Geological Storage and Engineering Application of Gases

A special issue of Eng (ISSN 2673-4117). This special issue belongs to the section "Chemical, Civil and Environmental Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2026 | Viewed by 3853

Special Issue Editors

Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Interests: CO2 utilization and storage; flow in porous media; molecular dynamics simulation; unconventional resource development; hydrocarbon reservoir evaluation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
Interests: CO2/H2 geological storage; multi-scale full-process modeling; low-carbon energy system

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

With the increasing global demand for low-carbon and sustainable energy systems, geological storage and engineering application of gases such as CO2, natural gas, and hydrogen have become critical frontiers in energy and environmental research. Technologies like carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), underground gas storage (UGS), and geological hydrogen storage (GHS) are essential for achieving carbon neutrality, ensuring energy security, and supporting the transition to renewable energy.

This Special Issue aims to showcase the latest scientific and engineering advancements in geological storage mechanisms, reservoir characterization, wellbore–reservoir coupling, multiphysics modeling, and field-scale applications across different gas storage technologies. We welcome contributions addressing the challenges and opportunities in gas injection, migration, containment, monitoring, and long-term storage safety, as well as innovative strategies to improve storage efficiency and economic feasibility.

Original research articles, reviews, and case studies that explore cross-cutting themes, such as geomechanics, chemical reactions, and digital technologies in gas storage systems, are particularly encouraged.

We invite researchers from academia, industry, and government to contribute their latest findings to advance this interdisciplinary and impactful field.

Topics of Interest

  • Carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies.
  • Underground gas storage for natural gas and hydrogen.
  • Geological hydrogen storage in depleted reservoirs and salt caverns.
  • Pore-scale, core-scale, and reservoir-scale gas transport mechanisms.
  • Geomechanical and geochemical coupling in gas storage systems.
  • Multiphysics and cross-domain modeling approaches.
  • Wellbore integrity, leakage risk assessment, and mitigation.
  • Monitoring, measurement, and verification technologies.
  • Reservoir evaluation and site selection methods.
  • Enhanced gas recovery and cyclic gas injection techniques.
  • Digitalization, artificial intelligence, and data-driven optimization in gas storage.
  • Environmental, economic, and policy aspects of geological gas storage.

Dr. Lu Wang
Dr. Xinyuan Gao
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Eng is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • carbon capture, utilization, and storage
  • underground gas storage
  • geological hydrogen storage
  • pore-scale modeling
  • geomechanical coupling
  • wellbore-reservoir coupling
  • wellbore integrity
  • multiphysics simulation
  • enhanced gas recovery
  • monitoring and verification
  • storage efficiency
  • energy transition

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

25 pages, 6652 KB  
Article
Attribute-Guided Prestack Seismic Waveform Inversion—Methodology, Applications, and Feasibility to Characterize Underground Reservoirs for Potential Hydrogen Storage
by Dwaipayan Chakraborty and Subhashis Mallick
Eng 2026, 7(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7010045 - 14 Jan 2026
Viewed by 413
Abstract
Prestack seismic waveform inversion starts with an initial model and computes synthetic or predicted seismic data using a wave equation-based approach. Then, by matching these predicted data with the observed seismic data, it iteratively modifies the initial model using an optimization method until [...] Read more.
Prestack seismic waveform inversion starts with an initial model and computes synthetic or predicted seismic data using a wave equation-based approach. Then, by matching these predicted data with the observed seismic data, it iteratively modifies the initial model using an optimization method until the predicted and observed data reasonably match. This method has been demonstrated to be superior to amplitude-variation-with-angle inversion. Because of the wave equation-based approach, computational cost is, however, one major drawback of the method. In the presence of well-logs with borehole measurements of the subsurface properties such as the P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, and density, it is possible to provide a good initial model, and the method quickly converges to the true model at well locations. However, for locations away from the wells, the initial models are obtained by interpolating the initial models at the well locations over the interpreted geological horizons. These models can be far from the true models and inverting prestack data for these locations using wave equation-based method is computationally challenging. Because of these computational challenges, amplitude-variation-with-angle inversion is the current state-of-the-art method for routine seismic inversion applications. In this work, we provide an attribute-guided framework to generate initial models and demonstrate its applicability, which can potentially overcome computational challenges of prestack seismic waveform inversion. Furthermore, we also discuss the feasibility of using this attribute-guided approach to characterize reservoirs for underground hydrogen storage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geological Storage and Engineering Application of Gases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 10132 KB  
Article
Underground Hydrogen Storage in Saline Aquifers: A Simulation Case Study in the Midwest United States
by Emmanuel Appiah Kubi, Hamid Rahnema, Abdul-Muaizz Koray and Babak Shabani
Eng 2026, 7(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7010024 - 3 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1401
Abstract
Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in saline aquifers offers a viable alternative to surface-based storage systems, which are limited by capacity constraints, high operational pressures, complex thermal regulation, low energy densities, and potential safety hazards. This study uses a fully compositional reservoir simulation model [...] Read more.
Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in saline aquifers offers a viable alternative to surface-based storage systems, which are limited by capacity constraints, high operational pressures, complex thermal regulation, low energy densities, and potential safety hazards. This study uses a fully compositional reservoir simulation model to evaluate hydrogen behavior in the Mt. Simon Sandstone in the Illinois Basin. The analysis focuses on the effects of hysteresis, solubility, diffusivity, and production well perforation location on recovery efficiency. Cyclic injection and withdrawal scenarios were simulated to assess storage performance and operational strategies. The results show that accounting for hydrogen diffusivity shows essentially unchanged withdrawal efficiency at 79%, the same as the base case. Solubility causes a slight decrease to 78%, while hysteresis leads to a more significant reduction to 63%. The location of injection well perforations also influences recovery: top-perforated wells increase efficiency from 60% after the first cycle to 74% after six cycles, whereas bottom-perforated injection wells increase efficiency from 56% to 79% over the same period. These findings emphasize the importance of accounting for multiphase flow dynamics and strategic well placement in optimizing UHS system performance. The insights contribute to advancing reliable, large-scale hydrogen storage solutions essential for supporting renewable energy integration and long-term energy security. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geological Storage and Engineering Application of Gases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

37 pages, 4851 KB  
Review
Engineering Parameter Design for CO2 Geological Storage: Research Progress and Case Analyses
by Hangyu Liu, Wei Lian, Jun Li and Yanxian Wu
Eng 2025, 6(11), 329; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6110329 - 18 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1584
Abstract
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a critical technology for promoting carbon reduction and achieving the carbon neutrality goal. As a vital component of CCS projects, the injection process makes it especially important to clarify wellsite layout methods, wellbore parameters, and injection parameters [...] Read more.
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a critical technology for promoting carbon reduction and achieving the carbon neutrality goal. As a vital component of CCS projects, the injection process makes it especially important to clarify wellsite layout methods, wellbore parameters, and injection parameters for the safe and efficient storage of CO2. This article presents a survey of engineering parameter design in typical domestic and international comprehensively compares and analyzes multi-dimensional parameters under different storage conditions such as saline aquifers and basalt, and clarifies the basic adaptation logic that storage types determine engineering parameters, the requirement that engineering designs should be formulated according to reservoir characteristics, and the need for dynamic adjustment of engineering parameters based on actual conditions. Meanwhile, the paper identifies various challenges, including geological hazards in wellsite selection, wellbore corrosion risks, loss of control over injection pressure, and storage safety, corrosion risks, and CO2 leakage risks caused by thermodynamic phase transitions. It puts forward suggestions such as risk prevention and control strategies, wellbore integrity guarantee systems, injection optimization methods, and leakage prevention and control systems, providing a basis for the engineering design and safety assessment of CCS projects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geological Storage and Engineering Application of Gases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop