You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Merits
  • Article
  • Open Access

11 November 2025

Strategic Human Resource Management in the Digital Era: Technology, Transformation, and Sustainable Advantage

,
and
Faculty of Economics, Administration and Business, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Strategic Human Resource Management: Transforming Organizations for Competitive Advantage

Abstract

The rapid integration of emerging technologies into organizational processes has fundamentally redefined the role of strategic human resource management (SHRM). This paper explores how digital innovations—such as artificial intelligence (AI), robotic process automation (RPA), blockchain, and immersive technologies—are reshaping the workforce and transforming the way organizations attract, develop, and retain talent. In the context of the digital era, human capital is no longer a passive input but a strategic enabler of sustainable competitive advantage. The purpose of the study is to analyze how SHRM practices must evolve to align with technology-driven organizational models, combining insights from a systematic literature review, institutional reports, and illustrative corporate cases. Findings indicate that agility, continuous reskilling, ethical AI governance, and employee well-being are critical levers for sustainable advantage. Comparative tables highlight differences between traditional HRM and SHRM in the digital era, while case studies (IBM, Walmart, Unilever, and UiPath) demonstrate the strategic value of predictive analytics, diversity and inclusion programs, virtual training, and people analytics. By proposing a conceptual model that links emerging technologies, SHRM, and competitiveness, the paper contributes to current debates on the transformation of work and organizational resilience. The study offers practical implications for HR leaders, policymakers, and academics navigating digital transformation while reinforcing human-centric performance and sustainability.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically accelerated digital transformation, compressing years of technological adoption into mere months. According to a global McKinsey survey, digital offerings advanced by nearly seven years in just the first half of 2020 []. This unprecedented shift has created a complex landscape for organizations: while automation, AI, and remote work technologies have enhanced efficiency and flexibility, they have also widened capability gaps and intensified pressure on workforce adaptability. SHRM, once focused on compliance and process optimization, must now take on a more dynamic role—reshaping organizational culture, aligning technological tools with human capital strategies, and sustaining long-term competitive advantage in a digital-first economy.
In this evolving context, organizations increasingly recognize that technological investment alone is insufficient. Competitive resilience in the digital era depends on the capacity to continuously upskill, empower, and retain a workforce that can operate alongside intelligent systems and data-driven processes. As AI, robotic process automation (RPA), blockchain, and immersive technologies reshape tasks and workflows, HR leaders face the urgent challenge of redesigning work models that emphasize agility, inclusiveness, and innovation [,]. This transition also implies a fundamental rethinking of talent acquisition, performance evaluation, and leadership development in line with the demands of Industry 4.0 and the emergent principles of Industry 5.0 [].
Human capital has become a strategic enabler—not merely a resource to be managed, but a catalyst for digital transformation itself. Organizations must evolve toward people-centered ecosystems where technological adoption is aligned with employee experience, learning agility, and psychological safety []. SHRM thus serves as a critical bridge between innovation and implementation, ensuring that the workforce is not only technologically competent, but also ethically engaged and socially integrated. This requires robust frameworks that incorporate predictive analytics, continuous learning systems, and collaborative digital platforms capable of supporting remote, hybrid, and AI-augmented workforces.
Against this backdrop, the purpose of this article is to explore how emerging technologies are transforming the role of SHRM and the configuration of human capital in organizations. The paper proposes a conceptual model that links SHRM, technological innovation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage (SCA). While Competitive Advantage is generally understood as superior performance achieved through valuable and unique resources, we argue that in the digital era, this advantage must also be sustainable—long-lasting, resilient, and aligned with human-centered and socially responsible practices. Building on this view, we suggest that technology-enabled SHRM redefines Competitive Advantage by extending it toward sustainability. It not only generates immediate efficiency and performance gains but also contributes to long-term Sustainable Competitive Advantage through human capital transformation, employee empowerment, and organizational resilience.
This study contributes to the literature not only by synthesizing existing knowledge but also by offering a structured comparative perspective through original tables and a conceptual model. These integrative elements highlight the novel linkages between SHRM, emerging technologies, and sustainable competitive advantage, thus moving beyond a descriptive review toward a framework with both theoretical and practical implications.
To guide the analysis, the following research questions are addressed:
(1)
How do emerging digital technologies reshape the strategic role of human resource management in organizations?
(2)
In what ways can technology-enabled SHRM practices contribute to sustainable competitive advantage in the Industry 4.0–5.0 context?
(3)
What lessons can be drawn from organizational cases (e.g., IBM, Walmart, Unilever, UiPath) to inform both future research and managerial practice?
Special attention is given to companies that have successfully aligned HR practices with advanced technologies—such as Walmart (virtual reality training), IBM (predictive attrition analytics), and UiPath (people analytics for talent development). These cases underscore the importance of strategic foresight and human-centric design in achieving both operational excellence and employee empowerment. Recent perspectives from the World Economic Forum further emphasize that rethinking the value and meaning of work is critical to fostering workplaces that balance technological efficiency with human fulfillment [].

2. Materials and Methods

This study employed a mixed qualitative and conceptual synthesis approach to examine how emerging technologies are reshaping SHRM and its role in sustaining sustainable competitive advantage in the Industry 4.0–5.0 continuum. The research design integrated three methodological components: (1) systematic literature review of peer-reviewed academic studies, (2) comparative analysis of policy and industry reports, and (3) cross-case synthesis of illustrative organizational practices.
First, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted following established protocols for academic rigor, with searches performed in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar between January and July 2025. Key terms included “strategic human resource management”, “Industry 5.0”, “emerging technologies”, “human–technology integration”, and “competitive advantage”. Inclusion criteria required sources to be published between 2010–2025, in English, and directly address the intersection of technology adoption and human capital strategy. Foundational theoretical works such as Barney’s resource-based view [], Ulrich’s HR value creation model [], and Wright et al.’s human capital and organizational capability framework [] provided the conceptual scaffolding.
Second, to capture the macroeconomic and institutional context, the analysis incorporated authoritative global reports, including Deloitte’s Global Human Capital Trends 2025 [], McKinsey’s State of AI 2023 [], and the European Commission’s Industry 5.0 vision documents [,,]. These were complemented by empirical contributions on Industry 4.0/5.0 readiness [] and human capital’s strategic role [,]. The inclusion of Nigar et al. [] ensured coverage of recent advances in understanding technological unemployment and mitigation strategies.
Third, a cross-case synthesis was applied to organizational practices drawn from diverse sectors—IBM’s AI-driven talent transformation [], Unilever’s diversity and inclusion initiatives [], UiPath’s automation-enabled people analytics [,], immersive training in VR [], and algorithmic management case studies [,]. This method facilitated the identification of patterns linking technological integration to human capital outcomes.
Finally, the study integrated forward-looking labor market projections from CIPD [], Eurofound [], OECD [], UN/ILO [], World Bank [], and INSEAD’s Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2023 [], alongside World Economic Forum data [], to contextualize SHRM’s evolving mandate in relation to “future jobs” scenarios. This allowed for triangulation between academic theory, empirical case evidence, and macro-level workforce trends, ensuring both analytical robustness and practical relevance.

3. Results

3.1. Theoretical Foundations of Strategic Human Resource Management

The concept of SHRM emerged in response to growing organizational complexity, technological advancement, and the transition from industrial to knowledge-based economies. Traditional HRM, often operational and administrative in nature, focused primarily on personnel management, recruitment, and compliance. In contrast, SHRM seeks to align human capital with long-term organizational objectives, creating a coherent framework that integrates talent strategies with innovation, digital capabilities, and sustainable competitiveness [,]. The shift from reactive to proactive HR strategies is particularly urgent in the digital age. According to the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, approximately 170 million new jobs are expected to be created globally by 2030, while 92 million existing roles may be displaced—resulting in a net gain of 78 million jobs, or 14% of today’s workforce []. These dynamics underscore the strategic role of HR in anticipating talent needs, enabling continuous reskilling, and managing workforce transitions with agility and inclusion. SHRM builds upon core theoretical frameworks, including the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm, which positions human capital as a key source of sustained competitive advantage []. Ulrich’s multiple-role model further conceptualizes HR as a strategic partner, change agent, and employee champion, suggesting that HR should co-lead organizational transformation alongside executive leadership []. This transformation is further illustrated in Table 1, which compares the traditional HRM model with the strategic orientation of SHRM in the digital era.
Table 1. Differences Between Traditional HRM and SHRM in the Digital Era.
More recent developments emphasize HR analytics, agile HR operating models, and human-centric design as foundations for resilience and adaptability in uncertain environments [].
By embedding these principles into organizational strategy, SHRM enables firms to manage technological disruptions while fostering innovation, employee engagement, and long-term value creation. It no longer functions merely as an internal service but as a core enabler of digital transformation and sustainable growth [].

3.2. Emerging Technologies Transforming Human Resource Management

The rapid advancement of emerging technologies is reshaping the landscape of HR management, transforming it from a transactional function to a strategic enabler of organizational competitiveness. Technologies such as AI, robotic process automation (RPA), blockchain, augmented/virtual reality (AR/VR), and Internet of Things (IoT) are increasingly integrated into HR practices, enhancing decision-making, operational efficiency, and workforce engagement [,].
AI and machine learning have become pivotal in talent acquisition and management processes. AI-driven tools automate resume screening, conduct initial candidate assessments via chatbots, and support talent management through predictive attrition models and personalized career development recommendations. Moreover, AI-powered performance management systems utilize sentiment analysis and trend evaluation to provide real-time insights into employee engagement and productivity.
RPA complements AI by streamlining administrative HR tasks, such as payroll processing, data entry, and onboarding documentation. By automating high-volume, repetitive activities, RPA allows HR professionals to focus on strategic initiatives, thereby enhancing overall productivity and reducing operational costs [].
Blockchain technology introduces a new level of transparency and security in HR processes, particularly in credential verification and smart contract management. The ability to authenticate candidates’ qualifications in real time reduces the time and costs associated with background checks while fostering trust in recruitment practices [].
AR/VR are revolutionizing training and development through immersive learning environments. These technologies facilitate experiential learning for soft skills, technical training, and crisis management, offering scalable solutions for geographically dispersed workforces []. Additionally, AR/VR enhances onboarding experiences, enabling interactive company tours and virtual orientation programs that increase employee engagement from the outset [].
People analytics and big data further empower HR departments by enabling predictive workforce planning, real-time feedback collection, and data-driven decision-making. Organizations can identify trends affecting performance, customize engagement strategies, and optimize talent deployment based on robust analytics.
When strategically implemented, these technologies often operate in tandem—for instance, AI algorithms working with RPA to automate complex workflows, or IoT devices providing data for advanced HR analytics. However, the effectiveness of technological adoption depends on its alignment with people-centered strategies and ethical oversight, ensuring that digital innovation enhances rather than undermines the human aspects of workforce management [].
A consolidated overview of the principal emerging technologies, their specific applications within human resource management, and the key benefits they generate is presented in Table 2. This synthesis highlights how these tools, when strategically integrated, can simultaneously enhance operational efficiency, strengthen decision-making, and improve workforce engagement.
Table 2. Emerging Technologies and Their Applications in HRM.

3.3. Human Capital Transformation in the Digital Era (Industry 4.0 and 5.0)

The notion of human capital—encompassing skills, knowledge, experience, and other value-adding attributes possessed by individuals—is undergoing a fundamental transformation due to the accelerated adoption of advanced technologies. This evolution is shaped by the paradigms of Industry 4.0 and the emerging Industry 5.0, both of which redefine the future of work and the nature of the employer–employee relationship.
Industry 4.0 is characterized by automation, AI, big data analytics, advanced robotics, and cyber-physical systems []. While early debates framed automation as a potential threat to employment, recent evidence shows that instead of replacing human labor entirely, these technologies have shifted the focus of human work toward more complex, creative, and non-routine tasks []. Machines excel at scalability and precision, but humans remain indispensable in activities that require critical thinking, contextual judgment, and emotional intelligence []. Consequently, the demand for talent capable of implementing, managing, and optimizing automated systems has increased substantially. Reskilling initiatives—covering data analytics, AI tool usage, and interdisciplinary collaboration—are now central to sustaining competitiveness in Industry 4.0 [].
Industry 5.0 builds on the technological foundations of Industry 4.0 but introduces a stronger emphasis on human–machine collaboration, human-centric design, and sustainability []. This paradigm shifts from purely efficiency-driven processes to approaches that enhance human creativity, personalization, and societal impact. In Industry 5.0 environments, automation handles repetitive tasks, while humans focus on innovation, empathy, and problem-solving. Furthermore, this approach integrates sustainability and well-being objectives into corporate strategies, ensuring that technological advancements contribute to broader social and environmental goals []. The transformation of human capital across these paradigms can be summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Evolution of HRM Practices from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0.
From a SHRM perspective, these changes require proactive adaptation. In Industry 4.0, HR policies must prioritize large-scale upskilling and digital literacy programs, integrating predictive analytics to anticipate future skill gaps []. In Industry 5.0, the HR function expands its scope to include employee well-being, innovation ecosystems, and interdisciplinary collaboration frameworks []. Leadership must combine digital fluency with empathy, guiding teams through transitions while fostering a culture of adaptability and creativity.
Ultimately, competitive advantage in the digital era will belong to organizations that can synchronize technology adoption with human capital transformation—ensuring that people remain at the core of innovation while leveraging the full potential of intelligent systems. As illustrated in Figure 1, the integration of digital skills development and enhanced performance into organizational workflows enables a smooth transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0, culminating in sustainable competitive advantage.
Figure 1. Digital skills and human capital flow in the intelligent enterprise.
The process illustrates the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 through (a) Digital Skills Development and Enhanced Performance as foundational capabilities; (b) Integration into Workflows leading to Sustainable Competitive Advantage.

3.4. Strategic HR–Technology Synergy for Sustainable Competitive Advantage

The convergence of SHRM and emerging technologies has become a decisive factor in shaping sustainable competitive advantage in the digital economy. Historically, technology adoption was perceived primarily as an infrastructural or process efficiency initiative. In the current paradigm, however, the emphasis is on a deliberate and holistic integration, where human capital strategies are purposefully aligned with technological investments to generate long-term organizational value []. In this context, technology acts not merely as an enabler but as a co-creator of organizational capabilities alongside a skilled, adaptive workforce. A critical challenge for HR leaders is moving beyond isolated technology deployments towards comprehensive strategic integration. This process requires the development of three interdependent pillars:
Technology–Human Capital Complementarity—Leveraging AI, automation, and analytics to augment rather than replace human decision-making. Studies show that emerging technologies deliver maximum impact when embedded into HR processes in tandem with employee empowerment, participatory governance, and targeted skill development initiatives []. This complementarity ensures that technology amplifies human strengths instead of diminishing them.
Digital Fluency and Change Agility—Cultivating a workforce capable of navigating rapid technological shifts. This entails fostering continuous learning ecosystems in which employees acquire not only technical competencies such as data literacy and AI tool usage but also adaptive capabilities such as resilience, critical thinking, and innovation []. The integration of technical and soft skills becomes essential for sustainable adaptability.
Strategic Performance Alignment—Establishing metrics that link technology adoption to measurable business outcomes, including productivity gains, innovation rates, employee well-being, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance indicators []. Such metrics ensure that technology investments contribute to broader organizational objectives.
This synthesis can be represented through the Integrated SHRM–Technology–Sustainability Framework (Figure 2), which positions SHRM at the intersection of technological adoption and strategic organizational planning. The framework highlights feedback loops whereby workforce analytics inform technology design, while technological outcomes feed into HR planning. This cyclical model facilitates continuous optimization of both human and technological resources, fostering resilience in dynamic market conditions [].
Figure 2. Integrated SHRM–Technology–Sustainability Framework.
The framework illustrates the interconnection between SHRM, technological adoption, and organizational strategy. The intersections highlight: (a) Technology–Human Capital Complementarity—aligning human capital capabilities with technological innovations; (b) Strategic Performance Alignment—ensuring technology supports strategic objectives; (c) Digital Fluency and Change Agility—building the ability to adapt to digital transformation.
Real-world examples underline the benefits of this synergy. IBM employs predictive analytics for employee attrition, combining AI algorithms with qualitative insights from HR specialists to achieve cost reductions and improved retention rates []. Unilever integrates AI-based recruitment tools with its diversity and inclusion strategy, ensuring that automation reinforces fairness and representation in hiring decisions []. UiPath applies people analytics to align internal career pathways with emerging skill demands, strengthening employee engagement and retention []. Strategic HR–technology integration also calls for redefined Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that go beyond operational efficiency to encompass innovation capacity, workforce satisfaction, and societal contributions.
Table 4 presents a selection of SHRM–technology KPIs that bridge organizational objectives with technological capabilities.
Table 4. Strategic HR—Technology KPIs for Sustainable Competitive Advantage.
In conclusion, achieving sustainable competitive advantage in the digital era depends on a purposeful alignment of SHRM and technological strategies, supported by robust performance metrics and a human-centered vision. This positioning elevates HR to a co-leadership role in digital transformation, ensuring that technological progress consistently translates into value creation for employees, organizations, and society at large.

3.5. Cases Based Evidence on Emerging Technologies and Strategic Human Resource Management in Redefining Competitive Advantage

3.5.1. Walmart: Virtual Reality for Scalable Experiential Learning

Walmart, the largest global retailer, sought to modernize its training processes for over one million employees, addressing the challenge of delivering consistent, high-quality learning across geographically dispersed locations. In partnership with Strivr, Walmart implemented immersive Virtual Reality (VR) modules to simulate high-pressure retail environments, such as the Black Friday shopping rush. Trainees, guided by virtual instructors, engaged in realistic scenarios that improved decision-making and situational awareness. The initiative yielded a 30% increase in training satisfaction, reduced training time per module from 90 to 20 min, and improved customer service readiness at scale []. Beyond these measurable outcomes, Walmart’s adoption of VR exemplifies how SHRM can leverage emerging technologies not only to enhance operational efficiency but also to reinforce employee engagement and retention by investing in innovative, experiential learning. A critical factor for success has been the scalability of training across a vast workforce, demonstrating how technology-enabled SHRM can sustain competitive advantage in a highly volatile retail environment.

3.5.2. IBM: Predictive Analytics for Talent Retention

IBM leveraged its Watson AI platform to develop a predictive attrition model capable of identifying employees at risk of leaving with 95% accuracy. The model analyzed variables such as tenure, performance metrics, promotion history, and engagement survey scores to generate actionable insights for managers. Targeted interventions—including tailored career development opportunities and compensation adjustments—helped IBM save an estimated USD 300 million in turnover costs []. Beyond cost savings, the initiative reinforced IBM’s competitive advantage by safeguarding critical skills, ensuring knowledge continuity, and fostering a data-driven HR culture. Importantly, transparency and change management were essential in gaining managerial trust in AI-driven recommendations. Importantly, transparency and change management were essential in gaining managerial trust in AI-driven recommendations. This case highlights how SHRM can integrate advanced analytics into workforce planning, transforming HR into a strategic partner that secures Sustainable Competitive Advantage through proactive talent retention.

3.5.3. Unilever: AI-Enhanced Recruitment for Speed and Diversity

Facing lengthy recruitment cycles for its graduate programs, Unilever transformed its selection process by integrating AI-driven tools such as Pymetrics cognitive games and HireVue video interviews. These solutions screened over 80% of candidates automatically, reducing time-to-hire from four months to four weeks and increasing the diversity of hires by 16% []. By removing early-stage human biases and focusing on competencies over traditional credentials, Unilever not only accelerated hiring but also improved workforce inclusivity—strengthening its employer brand and future talent pipeline, both critical elements of long-term competitive positioning. From a SHRM perspective, the initiative illustrates how AI-enabled recruitment can contribute to Sustainable Competitive Advantage by aligning efficiency with fairness, thereby reinforcing both organizational performance and social legitimacy.

3.5.4. UiPath: Robotic Process Automation in HR Operations

UiPath, a leader in RPA founded in Romania, implemented its own automation technology to streamline HR operations. Bots were deployed for onboarding workflows, document processing, and HR reporting, resulting in an 85% reduction in processing time for key administrative tasks []. Freed from repetitive work, HR professionals redirected efforts toward strategic functions such as workforce planning and employee engagement. UiPath’s case demonstrates how automating routine HR processes can enhance scalability, accuracy, and agility—three dimensions essential to sustaining competitive advantage in fast-changing markets. At the same time, the case shows that automation in HR must be strategically governed to avoid reducing human interaction to purely transactional processes. When effectively integrated, RPA illustrates SHRM’s role as an orchestrator of human–technology complementarity, enabling sustainable growth. A summary of this and other technology-driven SHRM cases is presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Summary of Technology-Driven SHRM Cases.

4. Discussion

4.1. Cross-Case Insights

A comparative synthesis of the four case studies—Walmart, IBM, Unilever, and UiPath—reveals several converging strategic patterns that underscore the transformative potential of integrating emerging technologies into SHRM. While each organization operated within distinct industry contexts, their experiences illustrate common mechanisms through which technological adoption reshapes HR capabilities and contributes to sustainable competitive advantage.
  • Acceleration of HR Processes Third
Across all cases, the deployment of advanced technologies significantly reduced the cycle times of core HR processes. AI-enabled recruitment platforms, immersive VR-based training modules, and RPA-driven administrative workflows collectively shortened process durations, in some cases by over 75%. This acceleration not only enhanced operational agility—enabling rapid responses to evolving market conditions—but also allowed HR functions to reallocate resources from transactional tasks to strategic initiatives. Such reallocation supports the argument in recent literature that process efficiency, when coupled with strategic redeployment of HR, magnifies organizational adaptability [].
  • Third Quality and Inclusivity Gains.
The cases further demonstrate that technology can act as a catalyst for improving both the quality of HR decision-making and the inclusivity of outcomes. AI-based recruitment tools reduced early-stage human biases by focusing on competencies rather than traditional credentials, resulting in more diverse hiring pools. Similarly, analytics-driven talent retention programs enabled targeted interventions grounded in objective performance and engagement data. These findings resonate with studies that position technology-enabled objectivity as a driver of workforce diversity and inclusion, provided that algorithms are subject to continuous bias auditing [].
  • Cost Efficiency with Strategic Impact.
Financial outcomes were consistently positive, with substantial reductions in turnover costs, administrative expenditures, and training overheads. Importantly, these savings were not pursued in isolation but reinvested into employee development programs, innovation initiatives, and engagement strategies. This reinvestment loop reflects an emergent best practice in SHRM, wherein cost efficiencies derived from automation and analytics are leveraged to strengthen, rather than erode, human capital assets.
  • Human–Technology Complementarity.
Perhaps the most salient insight is that in all four cases, technology complemented rather than supplanted human expertise. VR simulations enhanced experiential learning but still relied on instructor facilitation; predictive analytics flagged attrition risks but required managerial judgment for appropriate interventions; RPA bots handled repetitive tasks while freeing HR staff for complex problem-solving. This aligns with the Industry 5.0 paradigm, which emphasizes augmentation over replacement, positioning human skills—creativity, empathy, strategic thinking—as irreplaceable elements within technologically advanced HR ecosystems [].
Collectively, these insights reinforce the proposition that emerging technologies, when embedded within a coherent SHRM strategy, can generate synergistic value across efficiency, quality, inclusivity, and strategic agility. However, the realization of these benefits is contingent upon robust governance frameworks, continuous skill development, and an explicit commitment to human-centered innovation. The cases examined not only validate conceptual models linking technology and sustainable competitiveness but also provide empirical grounding for the argument that the future of HR lies in orchestrating a deliberate human–technology symbiosis.

4.2. Implications for Strategic HR–Technology Integration

The integration of emerging technologies into SHRM entails more than the digitization of existing processes; it represents a fundamental reconfiguration of the relationship between human capital and organizational capabilities. Evidence from literature [,,] and the cross-case analysis in this study suggests that achieving sustainable competitive advantage in the digital era depends on three interrelated strategic imperatives.
1.
First, embedding technology–human capital complementarity as a core design principle.
Research confirms that technology adoption delivers the highest returns when it augments rather than replaces human decision-making [,,]. This requires SHRM to deliberately align technological investments—such as AI-based recruitment tools, predictive analytics, and VR learning platforms—with employee empowerment strategies and capability-building programs [,,]. The aim is to create a mutually reinforcing cycle in which technology amplifies human creativity, problem-solving, and adaptability [].
2.
Second, institutionalizing continuous learning and change agility.
Digital transformation necessitates a workforce capable of navigating ongoing technological shifts [,,,]. This involves integrating lifelong learning frameworks, promoting digital literacy, and cultivating resilience at individual, team, and organizational levels [,]. Change agility is enhanced when organizations not only provide access to training resources but also embed learning into work routines, supported by analytics-driven feedback loops [,,].
3.
Third, establishing strategic performance alignment mechanisms.
The value of HR–technology integration must be measured through key performance indicators (KPIs) that link technological adoption to business outcomes, employee well-being, and ESG commitments [,,,]. This alignment ensures that investments in automation, analytics, and AI contribute to strategic objectives, such as innovation capacity, inclusion, and environmental sustainability [,]. Without such alignment, technological adoption risks becoming fragmented, producing efficiency gains without reinforcing long-term competitiveness [].
In sum, strategic HR–technology integration is not a one-off initiative but an evolving governance process. It requires robust leadership commitment, clear accountability, and cross-functional collaboration to maintain alignment between technology, people, and performance objectives [,,]. As organizations move further into the Industry 5.0 paradigm, the capacity to orchestrate a balanced human–technology symbiosis will distinguish those capable of shaping the future of work from those merely reacting to it [,,].

4.3. Challenges and Ethical Considerations

While the integration of emerging technologies into SHRM offers transformative potential, it also raises significant conceptual and practical challenges that can undermine intended benefits if left unaddressed. From a human capital perspective, sustainable competitive advantage depends not only on leveraging technological capabilities but also on developing organizational capacities that foster adaptability and resilience. However, rapid technological adoption can strain existing HR systems, requiring a reconceptualization of workforce development and talent management strategies to maintain alignment with evolving organizational goals. Ethical considerations are equally critical, as technology-driven HR practices must uphold fairness, inclusivity, and transparency to preserve organizational integrity and trust []. Moreover, integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into HRM processes ensures that technology deployment supports broader social objectives rather than merely operational efficiency []. Ultimately, without a strategic balance between innovation, human capital investment, and responsible governance, SHRM risks entering cyclical patterns of technological adoption that fail to deliver sustained competitive advantage [].
1.
Data Privacy and Security
The increasing reliance on AI, analytics, and digital platforms in HR processes requires the collection and processing of vast volumes of personal and performance-related data. This creates heightened exposure to data breaches, unauthorized access, and potential misuse of sensitive information. For instance, HR analytics platforms that integrate employee biometric data or behavioral monitoring systems can unintentionally cross ethical boundaries if data governance frameworks are insufficient []. Ensuring compliance with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and implementing transparent consent processes are fundamental prerequisites for ethical HR technology adoption.
2.
Algorithmic Bias and Fairness
One of the most widely debated issues in AI-driven HRM is the risk of algorithmic bias. Predictive models and automated decision-making systems can replicate or even amplify existing biases present in historical datasets, leading to discriminatory outcomes in recruitment, promotion, or performance evaluation []. While organizations like Unilever have demonstrated bias mitigation strategies—such as independent audits and algorithmic transparency—many companies still lack robust safeguards []. Embedding fairness-by-design principles and conducting regular bias testing are essential to maintain equity in technology-supported HR processes.
3.
Workforce Displacement and Job Redesign
Automation, robotics, and AI inevitably reshape workforce structures, leading to job displacement in certain roles, particularly those with repetitive or routine tasks. While strategic redeployment and upskilling initiatives can offset some of these effects, without deliberate intervention, there is a risk of widening inequalities between high-skilled and low-skilled employees []. Research suggests that successful transformation hinges on coupling technological investments with targeted human capital development strategies that enable employees to transition into higher-value roles [].
4.
Transparency, Accountability, and Trust
The “black box” nature of advanced AI systems poses a significant challenge for trust-building within organizations. When HR professionals and managers cannot understand how algorithms arrive at certain recommendations—such as identifying at-risk employees or ranking candidates—the perceived legitimacy of decisions is undermined []. Implementing explainable AI (XAI) approaches, establishing clear accountability lines for technology-driven decisions, and involving employees in co-designing these systems can strengthen acceptance and trust.
5.
Ethical Governance and ESG Alignment
Beyond internal HR ethics, there is growing stakeholder pressure to align HR technology practices with broader Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) commitments. This includes ensuring accessibility for underserved employee groups, promoting inclusivity in technology rollouts, and measuring the social impact of HR innovations []. Ethical governance frameworks that integrate ESG metrics can help organizations balance profitability with societal responsibility, thus reinforcing long-term competitive advantage.
In summary, addressing these challenges requires a multi-layered approach: embedding ethical principles into technology design, fostering organizational cultures of transparency, investing in continuous workforce reskilling, and ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory and societal expectations. As technology continues to redefine the boundaries of HRM, organizations that proactively manage ethical risks will be better positioned to sustain both performance and trust in the digital era.

4.4. Limitations and Future Research

This study is subject to several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, its conceptual and exploratory character restricts the generalizability of the findings. The insights are derived primarily from secondary data and illustrative corporate cases rather than from large-scale empirical validation. Second, reliance on documented practices and institutional reports may not fully capture the complexities and challenges organizations face in real time when adopting emerging technologies in HRM. Third, the rapid evolution of digital technologies poses an inherent limitation, as some of the examples or frameworks presented here may quickly become outdated in light of new developments.
Future research should therefore aim to address these limitations through empirical investigation. Large-scale quantitative surveys and longitudinal studies would be valuable for testing the proposed conceptual model and for assessing how SHRM practices evolve in tandem with technological adoption over time. Qualitative approaches such as interviews, ethnographies, or site visits could complement these efforts by uncovering contextual nuances and practical challenges. Comparative studies across industries and countries are also recommended to explore institutional, cultural, and regulatory variations that shape the integration of SHRM and emerging technologies. By combining these methodological approaches, future research can build a more comprehensive and dynamic understanding of how SHRM contributes to sustainable competitive advantage in the digital era.
These limitations also help explain why the present study did not include site visits or first-hand empirical evidence, as noted by reviewers. Future research addressing these aspects will provide deeper insights into the difficulties and pitfalls of technology-enabled SHRM.

5. Conclusions

The accelerating digital transformation within the Industry 4.0 and emerging Industry 5.0 paradigms is fundamentally reshaping the foundations of sustainable competitive advantage. In this environment, SHRM has evolved from a traditional administrative function into a central strategic actor capable of influencing organizational competitiveness. Emerging technologies—AI, generative AI, automation, immersive learning platforms, blockchain, and advanced analytics—are no longer peripheral tools but core enablers of strategic workforce planning [,,]. When embedded within coherent human capital strategies, these technologies can expand organizational agility, foster continuous innovation, and strengthen resilience in increasingly volatile global markets.
Sustainable competitive advantage in the digital era depends on the effective orchestration of human–technology complementarity [,]. Organizations that align technology adoption with workforce empowerment, ethical governance, and ESG priorities can achieve more than short-term efficiency—they can build adaptive capacity that endures over time. This requires cultivating a digitally fluent and resilient workforce capable of leveraging advanced technologies while preserving uniquely human strengths such as critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence. The Industry 5.0 vision reinforces that the next phase of competitiveness will be defined not solely by productivity gains but by the integration of inclusivity, well-being, and environmental stewardship into core business models [].
From a future-of-work perspective, the integration of emerging technologies within SHRM is not only about enhancing current workforce performance but also about anticipating and shaping the occupations of tomorrow. Insights from the World Bank [] and the Global Talent Competitiveness Index [] indicate that job creation over the next decade will be concentrated in technology-intensive, creativity-driven, and human-interaction-oriented roles—domains requiring a hybrid skill set that combines digital fluency with socio-emotional capabilities. The World Economic Forum (2025) projects a net positive global job growth of approximately 78 million positions by 2030, with 170 million new jobs created even as 92 million are displaced []. Achieving this potential will depend on deliberate investment in reskilling, inclusive talent development, and governance frameworks that align technological adoption with societal needs. By positioning itself as the architect of human–technology integration, SHRM can ensure that organizations proactively cultivate future-ready skill portfolios, aligning talent strategies with the evolving occupational landscape and reinforcing competitive advantage at both firm and societal levels.
The evidence presented in this study, including cross-sectoral case examples, shows that when SHRM operates as the architect of human–technology integration, technology adoption becomes a driver of both operational and strategic gains [,,,]. Companies that achieve this integration do more than react to technological change—they shape the future of work by embedding innovation capacity, strengthening talent retention, and building adaptive organizational cultures. This role entails designing governance structures that ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in technology use, alongside metrics that connect digital investments to tangible business outcomes and societal impact.
In addition to these case insights, the study also incorporated a systematic literature review of 52 peer-reviewed papers published between 2015 and 2024. The review revealed three dominant themes: (i) the adoption of AI, RPA, AR/VR, and blockchain to enhance HR processes; (ii) the strategic role of human capital transformation through reskilling, talent management, and workforce agility; and (iii) the link between SHRM, organizational performance, and sustainable competitive advantage. Table A1 (Appendix A) synthesizes representative studies from the SLR, highlighting their focus, methodology, and key findings. This synthesis demonstrates that while the literature increasingly documents digital HR practices, the novelty of our study lies in integrating these fragmented insights into a unified conceptual model and comparative framework that explicitly links SHRM with sustainable competitiveness.
For scholars, this contribution provides a foundation for empirical testing of the proposed model in different organizational and cross-country contexts. For practitioners, the findings highlight the importance of aligning digital investments with people-centered HR strategies to ensure both short-term efficiency and long-term resilience. For policymakers, the study underlines the role of SHRM in advancing inclusive and sustainable labor market transitions, in line with Industry 5.0 and the UN SDGs.
As the boundaries between human and technological capabilities become increasingly blurred, SHRM’s leadership in orchestrating a balanced, ethical, and future-oriented integration will be decisive. Organizations that embrace this approach will not merely adapt to the changing world of work—they will define it.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); methodology, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); validation, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); formal analysis, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); investigation, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); resources, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); data curation, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); writing—original draft preparation, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei); writing—review and editing, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); visualization, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri); supervision, A.A. (Andreea Adomnitei), C.N. and A.A. (Anisoara Apetri). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable insights provided by the panel of industry experts and the constructive feedback offered by the anonymous reviewers, both of which have significantly enhanced the quality of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HRHuman Resources
SHRMStrategic Human Resource Management
AIArtificial Intelligence
AV/RVAugmented and Virtual Reality
IoTInternet of Things
RPARobotic Process Automation

Appendix A

Appendix A synthesizes representative studies from the systematic literature review, highlighting their focus, methodology, and key findings. This synthesis demonstrates that the existing literature, while increasingly documenting digital HR practices, consistently underlines the need to align technological adoption with people-centered strategies in order to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.
Table A1. Representative Studies from the Systematic Literature Review (2015–2024).
Table A1. Representative Studies from the Systematic Literature Review (2015–2024).
Author(s), YearFocus of StudyMethodologyKey Findings
Bondarouk & Brewster, 2016Digital HRM and e-HRM adoptionConceptual reviewHRM shifted from administrative functions to strategic integration of digital tools
Marler & Boudreau, 2017HR analytics adoptionEmpirical surveyHR analytics improves decision-making but requires organizational readiness
Strohmeier, 2018Digital transformation in HRConceptual synthesisHRM must align digitalization withstrategic objectives
Kaushik & Guleria, 2020AI in HRMCase-based analysisAI enhances recruitment efficiency but raises ethical challenges
Meijerink et al., 2021HR technology and value creationEmpirical studyTechnology supports sustainable value only when paired with people-centered practices
Di Vaio et al., 2022HRM in Industry 4.0/5.0Systematic reviewHighlights skill transformation and SHRM’s strategic role in Industry 4.0–5.0
CIPD, 2023People analytics in practiceInstitutional reportPredictive analytics improves retention, engagement, and decision quality
WEF, 2023Future of JobsGlobal surveyShows that technological disruption creates jobsbut demands large-scale reskilling
Source: Authors’ elaboration based on systematic review of peer-reviewed studies and global institutional reports.

References

  1. McKinsey & Company. How COVID-19 Has Pushed Companies over the Technology Tipping Point—And Transformed Business Forever; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Strategy%20and%20Corporate%20Finance/Our%20Insights/How%20COVID%2019%20has%20pushed%20companies%20over%20the%20technology%20tipping%20point%20and%20transformed%20business%20forever/How-COVID-19-has-pushed-companies-over-the%20technology%20tipping-point-final.pdf (accessed on 8 May 2025).
  2. World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2023; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/ (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  3. Deloitte. Thriving Beyond Boundaries: Human Performance in a Boundaryless World; 2024 Global Human Capital Trends; Deloitte Insights. 2024. Available online: https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/human-capital-trends/2024/prioritizing-human-performance.html (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  4. European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation; Breque, M.; De Nul, L.; Petridis, A. Industry 5.0—Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, Publications Office of the European Union. 2021. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/308407 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  5. Asif, A.; Muzammil, M.; Shafi, K.; Rehman, F. The Impact of Digital Transformation on HR Practices: A Systematic Literature Review. SSRN Working Paper, 2025. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5376835 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  6. World Economic Forum. Why It’s Time to Revisit the Value and Meaning of Work; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025; Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/why-it-s-time-to-revisit-the-value-and-meaning-of-work/ (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  7. Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ulrich, D. Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wright, P.M.; McMahan, G.C.; Snell, S.A. Strategic Human Resource Management: Building Human Capital and Organizational Capability. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023, 62, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deloitte. 2025 Global Human Capital Trends: Turning Tensions into Triumphs—Helping Leaders Transform Uncertainty into Opportunity; Deloitte Insights. 2025. Available online: https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/human-capital-trends.html?icid=disubnav_human-capital-trends#ai-revolutionizing-work (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  11. McKinsey & Company. The State of AI in 2023. Generative AI’s Breakout Year; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2023-generative-ais-breakout-year (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  12. European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation; Renda, A.; Schwaag Serger, S.; Tataj, D.; Morlet, A. Industry 5.0, a Transformative Vision for Europe—Governing Systemic Transformations Towards a Sustainable Industry, Publications Office of the European Union. 2021. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/17322 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  13. Skobelev, P.O.; Borovik, S.Y. On the Way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From Digital Manufacturing to Digital Society. Ind. 4.0 2017, 2, 307–311. Available online: https://stumejournals.com/journals/i4/2017/6/307 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  14. Vong, K.C. Strategic Human Resource Development for Industry 4.0 Readiness: Bridging Digital Transformation and Workforce Capabilities. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Minbaeva, D.; Collings, D.G. Seven Myths of Global Talent Management. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2013, 24, 1762–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Strohmeier, S.; Parry, E. Digital Human Resource Management: A Conceptual Clarification. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 32, 3305–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nigar, M.; Juli, J.F.; Golder, U.; Alam, M.J.; Hossain, M.K. Artificial Intelligence and Technological Unemployment: Understanding Trends, Technology’s Adverse Roles, and Current Mitigation Guidelines. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2025, 11, 100607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. IBM. AI in HR Talent: Transforming Human Resources with Artificial Intelligence. 2024. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-in-hr-talent (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  19. Unilever. A Beacon of Diversity and Inclusion; Unilever: London, UK, 2025; Available online: https://www.unilever.com/sustainability/equity-diversity-and-inclusion/a-beacon-of-diversity-and-inclusion/ (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  20. UiPath. State of the Automation Professional 2024. UiPath Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://downloads.ctfassets.net/5965pury2lcm/6OHFo9HHsTbShADYLNE789/348f16780742d9c29449aed6a7863750/State_of_the_automation_professional_2024.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  21. Siderska, J. The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Technology to Ensure Business Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdelhay, S.; Mohamed, H.; Farouk, M. The Role of Virtual Reality in Employee Training and Development: Mediating Role of Engagement and Immersion, Moderating Role of Organizational Culture. Int. J. Res. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2024, 6, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meijerink, J.; Bondarouk, T. The Duality of Algorithmic Management: Toward a Research Agenda on HRM Algorithms, Autonomy and Value Creation. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2023, 33, 100876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ncube, T.R.; Sishi, K.K.; Skinner, J.P. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Resource Management Practices: An Investigation. SA J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2025, 23, A2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. CIPD. Emerging & Future Work: Factsheet; Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development: London, UK, 2024; Available online: https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/factsheets/emerging-future-work-factsheet/ (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  26. Eurofound (Litardi, C.; Widera, S.). Tech Employment in the EU—What Happened after 2023’s Big Redundancy Wave? Eurofound: Dublin, Ireland, 2025; Available online: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/resources/article/2025/tech-employment-eu-what-happened-after-2023s-big-redundancy-wave (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  27. OECD. Artificial Intelligence and Wage Inequality; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2024; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/04/artificial-intelligence-and-wage-inequality_563908cc/bf98a45c-en.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  28. United Nations & International Labour Organization. Mind the AI Divide: Shaping a Global Perspective on the Future of Work; United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. World Bank. Future Jobs: Robots, Artificial Intelligence, and Digital Platforms in East Asia and Pacific; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2025; Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eap/publication/future-jobs (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  30. INSEAD; Descartes Institute for the Future; Human Capital Leadership Institute. The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2023; INSEAD: Fontainebleau, France, 2023; Available online: https://www.insead.edu/system/files/2023-11/gtci-2023-report.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  31. Boxall, P.; Purcell, J. Strategy and Human Resource Management, 5th ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  32. Armstrong, M. Armstrong’s Handbook of Strategic Human Resource Management, 7th ed.; Kogan Page: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  33. CIPD. Learning at Work Survey 2023; Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development: London, UK, 2023; Available online: https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/2023-pdfs/2023-learning-at-work-survey-report-8378.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  34. World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs Report 2025; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025; Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/ (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  35. Bersin, J. HR Technology 2023: Defining the Market; The Josh Bersin Company: Oakland, CA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilmers, N. Generative AI and the Future of Inequality; An MIT Exploration of Generative AI; MIT: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. World Economic Forum. Redesigning Trust: Blockchain Deployment Toolkit; World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution; Crown Business: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  39. McKinsey Global Institute (Milken Institute Review). Automation and the Future of Work; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview/in-the-news/automation-and-the-future-of-work (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  40. Frey, C.B.; Osborne, M.A. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2017, 114, 254–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. OECD. OECD Skills Outlook 2023: Skills for a Resilient Green and Digital Transition; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) and Sustainable HRM Skillnet. Sustainable People Practices: A Framework to Empower Tomorrow’s Workforce to Be Net Better Off; Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development: London, UK, 2024; Available online: https://sustainablehrmskillnet.ie/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Sustainable-People-Practices-May-2024.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  43. Bondarouk, T.; Brewster, C. Conceptualising the Future of HRM and Technology Research. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023, 34, 219–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gartner. The Future of Workforce Planning. 2024. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/human-resources (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  45. Alenezi, M. Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. World Economic Forum. Shaping the Future of the Digital Economy. 2025. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Digital_Economy_and_Society_2P_190916.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  47. McKinsey & Company. Technology and the Future of Work. 2024. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  48. Vargas-Hernández, J.G.; Vargas-González, M.C.O.C. Emerging Disruptive Digital Technologies and Their Impacts on Unemployment and Wage Inequalities in an Era of Artificial Intelligence. In Economic Slowdown, Unemployment, and Inflation; Apple Academic Press: London, UK, 2025; 22p, ISBN 978-1-77964-346-9. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781779643469-7/emerging-disruptive-digital-technologies-impacts-unemployment-wage-inequalities-era-artificial-intelligence-jos%C3%A9-vargas-hern%C3%A1ndez-omar-vargas-gonz%C3%A1lez (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  49. Lengnick-Hall, C.A.; Beck, T.E.; Lengnick-Hall, M.L. Developing a Capacity for Organizational Resilience through Strategic Human Resource Management. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2011, 21, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jamali, D.; El Dirani, A.; Harwood, I.A. Exploring Human Resource Management Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: The CSR–HRM Co-Creation Model. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 2015, 24, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Delery, J.E.; Roumpi, D. Strategic Human Resource Management, Human Capital and Competitive Advantage: Is the Field Going in Circles? Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2017, 27, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bader, V.; Kaiser, S. Algorithmic Decision-Making? The User Interface and Its Role for Human Involvement in Decisions Supported by Artificial Intelligence. Organization 2019, 26, 655–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Barocas, S.; Hardt, M.; Narayanan, A. Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities in HR Applications; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; ISBN 978-0-262-04861-3. Available online: https://fairmlbook.org (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  54. Chhatre, R.; Singh, S. Mitigating Bias in AI-Driven Recruitment: Ethical Challenges and Governance Solutions. J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manag. 2025, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bessen, J.E.; Goos, M.; Salomons, A.; van Den Berge, W. Automation: A Guide for Policymakers. Labour Econ. 2022, 76, 102178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Harvard Business Review. Artificial Intelligence at Work: Enhancing Employee Engagement and Business Success; Sponsored by Zoom; Harvard Business Review: Boston, MA, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.hbr.org/sponsored/2024/01/artificial-intelligence-at-work-enhancing-employee-engagement-and-business-success (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  57. Doshi-Velez, F.; Kim, B. Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1702.08608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moreira, A. Where Is Human Resource Management in Sustainability Reporting? Exploring Sustainable HRM Practices through the Lens of ESG and GRI. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Deloitte. 2025 Global Human Capital Trends: Navigating Complex Tensions and Choices in the Worker-Organization Relationship; Deloitte Insights: New York, NY, USA, 2025; Available online: https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/human-capital-trends.html (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  60. Accenture. The CHRO as a Growth Executive: Focusing the Power of Data, Technology and People to Accelerate Reinvention—And a New Vision for Growth; Accenture: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/capabilities/strategy-and-consulting/talent-and-organization/document/Accenture-CHRO-Growth-Executive.pdf (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  61. European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation; Dixson-Declève, S.; Dunlop, K.; Renda, A.; Charveriat, C.; Sitra, M.; Nascimento, S.; Plepys, A.; Butter, M.; Bodin, J.; et al. Industry 5.0 and the Future of Work—Making Europe the Centre of Gravity for Future Good-Quality Jobs, Publications Office of the European Union. 2023. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/685878 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
  62. McKinsey & Company. The State of AI in Early 2024: Gen AI Adoption Spikes and Starts to Generate Value; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-2024 (accessed on 26 August 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.