNS relevance of 2-BFI but remained less replicated or more mechanistically indirect than the stroke/neurovascular evidence. Behavioral and pharmacological studies additionally indicated that 2-BFI modulates neurotransmitter-related systems associated with pain-, affective-, addiction-, opioid-, and compulsivity-related outcomes, although these findings should be distinguished from disease-modifying neuroprotective evidence. Conclusions: Meta-analysis was not conducted because of heterogeneity in models, dosing regimens, treatment timing, and outcomes. Overall, the current evidence does not yet support definitive dosing, treatment timing, or clinical development recommendations for 2-BFI. The strongest preclinical therapeutic rationale is currently found in ischemic stroke and neurovascular injury settings, whereas other CNS indications require further validation. Future studies should define dose–response relationships, therapeutic windows, pharmacokinetic and safety profiles, sex- and age-related effects, and efficacy in clinically relevant comorbid models before clinical translation is considered. The review was not prospectively registered. Funding was provided by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Neuropharmacology and Brain Injury Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop