Dance Objects

A special issue of Arts (ISSN 2076-0752).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2026) | Viewed by 1853

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, London SW15 5PH, UK
Interests: dance and visual arts or visual culture concepts

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, London SW15 5PH, UK
Interests: philosophy of dance; aesthetics; metaphysics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

What are dance objects? What can we learn from them about dance, its socio-material relations, and even objecthood itself? Dance is often conceptualized as resisting objectification, as emphasizing instead lived experience, movement, and event. Fraleigh, for example, suggests that “the dance begins and ends in lived time and immediate perception” and “leaves nothing concrete—as object—behind” (1987, 48). Yet there is a range of objects and kinds of objects involved in and generated by dance practices:

  • Material objects manipulated or worn by dancers and audience members (e.g., scenographic objects, props, costumes, fashion, accessories, etc.);
  • Pictorial, sonic, and other representational objects that depict or capture dance and dances (e.g., drawings/paintings, photos, notation scores, and films);
  • Digital objects (e.g., video files, moving and still digital images, motion capture and other types of dance data, and dance as algorithmic/generative objects);
  • Fictional objects (e.g., dance imaginaries, fictional worlds, fantasies, esoterica, and utopian conceptualizations);
  • Ephemera and fetish objects (e.g., postcards, posters, fan-made and dance collectibles, etc.);
  • Sensual objects or affective immaterial entities, produced through different participants’ interactions with dance performance events.

We might also think of dances as objects, as, for example:

  • Repeatable patterns or sequences of movement (dances or works as distinct from their performances);
  • The acts of dancing or dance discrete events, products of labor, and types of dialectical–relational objects;
  • Abstract or fictional objects (e.g., pure or indicated types, norm-kinds, and non-existent things);
  • Commodities with exchange value on the theater marketplace;
  • Choreographic objects, i.e., expressions of choreography’s principles without the body (Forsythe 2011).

In this Special Issue we are interested in what we can learn from dance objects through their social and material relations/conditions, as well as what we can learn about dance objects’ ontologies as divergent entities. How are dance’s “objects active within social and pre-social practices” (Caroll et al. 2020, 7)? What is the phenomenology of interaction with them? What affects development in and through them? And what if we decentre the human and think instead about the objects’ inanimate poetics and patterns of “vicarious causation” (Harman 2007, 190)?

Perspectives (and combinations of perspectives) from a range of disciplines might be relevant to elucidating such questions, including epistemologies of the Global South and views from the peripheries of dominant knowledge production. Relevant disciplines and fields include (but are not limited to): dance and performance studies, audience studies (including fandom), visual cultures, digital humanities, material culture, philosophy of art, performance philosophy, dialectical materialism, social ontology, phenomenology, object-oriented ontology, and actor–network theory.

We invite articles on any of the above themes as well as other topics critically examining dance objects, objecthood and objectification, in senses already understood or yet to be imagined.

Dr. Tamara Tomic-Vajagic
Dr. Anna Pakes
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Arts is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • dance objects
  • ontology
  • materialism
  • visual culture
  • commodity
  • ephemera

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 9299 KB  
Article
Looking into the Mirror: Affective Dance Objects in the Performances of Indian Dancer Ram Gopal
by Ann R. David
Arts 2026, 15(7), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15070162 - 13 Jul 2026
Abstract
The article begins with a detailed description of a brief and rare film clip of Indian dancer Ram Gopal applying his black kājal eyeliner in front of the mirror in his dressing room before a performance, giving us an intimate glimpse into a [...] Read more.
The article begins with a detailed description of a brief and rare film clip of Indian dancer Ram Gopal applying his black kājal eyeliner in front of the mirror in his dressing room before a performance, giving us an intimate glimpse into a dancer’s essential and careful preparation. Material objects related to dance performance such as make-up, mirrors and costumes are often essential to the presentation of Indian dance, especially in that historical period, but are often overlooked as significant artefacts or objects of dance. In considering this short clip of preparatory make-up, I argue how the materiality of cosmetic stage make-up together with dramatic stage costumes (in particular headdresses) and other material objects assist the process of alteration from dancer into a Hindu deity (Śiva) or mythological character on stage. I examine the process of making up, asking how it might manipulate what comes to be seen on stage and what affect is created through such a process. This article takes an imaginative look at the affective register of selected dance objects and their power to create transformation, drawing on theoretical evidence from philosophy and psychology relating to mirror image and the aesthetics of making up and the use of mirrors in early Indian art. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dance Objects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 18318 KB  
Article
The Whimsical Inflatable: Pneumatic Objects in Contemporary Visual and Choreographic Art
by Alexandra Kolb
Arts 2026, 15(7), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15070160 - 8 Jul 2026
Viewed by 155
Abstract
This article analyses pneumatic (inflatable) objects as used in the work of four contemporary European artists from diverse disciplinary backgrounds: choreographers Adrienne Hart and Gabriella Engdahl, and visual artists Michael Shaw and Bambí Benkö. Deployed across deconsecrated churches, swimming pools, theatres, galleries and [...] Read more.
This article analyses pneumatic (inflatable) objects as used in the work of four contemporary European artists from diverse disciplinary backgrounds: choreographers Adrienne Hart and Gabriella Engdahl, and visual artists Michael Shaw and Bambí Benkö. Deployed across deconsecrated churches, swimming pools, theatres, galleries and streets, these works demonstrate a broad spectrum of engagement with inflatables, ranging from formalist to existential, social and political-activist purposes—all implicating choreography in an expanded sense. Informed by theories from the visual arts, dance studies and sociology, as well as interviews with the artists themselves, the analysis adopts a multi-methodological approach attuned to this diversity. Overarching concerns about spectatorship, site and materiality centre on how inflatables’ precarious properties—porous seams requiring continual reinflation—engender playful instability and encourage interaction with audiences. Proposing ‘whimsy’ as a critical lens, the essay reimagines contemporary inflatables as cultural-choreographic objects that question disciplinary boundaries. The artists’ practices both extend a 1960s legacy of pneumatic experiments and redirect their utopian-critical impulses toward twenty-first-century issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dance Objects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1099 KB  
Article
On Affective Objects: Martyro, Veronique Doisneau, and the Production of (im)Material Objects
by Katerina Paramana
Arts 2026, 15(6), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15060141 - 17 Jun 2026
Viewed by 587
Abstract
Differing perspectives on the ephemerality of performance have led to debates since the 1980s regarding its ontology. Sondra Fraleigh and Peggy Phelan, for example, believe that performance’s ‘only life is in the present’. Others have disagreed. For example, Rebecca Schneider believes that performance [...] Read more.
Differing perspectives on the ephemerality of performance have led to debates since the 1980s regarding its ontology. Sondra Fraleigh and Peggy Phelan, for example, believe that performance’s ‘only life is in the present’. Others have disagreed. For example, Rebecca Schneider believes that performance remains in the body of the spectator in a complicated manner and Miranda Joseph, drawing on Marxist theory, argues that performance is in fact material because it produces social relations which have material effects: they affect our thinking and behaviour. In alignment with Joseph, this text begins with the presupposition that performance, and, specific to this text, the object we might call dance performance—the dance performance event and its particular contours, in other words, the performance event as an entity which emerges in the space-time where/when the onlooker and the work meet—is material because it is social. I discuss two dance performance objects, my work Martyro (2011) and Jérôme Bel’s (2005) Veronique Doisneau, as (im)material affective objects. I examine each work individually, providing first a thick description of each in order to communicate how they used affect to connect to their spectators and to critique the contexts of their presentation, the worlds in which the Subject in each of these performances worked. Drawing on understandings and theories of affect (from Deleuze and Guattari, Gilbert Simondon, and Brian Massumi to Lauren Berlant) and political economy (including David Harvey, Cedric Robinson, Jeremy Gilbert, Ashok Kumar, and Katerina Paramana), I then argue that both works used affect to remind their audiences, their witnesses, of the power of revealing one own’s experience of ‘suffering’ as Subjects, whilst simultaneously critiquing the wider economies in which these works, these affective objects and their Subjects, are embedded. It is this production of affect, I suggest, that potentiated action for change, by affecting others’ perspectives and behaviours. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dance Objects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop