Body Image and Wellbeing: From a Social Psychology Perspective

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Social Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 16 December 2025 | Viewed by 2381

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: social and health psychology; body image; sociocultural influence; interest in cosmetic surgery; prevention of risk behaviors; prejudice and stereotypes; psychosocial wellbeing

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy
Interests: social and health psychology; attitudes and attitude changes; health promotion; body image; interest in cosmetic surgery; prevention of risk behaviors

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy
Interests: body image; perceived mattering; metastereotypes; intergroup attitudes; acculturation; couple satisfaction

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Education, Languages, Intercultures, Literatures and Psychology, University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy
Interests: body image; sociocultural influence; prejudice and stereotypes; health psychology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Body image is a multidimensional construct encompassing both negative and positive dimensions. Negative body image is related to body dissatisfaction, while positive body image is related to body appreciation, body functionality appreciation, and body compassion. These dimensions are not opposite poles of the same continuum but coexist as distinct aspects of an individual’s relationship with their body.

Building on frameworks such as the Social Comparison Theory (Festinger, 1954), which highlights the drive to evaluate oneself against others, and the Objectification Theory (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997), which emphasizes the internalization of an observer’s perspective on the body, scholars have demonstrated that body image perceptions emerge at the intersection of individual psychological factors and pervasive sociocultural influences.

Sociocultural influences—including media, social media, family, peers, and romantic partners—along with stereotypes, metastereotypes, prejudice, and gender roles significantly shape body image perceptions and attitudes. These influences often promote unattainable esthetic standards, contributing to body dissatisfaction and behaviors aimed at modifying physical appearance, such as restrictive eating or esthetic surgery. Conversely, perceiving acceptance from their significant others fosters positive body image and supports healthier eating patterns. Similarly, engagement in sports and physical activities can either enhance or undermine one’s body image, depending on whether the emphasis is placed on functionality or esthetic appeal.

Intersectional factors, including gender, age, and cultural background, further complicate body image experiences, underscoring the dynamic relationship between individual and societal factors. Understanding these factors is crucial for examining how body image impacts wellbeing, eating habits, and quality of life across diverse populations.

We invite authors to contribute to this Special Issue by submitting original research articles, validation studies, meta-analyses, and reviews that advance knowledge in this domain. Papers selected for this Special Issue will undergo rigorous peer review to ensure prompt and broad dissemination of research findings, innovations, and applications.

References:

  1. Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202.
  2. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

Dr. Cristian Di Gesto
Dr. Amanda Nerini
Dr. Camilla Matera
Dr. Giulia Rosa Policardo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

 

Keywords

  • body image
  • sociocultural influences
  • esthetic surgery
  • stereotypes and gender differences
  • attitudes and behaviors
  • eating habits
  • pregnancy and postpartum period
  • sport and physical activity
  • intersectionality
  • wellbeing
  • quality of life

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 356 KB  
Article
Exploring the Link Between Body Appreciation and Health-Related Lifestyle in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Migle Baceviciene, Laima Trinkuniene and Rasa Jankauskiene
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1400; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101400 - 15 Oct 2025
Viewed by 216
Abstract
Adolescence is a critical developmental stage at which body image and lifestyle behaviours intersect. Research shows that having a positive body image during this period is linked to better mental health and certain aspects of a healthy lifestyle. However, more empirical evidence is [...] Read more.
Adolescence is a critical developmental stage at which body image and lifestyle behaviours intersect. Research shows that having a positive body image during this period is linked to better mental health and certain aspects of a healthy lifestyle. However, more empirical evidence is needed, especially concerning boys. This cross-sectional study explored the association between body appreciation (BA) and lifestyle factors in a large sample of Lithuanian adolescents. These associations were examined while controlling for body mass index (BMI), and the role of sex in these relationships was evaluated. A cross-sectional study involved 1412 adolescents (59.6% girls) aged 16–17 years (mean age of 16.97 ± 0.46 years). Participants completed questionnaires assessing BA, self-esteem, life satisfaction and lifestyle factors such as physical activity and perceived fitness, sleep duration, screen time and disordered eating (DE) attitudes and behaviours. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and binary logistic regression analysis. Higher BA was associated with greater life satisfaction, self-esteem, perceived physical fitness and healthier eating behaviours independent of BMI in boys and girls. Adolescents with high BA had significantly higher odds of participating in sports, having a healthy BMI, accurate body weight estimation, good self-rated health and non-smoking behaviours compared to those with low BA. BA was also associated with healthier sleeping hours, lower screen time and lower unhealthy and DE behaviour in girls. Boys with high BA were more likely to abstain from alcohol. Interaction effects indicated that the effect of BA on self-esteem, BMI and DE behaviours was stronger in girls than in boys. BA is strongly linked to positive lifestyle outcomes and self-esteem in adolescents, particularly in girls. The findings of this study indicate that initiatives designed to promote healthy lifestyles among adolescent boys and girls may be enhanced by the incorporation of education on positive body image. Interventions should be tailored to gender-specific needs, emphasizing prevention of dysfunctional eating for girls, and reducing substance use for boys. Incorporating body-positive education into schools and health programs can help create supportive environments that enhance both psychological well-being and physical health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Body Image and Wellbeing: From a Social Psychology Perspective)
16 pages, 565 KB  
Article
Romantic Relationship Quality and Eating Disorder Symptoms in Late Pregnancy: The Serial Mediating Role of Depression and Body Dissatisfaction
by Giulia Costanzo, Nadia Barberis, Eleonora Bevacqua, Maria Rita Infurna and Giorgio Falgares
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1392; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101392 - 14 Oct 2025
Viewed by 157
Abstract
Late pregnancy represents a critical period for the onset of eating disorder symptoms, particularly in the presence of psychological and relational vulnerabilities. Among these, the quality of the romantic relationship has received limited empirical attention, despite its potential role in shaping women’s psychological [...] Read more.
Late pregnancy represents a critical period for the onset of eating disorder symptoms, particularly in the presence of psychological and relational vulnerabilities. Among these, the quality of the romantic relationship has received limited empirical attention, despite its potential role in shaping women’s psychological adjustment, influencing both mood and body image. The present study examined the association between romantic relationship quality and eating disorder symptoms during the third trimester of pregnancy, considering the mediating roles of depressive symptoms and body dissatisfaction. A sample of 231 Italian pregnant women (Mage = 32.3 years) completed four self-report measures: the Dyadic Adjustment Scale-7, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale, and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire-Short. A serial mediation model was tested, including pre-pregnancy body mass index as a covariate. Results indicated that lower romantic relationship quality was associated with greater eating disorder symptoms through higher depressive symptoms and body dissatisfaction, which acted both independently and sequentially. These findings highlight the complex interplay between relational and psychological factors in the development of disordered eating during pregnancy, emphasizing the need for early screening and integrated interventions addressing both interpersonal and intrapersonal domains. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Body Image and Wellbeing: From a Social Psychology Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 599 KB  
Article
The Role of LGBTQ+ Vicarious Trauma in Eating Disorder Risk—A Psychological Parallel Mediation Model
by Fabrizio Santoniccolo, Tommaso Trombetta, Maria Noemi Paradiso and Luca Rollè
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1343; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101343 - 30 Sep 2025
Viewed by 341
Abstract
Minority stress appears to be consistently associated with a heightened risk of developing eating disorders. There is limited data investigating the role of witnessed heterosexist experiences (vicarious trauma), such as discrimination, harassment, or violence happening to other LGBTQ+ people. The present study aims [...] Read more.
Minority stress appears to be consistently associated with a heightened risk of developing eating disorders. There is limited data investigating the role of witnessed heterosexist experiences (vicarious trauma), such as discrimination, harassment, or violence happening to other LGBTQ+ people. The present study aims to examine the association between vicarious trauma and eating disorder risk while surveying the mediating role of emotional dysregulation, self-esteem, and shame. An anonymous online survey was conducted involving 376 LGBTQ+ people from Italy. Participants completed self-report questionnaires regarding heterosexist experiences and factors associated with eating behavior. Descriptive, bivariate, and mediation analyses were conducted using the “PROCESS” macro. Statistically significant positive associations were found between all the main variables in bivariate analyses. Mediation analyses highlighted a direct effect of vicarious trauma on eating disorder risk and indirect effects of vicarious trauma on eating disorder risk through low self-esteem and emotion dysregulation. The indirect effect through shame was nonsignificant. Vicarious trauma appears to have a significant direct effect on eating disorder risk and small but significant indirect effects through emotional dysregulation and low self-esteem. Health promotion contexts would benefit from policies at the institutional, organizational, and social levels to prevent minority stress and reduce observed health disparities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Body Image and Wellbeing: From a Social Psychology Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 859 KB  
Article
Orthorexia Nervosa and Its Associations with Novel Foods and Body Image Concerns
by Mirko Duradoni, Giulia Colombini, Noemi Gori and Andrea Guazzini
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(8), 1138; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081138 - 21 Aug 2025
Viewed by 698
Abstract
Research on food-related behaviors has increasingly focused on orthorexia nervosa, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, especially with the rise of new types of healthy foods. This study examines the associations between orthorexic tendencies, as measured by the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory [...] Read more.
Research on food-related behaviors has increasingly focused on orthorexia nervosa, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, especially with the rise of new types of healthy foods. This study examines the associations between orthorexic tendencies, as measured by the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory and ORTO-R, and scores on the Food Neophobias Scale, attitudes toward novel foods, body shape concerns, as assessed by the Body Shape Questionnaire, and drive for muscularity, training adherence, and anabolic steroid use, as measured by the Drive for Muscularity Scale. A total of 306 participants (68.3% female; Mage = 35.4 years, SD = 13.7), who were at least 18 old and fluent in Italian, took part in an online, anonymous data collection. The results revealed mixed associations between ON and the perceived attractiveness or intention to consume novel foods. In contrast, no relationship was found between orthorexia and food neophobia. Additionally, orthorexic dimensions were correlated with greater body shape dissatisfaction (r-scores ranging from 0.44 to 0.52, p < 0.001) and a drive for muscularity (r-scores ranging from 0.43 to 0.57, p < 0.001). Notably, orthorexic scores showed significant positive correlations with thoughts about anabolic steroid use (r-scores ranging from 0.26 to 0.60, p < 0.001) and training adherence (r-scores ranging from 0.39 to 0.53, p < 0.001) in a subsample of people who regularly exercise. Of examined the predictors, body shape concerns and thoughts about anabolic steroid use (ß ranging from 0.21 to 0.55, and R2 ranging from 0.43 to 0.57, p < 0.001) were the most robust predictors of orthorexic tendencies. Overall, the findings highlight the complex relationships between orthorexic tendencies, perceptions, and attitudes, as well as body-related concerns, while also providing new insights into their connection to novel foods. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Body Image and Wellbeing: From a Social Psychology Perspective)
Show Figures

Figure A1

Back to TopTop