Special Issue "Safety Training Effectiveness: A Research Agenda"

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Federico Ricci
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedical, Metabolical and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
Interests: occupational psychology; risk perception; safety training effectiveness; andragogy; non-technical skills; safe behavior; occupational health and safety; workplace well-being; safety performance
Dr. Fabrizio Bracco
E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Education Science, University of Genova, 16124 Genova, Italy
Interests: occupational psychology; risk perception; safety models; non-technical skills; high-fidelity simulation; occupational health and safety; workplace well-being; safety performance

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The International Labour Organization estimates over 6000 occupational fatalities per day around the world, corresponding to 2.3 million worker victims of work-related accidents or diseases every year. Overall, occupational accidents affect 160 million workers annually worldwide. To contribute to the improvement of interventions to ensure safety at work, Beus et al. (2016) proposed an integrated model of workplace safety, connecting different theoretical propositions in a multilevel perspective. This helps to identify antecedents of adverse events at both the individual and group/organization levels, distinguishing between distal (e.g., individual differences, contextual factors) and proximal factors (e.g., safety knowledge, skills, or motivation).

Safety training is considered an example of contextual factors, as safety leadership, safety norms, and safety climate. In this regard, Burke et al. (2011) show that safety training leads to a significant improvement in safety knowledge and behavior, in particular through the use of more engaging methods. Additionally, several studies suggest that safety outcomes can be influenced at both the individual and group level by contextual factors such as safety training.

As James Reason states, if we are not able to change the human condition, it is about changing the conditions in which people work, favoring the identification of errors and the recognition of their characteristics, to be able to manage them effectively. In this sense, safety training can make a relevant contribution.

Unfortunately, we still know too little about the characteristics of the safety training that is provided, and even less about the quality of this training and its effectiveness. Recent meta-analytical studies (Robson et al., 2012; Ricci et al., 2016) have made it possible to classify training outcomes on different levels (knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, health outcomes) and to identify valid measures and methods to detect safety training effectiveness. However, also due to a limited number of good quality primary studies, it is still not possible to clearly define which factors determine the effectiveness of safety training.

This Special Issue is aimed at publishing studies that, through the collection of original data (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), as well as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case studies and theoretical papers, make it possible to clarify the future directions of research in safety training. Namely, some core issues will be: how to measure the effectiveness of safety training at work; the effects of efficacy on one or more levels, detected through empirical studies (cross-sectional, longitudinal, randomized, controlled); and the definition of what is meant by more or less engaging training methods. Special attention will also be given to the presentation of interdisciplinary work and multinational collaborative research. In addition, methodological contributions about the investigation of the factors contributing to safety training effectiveness are welcome.

Prof. Dr. Federico Ricci
Guest Editor
Dr. Fabrizio Bracco
Co-Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • safety
  • health
  • training effectiveness
  • training methods
  • evaluation
  • prevention
  • workplace training
  • occupational safety and health
  • safe behavior
  • safety performance

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Article
Safer Systems: People Training or System Tuning?
Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2021, 11(3), 990-998; https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030073 - 31 Aug 2021
Viewed by 1157
Abstract
Safety is usually seen as a problem when it is absent rather than when it is present, where accidents, incidents, and the like represent a lack of safety rather than the presence of safety. To explain this lack of safety, one or more [...] Read more.
Safety is usually seen as a problem when it is absent rather than when it is present, where accidents, incidents, and the like represent a lack of safety rather than the presence of safety. To explain this lack of safety, one or more causes must be found. In the management of industrial safety, the human factor has traditionally been seen as a weak element; human error is often offered as the first, and sometimes the only cause of lack of safety and human factors have since the early days offered three principal solutions, namely training, design, and automation. Of these, training has considerable face value as an effective means to improve human performance. The drawback of safety training, however, is that it focuses on a single system component, the human, instead of on the system as a whole. Safety training further takes for granted that humans are a liability and focuses on overcoming the weakness of this specific component through simplistic models of what determines human performance. But humans may also be seen as an asset which changes the focus to strengthening how a complex socio-technical system functions. A socio-technical system comprises multiple functions that must be finely tuned in order to ensure expected and acceptable performance. Since systems cannot be made safer without developing effective ways of managing the conditions in which people work, system tuning offers an alternative solution to an old problem. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety Training Effectiveness: A Research Agenda)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop