Lider Project–Bus Techno Brick: Sustainable Bumper for a Helicopter by Polycarbonate †
Abstract
1. Introduction
Objetives and Scope
- Characterization of Hygrothermal Aging: Since helicopters operate in diverse climatic environments, the bumper will be exposed to cycles of moisture and heat. This work focuses on determining the combined influence of moisture absorption and high temperatures on the mechanical integrity of the PC. Specifically, the mechanical behavior is analyzed under a critical condition defined by the component’s mission profile: moisture-saturated material at a temperature of 90 °C.
- Evaluation of Response to High Strain Rates: Given that the main function of the bumper is impact protection, static (quasi-static) characterization is insufficient. As polymers are viscoelastic materials, their mechanical response is highly dependent on the rate of load application. This study analyzes the strain rate sensitivity of polycarbonate, determining how tensile strength, stiffness, and energy absorption capacity vary when the material is subjected to strain rates of 10 s−1, 50 s−1, and 100 s−1.
- Definition of the Material Operational Window: Finally, this research seeks to synthesize experimental results to establish a safe “operating window” for the bumper design. This involves quantifying the percentage loss of mechanical properties due to aging, confirming whether strain hardening (due to impact velocity) compensates for thermal softening, and providing reliable experimental data for future finite element analysis (FEA) simulations.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Material Characterization and Specimen Manufacturing
2.2. Experimental Setup and Environmental Conditioning
- Hygrothermal Aging (Moisture): Although polycarbonate is resistant, it is hygroscopic; water molecules in the polymer network can act as a plasticizer, interfering with Van der Waals forces between chains and altering mechanical properties [6]. Specimens designated as “Aged” were conditioned in a climatic chamber under controlled conditions of 70 °C and 85% relative humidity (RH). This process was maintained for a total period of 118 days. During this interval, gravimetric control was performed by periodically weighing control specimens to monitor absorption kinetics, confirming that the material reached the saturation plateau prior to mechanical testing.
- High Temperature Implementation: To evaluate performance at elevated temperatures 90 °C), a thermal chamber was coupled to the INSTRON machine (Instron, Norwood, MA, United States). The procedure involved placing the specimen in the jaws within the chamber, controlled heating to the target temperature (90 °C), and a specific soaking time prior to testing. This ensured the specimen reached thermal equilibrium throughout its thickness, avoiding temperature gradients that could distort ductility data [2].
2.3. Experimental Test Matrix
2.4. Data Acquisition and Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of Enviromental Conditions on Quasi-Static Behavior
3.2. Effect of High Strain Rates (Impact Simulation)
- At 10 s−1, the tensile strength increases to 67.77 ± 5.60 MPa, surpassing the static aged value.
- At 50 s−1, the material becomes significantly stiffer and stronger, reaching 84.06 ± 9.19 MPa.
- At 100 s−1, the material exhibits its maximum resistance, with a tensile strength of 98.36 ± 1.55 MPa, nearly doubling the strength of the aged material at 90 °C.
3.3. Summary of Mechanical Properties
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Campbell, F.C. Polymer Matrix Composites. In Manufacturing Technology for Aerospace Structural Materials; Elsevier Science: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 273–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Cao, K. Experimental investigation and modelling of the behavior of polycarbonate with temperature effects from low to high strain rates. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2014, 51, 2539–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pötsch, G.; Michaeli, W. Injection Molding: An Introduction, 2nd ed.; Hanser Publishers: Munich, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, K.; Wang, Y. Experimental investigation and modelling of the tensile behavior of polycarbonate. Polymers 2016, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 527-2:2012; International Organization for Standardization. Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 2: Test Conditions for Moulding and Extrusion Plastics. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
- Nouri, S.; Dubé, M. Experimental investigation of the effect of hygrothermal aging on the mechanical behavior of polycarbonate. Mech. Mater. 2016, 103, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callister, W.D.; Rethwisch, D.G. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 10th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]




| Test Type | Standard | Specimen Count | Temperature [°C] | Moisture | Test Velocity [mm/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile | ISO 527-2 | 5 | 23 | NO (Dry) | 0.08 |
| Tensile | ISO 527-2 | 5 | 23 | YES (Aged) | 0.08 |
| Tensile | ISO 527-2 | 4 | 90 | YES (Aged) | 0.08 |
| Tensile | ISO 527 | 5 | 23 | YES (Aged) | 1150 |
| Tensile | ISO 527 | 5 | 23 | YES (Aged) | 5750 |
| Tensile | ISO 527 | 5 | 23 | YES (Aged) | 11,500 |
| Test Conditions | Temperature [°C] | Strain Rate [s−1] | Tensile Strength [MPa] | Strain Break [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry (Reference) | 23 | Quasi-static | 62.92 ± 0.23 | 58.56 ± 6.60 |
| Aged | 23 | Quasi-static | 58.56 ± 6.60 | 3.69 ± 1.37 |
| Aged | 90 | Quasi-static | 42.24 ± 0.67 | 10.26 ± 2.03 |
| Aged (Impact) | 23 | 10 | 67.77 ± 5.60 | 4.75 ± 3.27 |
| Aged (Impact) | 23 | 50 | 84.06 ± 9.19 | 7.44 ± 3.81 |
| Aged (Impact) | 23 | 100 | 98.36 ± 1.55 | 8.75 ± 1.92 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Martín, E.J.; García, J.M.J.; Molera, D.C. Lider Project–Bus Techno Brick: Sustainable Bumper for a Helicopter by Polycarbonate. Eng. Proc. 2026, 133, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133190
Martín EJ, García JMJ, Molera DC. Lider Project–Bus Techno Brick: Sustainable Bumper for a Helicopter by Polycarbonate. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 133(1):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133190
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartín, Eduardo Javier, Juan Manuel Jiménez García, and Dario Crespo Molera. 2026. "Lider Project–Bus Techno Brick: Sustainable Bumper for a Helicopter by Polycarbonate" Engineering Proceedings 133, no. 1: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133190
APA StyleMartín, E. J., García, J. M. J., & Molera, D. C. (2026). Lider Project–Bus Techno Brick: Sustainable Bumper for a Helicopter by Polycarbonate. Engineering Proceedings, 133(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026133190
