Pig Castration: Strategies, Animal Welfare and Pork Quality

A special issue of Animals (ISSN 2076-2615). This special issue belongs to the section "Pigs".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 May 2026 | Viewed by 2785

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
Interests: food quality and food safety; sanitary inspection; meat quality
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
Interests: carcass composition; meat quality; image and spectroscopic methods for carcass evaluation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Veterinary Medicine, School of Sciences and Technology and MED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal
Interests: breeding management; genetic improvement; native farm breeds
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In 2020, around 81 million piglets were surgically castrated in the EU, about 31.5% of all pigs slaughtered that year. This is usually done without anesthesia up to 7 days old, raising ethical concerns about pain and animal welfare. The main reason is to prevent boar taint, an unpleasant odor affecting consumer preference, and to reduce aggressive behavior in non-castrated males.

Several options have been studied, but three main alternatives are being considered: 1. Surgical castration with anesthesia, which reduces suffering but adds cost and complexity; 2. Raising non-castrated males, avoiding castration but requiring boar taint detection at slaughterhouses; 3. Immunocastration, a vaccine against boar taint, has concerns about effectiveness and consumer acceptance.

The welfare of production animals is a strong concern for consumers and a major issue in pig industrial production systems. Even though enrichment materials can be given to pigs even in enclosed spaces to encourage natural behaviors and improve animal welfare without altering the housing structure, alternative methods offering pigs environments where they can express their natural behaviors are becoming more popular.

Further research is necessary to balance animal welfare and meat quality, avoiding compromises to animal welfare and the economic losses associated with meat that has undesirable organoleptic characteristics for consumers.

Dr. Alexandra Esteves
Dr. Severiano R. Silva
Prof. Dr. Rita Payan-Carreira
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Animals is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pig castration
  • castration strategies
  • pork quality
  • swine management
  • livestock welfare
  • swine industry

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 754 KB  
Article
Quality of Meat and Fat from Immunocastrated Boars and Uncastrated Boars Slaughtered at Different Body Weights
by Anna Zalewska, Marcin Sońta, Justyna Więcek, Anna Rekiel, Piotr Cybulski, Iwona Wojtasik-Kalinowska, Andrzej Półtorak, Kamila Puppel and Martyna Batorska
Animals 2025, 15(23), 3374; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15233374 - 21 Nov 2025
Viewed by 357
Abstract
This study involved 30 male pigs (DanBred × Duroc), which were divided into three groups of 10 animals each. Control group (C)—immunologically castrated boars with a slaughter weight of 120 kg; and experimental groups: E1—uncastrated boars with a slaughter weight of 120 kg, [...] Read more.
This study involved 30 male pigs (DanBred × Duroc), which were divided into three groups of 10 animals each. Control group (C)—immunologically castrated boars with a slaughter weight of 120 kg; and experimental groups: E1—uncastrated boars with a slaughter weight of 120 kg, and E2—uncastrated boars with a slaughter weight of 105 kg. Animals from all groups were fed a complete feed mixture in a liquid form three times a day. After slaughter, their meat and backfat were analysed for the physicochemical parameters and for the contents of indole, skatole, androstenol, and androsterone. A higher protein content was determined in the meat of boars from group E1 (23.48%) compared to those from groups C (22.87%) and E2 (22.99%) (p ≤ 0.01), and a higher content of n-6 PUFAs in the meat of boars from group C (5.21 mg/g of meat) compared to those from group E2 (4.81 mg/g of meat) (p ≤ 0.05). Analysis of the chemical composition of backfat showed a lower protein level in the backfat of boars from group C (4.70%) compared to those from group E1 (6.20%) and a higher fat level in the backfat from boars from group C (70.09%) compared to those from groups E1 (65.90%) and E2 (64.75%) (p ≤ 0.05). Body weight and immunocastration status were also shown to affect the fatty acid profile. Immunocastration also reduced the content of androstenol and androsterone in meat and fat. A higher content of indole was demonstrated in the meat of boars from group C and in the backfat of those from group E2 compared to the animals from the other groups (p ≤ 0.001). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pig Castration: Strategies, Animal Welfare and Pork Quality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 522 KB  
Article
Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Surgically Castrated and Immunocastrated Pigs at Two Slaughter Weights
by Dmytro V. Zhdanov, Oleksandr H. Mykhalko, Mykola H. Povod and Galia Zamaratskaia
Animals 2025, 15(19), 2846; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192846 - 29 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1434
Abstract
Surgical castration of male piglets is a common practice to prevent boar taint and reduce aggressive behaviour. However, it raises welfare concerns and alters carcass fat deposition. Immunocastration, a vaccine-based alternative targeting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), mitigates these welfare issues. This study evaluated carcass [...] Read more.
Surgical castration of male piglets is a common practice to prevent boar taint and reduce aggressive behaviour. However, it raises welfare concerns and alters carcass fat deposition. Immunocastration, a vaccine-based alternative targeting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), mitigates these welfare issues. This study evaluated carcass traits and meat quality in surgically and immunocastrated pigs slaughtered at two weight classes (approximately 116 kg and 136 kg). We compared growth performance, carcass composition, fat quality, and key meat quality indicators among surgically castrated males, immunocastrated males, and immunocastrated females. Inclusion of uncastrated and immunocastrated females provides novel comparative data for mixed-sex production systems, where such information is scarce. This broader evaluation helps fill current gaps in knowledge about immunocastration effects in female pigs. Surgically castrated males showed higher backfat thickness and fat content, particularly at the heavier weight, while immunocastrated pigs exhibited intermediate traits. Ultimate pH, colour, marbling, water-holding capacity, and moisture loss varied with castration method, sex, and slaughter weight, though many differences were subtle. The findings confirm that immunocastration offers a favourable balance between animal welfare and production traits, producing pork quality comparable to surgical castration. These results provide valuable insights for optimizing pork production systems, balancing welfare, efficiency, and meat quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pig Castration: Strategies, Animal Welfare and Pork Quality)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop