Conservation Biology, Management of Natural Resources, and Protected Areas Policies

A special issue of Conservation (ISSN 2673-7159).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 7841

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculté de Gestion, Economie et Science (FGES), Université Catholique de Lille, 59800 Lille, France
Interests: plant biology; ecological, biological and chemical traits; vegetation; ecosystems analysis and dynamics; conservation; restoration ecology; land and natural resources management; traditional uses and new applications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
1. Istituto Zooprofilattico della Sicilia “A. Mirri”, 90129 Palermo, Italy
2. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Species Survival Commission, 1196 Gland, Switzerland
Interests: island biodiversity
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
FGES, Université Catholique de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
Interests: ecology; conservation biology; agroecology; biodiversity

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Agriculture and Forestry (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
Interests: dendrology; silviculture; forest restoration

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The philosophy that led to the development of this Special Issue of Conservation is based on the growing body of knowledge and practice common to various practitioners and scientists dealing with conservation biology, the management of natural resources, and protected area policies. This SI aims to rework and improve ideas, actions, and policies about biodiversity conservation and land management in light of a continuously evolving corpus scientific knowledge in a way that enables humanity to face global changes, climate changes, and natural ecosystems loss, and to counteract biodiversity concerns stemming from human impact.

We also refer to the concept of ‘allochthonous’, ‘exotic’, ‘alien species’ and the articulation of the ‘para-autochthonous’ concept, with all the consequent possible management concepts.

It is known that certain non-native species can create problems, just as other non-native species are known for their advantages. Consequently, considering any non-native species as invasive can sometimes be an exaggeration. The consequences of this assumption, if applied to land management and biodiversity, can be very costly, harmful, and they can even surpass the deleterious effects that can be caused by non-native species.

Then, there is the problem of ‘unpleasant’ species that are often considered as negative or as alien even when they are not. On the contrary, we can observe other species that are often considered as native, even if they are not, because they are ‘pleasant’. The problem here is subjectivity: something that can be unpleasant for one observer, it can be pleasant to others, and vice-versa.

Non-native species must be viewed with a broader look, considering much more variables, with greater curiosity, with more thoughtful positions, with greater objectivity, and in a more rigorous manner. They should be contextualized case-by-case, avoiding concerning generalizations and vilifying them: looking for more efficient, durable, sustainable, serene and balanced solutions.

Reforestations should also be actively conserved, such as cultural ecosystems or as semi-natural environmental areas with ecological, landscape and cultural interest. Practices of conservation should supplant destructive ways of thinking about those plant formations. At the same time, even planting trees should not always be considered as something positive, but rather depends on the context, how it is performed and where. Just as much attention must be paid to the management of introduced species, and to the reintroduction of species.

For this reason, in Italy in Rome, on 22 May 2023, the Italian National Federation of Biologist Orders, organized a conference about the management of the Italian natural heritage during last decades. The conference was dedicated to Rachel Carson, who wrote the book "Silent Spring", pushing us to reflect on the impact of chemicals on agriculture, our development, environment problems, and the way of managing our territory.

This remains a severe problem, and it defies belief how today pesticides, herbicides and other poisons are increasingly proposed as being suitable for use in the management of natural areas. This, together with other intensive or expensive practices, could cause strong negative impacts.

In this Special Issue, we aim to collect contributions from this conference and also invite submissions from other contexts. This is carried out in order to widen the discussion on this subject, analyse different points of view with the aim of understanding weak points and the advantage of the actual ecosystem management strategies, environment policies, and to elaborate more sustainable and durable actions, pursuing reasoned approaches.

The guest editors would like to warmly thank the following expertise advisors of this Special Issue:
Prof. Dr. Rosario Fico (Società Italiana di Scienze Forensi Veterinarie)
Dr. Giuliano Russini (Federation of National Orders of Biologists)
Dr. Giorgio Boscagli (Wildlife biologist, former surveillance inspector of the Parco Nazionale d'Abruzzo, former director of the Parco Naturale Regionale del Sirente-Velino, and former director of Parco Nazionale delle Foreste Casentinesi)
Prof. Dr. Paolo Pupillo, Emeritus professor, University of Bologna (Plant physiologist and Conservationist)
Prof. Dr. Franco Pedrotti, Emeritus professor, University of Camerino (Botanist and Ecologist)
Their professionalism and support are much appreciated.

We hope to light a small spark that can stimulate other colleagues to share these concerns, contributing to the development of the science and improving biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management practices, together with the wellness of our society.

Dr. Kevin Cianfaglione
Guest Editor

Prof. Dr. Marco Masseti
Dr. Florian Kletty
Prof. Dr. Bartolomeo Schirone
Co-Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Conservation is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • invasive species
  • biodiversity conservation
  • conservation biology
  • management of natural resources
  • protected areas policies
  • ecosystem management
  • cultural ecosystems
  • semi-natural environment
  • non-native species

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

17 pages, 5519 KiB  
Article
Protected and Unprotected Areas as Refuges for Bird Conservation in Southeastern Coahuila, Mexico
by Eber G. Chavez-Lugo, Jorge E. Ramírez-Albores, Marlín Pérez-Suárez, Erika J. Cruz-Bazan, Juan A. Encina-Domínguez and Arturo Cruz-Anaya
Conservation 2024, 4(4), 560-576; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4040034 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1106
Abstract
Information gaps about the distribution of species hamper the evaluation of conservation status and decisions on biodiversity conservation, affecting areas with high species richness and endemism to a greater extent. In this context, carrying out biological inventories in protected and unprotected areas is [...] Read more.
Information gaps about the distribution of species hamper the evaluation of conservation status and decisions on biodiversity conservation, affecting areas with high species richness and endemism to a greater extent. In this context, carrying out biological inventories in protected and unprotected areas is an important tool to fill these gaps by providing data on the composition, richness, and abundance of species in each locality. The southeastern region of Coahuila (northeast Mexico) is a region where biodiversity research is required, as anthropogenic activities pose a serious threat to the avian diversity of this region. The present study aimed to compare the capacity of protected and unprotected areas to support the richness, abundance, and composition of bird species, as well as providing a list of bird species from eight areas located in this region. The point count method was conducted at the sites, and one-way ANOVA was used to determine the effect of area type on species richness and abundance. Based on our field observations, literature review, and digital databases, the avifauna of these eight areas includes 388 species in 63 families. Of these, 5 species are endemic to Mexico, 6 species are of global conservation concern, and 35 species are of regional conservation concern. The species richness found in this study supports the importance of protected and unprotected areas in southeastern Coahuila. The results of our study highlight the need for further assessment to conserve the avian community, especially considering the increasing threats of anthropogenic disturbance, as well as additional studies that will allow for better characterization of the avifauna of the region. This will help to ensure the conservation of the birds currently threatened by strong anthropic pressure due to the conversion of semiarid ecosystems to agricultural and livestock areas as well as increasing urbanization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3020 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Provisioning of Ecosystem Services Provided by the Relics Forest in Togo’s Mono Biosphere Reserve
by Kokouvi Gbétey Akpamou, Somiyabalo Pilabina, Hodabalo Egbelou, Kokou Richard Sewonou, Yvonne Walz, Luca Luiselli, Gabriel H. Segniagbeto, Daniele Dendi and Kouami Kokou
Conservation 2024, 4(3), 486-504; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4030030 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 940
Abstract
In most Sub-Saharan African countries, such as Togo, forest ecosystems provide ecosystem services to the local population. These ecosystem services are of vital importance to the local populations, who depend on the benefits derived from their use to meet their socio-economic needs. The [...] Read more.
In most Sub-Saharan African countries, such as Togo, forest ecosystems provide ecosystem services to the local population. These ecosystem services are of vital importance to the local populations, who depend on the benefits derived from their use to meet their socio-economic needs. The permanent dependence of these populations on ecosystem services is a major factor accelerating the degradation of natural resources, which are already under pressure from climatic factors. The present study assesses the provisioning of ecosystem services provided by the relics forest in the southeast region of the Mono Biosphere Reserve in Togo. Individual interviews and group discussions were carried out with 420 households in fourteen villages around the reserve to identify the current uses of woody species. The results show that 100% of the respondents cited plant species, such as Mitragyna inermis, Lonchocarpus sericeus, and Diospyros mespiliformis, as used for wood. Species, such as Mimusops andogensis and Triplohiton scleroxylon, were cited as exclusively used for wood by 94% and 86%, respectively. Other species, such as Vitex doniana and Dialium guineense, in addition to their use for wood (93% and 70%), were cited, respectively, by 97% and 98% of respondents as used for fruit, and by 82% and 90% for their leaves. The heavy daily use of these species compromises their sustainability. An analysis of Sorensen’s similarity index, according to gender, age, ethnic group, and sector of activity, revealed a variation in this index ranging from 0.6 to 1, reflecting households’ knowledge of the use of these seven species. The local populations are already feeling the effects of the low availability of these commonly used species. According to them, the depletion of these resources is caused mainly by agricultural clearing, illegal logging, and bushfires. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2498 KiB  
Article
Visitors’ Willingness to Pay for Protected Areas: A New Conservation Donation in Aso Kuju National Park
by Thomas Edward Jones, Duo Xu, Takayuki Kubo and Minh-Hoang Nguyen
Conservation 2024, 4(2), 201-215; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4020014 - 10 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1451
Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) such as national parks face funding issues that undermine effective management. Therefore, many PAs are exploring new financial instruments, such as visitor donations, to supplement their conservation budgets. This paper investigates visitor perceptions of one such system, a new conservation [...] Read more.
Protected areas (PAs) such as national parks face funding issues that undermine effective management. Therefore, many PAs are exploring new financial instruments, such as visitor donations, to supplement their conservation budgets. This paper investigates visitor perceptions of one such system, a new conservation donation under consideration in Aso Kuju National Park, southwest Japan, is due to be introduced. Our on-site survey at two trailheads in autumn 2022 gauged visitors’ willingness to pay (WTP) the expected JPY 500 donation. The analysis used Bayesian linear regression to look for significant predictors of WTP. Findings show that female, older, and higher-income visitors were more likely to pay the donation collectively rather than voluntarily. Prior knowledge of the donation system was also a significant predictor of WTP, but more frequent climbers were significantly less likely to pay the donation collectively, regardless of prior Kuju climbing experience, possibly due to the perceived increase in use costs. Moreover, visitors willing to pay the cooperation donation collectively are also willing to pay higher prices than those willing to pay voluntarily. The elicited WTP values confirm that the implementation of a new conservation donation could help to improve the long-term sustainable financing of PAs such as Aso Kuju while raising issues over price fairness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

16 pages, 14361 KiB  
Review
Challenges and Perspectives in Proving Harm of Anticoagulants to Marine Predators and Scavengers
by Robert Boesch
Conservation 2024, 4(4), 762-777; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4040045 - 2 Dec 2024
Viewed by 396
Abstract
Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) have been used for eradication of mammals such as rats and mice on islands for more than three decades. Baits containing 25 to 50 parts per million of an AR (usually the second-generation anticoagulant brodifacoum) were aerially applied to 70% [...] Read more.
Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) have been used for eradication of mammals such as rats and mice on islands for more than three decades. Baits containing 25 to 50 parts per million of an AR (usually the second-generation anticoagulant brodifacoum) were aerially applied to 70% or more of the area on islands. In some areas, baits entered the seas. Many apparent coincidences between the AR bait applications and marine mammal strandings that were observed are summarized and discussed. The coincidences were not well studied and the associations between AR applications and mammal strandings have been understudied or denied. Such associations warrant a need to investigate whether AR applications are directly associated with marine mammal deaths and strandings, for which challenges are discussed. Monitoring marine ecosystems faces many challenges. This review calls for attention to consider and possibly establish a reasonable certainty of no harm for ecosystem restoration efforts. Cases potentially related to ARs are presented to illustrate the concept and the need of establishing such a certainty. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 6008 KiB  
Review
Barn Owls as a Nature-Based Solution for Pest Control: A Multinational Initiative Around the Mediterranean and Other Regions
by Vasileios Bontzorlos, Shlomo Cain, Yossi Leshem, Orr Spiegel, Yoav Motro, Itai Bloch, Sidi Imad Cherkaoui, Shaul Aviel, Melpo Apostolidou, Antaia Christou, Harris Nicolaou, Nikolaos Kassinis, Mansour Abu Rashid, Mary Bahdouhesh and Alexandre Roulin
Conservation 2024, 4(4), 627-656; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4040039 - 4 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1094
Abstract
Pest rodents cause extensive damage to crops worldwide. Up to 40% of global crop production is lost annually to pests and diseases, with rodents accounting for 15–30% of this loss amounting to billions of dollars each year. The current method of controlling rodent [...] Read more.
Pest rodents cause extensive damage to crops worldwide. Up to 40% of global crop production is lost annually to pests and diseases, with rodents accounting for 15–30% of this loss amounting to billions of dollars each year. The current method of controlling rodent populations involves the extensive use of chemical rodenticides. While effective in the short term, these chemicals pose serious environmental and health risks, leading to secondary poisoning of non-target species and other long-term negative ecological consequences, underscoring the need to adopt more sustainable pest-control measures. Nature-Based Solutions (NbSs), on the other hand, are increasingly recognized for addressing environmental challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and sustainable development, and they include actions that protect, sustainably manage, and restore ecosystems. In this context, Barn Owls (Tyto alba) are highly effective as a natural pest-rodent control agents in agro-ecosystems. The species has a wide distribution and adaptability to various environments, and its diet consists predominantly of small mammals, with rodents making up from 50–60% up to even 90–95% of the diet according to different geographical regions. Each Barn Owl family can consume thousands of rodents annually, creating a high potential to reduce crop damage and infestations. Deploying nest boxes in agricultural areas can significantly increase Barn Owl populations, ensuring continuous and effective rodent control. Limitations of this solution must also be taken into consideration such as predation on rodents and small mammals that are not pests, and possible competition with other nocturnal birds of prey. Ιn the current paper, we aim to introduce the concept of owls as a NbS for pest rodent control and outline the main challenges, pitfalls, advantages, and disadvantages of implementing this solution in a new geographical region, and all the necessary in-between steps (scientific, societal, administrative, educational) that have to be followed for a successful implementation. So far, several countries have successfully implemented Barn Owl nest box schemes, with Israel and Cyprus achieving reduction in the use of pesticides by 45% and 58%, respectively, whereas the project is spreading to other Mediterranean countries (Jordan, Palestine Authority, Greece, Morocco, Spain), in palm plantations in Malaysia and USA, and in the vineyards of Napa Valley in California. The success of Barn Owl nest box programs relies on integrating scientific research, societal needs, supportive policy frameworks, and education. Barn Owl nest box programs are both bottom-up and top-down initiatives, in need of the participation of farmers and local communities to establish and deploy the Barn Owl solution. Continuous research is also necessary to explore systematically Barn owl trophic ecology, foraging and breeding ecology, interactions with agricultural landscape, and land uses in temporal and spatial scales, and challenges such as habitat suitability, availability of nesting sites, and regional ecological conditions must also be addressed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

7 pages, 1256 KiB  
Brief Report
A Synthetic Framework to Match Concepts and Approaches When Managing Anthropogenic Threats
by Corrado Battisti, Anna Testi, Giuliano Fanelli, Milvia Rastrelli, Pietro Giovacchini and Letizia Marsili
Conservation 2024, 4(3), 395-401; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation4030026 - 5 Aug 2024
Viewed by 838
Abstract
Anthropogenic threats impacting ecological targets should be mitigated and solved using fast and schematic tools useful in conservation strategies. Herein, we suggest a mixed and quick approach implementing coarse-grained (and expert-based) threat analysis with the fine-grained (and analytical) DPSIR (driving forces, pressure, status, [...] Read more.
Anthropogenic threats impacting ecological targets should be mitigated and solved using fast and schematic tools useful in conservation strategies. Herein, we suggest a mixed and quick approach implementing coarse-grained (and expert-based) threat analysis with the fine-grained (and analytical) DPSIR (driving forces, pressure, status, impact, and response) framework of indicators, all included in a single causal chain. Both approaches are largely used in conservation but never combined. A simulated example of the application of the set of indicators (status, pressure, impact, and response) on dune ecosystems (and nested targets represented by halo-psammophilous plants) has been included. Due to its schematic format, values as targets, pressures as threats, and responses as conservation strategies have been unified in a single conceptual framework. This synthetic framework can also be used to communicate to academic students the complexities of socio-ecological systems on the conservation front lines using a simplified cause–effect chain. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop