Economic Research on Forest Ecosystem Services

A special issue of Forests (ISSN 1999-4907). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 12 June 2026 | Viewed by 2595

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centro Transdisciplinar Universitario para la Sustentabilidad, Universidad Iberoamericana, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Interests: forest management; forest economics; agricultural economics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | SLU, Umea, Sweden
Interests: microeconometrics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CIIDIR Durango, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Durango, Mexico
Interests: silvicultura; ciencias agronomicas y veterinarias; biotecnología y ciencias agropecuarias

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The valuation of market and non-market benefits society obtains from nature has been present as an important concept to manage natural environments in a more sustainable way for the last fifty years. In this context, the ES framework, developed after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, has provided an advantageous way to conceptualize, quantify and value the different ways society benefits from natural capital. Many approaches to quantify and value ES have been developed so far; however, there is still debate on the adequacy of some of these approaches and their suitability to approach the valuation problem in specific circumstances. Part of the debate resides on the different uses and values society gives to those ES, the stage of the use of those products of services, the likely double counting of services, the temporality of the value approximated given the dynamics of the ecosystems, the geographical unit (scale) taken as reference to the valuation of some ES, or even the precision of the definition of the referred service, as is the case with some cultural services or, more broadly, the less tangible ecosystem services on which we depend.

Current developments in ES valuation identify the need to value forest goods and services from colective, transdisciplinary, local and dynamic perspectives in order to provide information to generate and support decisions and policies in complex areas under dynamic scenarios of climate change, loss of biodiversity, market volatility and changes in the preferences of stakeholders. From the methodological side, current research lines include valuations considering both costs and benefits trade-offs and multiple uses of ecosystem goods and/or services considering, their role in defining the economic, social and cultural development of society. Such developments also consider the endogeneity of the effects of society and nature.

The outputs of this Special Issue will be very helpful in order to identify likely conceptual, methodological and practical approaches to improve the value of ES and try to guide the discussion to solve the current debate on the valuation of ES.

The Special Issue aims to attract and review papers covering the most recent topics on ecosystem services valuation from methodological and practical perspectives. There is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers. We encourage scientists to publish their research in as much detail as possible.

Potential topics include:

  • Practical uses of valuation in forest management;
  • Valuation of forest non-market goods and services;
  • Challenges in the valuation of forest ES;
  • Valuation of the dynamics of change in ES and factors affecting them;
  • Identification of boundaries on values depending on the use of ES;
  • Innovative methodological approaches;
  • Transversality of the valuation;
  • Diversity of interests and values of different stakeholders;
  • Valuation of environmental catastrophes on the provision of ecosystem services.

Dr. Juan Manuel Torres-Rojo
Dr. Adan L. Martinez-Cruz
Prof. Dr. Gustavo Perez-Verdin
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forests is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • non-market valuation
  • nature-based solution valuation
  • valuation of changes in ecosystem services
  • transversality of valuation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 3183 KB  
Article
Modeling Carbon Sequestration and Economic Returns Using 3-PG in the FSC-Certified Simcoe County Forest
by Fanxuan Sun and Rasoul Yousefpour
Forests 2025, 16(10), 1610; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16101610 - 20 Oct 2025
Viewed by 533
Abstract
In this study, we developed three forest management scenarios for Simcoe County Forest in Southern Ontario, Canada, using the Physiological Principles Predicting Growth (3-PG) model to simulate future forest growth and carbon dynamics. The focus was on four main species: Red pine ( [...] Read more.
In this study, we developed three forest management scenarios for Simcoe County Forest in Southern Ontario, Canada, using the Physiological Principles Predicting Growth (3-PG) model to simulate future forest growth and carbon dynamics. The focus was on four main species: Red pine (Pinus resinosa), White pine (Pinus strobus), Sugar maple (Acer saccharum), and Red oak (Quercus rubra). We parameterized, calibrated, and validated parameters of the 3-PG model for these four species and applied the model to evaluate the performance of management scenarios incorporating timber and carbon values in Simcoe County Forest. The first scenario, “business as usual,” maintained the existing management plan for the forest, ensuring stable timber income (531.2 CAD/hectare) and moderate carbon sequestration. The second scenario aimed to optimize management for the highest timber Net Present Value (NPV), with half of the trees harvested before 2030, followed by gradual thinning over 15 years. This approach yielded the highest financial returns (1634.1 CAD/hectare) but the lowest carbon sequestration potential. The third scenario integrated carbon certification, emphasizing the retention of sugar maple stands over the next 20 years. This scenario produced financial returns (580.2 CAD/hectare) higher than the “business as usual” scenario, while saving 49.33 tons of biomass per hectare. Overall, this study provides a reference for the implementation of carbon sequestration projects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economic Research on Forest Ecosystem Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1062 KB  
Article
Uncovering Seasonal Heterogeneity in Forest Ecosystem Valuation: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis with Experimental Insights
by Chulhyun Jeon and Danny Campbell
Forests 2025, 16(10), 1508; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16101508 - 24 Sep 2025
Viewed by 586
Abstract
Seasonal variation not only influences the ecological functioning of forest ecosystems but also alters the benefits people derive from them, ranging from physical to psychological restoration. Ignoring such variation in valuation risks, thereby producing seasonally biased and unreliable estimates, constitutes an issue that [...] Read more.
Seasonal variation not only influences the ecological functioning of forest ecosystems but also alters the benefits people derive from them, ranging from physical to psychological restoration. Ignoring such variation in valuation risks, thereby producing seasonally biased and unreliable estimates, constitutes an issue that previous valuation studies have largely overlooked. This study investigates the extent of seasonal bias in willingness to pay (WTP) for forest ecosystem services using a meta-dataset of 476 observations from Korea. Applying pooled, weighted, and robust mixed-effects models, we uncovered substantial seasonal heterogeneity through our analysis: WTP increases by 67% in autumn but declines by 18% and 65% in the summer and winter, respectively. The robust mixed-effects model provided the best empirical fit, highlighting the methodological value of explicitly modeling temporal effects in meta-regression. These results reflect seasonally differentiated engagement with forests and suggest that individuals implicitly recognize the temporal value of ecosystem services. Nevertheless, limitations remain, particularly the heterogeneity of research designs, survey methods, and elicitation formats, which may introduce variability and potential bias. Therefore, while seasonal differences are statistically significant, the results should be interpreted with caution. Extrapolating annual values from single-season data risks systematic distortion, especially when stated preference methods are used. Beyond methodological implications, the findings also underscore a broader point: seasonal rhythms shape not only ecosystem dynamics but also human well-being. Accurately valuing these shifting benefits is essential for making credible economic assessments and sustaining long-term reciprocity between people and nature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economic Research on Forest Ecosystem Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 2907 KB  
Article
Economic Integration and Forest Sector Dynamics: Türkiye’s Strategic Outlook in a BRICS-Aligned Future
by Mahmut Muhammet Bayramoğlu, Emre Küçükbekir, Alper Bulut and Abdullah Çelik
Forests 2025, 16(9), 1473; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16091473 - 17 Sep 2025
Viewed by 738
Abstract
The BRICS has emerged as a strategic actor in global environmental and economic governance, encompassing 42% of the world’s population, 32% of global GDP, and nearly half of the world’s forest resources. Member countries have integrated forest management with renewable energy transition and [...] Read more.
The BRICS has emerged as a strategic actor in global environmental and economic governance, encompassing 42% of the world’s population, 32% of global GDP, and nearly half of the world’s forest resources. Member countries have integrated forest management with renewable energy transition and carbon market mechanisms as part of their sustainable development strategies. In this context, Türkiye positions the forestry sector as both an environmental and economic lever in its potential alignment with BRICS while seeking to diversify its foreign policy. This study examines the long-term relationships between forest area, population, forest product trade, renewable energy production, and carbon emissions in BRICS-T countries for the period 2009–2023, employing panel econometric methods (FMOLS and DOLS). The findings indicate that population growth, forest expansion, and forest product trade are associated with increased emissions, while renewable energy production contributes to emission reductions. Moreover, bidirectional causality is identified between population and emissions and between renewable energy and emissions. The results suggest that environmental sustainability depends not only on the availability of resources but also on the quality of governance, policy coherence, and sectoral coordination. The study provides an original contribution to the literature by analyzing Türkiye’s environmental and economic integration with BRICS through the combined lens of forestry and energy transition, offering exploratory policy implications for Türkiye’s strategic position in a multipolar world. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economic Research on Forest Ecosystem Services)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop