ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Health Literacy, Promotion and Prevention Improve Workers’ Health

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Global Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2024) | Viewed by 1146

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Département des Relations Industrielles, Université Laval, Pavillon J.-A.-DeSève, 1025, Avenue des Sciences-Humaines, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
2. VITAM-Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, 2480 Chem. de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 2G1, Canada
Interests: health, well-being and quality of life at work; peer support at work; employment precariousness; mental health; cultural diversity and inclusion; COVID-19 impacts

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Département des Relations Industrielles, Université Laval, Pavillon J.-A.-DeSève, 1025, Avenue des Sciences-Humaines, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Interests: mental health; well-being and quality of life; motivation; digital interventions; workplace interventions

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

People may experience a number of different mental and physical health issues in the workplace. These issues are caused or worsened by complex interactions between workplace factors (e.g., management practices, work tasks, and conditions of the psychosocial work environment), workers’ skills and abilities, and the support they receive to carry out their work and to take care of their health. If workers are in a highly stressful work environment, physical and mental health issues such as burn out, anxiety, depression, cardiovascular diseases, and musculoskeletal disorders may emerge or be aggravated, significantly affecting well-being, quality of life and performance at work. 

At the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in a globalized and increasingly connected world, workers are faced with many new challenges. This Special Issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) focuses on innovative approaches and theories aiming to prevent and protect workers from the health effects caused by occupational harmful factors, and more broadly, to promote their overall health and wellness. Recognizing the importance of a shared responsibility between employers and employees when it comes to occupational health and safety, contributions pertaining to the interplay between workplace/organizational factors and workers’ physical and/or mental health literacy (i.e., knowledge and skills of individuals regarding how to optimize their health) and self-management practices will be considered particularly relevant. Given the importance of developing a holistic conceptualization of health, contributions recognizing both positive (i.e., protective) and negative (i.e., risks) factors as well as positive and negative mental and/or physical health outcomes will be deemed particularly relevant. Additionally, contributions pertaining to emerging occupational health issues (e.g., bore out; brown out), as well as risks and opportunities offered by increasingly prevalent ways of working (e.g., remote and hybrid work) and new tools (e.g., digital tools/interventions) are sought. Theoretical, systematic/scoping reviews and empirical (e.g., qualitative and/or quantitative research designs; action research design) papers, as well as both observational and intervention-focused manuscripts, will be considered.

Dr. Simon Coulombe
Dr. Joel Gagnon
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • occupational health
  • physical health
  • mental health
  • depression
  • work stress
  • wellbeing
  • wellness
  • burnout
  • health promotion
  • health literacy
  • self-management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 647 KiB  
Article
Self-Management at Work’s Moderating Effect on the Relations Between Psychosocial Work Factors and Well-Being
by Carol-Anne Gauthier, Tyler Pacheco, Élisabeth Proteau, Émilie Auger and Simon Coulombe
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(7), 1070; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22071070 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 433
Abstract
Mental health self-management (MHS) strategies may help workers with mental health concerns preserve and enhance their well-being. However, little research has explored how these strategies may help mitigate the effects of negative psychosocial work factors (PWFs) on well-being outcomes. This cross-sectional study investigated [...] Read more.
Mental health self-management (MHS) strategies may help workers with mental health concerns preserve and enhance their well-being. However, little research has explored how these strategies may help mitigate the effects of negative psychosocial work factors (PWFs) on well-being outcomes. This cross-sectional study investigated (1) the relationship between PWFs and well-being, (2) the association between MHS at work and well-being, and (3) the moderating role of self-management in preventing negative PWFs’ deleterious effects. A sample of 896 Francophone workers in Canada completed a questionnaire that included self-reported measures related to workplace, self-management, and well-being. Structural equation modeling (conducted via the MPlus software, version 8.6) revealed that psychological demands were negatively related to positive well-being outcomes and positively associated with adverse well-being outcomes. Competency-related autonomy was positively associated with flourishing, and recognition was positively associated with flourishing and positive well-being at work, as well as being negatively associated with burnout and depression. Surprisingly, supervisor support was negatively related to positive well-being and positively related to burnout and depression. MHS was positively associated with positive well-being at work, flourishing, and work performance, but had no relationship with negative mental health. MHS significantly moderated the relationship between each PWF and well-being at work in both beneficial and adverse ways, depending on the specific well-being indicator being considered. From a workplace well-being perspective, this suggests that although self-management may help workers preserve and enhance their positive well-being, organizations must also directly target PWFs to prevent negative well-being outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Literacy, Promotion and Prevention Improve Workers’ Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop