Contributions of the 2030 Agenda to the Implementation and Evaluation of Policies to Fight Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rural and Urban Areas

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2023) | Viewed by 9375

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Research Institute on Policies for Social Transformation, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
Interests: development studies; global governance; policy coherence for development; urban governance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Business Management, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
Interests: development studies
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly formally adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, establishing a set of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be pursued until 2030, acknowledging the need to adopt a more inclusive and sustainable development model at the global level. The achievement of the SDGs requires global collective action; however, they must be implemented at the domestic level on a non-binding basis. This adoption raises tensions, as the pursuit of domestic interests may detract from funds for international commitments for global development. This is especially relevant for countries in the Global South, as they will be unable to reach the proposed goals without the help of more developed countries. In general, the 2030 Agenda lacks rules to reconcile such tensions.

In this Special Issue, we want to focus on the articulation of the 2030 Agenda at the domestic level on policies addressing social exclusion in rural and urban contexts, both in countries from the Global North and the Global South. In such contexts, a complex multiactor governance mechanism is required to guarantee the participation of all relevant stakeholders in the policy cycle to avoid a scenario in which the most powerful groups co-opt the process. This democratic governance is especially relevant to effectively address the problems faced by the most vulnerable people and groups in rural and urban areas.

Many elements that define the situation of vulnerability and deprivation that people face occur in relation to and are caused by the characteristics of the place where they live, be it a city or a rural area. It is well known that the rural milieu shows higher levels of poverty, hunger, unemployment, economic stagnation, and inequality, as well as a worse endowment of resources related to health, education, water, and sanitation, just to mention some of the issues included in different SDGs. Additionally, and according to the United Nations, in 2030, 60% of the population will live in urban areas, especially in developed countries. However, the major shift will take place in developing countries, where the percentage of people living in cities will grow from the current level, 52%, to 57%. Consequently, cities will gain relevance as a space of social exclusion, vulnerability, and inequality; hence, the 2030 Agenda encourages us in SDG 11 to “make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable”. Finally, rural and urban vulnerabilities should not be studied as two separate realities, not only because they share common features, but also because those most deprived in cities are likely to have migrated from the rural milieu in search of a better life. Thus, they can be regarded as two stages in time and space of a continuum of underdevelopment.

In a previous Special Issue (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/land/special_issues/agenda2030), the authors explored the influence of the 2030 Agenda in the design of policies to fight poverty and social exclusion in rural and urban contexts. In this Special Issue, we would like to invite scholars to explore questions such as: How is the 2030 Agenda influencing the implementation and evaluation of domestic policies dealing with rural and urban poverty and inequality in those countries that are adopting it as an inspiring framework? How is the conflict between global and domestic interests being incorporated in the implementation of such policies? What elements of the policy implementation and evaluation deal with the participation of the most vulnerable local stakeholders in the process? What lessoms may be drawn from similar experiences of multilevel policy implementation and evaluation (e.g., EU directives or EU recommendations) that could be applied to the 2030 Agenda? How and what diffusion models of the 2030 Agenda are being implemented? Most of these questions are still underexplored in the academic literature, in part due to the still-recent adoption of the 2030 Agenda.

To address these and other similar research questions, this Special Issue invites contributions such as:

  • Case studies of public policies that required a multilevel (transnational and domestic) implementation to address social exclusion in rural and urban contexts;
  • Elements and principles of the 2030 Agenda effectively included in the implementation and evaluation of national and local policies on rural and urban vulnerability;
  • Implementation of policies designed on the basis of Agenda 2030: localization of SDGs, multistakeholder partnerships, etc.;
  • Methodological models for studying the articulation of global policies such as the 2030 Agenda in the implementation and evaluation of national and local policies;
  • Analysis of policy procedures, processes, spaces, and other levers to facilitate such articulation;
  • Case studies on the linkages between design, implementation, and evaluation in multilevel public policies on social exclusion in rural and urban contexts;
  • Potentially replicable diffusion and transference models for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda;
  • Systematic reviews on these and other issues of similar nature.

This special issue is carried out within the research project 'GlobalGob2030', supported by the Spanish National R&D&I Plan, funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation under Grant number 'PID2019-104967RB-I00'.

Dr. Antonio Sianes
Prof. Dr. Luis A. Fernández-Portillo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

37 pages, 5758 KiB  
Article
Neighborhood Spatio-Temporal Impacts of SDG 8.9: The Case of Urban and Rural Exhibition-Driven Tourism by Multiple Methods
by Gangwei Cai, Baoping Zou, Xiaoting Chi, Xincheng He, Yuang Guo, Wen Jiang, Qian Wu, Yujin Zhang and Yanna Zhou
Land 2023, 12(2), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020368 - 29 Jan 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2377
Abstract
Rural arts events (triennials/festivals) are mainly aimed at local and regional revitalization. This exhibition-driven tourism (unlike traditional festivals, conferences, and exhibitions) has existed for more than 20 years in Japan. The curators of exhibition-driven tourism hope that these events can promote the economy [...] Read more.
Rural arts events (triennials/festivals) are mainly aimed at local and regional revitalization. This exhibition-driven tourism (unlike traditional festivals, conferences, and exhibitions) has existed for more than 20 years in Japan. The curators of exhibition-driven tourism hope that these events can promote the economy and stop population decline as a result of the aging population. Therefore, this paper attempts to evaluate the effects of urban and rural arts event tourism in local and neighborhood areas in Niigata, Japan from the perspective of SDG 8.9. The Echigo-Tsumari Art Triennial and Water and Land Niigata Art Festival were chosen as case studies. Panel data (1997–2019) concerning tourists, income, and population in Niigata were evaluated using multiple empirical methods with descriptive correlation statistics (simple linear regression (SLR) and one-way ANOVA) and spatial analysis (Moran’s I). Through multiple-method analysis, the positive impacts of urban and rural arts event tourism in local and neighborhood areas in relation to Sustainable Development Goal 8.9 were evaluated. The findings presented herein have meaningful implications for tourism academia and the industry in general. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2485 KiB  
Article
Digital Economy Development and the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Intensifying or Reducing
by Qi Jiang, Yihan Li and Hongyun Si
Land 2022, 11(11), 1980; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111980 - 04 Nov 2022
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4379
Abstract
Based on theoretical analysis, this study examines the relationship between the development of China’s digital economy and the urban–rural income gap by using an empirical model to test panel data for 30 provinces in China from 2009 to 2019. The results of the [...] Read more.
Based on theoretical analysis, this study examines the relationship between the development of China’s digital economy and the urban–rural income gap by using an empirical model to test panel data for 30 provinces in China from 2009 to 2019. The results of the study reveal that (1) there is a “U-shaped” relationship between the digital economy and the urban–rural income gap, with the gap narrowing in the early stages of development and widening in the medium-to-long term. (2) The development of the digital economy in peripheral regions will have an impact on the urban–rural income gap in the region through spatial spillover. (3) The heterogeneity tests reveal that the digital economy has a stronger impact on the urban–rural income gap in western China and a weaker impact in the east. (4) A double difference test using “Broadband Rural” construction as a policy shock variable reveals that the pilot project helped reduce the urban–rural income gap. This study deepens our understanding of the digital economy for integrated urban–rural development. It provides a theoretical basis and practical experience for enhancing the living standard of rural residents and promoting the integrated development of urban and rural areas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4614 KiB  
Article
High-Speed Railway Network Development, Inter-County Accessibility Improvements, and Regional Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from China
by Jing Fan, Hironori Kato, Xinghua Liu, Ye Li, Changxi Ma, Liang Zhou and Mingzhang Liang
Land 2022, 11(10), 1846; https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101846 - 20 Oct 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1978
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the high-speed railway (HSR) network in China has significantly shortened the space–time distance between cities. China is striving to enter an anti-poverty era, which is increasing the importance of research on the poverty reduction effect created by upgrading transportation [...] Read more.
The rapid expansion of the high-speed railway (HSR) network in China has significantly shortened the space–time distance between cities. China is striving to enter an anti-poverty era, which is increasing the importance of research on the poverty reduction effect created by upgrading transportation infrastructure, in particular, HSR development. Describing the characteristics of accessibility and the mechanisms by which that accessibility reduces poverty could provide the insights needed for determining suitable anti-poverty paths. By using data for 2341 counties and equivalents in China during 2007–2018, this study analyses the railway accessibility improvements and the poverty reduction effect created by HSR development. On average, HSR in China contributed to a significant increase in potential economic accessibility (317.8%) and a decrease in weighted average travel time (39.9%) for counties. Based on accessibility calculations, the Theil index was used to measure the disparity level of regional accessibility and regional poverty measured based on the income of rural residents. The results indicate that HSR leads to an increase in inequality in terms of travel time and potential economic accessibility at a national level. Pearson coefficients reveal a strong correlation between disparities in accessibility and in rural income among provinces. Furthermore, using the full sample, and sub-samples of poor and non-poor counties in China, the association between regional accessibility and poverty was examined by using two-way fixed effect models and spatial econometric models. The estimated results show that a 1% improvement in potential economic accessibility leads to an aggregate rural income improvement of 0.03–0.17%; the ratio of rural income to urban income increases by 0.04–0.12% and a larger effect is observed in poor counties. The weighted average travel time reduction also leads to improvement in rural income and reduction in the urban–rural income gap. The empirical results obtained by different robust test methods, including different sample groups, different estimated methods and accessibility indicators, are shown to be robust. These findings can help transportation departments formulate poverty-alleviation-oriented transportation planning and investment policies and inform future policies for countries planning to construct HSRs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop