2nd Edition of Data Science for Health Services

A special issue of Information (ISSN 2078-2489). This special issue belongs to the section "Information Applications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2025) | Viewed by 8242

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA
Interests: health behaviors; machine learning; modeling; simulation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Business and Technology, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, IL 60625, USA
Interests: artificial intelligence; information extraction; human–computer interaction; natural language processing; dialogue systems

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.
Interests: data science; machine learning; medical informatics; mathematical modeling

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to announce a Special Issue on “Data Science for Health Services II”. In recent years, health services have been transformed by the emergence and increased application of data science methods such as predictive modeling, visualization, and artificial intelligence. These methods are being used for service planning, service management, and the delivery of care, thus improving the health of individuals and communities. Research on data science methods for health services can be broadly grouped into three stages:

  • At the collection stage, data need to be acquired, stored safely and effectively, and occasionally combined. Data may include demographic and clinical information obtained from electronic medical records (EMRs), insurance claims, and other administrative data, as well as data continuously flowing from devices grouped under the Internet of Things (IoT). Recent innovations include virtual hospitals, wearable biosensors, digital health apps, and smart monitors. New data warehouse designs are often sought after to handle constraints such as privacy preservation, the large scale of records, and the need to efficiently support various queries. Finally, data fusion is required to augment common sources with value-added information or derive comprehensive measures for health service performance (e.g., quality index).
  • At the analysis and forecasting stage, artificial intelligence (AI) allows for the exploration of patterns or the assessment of possible future scenarios. Machine learning (ML) techniques can serve to predict healthcare outcomes such as quality, utilization, or cost. Modeling and simulation (M&S) provides estimates for scenarios, such as the impact of a vaccination scheme on the number of beds in intensive care units. ML and M&S both face challenges in terms of data (e.g., insufficient data for emerging problems and conflicting measures) and algorithmic efficiency (e.g., scaling to big data).
  • The adoption of data science methods in health services sheds light on how to translate results into actions that improve care for individuals and better meet the health needs of communities. Such translational efforts include novel multidisciplinary initiatives which bridge academic or organizational silos such as, for example, when social scientists, epidemiologists, and modelers create joint frameworks. The adoption of these methods also needs to navigate regulatory and legal frameworks, particularly in a changing ecosystem (e.g., new laws on data protection) and, given the emergence of new approaches, to safely perform computations (e.g., federated learning and secure enclaves).

We solicit papers for this Special Issue that broadly deal with such challenges by addressing open questions, providing novel case studies, or encouraging interesting and challenging debates. Papers can be reviews, syntheses, viewpoints, meta-analyses, or original research articles.

Dr. Philippe J. Giabbanelli
Dr. Francisco Iacobelli
Dr. Charlotte James
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Information is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • clinical decision support
  • clinical care models
  • health informatics
  • quality of care
  • population health planning
  • digital health

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 197 KiB  
Article
Artificial Intelligence for Medication Management in Discordant Chronic Comorbidities: An Analysis from Healthcare Provider and Patient Perspectives
by Tom Ongwere, Tam V. Nguyen and Zoe Sadowski
Information 2025, 16(3), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030237 - 17 Mar 2025
Viewed by 345
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have created opportunities to enhance medical decision-making for patients with discordant chronic conditions (DCCs), where a patient has multiple, often unrelated, chronic conditions with conflicting treatment plans. This paper explores the perspectives of healthcare providers (n = [...] Read more.
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have created opportunities to enhance medical decision-making for patients with discordant chronic conditions (DCCs), where a patient has multiple, often unrelated, chronic conditions with conflicting treatment plans. This paper explores the perspectives of healthcare providers (n = 10) and patients (n = 6) regarding AI tools for medication management. Participants were recruited through two healthcare centers, with interviews conducted via Zoom. The semi-structured interviews (60–90 min) explored their views on AI, including its potential role and limitations in medication decision making and management of DCCs. Data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach, including semantic analysis and grounded theory, yielding an inter-rater reliability of 0.9. Three themes emerged: empathy in AI–patient interactions, support for AI-assisted administrative tasks, and challenges in using AI for complex chronic diseases. Our findings suggest that while AI can support decision-making, its effectiveness depends on complementing human judgment, particularly in empathetic communication. The paper also highlights the importance of clear AI-generated information and the need for future research on embedding empathy and ethical standards in AI systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition of Data Science for Health Services)
21 pages, 3520 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Published Papers on the Use of Machine Learning in Diagnosis and Treatment of Mastitis
by Maria V. Bourganou, Yiannis Kiouvrekis, Dimitrios C. Chatzopoulos, Sotiris Zikas, Angeliki I. Katsafadou, Dimitra V. Liagka, Natalia G. C. Vasileiou, George C. Fthenakis and Daphne T. Lianou
Information 2024, 15(8), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080428 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1445
Abstract
The present study is an evaluation of published papers on machine learning as employed in mastitis research. The aim of this study was the quantitative evaluation of the scientific content and the bibliometric details of these papers. In total, 69 papers were found [...] Read more.
The present study is an evaluation of published papers on machine learning as employed in mastitis research. The aim of this study was the quantitative evaluation of the scientific content and the bibliometric details of these papers. In total, 69 papers were found to combine machine learning in mastitis research and were considered in detail. There was a progressive yearly increase in published papers, which originated from 23 countries (mostly from China or the United States of America). Most original articles (n = 59) referred to work involving cattle, relevant to mastitis in individual animals. Most articles described work related to the development and diagnosis of the infection. Fewer articles described work on the antibiotic resistance of pathogens isolated from cases of mastitis and on the treatment of the infection. In most studies (98.5% of published papers), supervised machine learning models were employed. Most frequently, decision trees and support vector machines were employed in the studies described. ‘Machine learning’ and ‘mastitis’ were the most frequently used keywords. The papers were published in 39 journals, with most frequent publications in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture and Journal of Dairy Science. The median number of cited references in the papers was 39 (interquartile range: 31). There were 435 co-authors in the papers (mean: 6.2 per paper, median: 5, min.–max.: 1–93) and 356 individual authors. The median number of citations received by the papers was 4 (min.–max.: 0–70). Most papers (72.5%) were published in open-access mode. This study summarized the characteristics of papers on mastitis and artificial intelligence. Future studies could explore using these methodologies at farm level, and extending them to other animal species, while unsupervised learning techniques might also prove to be useful. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition of Data Science for Health Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 9723 KiB  
Article
On the Generalizability of Machine Learning Classification Algorithms and Their Application to the Framingham Heart Study
by Nabil Kahouadji
Information 2024, 15(5), 252; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15050252 - 29 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2043
Abstract
The use of machine learning algorithms in healthcare can amplify social injustices and health inequities. While the exacerbation of biases can occur and be compounded during problem selection, data collection, and outcome definition, this research pertains to the generalizability impediments that occur during [...] Read more.
The use of machine learning algorithms in healthcare can amplify social injustices and health inequities. While the exacerbation of biases can occur and be compounded during problem selection, data collection, and outcome definition, this research pertains to the generalizability impediments that occur during the development and post-deployment of machine learning classification algorithms. Using the Framingham coronary heart disease data as a case study, we show how to effectively select a probability cutoff to convert a regression model for a dichotomous variable into a classifier. We then compare the sampling distribution of the predictive performance of eight machine learning classification algorithms under four stratified training/testing scenarios to test their generalizability and their potential to perpetuate biases. We show that both extreme gradient boosting and support vector machine are flawed when trained on an unbalanced dataset. We then show that the double discriminant scoring of type 1 and 2 is the most generalizable with respect to the true positive and negative rates, respectively, as it consistently outperforms the other classification algorithms, regardless of the training/testing scenario. Finally, we introduce a methodology to extract an optimal variable hierarchy for a classification algorithm and illustrate it on the overall, male and female Framingham coronary heart disease data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition of Data Science for Health Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 4771 KiB  
Article
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Participatory Modeling to Support Paradigm Shifts in Public Health: An Application to Obesity and Evidence-Based Policymaking
by Philippe J. Giabbanelli and Grace MacEwan
Information 2024, 15(2), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15020115 - 16 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2672
Abstract
The Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) of British Columbia suggested that a paradigm shift from weight to well-being could address the unintended consequences of focusing on obesity and improve the outcomes of efforts to address the challenges facing both individuals and our healthcare [...] Read more.
The Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) of British Columbia suggested that a paradigm shift from weight to well-being could address the unintended consequences of focusing on obesity and improve the outcomes of efforts to address the challenges facing both individuals and our healthcare system. In this paper, we jointly used artificial intelligence (AI) and participatory modeling to examine the possible consequences of this paradigm shift. Specifically, we created a conceptual map with 19 experts to understand how obesity and physical and mental well-being connect to each other and other factors. Three analyses were performed. First, we analyzed the factors that directly connect to obesity and well-being, both in terms of causes and consequences. Second, we created a reduced version of the map and examined the connections between categories of factors (e.g., food production, and physiology). Third, we explored the themes in the interviews when discussing either well-being or obesity. Our results show that obesity was viewed from a medical perspective as a problem, whereas well-being led to broad and diverse solution-oriented themes. In particular, we found that taking a well-being perspective can be more comprehensive without losing the relevance of the physiological aspects that an obesity-centric perspective focuses on. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2nd Edition of Data Science for Health Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop