Shaping Workplace Behavior: Leadership, Communication and Office Politics

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Organizational Behaviors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2026 | Viewed by 3112

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Communication and Information Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
Interests: behavioral and communication styles; behavioral science; behavioral sociology; public relations; public relations leadership; workplace culture; workplace behavior; PR history
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will address workplace behavior, looking particularly into leadership and the role of communication, as well as how office politics have evolved and adapted over time.

The literature shows that employee behavior, wellbeing, and satisfaction are often shaped and influenced by the leadership styles of managers, as well as organizational communication and culture. Organizations that have a culture of collaboration, inclusivity, and strong internal communication policies are generally thought to achieve better results with regard to employee retention and satisfaction, and this also positively influences productivity. Moreover, leaders that listen to their employees, communicate their decisions transparently, and generally behave in a way that creates a positive organizational culture are thought to have more success in retaining employees. However, workplace behavior has changed since the COVID-19 pandemic, with many companies remaining remote even after the lifting of restrictions.

Whilst many studies have tackled the switch to remote work and how this affects employee productivity, satisfaction, and retention, with some studies suggesting that remote work options represent an advantage in attracting and retaining employees and that remote work reduces work-related bullying, along with engagement with office politics and all of the negative consequences that office politics bring, fewer authors have tackled the ways in which leadership behavior and communication have changed, whether organizations and managers have adapted to leading in a remote environment, and how this affects office politics and leadership behavior in a remote context.

We must ask the question of whether office politics and discrimination have disappeared or whether means of communicating and leadership in workplaces have adapted to new circumstances and changed, but with the outcomes remaining the same. Equally, what is the impact of ‘new’ office politics on employees and their workplace behavior; have office politics and discrimination disappeared, or are employees less likely to communicate concerns in a remote context? How does internal organizational communication work in an increasingly remote context, and how does internal communication affect workplace behavior?

For this Special Issue, we invite contributions on workplace behavior, focusing particularly on office politics and how office politics have changed and adapted over time. Thus, both historical and contemporary submissions are welcome. Papers tackling the role of leadership, behavioral leadership styles, and the role of communication in office politics and workplace behavior are also welcome.

Dr. Martina Topić-Rutherford
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • organizational behavior
  • workplace behavior
  • leadership
  • behavioral leadership
  • employee relations
  • internal communication
  • office politics
  • remote work
  • communication
  • public relations

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 350 KB  
Article
Empathetic Leadership in Corporate Communication: Cultivating Positive Dynamics and Enhancing Employee Well-Being
by Karen Robayo-Sanchez, Michael A. Cacciatore and Juan Meng
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(3), 412; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030412 - 11 Mar 2026
Viewed by 316
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impact of empathetic leadership in corporate communication, focusing on its role in enhancing employee well-being and fostering a positive workplace culture. It explores how empathetic communication contributes to trust, engagement, and long-term organizational success. Based on an [...] Read more.
This study aims to examine the impact of empathetic leadership in corporate communication, focusing on its role in enhancing employee well-being and fostering a positive workplace culture. It explores how empathetic communication contributes to trust, engagement, and long-term organizational success. Based on an international survey conducted among communication professionals in Canada and the United States (n = 1055), our analyses revealed significant gender disparities in the perception of empathy among senior communication leaders, with male professionals reporting higher perceived empathy compared to female professionals. Additionally, hierarchical position influenced perceptions, with higher-ranking employees reporting stronger empathic leadership. Perceptions of increased empathic communication over the past year were notably higher among men, older employees, and those with more experience. Empathetic leadership demonstrated a strong positive correlation with employee engagement and organizational commitment but did not significantly impact burnout. Findings from this study contribute to a broader understanding of how leadership empathy varies across professional environments and demographic groups, underscoring the complex dynamics of gender and organizational structure in shaping workplace experiences. Findings in our study contribute to both the advancement of leadership theory and the improvement of corporate communication practice. Full article
18 pages, 670 KB  
Article
When Feedback Backfires: Effects of Real-Time Participation Feedback and Group Norm Prompt on Team Creativity in Virtual Workspaces
by Woonki Hong and Heajung Jung
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 204; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020204 - 30 Jan 2026
Viewed by 384
Abstract
This study examines how structured interventions influence team creativity on a metaverse-based collaboration platform. Using B.sket, a custom virtual workspace, we tested two interventions during an online brainstorming task: (1) real-time participation feedback delivered as a communication barcode showing each member’s speaking time [...] Read more.
This study examines how structured interventions influence team creativity on a metaverse-based collaboration platform. Using B.sket, a custom virtual workspace, we tested two interventions during an online brainstorming task: (1) real-time participation feedback delivered as a communication barcode showing each member’s speaking time and sequence (an informational cue), and (2) a group norm communication encouraging equal participation (a social-normative cue). Eighty-one university students in South Korea, recruited through online advertisements using a convenience sampling method, participated in a 2 (group norm prompt: provided vs. not) × 2 (participation feedback: provided vs. not) between-subject factorial design. Team creativity was evaluated by fluency, flexibility, and originality. Results revealed that, contrary to expectations, participation feedback significantly reduced idea fluency and showed marginally negative effects on flexibility and originality. The group norm prompt produced no significant improvements in creativity. We speculate that these findings can be explained by self-determination theory and ego depletion theory, such that real-time participation feedback may undermine individuals’ sense of autonomy and induce cognitive distraction, thereby reducing creative performance. We discuss practical implications that team process interventions for promoting equal participation should be designed carefully to avoid these unexpected consequences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 680 KB  
Article
The Impact of Empowering Leadership on the Job Crafting of Knowledge Employees: A Moderated Mediating Effect Model
by Yu Mao, Quan Fang, Chunyan Jiang and Huabin Wu
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 117; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010117 - 14 Jan 2026
Viewed by 447
Abstract
Empowering leadership can provide more resource support for organizations and better match the characteristics of current knowledge employees, such as a high demand for autonomy and pursuit of value diversification. However, existing literature has not fully clarified the specific cognitive transmission mechanisms linking [...] Read more.
Empowering leadership can provide more resource support for organizations and better match the characteristics of current knowledge employees, such as a high demand for autonomy and pursuit of value diversification. However, existing literature has not fully clarified the specific cognitive transmission mechanisms linking empowering leadership to knowledge workers’ job crafting, nor has it sufficiently examined the boundary conditions of this relationship under specific individual traits. This study aimed to explore the impact of empowering leadership on knowledge employees’ job crafting by constructing a moderated mediation model. This study introduces role breadth self-efficacy as a mediating variable and learning goal orientation as a moderating variable and collects questionnaire data to investigate the underlying mechanisms among 338 knowledge employees. Empowering leadership has a positive effect on knowledge employees’ job crafting. Role breadth self-efficacy mediates the relationship between empowering leadership and job crafting. Learning goal orientation positively moderated the impact of empowering leadership on role breadth self-efficacy. Building an empowering leadership model with empowerment and psychological safety at its core can stimulate employees’ job crafting. Role breadth self-efficacy can be improved by challenging tasks and systematic training. The implementation of differentiated management based on learning-goal orientation strengthens the empowerment effect. These measures provide feasible paths for organizations to drive adaptive changes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 596 KB  
Article
All Eyes on the New, but Who Hears the Old? The Impact of Incumbent Employees’ Perceived Status Threat on Work Behavior
by Yanshu Ji, Ke Hu, Wen Zhang and Yuanyun Yan
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1550; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111550 - 13 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1014
Abstract
This research applies the stress appraisal framework to examine how perceived status threats, triggered by high-performing new employees, affect incumbent employees’ work engagement and withdrawal behaviors. The investigation proposes that coping approaches, specifically proactive adaptation strategies and disengagement tactics, serve as mediating mechanisms, [...] Read more.
This research applies the stress appraisal framework to examine how perceived status threats, triggered by high-performing new employees, affect incumbent employees’ work engagement and withdrawal behaviors. The investigation proposes that coping approaches, specifically proactive adaptation strategies and disengagement tactics, serve as mediating mechanisms, with stress perception orientation playing a moderating role. By reversing traditional research perspectives to concentrate on incumbent employees rather than new employees, this analysis identifies the key drivers of perceived occupational vulnerability and investigates their behavioral consequences. Through a time-lagged research methodology, we garnered responses from 266 incumbent employees spanning multiple sectors. The results demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the competence of new employees and incumbent employees’ perceived status of threat, which subsequently elevates work engagement via approach-focused strategies, while simultaneously increasing disengagement behaviors through avoidance mechanisms. Notably, employees’ fundamental beliefs about stress significantly weaken the association between perceived competitive threats and passive coping methods. These discoveries highlight critical implications for managing workplace dynamics and optimizing team performance through an enhanced understanding of perceived status challenges. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop