Advanced Studies in Human-Centred AI

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X). This special issue belongs to the section "Cognition".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2025) | Viewed by 1164

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Psychology, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 4AG, UK
Interests: categorization; attention; artificial intelligence

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Human-centred AI puts human behaviour and experience at the heart of artificial intelligence research. For example, it is sometimes claimed that artificial neural networks (ANNs) now perform at human levels in a variety of tasks—to what extent is this claim substantiated by the evidence? Does that performance, human-level or otherwise, extend to replicating (or perhaps amplifying) well-documented biases in human decision-making? Can ANNs effectively and safely be used to support the work of highly trained professionals—for example, radiologists, therapists, legal advisors, or researchers? Can we effectively adapt the skills and techniques of behavioural research, previously applied to humans and other animals, to better understand the ‘psychology’ of complex black-box ANNs? To what extent can our understanding of how humans explain their decisions inform explainable AI? What makes an AI system seem trustworthy, and is that trust well placed? Can people spontaneously distinguish real photographs and videos from deepfakes—and, if not, can they be trained to do so? Can work on goal-setting and reinforcement learning in humans inform agentic behaviour and AI alignment? If the technical issues of AI alignment are indeed solvable, to what values should they be aligned? We welcome original papers on these and related topics in human-centred AI. The papers may be theoretical, empirical, or both. They may report new findings, or synthetically review the existing literature.

Prof. Dr. Andy J. Wills
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • human-centred AI
  • neural networks
  • AGI
  • bias
  • decision-making
  • therapy
  • healthcare
  • experimental psychology
  • explainable AI
  • trust and trustworthiness
  • deepfake detection
  • AI alignment

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 964 KB  
Article
Human-Centred Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in the Care of Older Adults: A Q Methodology Study of Caregivers’ Perceptions
by Seo Jung Shin, Kyoung Yeon Moon, Ji Yeong Kim, Youn-Gil Jeong and Song Yi Lee
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1541; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111541 - 12 Nov 2025
Viewed by 277
Abstract
This study used Q methodology to explore and categorise caregivers’ subjective perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ‘virtual human’ (AVH) devices in caring for older adults. We derived 123 initial statements from literature and focus groups and narrowed them to 34 statements as the [...] Read more.
This study used Q methodology to explore and categorise caregivers’ subjective perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ‘virtual human’ (AVH) devices in caring for older adults. We derived 123 initial statements from literature and focus groups and narrowed them to 34 statements as the final Q sample. Seventeen caregivers, nurses, and social workers completed the Q-sorting procedure. Using principal component analysis and Varimax rotation in Ken-Q, we identified three perception types: Active Acceptors, who emphasise the devices’ practical utility in patient communication; Improvement Seekers, who conditionally accept the technology while seeking greater accuracy and effectiveness; and Emotional Support Seekers, who view the device as a tool for emotional relief and psychological support. These findings suggest that technology acceptance in caregiving extends beyond functional utility. It also involves trust, affective experience, and interpersonal interaction. This study integrates multiple frameworks, including the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Science and Technology Studies (STS), and Human–Machine Communication (HMC) theory, to provide a multifaceted understanding of caregivers’ acceptance of AI technology. The results offer valuable implications for designing user-centred AI care devices and enhanced emotional and communicative functions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Studies in Human-Centred AI)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop