Special Issue "Media and Nationalism in the Network Society"
A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 December 2018) | Viewed by 12140
Interests: media and journalism studies (with special focus on journalism practice and agenda setting theory); public relations history; women’s studies
Interests: media studies; mass communication; communication theory; cultural studies; new media
Articles are invited for this Special Issue of Social Sciences on the theme of media and nationalism in a network society. According to the network society theory eloquently elaborated by Van Dijk and Castells, in an age of hyper-connectivity and blurred cultural boundaries, those who are not part of the network society are becoming unemployable and thus turn to national as opposed to global and cast so-called protest votes. Thus, the past decade has witnessed an upsurge of nationalism in the West, with the rise of the Far Right movement. This eventually resulted with victories of nationalist parties, national sovereign governance as opposed to transnational collaborations, seclusion as opposed to connectivity and inclusion, demise of equality and diversity policies, demise of identity politics, criticism of women’s rights and feminism, etc.
While many see events in the UK and the US (Brexit vote and the Donald Trump’s victory) as new and problematic victories of the Far Right and the upsurge of nationalism masked under the term patriotism or conservativism, this movement started much before with Far Right winning national elections in many European countries not all of Western origin and culture. For example, in Austria Jorg Heider won elections and joined the Austrian Government as a coalition partner in 2000. In post-Communist Europe, nationalist parties gained power after the fall of Communism and in that they advocated return to the tradition and enforced nationalist policies.
While there has been lots of work published on media and nationalism, new events deserve a new consideration. The question is no longer whether the media push an agenda because agenda studies have demonstrated so for decades. The question is how nationalism is conceptualised and how nationalist policies and ideas are being promoted? How traditional media promote these particular policies and what this means for current media landscape? What is the role of social media in promoting nationalism and nationalist candidates? How candidates reach out to potential voters and which media are driving these new nationalist movements? Is there a strong generational divide and how different generations respond to different policies? Have traditional media embraced a stakeholder orientation and started to produce content that their readers want to read? If so, what does this mean for the future of journalism? How have editorial policies changed over time and how editorial policies affect political divides? If social media activism is influencing the publics, what is the role of traditional media, to join in and continue producing content for SEO enhancement or insist on their traditional role to report the truth and be impartial? What is the role of SEO in current media landscape and has SEO influenced changed in current journalism?
The articles for this special issue should tackle questions such as,
Which platforms do nationalists use and how they promote their work, and achieve popular support?
What is the role of traditional media in promoting nationalistic policies?
Have media turned towards stakeholder orientation (advocated predominantly by the Left) and started to produce content that their readers want to read, which helped the Far Right agenda? If so, how this happened, i.e. is it because of changed nature of journalism and the need to follow user-generated content such as comments, blogs, vlogs, SEO strategy, etc.?
How is it possible that two diametrically opposite political candidates use social media to promote their policies (Obama vs Trump) in a very similar way?
What media Diaspora reads, and what is their role in national elections?
Is there a generational divide when it comes to nationalism, and if so, how is this negotiated in network society? Who is networking and in which way? Which platforms people use and for which purposes?
How is SEO changing journalism?
Changes in editorial policies and their influence on political divides
Dr Martina Topić
Dr. Niamh Kirk
Manuscript Submission Information
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.
- network society
- Far Right Media
- social media and nationalism
- SEO and journalism
- generational divide
- Donald Trump
- European Far Right