ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Current Knowledge Challenges for Public and Occupational Health

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Health Promotion Research Centre, University of Galway, H91TK33 Galway, Ireland
Interests: workplace health promotion; workplace ill treatment: bullying, incivility and violence; work life balance

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
Interests: leadership; trust and organizational organisational culture; workplace bullying; employee stress and well-being; emotional labour

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Violent and hostile behaviour is a public health issue and a leading cause of physical and mental illness, making its prevention a public health priority. Terrorism, riots, and civil unrest are daily events across the globe [1]. At a local level, aggressive and humiliating behaviour is not only tolerated but is feted, even glorified, on reality TV shows that celebrate the humiliation and rejection of others. Sexual harassment in public spaces is widespread and often normalised, frequently reinforced by cultural values that celebrate hypermasculinity [2]. As abuse becomes alarmingly normalised, it is little surprise that bullying and harassment are pervasive problems in today’s workplaces. 

Over three decades of research on workplace bullying and harassment have confirmed that it is a serious problem in work organisations, exhibiting strong and bidirectional associations with anxiety, depression [3], and, relatedly, with presenteeism, absenteeism, and poor job satisfaction, potentially leading to economic, health, and social costs [4,5]. Workplace bullying constitutes a widespread occupational health threat. When measured using behavioural checklists, bullying is experienced by, on average, 14–15% of workers, rising to 20–28% in certain occupational sectors, such as health care and education [6,7].

Associations between workplace bullying and stressful, poorly regulated and hostile work environments have been demonstrated [8–10], positioning bullying and harassment as complex problems within complex environments.  Despite unequivocal evidence of associations with employee ill health and the potential impact on productivity, several strands of research converge to indicate that organisations fail to comprehensively prevent or effectively manage the problem [11]. As such, bullying and harassment can be interpreted as structural and organisational determinants of health.

Policies are the most common form of prevention; however, these are rarely evaluated and have been subject to critique, particularly with respect to concerns about mutuality and misalignment with research findings [12,13]. The normalisation of bullying and harassment across society is reflected in workplace practices and cultures, a phenomenon that is well documented and potentially linked to other forms of ‘normalisation’, such as  entitlement to exercise power, even when bordering on brutal behaviour or coercive control.

Although debates about conceptual distinctiveness persist, we consider negative behaviours commonly described as bullying, harassment, and incivility to constitute forms of unethical and harmful occupational exposure [14]. This raises the question of how ethical climate can be embedded in contemporary workplaces [15]. 

Moving beyond the substantial body of prevalence and outcome studies, current knowledge challenges identified in the literature include the need for improved theorization; greater attention to causative societal and intra-organisational factors and processes beyond interpersonal dyadic relationships; the development of both evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence; and the need to address the unethical and institutionalised nature of bullying and harassment as a broader public health concern [1,3,14,16,17]. 

Papers are invited across the range of knowledge challenges identified here, including but not limited to the following:

  1. Analysis of anti-bullying and harassment policies as public and occupational health interventions, including policy formulation, implementation, evaluation, and health impact.
  2. Organisational and institutional thinking and processes that create or contribute to organisational blindness, inaction, and betrayal, and their implications for public health, employee health, and organisational and interpersonal trust.
  3. Knowledge translation from research to practice and from practice to research, including interventions with the greatest potential to address the problem, such as prevention strategies relevant to public health and employee health and safety.
  4. Explorations of workplace ethical climate as a determinant of public and occupational health, including how ethical climates are created, sustained, and regulated.

 References:

  1. Krug, E.; Dahlberg, L.; Mercy, J.; Zwi, A.; and Lozano, R. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2002.
  2. 2. Hoel, H. and Vartia, M. Bullying and sexual harassment at the workplace, in public spaces, and in political life in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament. 2018
  3. Nielsen, M.B.; Einarsen, S.V. What we know, what we do not know, and what we should and could have known about workplace bullying: An overview of the literature and agenda for future research. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2018, 42, 71–83.
  4. Liu, M.; Cheng, L.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Zeng, Y. The Bidirectional Relationship Between Workplace Bullying and Presenteeism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Work. Heal. Saf. 2025, 73, 248–259.
  5. Cullinan, J.; Hodgins, M.; Hogan, V.; Pursell, L. The value of lost productivity from workplace bullying in Ireland. Occup. Med. 2020, 70, 251–258.
  6. Chang, P.; Su, A.; Mizanur, M. Workplace bullying and its association with depression and self-esteem among health care workers in selected hospitals in Sarawak. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018, 18(75), A340-A344.
  7. Mazzone, A.; Jones, E.; Freeney, Y.; O’Higgins Norman, J. Report on the National Survey of Staff Experiences of Bullying in Irish Higher Education Institutions. Dublin City University: Dublin, Ireland, 2022.
  8. Zahlquist, L.; Hetland, J.; Notelaers, G.; Rosander, M.; Einarsen, S.V. When the Going Gets Tough and the Environment Is Rough: The Role of Departmental Level Hostile Work Climate in the Relationships between Job Stressors and Workplace Bullying. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2023, 20, 4464.
  9. Trépanier, S.-G.; Fernet, C.; Austin, S.; Boudrias, V. Work environment antecedents of bullying: A review and integrative model applied to registered nurses. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016, 55, 85–97.
  10. Einarsen, S. V.; Hoel, H.; Zapf, D.; Cooper, C. L. The Concept of Bullying and Harassment at Work: the European Tradition. In: Einarsen, S. V.; Hoel, H.; Zapf, D.; Cooper, C. L., editors. Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace Theory, Research and Practice. Taylor and Francis: London, United Kingdom, 2020. 3-53.
  11. Hodgins, M.; MacCurtain, S.; Mannix-McNamara, P. Power and inaction: why organizations fail to address workplace bullying. Int. J. Work. Heal. Manag. 2020, 13, 265–290.
  12. Martin, S.; Klein, A. The presumption of mutual influence in occurrences of workplace bullying: time for change. J. Aggress. Confl. Peace Res. 2013, 5, 147–155.
  13. Ahmed, S. Complaint! Duke University Press: Durham, United States, 2021.
  14. D’Cruz, P.; Noronoha, E. Mapping “Varieties of Workplace Bullying”: The Scope of the Field. In: D'Cruz, P.; Noronha, E.; Notelaers, G.; Rayner, C. (eds) Concepts, Approaches and Methods. Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment. Springer Nature: Singapore, 2019, 1.
  15. Scott, H. S. Extending the Duluth Model to Workplace Bullying: A Modification and Adaptation of the Workplace Power-Control Wheel. Workplace health & safety. 2018, 66(9), 444–452.
  16. Rhodes, C.; Pullen, A.; Vickers, M. H. Clegg S, Pitsis, A. Violence and Workplace Bullying: What Are an Organization’s Ethical Responsibilities? Administrative Theory & Praxis. 2010, 32(1), 96–115.
  17. Berlingieri, A. Workplace bullying: exploring an emerging framework. Work. Employ. Soc. 2015, 29, 342–353

Prof. Dr. Margaret Hodgins
Prof. Dr. Patricia Mannix McNamara
Prof. Dr. Sarah MacCurtain
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • workplace bullying
  • harassment
  • occupational health
  • institutional abuse
  • institutional betrayal
  • ethical climate
  • public health prevention
  • anti-bullying policy
  • unethicality

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 410 KB  
Article
The Master’s Tools—Anti-Bullying and Harassment Policy in Higher Education Institutions
by Margaret Hodgins, Carol Ballantine and Patricia Mannix McNamara
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(6), 706; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23060706 - 26 May 2026
Viewed by 533
Abstract
The persistently high prevalence of gender-based violence and harassment (GBVH) in higher education institutions is a well established phenomenon, as is the inadequacy of institutional responses and the silencing of those who aim or attempt to report it. Drawing on Ahmed’s concept of [...] Read more.
The persistently high prevalence of gender-based violence and harassment (GBVH) in higher education institutions is a well established phenomenon, as is the inadequacy of institutional responses and the silencing of those who aim or attempt to report it. Drawing on Ahmed’s concept of ‘non-performativity’, ‘institutional speech acts that do not bring into effect what they name’, this paper argues that the non-performativity of anti-bullying and harassment policy is an exercise of power, consistent with Agócs concept of institutionalised resistance. Reporting misconduct is intentionally transformational, but seen as a threat to powerful organisational actors, who exercise institutional power to enact procedures in such a way that victim-survivors are unvoiced and tricked into ‘reluctant acquiescence’ with adverse consequences on their personal and occupational health. We employ documentary analysis to critique policies and procedures for GBVH in Irish universities, and specifically how institutional power is exercised through policy documents. The analysis is based on ten pseudonymised universities, rendering a sample size of 23 documents, pertaining to GBVH for staff. We find that the tone and language employed in policies, and the way in which the informal and formal approaches in anti-bullying and harassment policies frame the problem, serve the interests of the institution. Confidentiality clauses, the framing of the problem as an individualistic, incident-based problem, to be resolved case-by-case, and quasi-legal processes facilitate non-performativity, preserving institutional power and the status quo. From a public health perspective such inertia undermines efforts to prevent harm and promote workplace wellbeing. Meaningful reform will require that HEIs employ alternative tools capable of unsettling these entrenched institutional arrangements and to adopt alternative, proactive tools that prioritise accountability, transparency, prevention and health gain. We suggest new tools in the form of victim-centred, trauma-informed, remediation- and restorative-based approaches. Full article
Back to TopTop