applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Advances in Underground Pipeline Technology, 2nd Edition

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Civil Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2024) | Viewed by 3791

Special Issue Editors

Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geoscience-Wuhan, Wuhan 430074, China
Interests: buried pipe; pipe jacking; pipe-soil interaction
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geoscience-Wuhan, Wuhan 430074, China
Interests: trenchless technology; pipe rehabilitation; horizontal directional drilling
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China
Interests: trenchless rehabilitation; devlopment and utilization of underground space
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Interests: cement concrete; cement composites; ecological building materials; solid waste recycling; pavement recycling; coating and repair materials; pavement performance evaluation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue is a continuation of our previous Special Issue “Advances in Underground Pipeline Technology” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci/special_issues/Z3HA235JTB). Underground pipelines are critical lifeline infrastructures built in response to urban operation and development. Over the last decade, important improvements have been achieved in the design, construction, and maintenance of urban underground pipelines, especially in terms of new materials, construction equipment and technologies, and basic theories.

With the aim of presenting and discussing case studies, new methods, and research on current advances and future prospects surrounding underground pipelines, this Special Issue invites original submissions of theoretical analyses, computational models, physical experiments, and field tests for pipeline construction and design. Theoretical papers and papers discussing computational methods are welcomed. Practice-oriented papers are also encouraged, particularly case studies of challenging projects in practice.

Dr. Peng Zhang
Dr. Xuefeng Yan
Dr. Cong Zeng
Dr. Fang Xu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • trenchless technology
  • buried pipes
  • pipeline design and construction
  • pipe jacking
  • pipe rehabilitation
  • horizontal directional drilling
  • pipe–soil interaction

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

21 pages, 3526 KiB  
Article
A Comprehensive Analysis of Environmental Emissions from Trenchless CIPP and Excavation Technologies for Sanitary Sewers
by Eesha Karkhanis, Vinayak Kaushal, Gayatri Thakre and Mohammad Najafi
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 1268; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031268 - 26 Jan 2025
Viewed by 940
Abstract
The renewal of underground infrastructure is an emerging challenge for most municipalities in the United States. As compared to trenchless cured-in-place pipes (CIPPs), excavation technologies (ETs) have adverse impacts on the environment. Due to its lower ecological impact, trenchless technology is preferred in [...] Read more.
The renewal of underground infrastructure is an emerging challenge for most municipalities in the United States. As compared to trenchless cured-in-place pipes (CIPPs), excavation technologies (ETs) have adverse impacts on the environment. Due to its lower ecological impact, trenchless technology is preferred in comparison to conventional pipe replacement. The selection of the most appropriate method depends on factors such as the existing sewer network, traffic disruption, soil conditions, and environmental safety. Recent concerns pertaining to environmental impact have increased the demand for reduced carbon footprints. The objectives of this paper are the following: (1) to present a comprehensive review on the achievements achieved over the years in understanding the factors influencing environmental emissions from the use of CIPP and ETs and (2) to analyze and compare the environmental emissions produced from CIPPs and ETs for 8-inch-, 10-inch-, and 12-inch-diameter pipes. Published papers from 1990 through 2024 have been included, which reported emissions from both alternatives. A comparison of total environmental emissions produced from both the processes is presented. The literature review and analysis suggest that higher emissions are a result of higher fuel consumption, material use, and input allocation. The emissions of pipeline renewal methods were evaluated using USEPA’s TRACI 2.1 methodology within SimaPro software. The analysis showed that CIPP renewal greatly reduced carbon emissions when compared with ET. CIPPs exhibited approximately 70% less ecological impact, 75% less impact on human health, and 60% less depletion of resources. CIPPs reduced carbon emissions by 78–100% in comparison to ETs. The recycling materials used in CIPPs potentially reduce the environmental impact by 10%, making them highly sustainable. The installation phase should therefore be carefully analyzed for factors like the pipe material and the pipes’ external diameter in view of achieving the greatest sustainability of these methods, as these characteristics affect emissions. It can be inferred that the comparison of the emissions of both alternatives is extremely vital for sustainable underground infrastructure development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Underground Pipeline Technology, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5785 KiB  
Article
Mechanical Characteristics of Suspended Buried Pipelines in Coal Mining Areas Affected by Groundwater Loss
by Wen Wang, Fan Wang, Xiaowei Lu, Jiandong Ren and Chuanjiu Zhang
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(16), 7187; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167187 - 15 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 950
Abstract
Research on the deformation characteristics and failure modes of buried pipelines under local suspension conditions caused by groundwater loss in coal mining subsidence areas is conducive to grasping the failure evolution law of pipelines and providing technical support for the precise maintenance of [...] Read more.
Research on the deformation characteristics and failure modes of buried pipelines under local suspension conditions caused by groundwater loss in coal mining subsidence areas is conducive to grasping the failure evolution law of pipelines and providing technical support for the precise maintenance of gathering and transportation projects and the coordinated mining of gas and coal resources. First, a test system for monitoring the deformation of pipelines under loading was designed, which mainly includes pipeline load application devices, end fixing and stress monitoring devices, pipeline end brackets, and stress–strain monitoring devices. Then, a typical geological hazard faced by oil and gas pipelines in the gas–coal overlap area—local suspension—was used as the engineering background to simulate the field conditions of a 48 mm diameter gas pipeline with a localized uniform load. At the same time, deformation, top–bottom strain, end forces, and damage patterns of the pipeline were monitored and analyzed. The results show that the strain at the top and bottom of the pipeline increased as the load increased. In this case, the top was under pressure, and the bottom was under tension, and the conditions at the top and bottom were opposite.. For the same load, the strain tended to increase gradually from the end to the middle of the pipeline, and at the top, it increased significantly more than at the bottom. The tensile force carried by the end of the pipeline increased as the applied load increased, and the two were positively correlated by a quadratic function. The overall deformation of the pipeline evolved from a flat-bottom shape to a funnel and then to a triangular shape as the uniform load increased. In addition, plastic damage occurred when the pipeline deformed into a triangular shape. The results of the investigation clarify for the first time the mathematical relationship between local loads and ultimate forces on pipelines and analyze the evolution of pipeline failure, providing a reference for pipeline field maintenance. Based on this, the maximum deformation of and the most vulnerable position in natural gas pipelines passing through a mining subsidence area can be preliminarily judged, and then the corresponding remedial and protection measures can be taken, which has a certain guiding role for the protection of natural gas pipelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Underground Pipeline Technology, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

31 pages, 7093 KiB  
Review
A Data-Driven Visualization Approach for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Open-Cut and Trenchless CIPP Methods for Sanitary Sewers: A PRISMA Systematic Review
by Gayatri Thakre, Vinayak Kaushal, Eesha Karkhanis and Mohammad Najafi
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 1765; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041765 - 9 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1395
Abstract
The wastewater conveyance systems in the United States are facing severe structural challenges, with the nation’s overall wastewater infrastructure receiving a critically low grade of D- from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Innovative trenchless technologies, such as Cured-in-Place Pipe Renewal Technology [...] Read more.
The wastewater conveyance systems in the United States are facing severe structural challenges, with the nation’s overall wastewater infrastructure receiving a critically low grade of D- from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Innovative trenchless technologies, such as Cured-in-Place Pipe Renewal Technology (CIPPRT), offer a cost-efficient substitute for traditional open-cut construction methods (OCCM). However, the possibility of a comprehensive life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) comparing these methods remains unexplored. LCCA examines the comprehensive financial impact, encompassing installation, operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement expenses, using net present value (NPV) over a set duration. The objective of this study is to systematically review the existing literature to explore advancements in calculating the LCCA for CIPPRT and compare the latter approach to OCCM. A rigorous PRISMA-guided methodology applied to academic databases identified 845 publications (1995–2024), with 83 documents being selected after stringent screening. The findings reveal limited use of artificial intelligence (AI) or machine learning (ML) in predicting CIPPRT costs. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer visualizes the results. The study underscores the potential of intelligent, data-driven approaches, such as spreadsheet models and AI, to enhance decision-making in selecting rehabilitation methods tailored to project conditions. These advancements promise more sustainable and cost-effective management of sanitary sewer systems, offering vital insights for decision-makers in addressing critical infrastructure challenges. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Underground Pipeline Technology, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop