ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Work Psychology and Occupational Health: 2nd Edition

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Akita University Health Center, Akita University, 1-1 Tegatagakuen-machi, Akita 010-8502, Japan
Interests: psychiatry; work psychology; occupational health; mental health; stress
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

COVID-19 has had a negative impact on the health of workers, and especially on their mental health. Despite the end of the pandemic, many studies have highlighted that the serious impact it has had on workers’ health has been long-lasting and will continue to affect them in the future, as is captured by the term “Long COVID.” Thus, further research on the impact of COVID-19 on workers and companies, especially regarding its psychological impact and the coping strategies used in response, is essential. In this Special Issue, we aim to discuss (1) the importance of the measures taken to protect workers’ health (especially mental health) during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) the areas in which working environments have returned to their pre-COVID states as a result of the pandemic being largely over, and (3) new changes that have been brought about in the working environment as a result of the pandemic, i.e., areas that will never return to their pre-COVID states in the future. The main items we are interested in exploring in relation to the above are as follows: insights into workers’ increased stress and coping strategies; changes in psychological impacts, such as increased loneliness and isolation; changes in communication opportunities, including opportunities for employees to socialize as a mental health resource; and practical experiences in addressing serious stress and increased loneliness through evidenced support at the organizational and individual levels. These include changes in the working environment, such as the impact of reduced working hours, layoffs, and unemployment; changes related to the implementation of teleworking and online working; and changes such as the increased need for self-care as a way to cope with stress. Furthermore, studies on these topics are welcome for submission to this Special Issue of IJERPH.

Prof. Dr. Masahito Fushimi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • work psychology
  • occupational health
  • mental health
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • self-care
  • coping strategy
  • stress
  • worker

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 477 KB  
Article
Professional Pride During COVID-19 in a Cohort of Healthcare Workers
by Tanis Zadunayski, Anil Adisesh, France Labrèche, Shannon M. Ruzycki and Nicola Cherry
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(3), 357; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23030357 - 11 Mar 2026
Viewed by 248
Abstract
We aimed to identify circumstances associated with feelings of pride in healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A prospective cohort of Canadian HCWs reported pride-reinforcing events in April 2020 (Phase 1). In spring/summer 2022 (Phase 4), they completed a self-reported retrospective comparison [...] Read more.
We aimed to identify circumstances associated with feelings of pride in healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A prospective cohort of Canadian HCWs reported pride-reinforcing events in April 2020 (Phase 1). In spring/summer 2022 (Phase 4), they completed a self-reported retrospective comparison rating of whether they ‘now feel more [professional] pride than before the pandemic’. Among 4964 HCWs, 4360 (88%) described pride-reinforcing events in Phase 1; 3926 (79%) rated feeling more professional pride than before the pandemic in Phase 4. Teamwork (34%) and public appreciation (13%) were most cited in Phase 1. At Phase 4, male and older HCWs and community-based staff reported feeling more pride. Working as a physician, in hospital, with COVID-19 patients, and early anxiety/depression were associated with lower pride. Higher ratings were associated with greater organizational support. Many HCWs reported feeling more professional pride than before the pandemic. External support may help mitigate negative feelings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Work Psychology and Occupational Health: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 629 KB  
Article
Validity Evidence for the Secondary Symptoms of the Burnout Assessment Tool: A Brazilian Study
by Andrea Marilin Vinueza-Solórzano, Jaqueline de Carvalho Rodrigues, Clarissa Pinto Pizarro de Freitas, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Hans De Witte, Ana Claudia Souza Vazquez and Cecilia Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarria
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(3), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23030302 - 28 Feb 2026
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Burnout syndrome is conceptualized as a work-related psychological condition primarily marked by persistent exhaustion, emotional and cognitive impairment and mental distancing. In addition to these core dimensions, burnout may give rise to secondary symptoms, including psychological distress, psychosomatic complaints, and depressive mood. The [...] Read more.
Burnout syndrome is conceptualized as a work-related psychological condition primarily marked by persistent exhaustion, emotional and cognitive impairment and mental distancing. In addition to these core dimensions, burnout may give rise to secondary symptoms, including psychological distress, psychosomatic complaints, and depressive mood. The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) includes specific measures for both primary and secondary symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the validity evidence of the BAT’s secondary symptoms Brazilian version scale (BAT-S). The sample consisted of 1.750 professionals (71% women), with a mean age of 39 years (SD = 11). Confirmatory Factor Analyses indicated that a model of two oblique first-order factors, differentiating psychological distress from psychosomatic complaints, provided a superior fit compared to the unidimensional solution. The scale also presented satisfactory internal consistency for the scales of psychological distress (α = 0.88 and ω = 0.90) and psychosomatic complaints (α = 0.85 and ω = 0.87). The BAT-S represents a reliable tool to assess these secondary symptoms of burnout, advancing research that integrates behavioral and physiological markers, offering practical applications for occupational health interventions and preventive strategies in the workplace. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Work Psychology and Occupational Health: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 839 KB  
Article
Prolonged Effects on Frontline Caregivers: Occupational Stress and Mental Well-Being in Transformed Healthcare Environments Post-COVID-19
by Rauer Ferreira Franco, Jefferson Martinelli, Amanda Oliva Spaziani, Luis Carlos Spaziani, João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, Emerson Roberto dos Santos, Rita de Cássia Helú Mendonça Ribeiro, Josimerci Ittavo Lamana Faria, Janaína Aparecida de Sales Floriano, Fernando Nestor Facio Júnior, Nádia Antônia Aparecida Poletti, Flávia Cristina Custódio, Clarissa Albuquerque Vaz Nunes, Franciane Michele da Silva, Maysa Alahmar Bianchin, Luís Cesar Fava Spessoto, Ana Paula Bernardes da Rosa, Maria Helena Pinto, Cíntia Canato Martins, Marli de Carvalho Jerico, Fabiana de Souza Orlandi, Lais Fernanda de Amorin, Paula Buck de Oliveira Ruiz, Fabricio Sidnei da Silva, Luan Souza do Nascimento, Catia Canova Fraccari, Gerardo Maria de Araújo Filho, Marcia Regina Furlani, Stela Regina Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho, Ana Maria Rita Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho Engel, Thiago Sivieri, Bruna Santos de Oliveira Martins, Daniela Gonçalves Faustino, Maicon José de Jesus Vijarva and Júlio César Andréadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(2), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23020271 - 22 Feb 2026
Viewed by 415
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated Quality of Life (QoL) and mental health among nursing technicians in Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) emergency units, specifically exploring occupational safety and well-being in the post-COVID-19 era. Design: A quantitative, descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional design was employed. Methods: Data [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study evaluated Quality of Life (QoL) and mental health among nursing technicians in Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) emergency units, specifically exploring occupational safety and well-being in the post-COVID-19 era. Design: A quantitative, descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional design was employed. Methods: Data from 146 nursing professionals in Brazilian SUS emergency units were collected remotely during the post-acute pandemic phase (July–Nov 2024). QoL (WHOQOL-BREF) and mental health (HADS) were assessed, followed by descriptive and correlational statistics. Results: The predominantly female, experienced sample showed heterogeneous general QoL but pervasive anxiety, reflecting a sustained psychological burden. Sociodemographic/professional factors had a negligible impact; the emergency environment’s overwhelming influence, intensified by post-pandemic challenges, was key. Psychological distress was strongly negatively correlated with overall QoL and depression in the social domain. Conclusions: The intrinsic nature of emergency work, amplified by persistent psychosocial effects of the global health crisis, drives anxiety and impairs QoL/social relationships. Interventions strengthening QoL, enhancing coping, and adapting work environments to new realities (e.g., loneliness, prolonged mental health impacts) are vital for professional well-being and patient care in this post-pandemic era. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Work Psychology and Occupational Health: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 240 KB  
Article
Burnout Persists in Teachers in Ireland Post-COVID-19: A Qualitative Follow Up Comparative Study
by Ellen Ní Chinseallaigh, Matthew Shipsey, Elisha Minihan, Blanaid Gavin and Fiona McNicholas
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(4), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040641 - 18 Apr 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1547
Abstract
Teacher burnout, a combination of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and diminished personal accomplishment has been increasing, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our 2022 study revealed significant burnout levels, identifying that teachers’ pandemic experiences had adverse “Consequences” that left them feeling “Overburdened”, and “Abandoned”. Although [...] Read more.
Teacher burnout, a combination of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and diminished personal accomplishment has been increasing, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our 2022 study revealed significant burnout levels, identifying that teachers’ pandemic experiences had adverse “Consequences” that left them feeling “Overburdened”, and “Abandoned”. Although COVID-19 has receded, recent findings indicate that Irish teachers continue to face heightened demands without adequate support. This follow-up comparative study aims to deepen understanding of post-pandemic teacher burnout by using the same questions from the 2022 study to understand and analyse these evolving stressors. A qualitative, comparative approach was employed. Participants (n = 337) were recruited from various school types across Ireland. A Study Specific Questionnaire (SSQ) with open-ended questions allowed for thematic analysis, comparing responses with 2022 themes to explore continuity and changes in burnout experiences. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: (1) Administrative Overload—increasing paperwork and curriculum changes; (2) Unrealistic Expectations—pressures from parents, society, and authorities; (3) Lack of Community Support and Empathy—teachers reported a sense of isolation and a need for mutual support; and (4) Inadequate Mental Health and Professional Support—insufficient mental health resources for both educators and students. The study underscores the urgent need for systemic changes to address teacher burnout in Ireland. Recommendations include reducing administrative load, clarifying professional boundaries, fostering empathy within the school community, and expanding mental health services. Addressing these factors is essential for sustaining a resilient educational system in the post-pandemic context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Work Psychology and Occupational Health: 2nd Edition)

Review

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 1170 KB  
Review
What Is the Role of Industry-Based Intermediary Organisations in Supporting Workplace Mental Health in Australia? A Scoping Review
by Kristy Burns, Louise A. Ellis, Abilio De Almeida Neto, Carla Vanessa Alves Lopes and Janaki Amin
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(7), 974; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22070974 - 20 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 876
Abstract
Despite increasing interest in workplace mental health, limited attention has been paid to the role of industry-based intermediary organisations in delivering mental health support. This scoping review addresses this gap by examining the mental health-related activities of industry intermediaries in Australia. A systematic [...] Read more.
Despite increasing interest in workplace mental health, limited attention has been paid to the role of industry-based intermediary organisations in delivering mental health support. This scoping review addresses this gap by examining the mental health-related activities of industry intermediaries in Australia. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature from 2010 to 2023, supported by expert consultation and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, identified 35 relevant records. Interventions were categorised using the WHO Guidelines on Mental Health at Work and evaluation activities coded according to the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Research. Organisational-level interventions were the most common (54%), followed by individual psychosocial support for distressed workers (40%). Mental health-specific intermediaries offered more WHO-recommended interventions and were more likely to evaluate their programs. Although evaluations suggested improvements in mental health literacy and high program acceptability, evidence of impact on worker health and organisational outcomes was limited. The findings suggest that intermediary organisations—including unions, business associations, and professional bodies—are well positioned to support tailored mental health strategies. However, the current lack of robust evaluations limits the understanding of their effectiveness. Future efforts should prioritise industry–research collaborations to strengthen the evidence base and inform sustainable investment in workplace mental health initiatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Work Psychology and Occupational Health: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop