
Journal Menu
► ▼ Journal Menu-
- Materials Home
- Aims & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Topical Advisory Panel
- Instructions for Authors
- Special Issues
- Topics
- Sections & Collections
- Article Processing Charge
- Indexing & Archiving
- Editor’s Choice Articles
- Most Cited & Viewed
- Journal Statistics
- Journal History
- Journal Awards
- Society Collaborations
- Conferences
- Editorial Office
Journal Browser
► ▼ Journal BrowserNeed Help?
Announcements
20 May 2025
Materials Exceptional Reviewers List 2025

We are thrilled to share the updated Exceptional Reviewers List for 2025. This program was designed to recognize and honor scholars who have delivered consistently exceptional review reports to our journal. Committed to fostering rigorous research and promoting knowledge exchange, Materials (ISSN: 1996-1944) recognizes the significant role our reviewers play in maintaining the quality and integrity of the articles we publish. According to the latest surveys conducted in 2024, 92% of our authors rate the peer review as good or excellent, thanks to our pool of excellent reviewers.
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the reviewers who have generously volunteered their time and expertise to assist in the peer review process for Materials. Their dedication and attention to detail in evaluating manuscripts, offering valuable feedback, and contributing to academic rigor are truly commendable.
The Exceptional Reviewers List was introduced in January 2025. Each month, we will select a group of outstanding reviewers and introduce them here.
April
Name: Dr. Adriano Verna |
Name: Dr. Armin Gharibi |
Name: Dr. Awais Ikram |
Name: Dr. Bozhidar Stefanov |
Name: Dr. Can Rüstü Yörük |
Name: Dr. Carmen Ioana Fort |
Name: Dr. Chenhui Yang |
Name: Dr. Danilo Zola |
Name: Dr. Dario Babić |
Name: Dr. Dariusz Pyka |
Name: Dr. Giuseppe Dell'Avvocato |
Name: Dr. Hiroyuki Ueda |
Name: Dr. Hoda Eldardiry |
Name: Dr. Ireneusz Zagórski |
Name: Dr. Janko Kreikemeier |
Name: Dr. Janne T.A. Mäkelä |
Name: Dr. Jelena Jadzic |
Name: Dr. Jessica Veliscek-Carolan |
Name: Dr. Jibo Huang |
Name: Dr. Jose Luis Diaz-Hernandez |
Name: Dr. Kavita Kumari |
Name: Dr. Lei Gao |
Name: Dr. Lenka Kubíčková |
Name: Dr. Lubinda F. Walubita |
Name: Dr. Mark Auslender |
Name: Dr. Michael Hubbard |
Name: Dr. Mohammad Saadati |
Name: Dr. Pedro Sánchez-Soto |
Name: Dr. Raffaele De Palo |
Name: Dr. Randy Jalem |
Name: Dr. Rosen Mitrev |
Name: Dr. Sayan Ganguly |
Name: Dr. Stanisław Pietrzyk |
Name: Dr. Vlastimil Matejec |
Name: Dr. Wojciech Pakos |
Name: Dr. Željko Skoko |
Name: Dr. Zhen Liu |
Name: Dr. Žiga Gosar |
Name: Prof. Alexander S. Brand |
Name: Prof. Dr. Arno Schindlmayr |
Name: Prof. Dr. Bogdan Alexandru Chirita |
Name: Prof. Dr. Fabrizio Cei |
Name: Prof. Dr. Georgios Savaidis |
Name: Prof. Dr. Jianting Guo |
Name: Prof. Dr. Jorg Wiezorek |
Name: Prof. Dr. Marek Wasiucionek |
Name: Prof. Dr. Marta Oliveira |
Name: Prof. Dr. Peipeng Li |
Name: Prof. Dr. Razvan Udroiu |
|
See what our reviewers have to say about the review process of Materials:
“Reviewing for Materials has been a rewarding experience that deepens my engagement with cutting-edge research and supports the advancement of scientific quality.”—Dr. Armin Gharibi |
“Peer review is the cornerstone of scientific integrity, ensuring methodological rigor and reproducibility in materials research. My review prioritized critical evaluation of experimental design, data validity, and alignment with field advancements, while balancing constructive critique to foster innovation. Rigorous scrutiny safeguards the journal’s standards and accelerates impactful discoveries for both academia and industry.”—Dr. Chenhui Yang |
“Providing constructive comments as a reviewer helps rapidly disseminate the latest knowledge for science development. I was fortunate to be a part of making this crucial contribution to Materials.”—Dr. Hiroyuki Ueda |
“The instructions and communication with the editorial team of Materials were always on point and very user-friendly, providing quick and reliable scientific peer review to reach high-quality publishing standards.”—Dr. Jelena Jadzic |
“First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to those who have promoted this recognition. But I would also like to go further: I want to encourage all those involved in the task of review. We should approach this activity in the spirit of good sportsmanship, considering ourselves athletes who compete with ourselves in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding. For us, the simple principles that are familiar to anyone who has nobly practised a sport apply: "citius, fortius, altius"-faster, stronger, higher. |
“As a peer reviewer, my responsibility is not only to uphold research quality in the growing number of scientific articles, but to provide guidance and support for promising, less experienced authors.”—Prof. Dr. Arno Schindlmayr |