Dear Colleagues,

Prominent normative (von Neumann & Morganstern, 1947) and descriptive (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992) theories of decision-making assume that people have stable and consistent preferences, informed by psychological computational processing. In contrast, empirical evidence has demonstrated that peoples’ preferences are sensitive to features of the environment – context, content and behavioural task (e.g., Hertwig et al., 2004; Kusev et al., 2009; Kusev & van Schaik, 2011; Martin, Kusev, & van Schaik, 2021; Martin, Kusev, Teal, et al., 2021; Pedroni et al., 2017; Teal et al., 2021) and ‘constructed on the fly’ (Kusev et al., 2020; Slovic, 1995), often using non-computational psychological mechanisms (e.g., Brandstätter et al., 2006; Gigerenzer et al. 1999; Stewart et al., 2006). However, little is known about the relationship between features of the environment and the specific psychological mechanisms (e.g., sampling, computational processing, adaptive heuristics) which they trigger, and which are subsequently used by people to construct their preferences ‘on the fly’. 

Accordingly, this special issue focuses on advancing the exploration of how (and when) features of the decision-making environment (context, content and task) trigger the psychological mechanisms which influence peoples’ decision-making behaviour. For instance, contributors may wish to explore the psychology of decision-making, behavioural science and/or behavioural economics in one of the following domains (please note, this list provides examples – it is non-exhaustive): 

• Risky Behaviour
• Moral Behaviour
• Consumer Behaviour
• Health and Wellbeing
• Public Policy (e.g., boosting vs nudging)
• Prosocial Behaviour
• Behaviour and Social Cognition
• Cognition and Behaviour
• Behaviour of Autonomous Systems/Technology
• Behavioural Finance
• Behaviour in the Workplace
• Managerial Decision Making 

Given the broad scope of this special issue and the interdisciplinary nature of decision-making research, we expect that it will attract contributions (empirical and review manuscripts) from researchers in fields such as: behavioural science, behavioural economics, behavioural finance, psychology, economics, computer science, sociology, anthropology, political science, philosophy.

References

• Brandstätter, E.; Gigerenzer, G.; Hertwig, R. The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychol. Rev. 2006, 113, 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409.
• Gigerenzer, G.; Todd, P.M.; ABC Research Group. Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
• Hertwig, R.; Barron, G.; Weber, E.U.; Erev, I. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15, 534–539.
• Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47, 263–291.
• Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P. Preferences under risk: Content-dependent behaviour and psychological processing. Front.Psychol. 2011, 2, 269.
• Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P.; Ayton, P.; Dent, J.; Chater, N. Exaggerated risk: Prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn., Mem. Cogn. 2009, 35, 1487–1505.
• Kusev, P.; Van Schaik, P.; Martin, R.; Hall, L.; Johansson, P. Preference reversals during risk elicitation. J. Exp. Psychol. 2020, 149, 585–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000655.
• Martin, R.; Kusev, P.; van Schaik, P. Autonomous vehicles: How perspective-taking accessibility alters moral judgments and consumer purchasing behavior. Cognition 2021, 212, 104666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104666.
• Martin, R.; Kusev, P., Teal; J., Baranova, V.; Rigal, B. Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility. Behav. Sci. 2021, 11, 66.
• Pedroni, A.; Frey, R.; Bruhin, A.; Dutilh, G.; Hertwig, R.; Rieskamp, J. The risk elicitation puzzle. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017, 1, 803–809. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0219-x.
• Slovic, P. The construction of preference. Am. Psychol. 1995, 50, 364.
• Stewart, N.; Chater, N.; Brown, G.D.A. Decision by sampling. Cogn. Psychol. 2006, 53, 1–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003.
• Teal, J.; Kusev, P.; Heilman, R.; Martin, R.; Passanisi, A.; Pace, U. Problem Gambling ‘Fuelled on the Fly’. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8607.
• Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 1992, 5, 297–323.
• von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1947.

You may choose our Joint Special Issue in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Prof. Dr. Petko Kusev
Dr. Rose Martin
Dr. ‪Joseph Teal‬
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

• psychology of decision-making
• behavioural science
• behavioural economics
• decision environment
• cognition