Decision-Making Strategies for Aerospace Mission Design and Planning

A special issue of Aerospace (ISSN 2226-4310).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026 | Viewed by 699

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Electronics, Technology of Computers and Projects, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
Interests: multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) in asteroids, space debris, and aerospace missions; combination of MCDM and geographical information systems (GIS) in lunar exploration
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Applied Mathematics and Aerospace Engineering, Universidad de Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain
Interests: meteor and fireballs; lunar impact flashes; meteoroid; small bodies; lunar exploration
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

In the field of aerospace engineering, mission and operational scenarios are numerous and diverse, encompassing, among others aspects, asteroid‑deflection strategies, space‑debris mitigation, exploration of lunar and other Solar System bodies, satellite configuration, resource allocation, and mission architecture selection. These complex activities require advanced decision‑making frameworks capable of handling multiple criteria, strong interdependencies, and significant uncertainty. Within this context, multi‑criteria decision‑making (MCDM) methodologies represent a fundamental analytical foundation. Their application spans classical approaches, such as AHP, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE, as well as recently developed methods, including CoCoSo, MABAC, and FUCOM. Moreover, the integration of these techniques with fuzzy logic enables the modelling of ambiguity, uncertainty, and expert judgement in critical aerospace scenarios. 

This Special Issue aims to advance methodologies in multi‑criteria decision‑making, highlighting their applicability to current scientific and technological challenges in aerospace missions and operations. Contributions are expected to provide rigorous validation and clear relevance to mission design, planning, and operational decision processes across the space domain. 

Prof. Dr. Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano
Dr. Eloy Peña-Asensio
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Aerospace is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • multi-criteria decision-making
  • prioritization
  • decision matrix
  • fuzzy logic
  • space mission
  • planetary exploration
  • aerospace engineering
  • space science

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 8384 KB  
Article
A Simulation and TOPSIS Approach to the Satellite Constellation Design Problem
by Mikkel Søby Kramer, Frederik Christensen, Veronica Hjort, Peter Nielsen and Alex Elkjær Vasegaard
Aerospace 2026, 13(3), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13030284 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 439
Abstract
The design of satellite constellations is a complex optimization problem interdependent with other decision problems and multiple competing, user-specific criteria. Consequently, it is very difficult to make a final decision on the constellation design. This study proposes a full simulation and evaluation framework [...] Read more.
The design of satellite constellations is a complex optimization problem interdependent with other decision problems and multiple competing, user-specific criteria. Consequently, it is very difficult to make a final decision on the constellation design. This study proposes a full simulation and evaluation framework for designing a satellite constellation. Firstly, constructing a solution space by constraining orbital parameters and varying satellite count and plane configuration. Secondly, employing six evaluation metrics—covering both cost and coverage—that are weighted via the case company, Sternula’s setting, with the TOPSIS approach for ranking the candidate constellations. A subsequent sensitivity analysis evaluates robustness to shifts in criterion weights and per-satellite cost. The study indicates that a Walker Star constellation with 97.5° inclination, 105 satellites in 15 planes (phasing 7) achieves the best cost–coverage balance for the case company and remains stable under weight and cost variations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Decision-Making Strategies for Aerospace Mission Design and Planning)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop