Life Cycle Assessment: Methods and Tools to Achieve Sustainable Decarbonization and Circular Economy in the Building Sector

A special issue of Environments (ISSN 2076-3298).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 May 2025 | Viewed by 1736

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Architecture, Built environment and Construction Engineering (ABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
Interests: sustainability at building and product level; life cycle assessment; circular economy; resource efficiency; design for reversibility; reuse and recycling

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Architecture, Built environment and Construction Engineering (ABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
Interests: sustainability and sustainable buildings; sustainable construction and building materials; construction methods and techniques; life cycle as-sessment; green building rating systems; circular economy
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
EnergyVille / KU Leuven / VITO, Genk, Belgium
Interests: life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; sustainable buildings; building stock modeling

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

At the European level, the building sector accounts for approximately 50% of all material extraction and 37.5% of total waste production. Furthermore, it is responsible for 40% of the primary energy demand in the EU and 36% of greenhouse gas emissions.

Reducing the impact of the building sector is, therefore, a priority for achieving the environmental goals related to decarbonization and the circular economy.

In this context, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a well-established method that allows for the assessment of the potential environmental impacts caused throughout the building life cycle and, consequently, the definition of strategies to achieve environmental sustainability.

LCA in the building sector can be applied at different scale levels: the entire building, the building element, and the building component. It involves multiple and different stakeholders in the building value chain.

Recently, LCA has been increasingly applied within legislation, such as building codes and regulations, and within Green Public Procurements to ensure lower environmental impacts over the whole building life cycle. Moreover, LCA can be useful to support the definition of policies to reduce the impact of the built environment, for example, by modeling the entire building stock and evaluating the current situation and impact reduction scenarios.

During the building design phase, LCA can be used to compare different design choices (e.g., refurbishment vs. demolition and new construction) and different types of materials or building solutions (e.g., reversible vs. traditional solutions). Furthermore, it is useful for comparing end-of-life scenarios (e.g., reuse, remanufacturing, recycling) to promote resource efficiency and sustainable waste treatment.

The development of LCA tools and software is essential to making the methodology applicable in building practice. To increase their application, these tools should be compatible with Building Information Modeling and other tools such as Material Passports, pre-demolition audits, and digital web platforms for material traceability.

Furthermore, the quality of environmental data is essential to achieving a robust assessment. The development of generic LCI databases of building materials as well as the dissemination of EPDs (Environmental Product Declarations) are therefore fundamental.

Finally, the definition of LCA benchmarks or reference values is important to compare and position the obtained LCA results, to support the implementation of environmental policies, and to stimulate competitiveness in the market.

This Special Issue aims to gather original contributions and review articles focusing on the application of LCA in the building sector regarding the following:

  • LCA to support policies and regulations;
  • LCA as a design support tool to reduce the building life cycle impact;
  • Development of LCI and EPD databases to improve data quality.

References

Andersen, S. C., Birgisdottir, H., & Birkved, M. (2022). Life Cycle Assessments of Circular Economy in the Built Environment—A Scoping Review. Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116887

De Wolf, C., Cordella, M., Dodd, N., Byers, B., & Donatello, S. (2023). Whole life cycle environmental impact assessment of buildings: Developing software tool and database support for the EU framework Level(s). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106642

Eberhardt, L. C. M., Birgisdóttir, H., & Birkved, M. (2019). Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly. Building Research and Information, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1517458

Lavagna, M., Baldassarri, C., Campioli, A., Giorgi, S., Dalla Valle, A., Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2018). Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock. Building and Environment, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008

Obrecht, T. P., Jordan, S., Legat, A., Ruschi Mendes Saade, M., & Passer, A. (2021). An LCA methodolody for assessing the environmental impacts of building components before and after refurbishment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129527

Ramon, D., Allacker, K., Trigaux, D., Wouters, H., & van Lipzig, N. P. M. (2023). Dynamic modelling of operational energy use in a building LCA: A case study of a Belgian office building. Energy and Buildings, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112634

Röck, M., Baldereschi, E., Verellen, E., Passer, A., Sala, S., & Allacker, K. (2021). Environmental modelling of building stocks – An integrated review of life cycle-based assessment models to support EU policy making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 151). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111550

Röck, M., Hollberg, A., Habert, G., & Passer, A. (2018). LCA and BIM: Visualization of environmental potentials in building construction at early design stages. Building and Environment, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.006

Dr. Serena Giorgi
Dr. Monica Lavagna
Dr. Damien Trigaux
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Environments is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • life cycle assessment
  • decarbonization
  • circular economy
  • building environmental regulations and policies
  • resource efficiency
  • life cycle design
  • sustainable building end-of-life
  • life cycle tools and software
  • LCI and EPD databases

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

31 pages, 3239 KiB  
Article
The Potential of Wood Construction Waste Circularity
by Gunita Kiesnere, Dzintra Atstaja, Natalija Cudecka-Purina and Rozita Susniene
Environments 2024, 11(11), 231; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11110231 - 22 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1023
Abstract
Wood construction waste circularity presents enormous potential to significantly de-crease total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the European Union (EU). Latvia could become a frontrunner due to its historic relationship with forestry, wood construction practises and unused potential of the innovative application of [...] Read more.
Wood construction waste circularity presents enormous potential to significantly de-crease total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the European Union (EU). Latvia could become a frontrunner due to its historic relationship with forestry, wood construction practises and unused potential of the innovative application of wood. This research examines what the potential of “circular wood” in Latvia is, how ready the Latvian wood house construction sector is to engage in a circular economy and wood waste circularity and whether the legal framework is ready to support wood waste management in the country. This study presents a combined approach for systematic wood construction product circularity assessment that includes a review of existing EU and Latvian frameworks for construction and demolition waste (CDW) management and wood construction, a general analysis of wood waste recycling systems and technologies, a quantitative data analysis of construction waste management in Latvia and qualitative data analysis of the Latvian wood house construction sector, and interviews with a focus group of Latvian wood industry representatives. The Latvian scope has allowed us to clarify the pattern methodology and impact points to be replicated, tested and measured further on a broader scale, in other countries, or throughout the whole EU. The main findings reveal a potential life cycle assessment (LCA) verifying the circularity of wood and limitations of wood construction waste circularity in Latvia in terms of wood house construction industry readiness and a legal framework as well as overall social prejudices for circular construction. Findings indicate an overall awareness and level of willingness to participate and engage in the circular construction models among Latvians; however, proactiveness and support (legal and financial) is expected from the government and municipalities. The recommendations point towards improvements in wood waste data management, the wood construction sector and the overall impact on sustainable development goals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop