Advance in the Theory and Applications of Financial Literacy

A special issue of International Journal of Financial Studies (ISSN 2227-7072).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2025 | Viewed by 2657

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: econometric modelling of experimental data (experimetrics); structural model estimation; monte Carlo simulation techniques; finite and continuous mixture models; estimation of limited dependent variable models; panel data; simultaneous equation systems; survey methodology; survey data analysis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Department of Statistical Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
Interests: gender economics; labour economics; human development; data feminism
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Statistical Science, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
Interests: financial literacy; machine learning; decision trees; random forest; gradient boosting; self-efficacy in higher education; gender gaps; maternal employment; Argentina; Guatemala
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
Interests: market microstructure; liquidity; bond markets; behavioural and experimental finance; financial economics; survey data analysis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Economic theory postulates that investors act rationally in making financial decisions. However, such behaviour often deviates from economic theory’s predictions. In the past decades, intensive theoretical and empirical research has been concentrated on discovering which theories are most robust and persuasive in describing empirical investors’ behavior. These studies have revealed considerable heterogeneity in observed behaviour, and that there is not one single theory capable of describing it. Moreover, behavioural economists have shown that psychological factors (such as emotions), demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, etc.), and social norms may not only explain deviations from rational financial predictions but also differences between and within individuals, ceteris paribus

By the same token, the main differences in investment decisions, both between and within individuals, may be driven by investors' level of financial knowledge. Therefore, differences in investment decisions and in risk and/or ambiguity propensity can be explained by looking at differences in the levels of financial literacy and financial sophistication, whose measures can reach different levels of refinement. 

This Special Issue welcomes submissions mainly, but not exclusively, on experimental, empirical, and theoretical contributions on this topic. We encourage the submission of studies focusing on financial literacy's effect on financial decision-making and financial well-being, as well as on socio-economic inequalities. Contributions based on survey data, proposals for new measures of financial literacy, as well as literature reviews or appraisals of the existing literature are also encouraged.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Behavioural finance and financial literacy;
  • Risk aversion and financial literacy;
  • Reverse causality between financial literacy and financial/economic behaviour;
  • Financial literacy and financial well-being;
  • Gender gaps in financial literacy;
  • Financial literacy and ageing (pensions);
  • Alternative measures of financial literacy;
  • Financial literacy in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic;
  • Theoretical and econometric modelling of financial literacy and risk;
  • Crypto and financial literacy.

Prof. Dr. Anna Conte
Prof. Dr. Marcella Corsi
Dr. Paola Paiardini
Dr. Zacchia Giulia
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Financial Studies is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • financial literacy
  • financial knowledge
  • behavioural finance
  • gender gaps in financial literacy
  • financial wellbeing

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 932 KiB  
Article
Digital Financial Knowledge Scale (DFKS): Insights from a Developing Economy
by Kelmara Mendes Vieira, Taiane Keila Matheis, Eliete dos Reis Lehnhart and Fernando Oliveira Tavares
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2024, 12(4), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12040120 - 2 Dec 2024
Viewed by 461
Abstract
This work aims to create and validate the digital financial knowledge scale (DFKS). Three studies were carried out, including a focus group, expert validation, pre-testing, and the application of item response theory. From these procedures, two versions of the scale were constructed and [...] Read more.
This work aims to create and validate the digital financial knowledge scale (DFKS). Three studies were carried out, including a focus group, expert validation, pre-testing, and the application of item response theory. From these procedures, two versions of the scale were constructed and validated. An evaluation and classification methodology was proposed. Two versions for measuring digital financial knowledge are presented. The long version is composed of 40 items and the short version has 26 items. Applying the proposed methodology, it is possible to classify the level of digital financial knowledge as low, intermediate, or high. The DFKS can be useful for both financial system agents and governments and researchers, who can use it in different contexts. In the banking sector, identifying the level of digital financial knowledge can reduce risks, as losses suffered by clients due to an uninformed adoption of digital banking services break the relationship of trust and can lead to lower financial inclusion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in the Theory and Applications of Financial Literacy)
14 pages, 304 KiB  
Article
Developing a Measure of Financial Privacy: A Pilot Study of U.S. College Students
by Thomas A. Hanson and Andrew J. Byrd
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2024, 12(4), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12040116 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 599
Abstract
This study applied communication privacy management (CPM) theory to develop a new measure of financial privacy, encompassing three dimensions of ownership, permeability, and linkages. The exploratory factor analysis was based on a pilot survey of 371 U.S. college students. The development of this [...] Read more.
This study applied communication privacy management (CPM) theory to develop a new measure of financial privacy, encompassing three dimensions of ownership, permeability, and linkages. The exploratory factor analysis was based on a pilot survey of 371 U.S. college students. The development of this scale was motivated by previous research establishing links between financial literacy, financial socialization, and family communication patterns to suggest the importance of understanding and measuring the role of communication and privacy in the transmission of financial knowledge. Therefore, correlations are also presented between the new measure of financial privacy and measures of financial knowledge, confidence, and experience. The financial privacy scale attained adequate validity and reliability to encourage further refinement and utilization in future theoretical and practical research related to family financial socialization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in the Theory and Applications of Financial Literacy)
29 pages, 687 KiB  
Article
Dealing with “Do Not Know” Responses in the Assessment of Financial Literacy: The Use of a Sample Selection Model
by Anna Conte, Paola Paiardini and Jacopo Temperini
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2024, 12(3), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12030076 - 6 Aug 2024
Viewed by 905
Abstract
Financial literacy assessments typically rely on sample surveys containing sets of questions designed to gauge respondents’ comprehension of fundamental financial concepts necessary for making informed decisions. The answers to such questions, either categorical or continuous in nature, generally include a “Do not know” [...] Read more.
Financial literacy assessments typically rely on sample surveys containing sets of questions designed to gauge respondents’ comprehension of fundamental financial concepts necessary for making informed decisions. The answers to such questions, either categorical or continuous in nature, generally include a “Do not know” option. If those who choose the “Do not know” option are not a random sample of the population but exhibit peculiar characteristics, treating these observations as either incorrect responses or as missing data may distort the results regarding the determinants of financial literacy. A noteworthy case lies in the observation from survey studies that women tend to choose the “Do not know” option more frequently than men. In similar cases, treating the “Do not know” responses as incorrect answers increases the gender gap in financial literacy while treating them as missing values reduces the gap. We propose using a model with sample selection, which enables us to disentangle the inclination to answer “Do not know” from actual responses. By applying this model to a representative sample of the UK population, we do not find any systematic gender gap in financial knowledge. The study’s novel treatment of “Do not know” responses contributes valuable insights to the broader discourse on the determinants of financial literacy and the related gender-based differences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in the Theory and Applications of Financial Literacy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop