Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Fast Forward: Optimized Sample Preparation and Fluorescent Staining for Microplastic Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Accuracy of a Simple Microplastics Investigation Method on Sandy Beaches
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Microplastics and Mesoplastics and Presence of Biofilms, Collected in the Gualí Wetland Cundinamarca, Colombia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparing Methods for Microplastic Quantification Using the Danube as a Model

1
Faculty of Medical and Life Sciences, Institute of Applied Biology, Hochschule Furtwangen, 78054 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
2
Department of Earth and Environmental Systems, University of the South, Sewanee, TN 37383, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microplastics 2023, 2(4), 322-333; https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics2040025
Submission received: 20 August 2023 / Revised: 30 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 October 2023 / Published: 17 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Current Opinion in Microplastics)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact different mesh-sized filtration methods have on the amount of detected microplastics in the surface water of the Danube River delta. Further, the distribution of microplastics in different size categories (20 µm, 65 µm, 105 µm) and in the water column (0 m, 3 m, 6 m) was analyzed. Our findings show that the Danube River carries 46 p∙L−1 (microplastic particles per liter) with a size larger than 105 µm, 95 p∙L−1 larger than 65 µm and 2677 p∙L−1 that are larger than 20 µm. This suggests a negative logarithmic correlation between mesh size and particle amount. The most abundant polymer throughout all samples was polyethylene terephthalate, followed by polytetrafluorethylene. Overall, the data shows that different sampling methods cannot be compared directly. Further research is needed to find correlations in particle sizes for better comparison between different sampling methods.
Keywords: microplastics; polymers; method comparison; Danube microplastics; polymers; method comparison; Danube

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kiefer, T.; Knoll, M.; Fath, A. Comparing Methods for Microplastic Quantification Using the Danube as a Model. Microplastics 2023, 2, 322-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics2040025

AMA Style

Kiefer T, Knoll M, Fath A. Comparing Methods for Microplastic Quantification Using the Danube as a Model. Microplastics. 2023; 2(4):322-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics2040025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kiefer, Tim, Martin Knoll, and Andreas Fath. 2023. "Comparing Methods for Microplastic Quantification Using the Danube as a Model" Microplastics 2, no. 4: 322-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics2040025

APA Style

Kiefer, T., Knoll, M., & Fath, A. (2023). Comparing Methods for Microplastic Quantification Using the Danube as a Model. Microplastics, 2(4), 322-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics2040025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop