Collaboration and Co-Creation Research in the Behavioral Sciences: Assisting Policing and Criminal Justice Practice

A Special Issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 16 June 2027 | Viewed by 1929

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
Interests: sexual violence; domestic violence and abuse; crime analysis; behavioural investigative advice; homicide

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Media, Science, & Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK
Interests: modern slavery and human trafficking; digitally facilitated exploitation; child criminal exploitation and county lines; domestic violence and abuse; spiking and police wellbeing and welfare

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

There is increasing awareness that practitioner–academic collaborations, or work by ‘pracademics’, in the behavioural sciences can have significant impact on professional practice. Research on this topic is developed with pragmatic needs in mind: to enhance the ability to understand professional experiences and difficulties; to improve access to ‘in-house’ potentially confidential data; and to increase the likelihood that resultant findings can be applied in practice, enabling societal impact.

In addition, there is a growing appetite for an enhanced evidence base to underpin practice, alongside an increased professionalisation of roles, which often includes the requirement of, or aspiration towards, enhanced levels of post-graduate academic qualification. As such, behavioural science research combining bespoke knowledge exchanges between researchers and practitioners has significantly increased. This has been witnessed specifically within law enforcement and policing roles, where enhanced professionalisation has led to an academic surge in those seeking to develop their knowledge and improve services through evidence-based research in areas of psychology, criminology and the behavioural sciences, in the pursuit of effective criminal justice. This edition will therefore bring together examples of academic research by psychologists and behavioural scientists, co-created with and for policing and law enforcement.

The following Special Issue calls for contemporary examples of research involving collaborative endeavours between academics and law enforcement, which aim to assist and improve criminal investigations and the delivery of justice.

Dr. Terri Cole
Dr. Sarah Hambidge
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • practitioner–academic
  • policing
  • investigations
  • crime
  • criminal justice
  • pragmatic research
  • evidence-based policing

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 325 KB  
Article
Does Familial Domestic Abuse Present Differently to Intimate Partner Violence? An Exploratory Analysis of Police Data Examining Parent-, Child-, and Sibling-Perpetrated Domestic Abuse
by Louise Almond, Paige Monaghan, Michelle McManus, Danielle Murphy, Lauren Halsall and Jo-Pei Tan
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(10), 1811; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16101811 - 3 Oct 2026
Viewed by 140
Abstract
Domestic Abuse (DA) cases perpetrated by family members account for a substantial proportion of reported DA cases, yet responses within policing and support services remain largely informed by evidence derived from Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). Although familial DA includes a range of family [...] Read more.
Domestic Abuse (DA) cases perpetrated by family members account for a substantial proportion of reported DA cases, yet responses within policing and support services remain largely informed by evidence derived from Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). Although familial DA includes a range of family relationships, including parent, child, sibling, it remains unclear whether these cases present differently to IPV and therefore require different responses. This study examined routinely collected police data from 122,276 DA incidents reported to a UK police force between April 2019 and March 2023. Perpetrator, victim, offence, risk, and case outcome characteristics were examined for parent-, child-, and sibling-perpetrated DA, with each subgroup compared separately with cases of IPV. Statistically significant differences were identified across all familial perpetrator groups; however, the magnitude and pattern of these differences varied considerably. When compared with the IPV subsample child-perpetrated DA demonstrated the greatest differentiation across perpetrator, victim, offence, and risk characteristics, whereas parent- and sibling-perpetrated DA showed comparatively modest divergence. These findings suggest familial DA should not be treated as a single category and that current DA responses, including the routine use of IPV-informed risk assessments for non-IPV cases, may not be equally appropriate across all forms of familial DA. Full article
15 pages, 431 KB  
Article
Rape Survivors’ Experience of the UK Criminal Justice System: A Qualitative Study
by Hannah Shone, Alison Woodward, Helen Stevens and Peter James Hills
Behav. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050699 - 4 May 2026
Viewed by 995
Abstract
The conviction rate for sexual assault and rape in the UK has decreased since the 1980s. In part, this has been due to survivors’ negative experiences during their journey through the criminal justice system. While thorough reviews of the criminal justice system have [...] Read more.
The conviction rate for sexual assault and rape in the UK has decreased since the 1980s. In part, this has been due to survivors’ negative experiences during their journey through the criminal justice system. While thorough reviews of the criminal justice system have taken place and recommendations have been made, there is a lack of psychological evaluation of the effects of this journey. In this study, we interviewed eight survivors who had gone through the criminal justice system, asking about their experiences and their impact. Thematic analysis, with triangulation, was undertaken, revealing that the negative experiences of feeling let down and the disjointed communication led to prolonged mental health difficulties. The interrelated subthemes highlighted how survivors’ expectations, potentially from seeking justice, were different from reality. Their reality of delayed, poor, and misguided communication from members of the criminal justice system made them feel abandoned, helpless, and powerless. The consequence of this was negative strain, additional trauma, and prolonged distress. These results are interpreted within a framework of the practicalities of investigating serious sexual assault and how best to support survivors of sexual violence while they are treated as witnesses under the criminal justice system in the UK. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop