ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Mental Health and Wellbeing in High-Risk Occupational Groups

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Global Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2025 | Viewed by 1545

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Work, Organisation and Wellbeing, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
Interests: work health and safety; wellbeing, stress; psychosocial hazards

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Work, Organisation and Wellbeing, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
Interests: frontline managers; human resource management; employee voice; wellbeing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It is commonly known that workers in different occupational groups face varying and often unique challenges, with high-risk occupations traditionally being considered first responders, healthcare workers, and combat personnel because they frequently expose workers to traumatic events, high levels of stress, and long hours. There is increasing recognition, however, that other aspects of work, such as the location of work and the work arrangements that individuals are employed under (contract, remote and fly-in–fly-out work), influence the mental health and wellbeing of workers, meaning that occupational groups previously not considered high risk are now in need of consideration.

For all organisations employing high-risk occupational groups, it is essential to recognise the unique stressors that individuals face and take proactive steps to support their mental health and wellbeing and minimise the risk of workers developing mental health disorders, such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Traditionally, organisational interventions have focused on access to mental health resources, such as counselling services, support groups, and mental health days, as well as providing stress management training and regular mental health screenings and encouraging open communication in the workplace. There is limited published empirical evidence of the effectiveness of these interventions, and there are very few frameworks to guide organisational efforts and promote health and wellbeing in high-risk occupational groups.

This Special Issue of the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) focuses on advances in our understanding of the workplace hazards that give rise to occupational groups being at high risk for poor mental health and wellbeing. Submissions dealing with innovative organisational interventions to control the unique hazards faced by high-risk workers, as well as interventions to promote the flourishing aspects of work, are also welcome, especially those combining forward-looking, dynamic, and organisation-wide mental health programs with prominent intervention theories.

Dr. Rebecca Loudoun
Prof. Dr. Keith Townsend
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • high-risk occupations
  • mental health and wellbeing
  • emerging workplace hazards
  • organisational interventions
  • intervention theory

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 738 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Psychosocial Risk and Resource Factors Perceived by Military and Civilian Personnel at an Armed Forces Medical Center
by Alicia Bouché-Bencivinni, Vanessa Kratzien, Bruno Ballester, Mohamed Boua and Christine Jeoffrion
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(4), 494; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040494 - 26 Mar 2025
Viewed by 340
Abstract
The aim of this study is to identify the factors contributing to psychosocial risks (PSR) and the specific resources available within an Army Medical Center (AMC), with a view to developing a questionnaire adapted to this unique context. A qualitative study was carried [...] Read more.
The aim of this study is to identify the factors contributing to psychosocial risks (PSR) and the specific resources available within an Army Medical Center (AMC), with a view to developing a questionnaire adapted to this unique context. A qualitative study was carried out with 56 military and civilian employees, using semi-directive interviews. The results highlight similarities with PSR and resource factors already identified in the literature, such as workload, emotion management and salary recognition. They also reveal PSR factors specific to the activity of AMC staff, such as the need for availability and mobility, discipline and rigor, task shifting and impeded quality, as well as resource factors such as sports practice and cohesion. The results were used to develop a questionnaire, currently being validated, tailored to the context of army medical centers, with the aim of improving strategies for preventing Psychosocial Risks (PSRs). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health and Wellbeing in High-Risk Occupational Groups)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 302 KiB  
Article
Understanding Suicide Stigma in Fly-In/Fly-Out Workers: A Thematic Analysis of Attitudes Towards Suicide, Help-Seeking and Help-Offering
by Jordan Jackson and Victoria Ross
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(3), 395; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22030395 - 7 Mar 2025
Viewed by 736
Abstract
Background: Suicide is estimated to be the fourth leading cause of death globally, with those working in male-dominated industries such as mining and construction at higher risk than the general population. Research suggests this is due (in part) to stigma towards mental health. [...] Read more.
Background: Suicide is estimated to be the fourth leading cause of death globally, with those working in male-dominated industries such as mining and construction at higher risk than the general population. Research suggests this is due (in part) to stigma towards mental health. No research exists that has sought to understand the attitudes underpinning this stigma in the fly-in/fly-out (FIFO) industry. The current study, set in Australia, is the first of its kind to examine what specific stigmatised attitudes of FIFO workers exist towards suicide, help-seeking, and help-offering. Methods: Using convenience sampling, FIFO workers (n = 138) completed an online self-report survey. General thematic analysis identified four major themes. Most salient was that fear of negative consequences for employment was a primary barrier to help-seeking and help-offering. Participants also expressed lack of trust in leadership and workplace mental health culture, lack of knowledge and confidence in responding to suicidality disclosure, and fear of negative reactions as barriers to help-seeking and help-offering behaviours. Conclusions: These findings present new and valuable insights into why FIFO workers are reluctant to seek or offer help for suicidality and have important implications for addressing systematic inadequacies within the sector that hinder disclosure of suicidal ideation and access to vital services. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health and Wellbeing in High-Risk Occupational Groups)
Back to TopTop