Children’s Cognitive Development in Social and Cultural Contexts

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Developmental Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 February 2026 | Viewed by 916

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, MA 02747-2300, USA
Interests: cultural, contextual and cognitive factors that promote positive youth development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA
Interests: cognitive development; executive function; representational development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Research on cognitive development has been dominated by the assumption that universal processes guide cognition; thus, the social and cultural aspects of cognitive development have not been well represented in the literature. That said, researchers have found that culture shapes memory (Wang et al., 2024; Tsethlikai and Rogoff, 2013), perception (Chen et al., 2024), and attention (Falon et al., 2024; Taverna et al., 2024). Social processes also shape cognitive development with in-group versus out-group influences on cognitive control (Doebel and Munakata, 2018), and delay of gratification (Munakata et al., 2020), with social contexts more broadly influencing executive function development (Munakata and Michaelson, 2020). A solid foundation exists to build upon; however, recent reviews clearly illustrate the need for more research, especially research on cognitive development in diverse populations (Roberts et al., 2020: Tsethlikai et al., 2024).

For this Special Issue, we invite articles focused on understanding cognitive development in high-risk contexts with a focus on social and cultural processes that buffer or protect children from the negative effects of stress and toxic environments on cognitive development. Additionally, research focused on the social aspects of cognitive development among all children, but especially underrepresented, underserved, and international children, is welcomed. Review articles that examine measurement issues in studying cultural and social aspects of cognition or the conceptualization of what cognitive development means in international, ethnic, and vulnerable communities are also invited for consideration. Within-group longitudinal studies of cultural and social aspects of cognitive development are particularly needed in the field, but we recognize that working in underserved, underrepresented, international, and vulnerable populations often necessitates the use of cross-sectional studies.

The aim of this Special Issue is to select a representative set of empirical articles that attempt to shed light on how cultural and social processes influence children’s cognitive development. We invite articles from multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives (psychology, education, anthropology, cognitive neuroscience, and developmental psychology) that address various aspects of cognitive development (attention, memory, perception, executive function, and language), and various social and cultural factors (e.g., cultural and spiritual customs and practices, ethnic/racial socialization, in-group versus out-group influences, and the roles of emotion and social context) that guide development.

References

(Chen et al. 2024) Chen, P.; Chung-Fat-Yim, A.; Guo, T.; Marian, V. 2024. Cultural background and input familiarity influence multisensory emotion perception. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology 30: 487–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000577

(Doebel and Munakata 2018) Doebel, S.; Munakata, Y. 2018. Group Influences on Engaging Self-Control: Children Delay Gratification and Value It More When Their In-Group Delays and Their Out-Group Doesn’t. Psychological Science 29: 738–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617747367

(Falon et al. 2024) Falon, S.L.; Jobson, L.; Liddell, B.J. 2024. Does culture moderate the encoding and recognition of negative cues? Evidence from an eye-tracking study. PLoS ONE 19: 22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295301

(Munakata and Michaelson 2020) Munakata, Y.; Michaelson, L.E. 2020. Executive Functions in Social Context: Implications for Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Supporting Developmental Trajectories. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology 3: 139–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-085005

(Munakata et al. 2020) Munakata, Y.; Yanaoka, K.; Doebel, S.; Guild, R.M.; Michaelson, L.E.; Saito, S. 2020. Group Influences on Children’s Delay of Gratification: Testing the Roles of Culture and Personal Connections. Collabra. Psychology 6: 1. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.265

(Roberts et al. 2020) Roberts, S.O.; Bareket-Shavit, C.; Dollins, F.A.; Goldie, P.D.; Mortenson, E. 2020. Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15: 1295–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709.

(Taverna et al. 2024) Taverna, A.; Padilla, M.; Waxman, S. 2024. How pervasive is joint attention? Mother-child dyads from a Wichi community reveal a different form of “togetherness”. Developmental Science 27: 13. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13471

(Tsethlikai et al. 2024) Tsethlikai, M.; Cole, A.B.; Hoffman, A.; Ng, F.; Bang, M. 2024. To heal, grow, and thrive: Pursuing Indigenous perspectives and paradigms in developmental science. Child Development Online

(Tsethlikai and Rogoff 2013) Tsethlikai, M.; Rogoff, B. Involvement in traditional cultural practices and American Indian children’s incidental recall of a folktale. Dev. Psychol. 2013, 49, 568–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031308. PMID: 23316771.

(Wang et al. 2024) Wang, Q.; Mert, N.; Tian, Y. 2024. Remembering the good and bad and the self and others in a culturally modulated self-memory system. Memory 32: 790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2372373.

Dr. Monica Tsethlikai
Dr. Stephanie Miller
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cultural and social influences
  • cognitive development
  • attention
  • learning
  • memory
  • academic outcomes

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 2009 KiB  
Article
Driving Factors in the Development of Eye Movement Patterns in Chinese Reading: The Roles of Linguistic Ability and Oculomotor Maturation
by Meihua Guo, Nina Liu, Jingen Wu, Chengchieh Li and Guoli Yan
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 426; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040426 - 26 Mar 2025
Viewed by 295
Abstract
The mechanisms driving the development of eye movement patterns is an unresolved debate in children during reading, with three competing hypotheses: the oculomotor-tuning hypothesis, the linguistic-proficiency hypothesis, and the combined hypothesis that incorporates both. This study examined eye movement patterns in 215 Chinese [...] Read more.
The mechanisms driving the development of eye movement patterns is an unresolved debate in children during reading, with three competing hypotheses: the oculomotor-tuning hypothesis, the linguistic-proficiency hypothesis, and the combined hypothesis that incorporates both. This study examined eye movement patterns in 215 Chinese children from first to fifth grade using sentence-reading tasks. Oculomotor maturation was measured through saccade tasks, and linguistic abilities were assessed using Chinese character recognition and vocabulary knowledge tests. Path analysis explored how these factors predict temporal and spatial eye movement measures. Results indicated that temporal measures were primarily driven by linguistic abilities, supporting the linguistic-proficiency hypothesis. Spatial measures, however, were influenced by both linguistic abilities and oculomotor maturation, supporting the combined hypothesis. These findings diverge from predictions of the E-Z Reader model in alphabetic scripts, likely due to the unique visual complexity of Chinese characters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Children’s Cognitive Development in Social and Cultural Contexts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop