Journal Menu
► ▼ Journal Menu-
- Applied Sciences Home
- Aims & Scope
- Editorial Board
- Reviewer Board
- Topical Advisory Panel
- Instructions for Authors
- Special Issues
- Topics
- Sections & Collections
- Article Processing Charge
- Indexing & Archiving
- Editor’s Choice Articles
- Most Cited & Viewed
- Journal Statistics
- Journal History
- Journal Awards
- Society Collaborations
- Conferences
- Editorial Office
Journal Browser
► ▼ Journal BrowserNeed Help?
Announcements
26 May 2026
Applied Sciences Exceptional Reviewers List 2026
We are thrilled to share the updated Exceptional Reviewers List 2026. This program was established to recognize and honor scholars who have consistently delivered exceptional review reports to our journal. Committed to fostering rigorous research and promoting knowledge exchange, Applied Sciences (ISSN: 2076-3417) acknowledges the vital role our reviewers play in maintaining the quality and integrity of the articles we publish. According to surveys conducted in 2025, 93% of our authors rated the peer review process as good or excellent, reflecting the strength and effectiveness of our reviewer community.
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the reviewers who have generously volunteered their time and expertise to assist in Applied Sciences’ peer-review process. Their dedication and attention to detail in evaluating manuscripts, offering valuable feedback, and contributing to academic rigor are truly commendable.
The Exceptional Reviewers List was introduced in May 2026. Each quarter, we will be selecting a group of outstanding reviewers and introduce them here.
Q1
|
Name: Dr. Daniele Fattorini |
Name: Dr. Alejandro Arbelaez |
|
Name: Dr. Wenbo Zhu |
Name: Dr. Zheming Liu |
|
Name: Dr. Luca Dimauro |
Name: Dr. Esvan Perez-Perez |
|
Name: Dr. Paweł Rudnicki-Velasquez |
Name: Dr. Matteo Bodini |
|
Name: Dr. William Huxter |
Name: Dr. Giuseppe Ciaburro |
|
Name: Dr. Maciej Kalinowski |
Name: Dr. Juan Calderon |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Riccardo Liberotti |
Name: Dr. Juan Calderon |
|
Name: Prof. Dr. Helena M. Ramos |
Name: Dr. Lorenzo Albanese |
|
Name: Dr. Edgars Bernans |
Name: Dr. Domenico De Carlo |
|
Name: Dr. Fabrice Brunel |
Name: Dr. Krzysztof Domino |
|
Name: Dr. Valeri Petrov Gochev |
Name: Dr. Chad Schou |
|
Name: Dr. Mironela Pirnau |
Name: Prof. Dr. Zhiguo Qu |
|
Name: Dr. Zlatko Brisevac |
Name: Dr. Carlos D. Gómez-Carmona |
|
Name: Dr. Pawel Kazibudzki |
Name: Dr. Silvie Bernatová |
See what our reviewers have to say about Applied Sciences’ review process:
|
“I am thrilled to serve as a reviewer for Applied Sciences, having consistently positive experiences with multidisciplinary manuscripts and appreciating the clarity and courtesy of communications that result from excellent editorial work.”—Dr. Daniele Fattorini |
|
“I see peer review as a collaborative process. My goal is always to provide detailed, constructive suggestions that can strengthen the manuscript. Being a reviewer allows me to serve the scholarly community, and I hope to make the publication process both rigorous and author-friendly. Reviewing helps me stay current with cutting-edge research and sharpens my own critical thinking. I believe a good review respects the author’s effort while clearly pointing out weaknesses and offering solutions. It’s a responsibility I take seriously.”—Dr. Wenbo Zhu |
|
“Reviewing is an opportunity to contribute to the quality, rigor, and advancement of research through constructive and timely feedback.”—Dr. Esvan Perez-Perez |
|
“Peer review plays a crucial role in maintaining scientific quality and integrity, especially in interdisciplinary research.”—Dr. Paweł Rudnicki-Velasquez |
|
“Peer review is the backbone of quality science. Contributing to Applied Sciences as a reviewer is a privilege that helps ensure rigorous and impactful research reaches the community.”—Dr. Matteo Bodini |
|
“I was pleased to serve as a reviewer for Applied Sciences. This experience allowed me to engage with diverse, high-quality research and contribute to improving the clarity, rigor, and impact of the authors’ work.”—Dr Giuseppe Ciaburro |
|
“Peer-review activity represents, foremost, an important opportunity for intellectual and scientific growth. It allows scholars to engage with researchers from different countries and disciplinary traditions, often addressing topics closely related to, intersecting with, or expanding one’s own field of expertise. |
|
“Through peer review, I contribute to research quality and fairness while gaining early insight into new work and continuously improving my own scientific writing and methodology.”—Dr. Edgars Bernans |
|
“Reviewing interdisciplinary research, including optimization methods and machine learning approaches for resilient railway systems, is a rewarding way to support impactful, high-quality science.”—Dr. Krzysztof Domino |
|
“The activity of a reviewer requires attention, discernment, and responsibility, contributing to strengthening the quality of research and scientific papers. Whenever time allows, I remain seriously involved in this activity.”—Dr. Mironela Pirnau |
|
“I approach peer review with rigor, clarity, and responsibility, aiming to ensure methodological soundness, logical consistency, and a meaningful contribution to scientific knowledge.”—Dr. Pawel Kazibudzki |
You can read more testimonials at the following link:
https://www.mdpi.com/testimonials?type=all&journal_id=90&page_count=50.