The Impact of Population Transition on Land Value and Planning in Rural Areas

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2026 | Viewed by 2749

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Land Resource Management, College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Interests: land system and law; agricultural (land) economic theory and policy; land law and policy; land administration; resource and environmental law; real estate economics and valuation; regional and urban economics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Public Administration, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai' an, China
Interests: urban–rural relations; land use and planning; rural transformation; land economy and system

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Interests: agricultural economics; environmental policy analysis; behavior choice; rural economic development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Against the backdrop of accelerating urbanization and industrialization in developing countries, the decline of rural populations has become an inevitable trend. In China, remarkable achievements in urbanization and population mobility driven by industrialization, coupled with aging rural populations, are fundamentally reshaping the functional attributes and value systems of rural land. These transformations unfold across two interrelated dimensions: on the one hand, population outflow has led to widespread land idling and, on the other, the return of migrant workers has raised demands for actualizing rural land value and optimizing resource utilization. Consequently, rural land is undergoing a historic shift—evolving from a "means of survival" to "development capital," and from a "single-function entity" to a "multidimensional value carrier."

Today, land is no longer merely a natural resource or production factor; its economic, social, and ecological value has become increasingly prominent, and critical initiatives such as rural land use optimization, consolidation, and marketization fundamentally depend on reforms to the rural land system. Against a backdrop of finite land resources and escalating development demands, the challenge of fully unleashing the potential of rural land, maximizing its value, and advancing rural revitalization has emerged as a central theme in academic discourse.

The practice of multifunctional land use in rural areas—manifested not only in the physical transformation of land use patterns but also in the deep reconstruction from "production factor" to "diverse value carrier"—has become widespread. Going forward, the core proposition of implementing the Rural Revitalization Strategy lies in fostering a new ecosystem for coordinated "population–land–industry" development, all the while safeguarding food security, ecological integrity, and farmers' rights. This profound reconstruction is set to trigger a paradigm shift in rural planning, demanding innovative approaches to balance developmental imperatives with sustainable land governance.

The goal of this Special Issue is to collect papers (original research articles and review papers) that provide insights into rural man–land relationships, rural land value, rural land use planning, and rural land system reform.

This Special Issue will welcome manuscripts that link the following themes:

  • Rural man–land relationships;
  • Rural–urban migration and rural population transition;
  • The economic, social, and ecological value of rural land and its multifunctional utilization;
  • The urban citizenship of migrant workers and rural land circulation;
  • Rural land system reform;
  • Rural planning and sustainable land governance.

We look forward to receiving your original research articles and reviews.

Prof. Dr. Huiguang Chen
Prof. Dr. Taiyang Zhong
Dr. Changjun Jiang
Prof. Dr. Wojciech J. Florkowski
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • rural population mobility
  • the urban citizenship of migrant workers
  • rural aging
  • rural land function
  • rural land value
  • rural land consolidation
  • rural land use plan
  • rural revitalization

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

36 pages, 2942 KB  
Article
Can a Rural Collective Property Rights System Reform Narrow Income Gaps? An Effect Evaluation and Mechanism Identification Based on Multi-Period DID
by Xuyang Shao, Yihao Tian and Dan He
Land 2026, 15(2), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020243 - 30 Jan 2026
Viewed by 624
Abstract
For a long time, low efficiency in the transfer of rural collective land use rights and the ambiguous attribution of collective land property rights have not only restricted the mobility of rural labor factors but have also hindered the release of vitality in [...] Read more.
For a long time, low efficiency in the transfer of rural collective land use rights and the ambiguous attribution of collective land property rights have not only restricted the mobility of rural labor factors but have also hindered the release of vitality in the rural collective economy. This has resulted in lagging growth in the income that rural residents obtain from collective economic factors, contributing to the persistent widening of the urban/rural income gap. As an important institutional innovation to address these issues, the effects of the reform of the rural collective property rights system urgently need to be clarified. The reform of the rural collective property rights system constitutes a major initiative in the transformation of the rural land system. Centered on asset verification and valuation, as well as the demarcation of membership rights and the restructuring towards a shareholding cooperative system, it aims to establish a collective property rights regime characterized by clearly defined ownership and fully functional entitlements. This study takes the national pilot reform of rural collective property rights launched in 2016 as a quasi-natural policy experiment, systematically examining the impact of this pilot policy on the internal income gap within households and its spillover effects on the urban–rural income gap. Based on microdata from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) and the China Longitudinal Night Light Data Set (PANDA-China), this study constructs a five-period balanced panel dataset covering 2304 rural households across 25 provinces. A relative exploitation index based on the Kawani index is constructed, and empirical analysis is conducted using a combination of multi-period difference-in-differences (Multi-period DID), discrete binary models, and propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) models. The results show that: First, the pilot reform significantly reduced the level of income inequality within rural areas in the pilot regions, and its policy benefits further generated positive spillovers via market-driven factor allocation mechanisms, effectively bridging the urban–rural income gap. Second, institutional reforms activated the potential of rural non-agricultural economic factors, establishing new channels for a two-way flow of urban and rural factors, becoming an important path to achieve the goal of common prosperity. Third, the policy effects exhibited significant heterogeneity, specifically manifested in the attributes of major grain-producing regions, initial household income levels, and the human capital characteristics of household heads having significant moderating effects on reform outcomes. This study not only provides theoretical support and empirical evidence for deepening rural property rights reforms under the new rural revitalization strategy, but it also reveals the driving role of institutional innovation in factor mobility, thereby influencing the transmission mechanism of income distribution patterns. This finding offers a China-based solution for developing countries to address the imbalance in urban–rural development and the widening income gap. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 3784 KB  
Article
Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors in Supply–Demand Matching of Rural Social Values: A Case Study of Yangzhong City, Jiangsu Province
by Zhicheng Zhang, Bin Fang, Tongtong Fan and Yirong Wang
Land 2025, 14(12), 2367; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14122367 - 3 Dec 2025
Viewed by 695
Abstract
The spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of rural values is a key cause of the rural identity crisis. Promoting a shift in rural value research from a resource-oriented to a subject-perception-oriented approach is a crucial pathway to addressing this crisis. From [...] Read more.
The spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of rural values is a key cause of the rural identity crisis. Promoting a shift in rural value research from a resource-oriented to a subject-perception-oriented approach is a crucial pathway to addressing this crisis. From the perspective of subjective perception, this study introduces the concept of rural social values (RSVs). Taking Yangzhong City, Jiangsu Province, as a case study, the SolVES model, comparative analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed to investigate the spatial matching between RSV supply and demand. The main findings are as follows: (1) RSV supply exhibits a complex pattern characterized by “ecological baseline constraints” and “urban–rural boundary differentiation”; (2) RSV demand is shaped by both the collective expectations of subjects and the actual supply level of rural areas; (3) RSV supply–demand matching exhibits a complex situation coexisting with universal deficits, structural surpluses, and regional misalignments; (4) geographical environment and socio-economic conditions are key factors influencing the spatial matching between supply and demand at the village level, while the impact of individual characteristics is overshadowed by the overall village environment. This study not only provides a new theoretical perspective for understanding the rural value identity crisis, but also offers practical references for rural spatial governance in Yangzhong City and similar regions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

22 pages, 1620 KB  
Review
Advancing the Study of Rural Spatial Commodification and Land Use Transition: Towards an Integrated Coupling Framework
by Zhen Chen, Yihu Zhou, Fazhi Li and Fan Lu
Land 2026, 15(2), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020218 - 27 Jan 2026
Viewed by 597
Abstract
Rural spatial commodification serves as a vital pathway toward comprehensive rural revitalization. Its development is closely intertwined with land use transition, with each process exerting reciprocal influence on the other. Research on the coupling between these two systems has emerged as a cutting-edge [...] Read more.
Rural spatial commodification serves as a vital pathway toward comprehensive rural revitalization. Its development is closely intertwined with land use transition, with each process exerting reciprocal influence on the other. Research on the coupling between these two systems has emerged as a cutting-edge interdisciplinary field bridging rural geography and land system science. Based on a systematic review of research advances in rural spatial commodification and land use transition, this paper summarizes the existing gaps in the literature and attempts to construct a coupling framework integrating rural spatial commodification and land use transition. The findings indicate that, although the academic community has amassed a substantial body of research on rural spatial commodification, land use transition, and their coupled relationship with rural transformation, several gaps persist. These encompass the absence of systematic indicator frameworks and quantitative validation methods for rural spatial commodification, insufficient exploration into the coupling mechanisms between rural spatial commodification and land use transition, and a notable scarcity of empirical studies examining land use optimization driven by rural spatial commodification. Future research on the coupling between rural spatial commodification and land use transition should follow the logical framework of “elucidating theoretical connotations, characterizing coupling relationships, analyzing coupling mechanisms, simulating coupling processes, and regulating coupling states”. It is essential to strengthen the interdisciplinary integration of rural geography and land system science, thereby providing scientific guidance for the allocation of resources in rural areas and the implementation of rural revitalization practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop